Bitwise: This Weekend's Surge Accelerates the On-Chain Migration of the Financial World

marsbitPublicado em 2026-03-05Última atualização em 2026-03-05

Resumo

Financial migration to the blockchain is inevitable, and recent geopolitical events have dramatically accelerated this shift. Traditional markets operate with delays, high costs, and limited hours, but blockchain enables 24/7 global trading, instant settlement, and lower costs. While many assumed this transition would take 5–10 years, a weekend military strike against Iran—occurring when almost all traditional markets were closed—proved a turning point. On February 28, during widespread market closures, decentralized platforms like Hyperliquid saw explosive activity. Hyperliquid’s oil perpetual contracts became a key price reference, even cited by Bloomberg. Tether’s gold token XAUT reached over $300 million in trading volume, and prediction markets like Polymarket hit record highs. For the first time, crypto markets functioned as the primary real-time financial system during a major event. This event underscores that investors, funds, and institutions can no longer ignore on-chain finance. The barrier to entry—learning wallets, stablecoins, and DeFi platforms—is diminishing as necessity drives adoption. Once engaged, users gain access to a faster, more open financial system. Critics may argue extended traditional hours could suffice, but history shows that disruptive technology, like blockchain, often outperforms incremental improvements. The move to on-chain finance is happening faster than anyone expected.

I have always believed that the migration of the financial industry to on-chain is inevitable.

Blockchain enables assets to be traded 24/7, 365 days a year, with instant settlement and costs far lower than the traditional system. It makes traditional stock trading platforms and T+1 settlement seem incredibly antiquated.

But I've always wondered: When exactly will this transition happen? And what event will catalyze the system's complete transformation?

After all, most people don't feel the delays of the current system. When my uncle buys stocks in his Charles Schwab account, he doesn't care that it takes a day to settle, nor does he care about the complex processes involving mysterious institutions like the NSCC, DTCC, and Cede & Co. He buys, the stock appears in his account, simple and straightforward, no fuss.

So I once thought that crypto-driven markets would grow on the fringes first. Over the next 5 to 10 years, they would primarily serve crypto-native users and those who don't fit perfectly into the traditional financial system, like global retail investors wanting to trade U.S. stocks. Eventually, these systems would become good enough to gradually take over the existing system, and institutions like the NYSE would transition to tokenized markets, much like they moved from floor trading to electronic trading.

This would be a classic tech story: disrupt the edges first, then take over the core. I thought this would take 5 to 10 years.

But this weekend proved me wrong. I am now convinced that this will happen much faster than anyone anticipated.

What Happened This Weekend

At 2:30 AM EST on Sunday, February 28th, Trump announced a strike against Iran. This timing is very specific for global financial markets; almost all markets were closed.


· U.S. stock markets were closed
· U.S. futures markets were closed
· Major forex markets were closed
· European markets were closed
· Asian markets were closed

Essentially, the only markets still trading were those in Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and other Middle Eastern countries (which operate on a Sunday-to-Thursday schedule), but these markets are limited in size and scope, with little participation from Western investors and covering few assets.

In the past, if a major geopolitical shock occurred on a Sunday morning, investors would have had to wait until 6:00 PM Sunday evening for U.S. futures to open to see the market's reaction. But this weekend showed us: they now have another choice—turning to the 24/7, globally traded crypto infrastructure.

And this weekend, they actually did it.

Throughout Sunday, on-chain finance became the core of global finance. The decentralized exchange Hyperliquid, in particular, was the focal point. It offers perpetual contracts for crypto assets as well as real-world assets like crude oil.

Hyperliquid's trading volume surged so much that Bloomberg, in its coverage of the airstrike's impact on oil, directly cited the price of the crude oil contract on Hyperliquid as the most significant reference price. This was no coincidence; Hyperliquid's native token, HYPE, rose about 30% over the weekend. In my view, this is more like investors paying upfront for its future.

But it wasn't just Hyperliquid. The trading volume for XAUT, a gold token issued by Tether, soared to over $300 million in 24 hours. Prediction markets like Kalshi and Polymarket hit record trading volumes. Bitcoin, Ethereum, and other crypto assets were also in the spotlight.

In my memory, this is the first time the cryptocurrency market has truly functioned as a "market" in the real sense.

Why This Matters

If you are a hedge fund, a bank, or any investor who wants to stay competitive, you now have no choice: you must open a stablecoin wallet, you must learn to trade on Hyperliquid, you must understand XAUT, you must research tokenized stocks.

Because even if you don't, someone else will.

This trend will accelerate. The biggest barrier to participating in on-chain markets is getting used to tools like wallets, stablecoins, Hyperliquid, and Uniswap. Once you get the hang of it, all the new capabilities of DeFi and on-chain finance are within reach. Exposure leads to exploration, and exploration leads to trading.

Of course, some will surely say: Traditional markets can do this too! Nasdaq is moving towards 23-hour trading, 5 days a week! We don't offer 24/7 trading because no one needs it!

Fine, whatever. That's what Blockbuster said about Netflix, and what Microsoft said about the iPhone.

The shift to on-chain finance is inevitable. And after this weekend, I am certain: its arrival will be much sooner than any of us imagined.

Perguntas relacionadas

QAccording to the article, what event over the weekend accelerated the migration of the financial world on-chain?

AThe announcement of a U.S. military strike on Iran in the early hours of Sunday, February 28th, a time when almost all traditional global financial markets were closed.

QWhich on-chain platform became a focal point for trading during the weekend's market closure and was even cited by Bloomberg?

AThe decentralized exchange Hyperliquid, which offers perpetual contracts for crypto assets and real-world assets like crude oil.

QWhat is the author's view on the traditional argument that 24/7 trading is unnecessary?

AThe author dismisses this argument, comparing it to past dismissals of disruptive technologies like Netflix by Blockbuster and the iPhone by Microsoft, and believes the shift to on-chain finance is inevitable and will happen sooner than expected.

QWhat specific asset, issued by Tether, saw its 24-hour trading volume surge to over $300 million during this event?

ATether's gold token, XAUT.

QWhat does the author identify as the biggest hurdle for participating in on-chain markets, and what is the consequence of overcoming it?

AThe biggest hurdle is getting accustomed to the tools like wallets, stablecoins, and platforms like Hyperliquid and Uniswap. Once this is overcome, it leads to exploration and, subsequently, more trading activity as all the new capabilities of DeFi and on-chain finance become accessible.

Leituras Relacionadas

Trend in US Stocks: Jensen Huang's One Sentence Triggers $47 Billion Surge; Google Raises Funds for First Time in 20 Years

U.S. markets reached record highs on June 2nd, but the real story was the intensifying AI arms race, now pivoting from chip supremacy to a scramble for capital to fund compute infrastructure. The day highlighted two stark realities: Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang's endorsement of Marvell Technology as the "next trillion-dollar company" at Computex fueled a historic 32.5% surge, adding $47 billion to its value. Conversely, Alphabet announced its first equity raise in two decades—an $80 billion plan—signaling that even its massive cash flow can't keep pace with soaring AI capital expenditures, forecast to exceed $180 billion in 2026. While the S&P 500 closed above 7,600 for the first time, led by tech and semiconductor stocks (SOXX +5.79%), sector performance was mixed. Alphabet's 4% drop dragged down communications services, illustrating market anxiety over the unsustainable cost of the AI buildout. Hewlett Packard Enterprise soared 25% on stellar earnings, proving AI's benefits extend beyond chip designers to infrastructure providers. Beneath the index highs, concerns linger over extreme concentration in a few AI stocks and geopolitical tensions. The focus now shifts to upcoming economic data, particularly Friday's nonfarm payrolls, which could challenge the market's current "ignore rates, chase AI" mentality.

marsbitHá 6m

Trend in US Stocks: Jensen Huang's One Sentence Triggers $47 Billion Surge; Google Raises Funds for First Time in 20 Years

marsbitHá 6m

Variant: Bitcoin, Ethereum, and ZCash Highly Likely to Become Major Stores of Value

At Variant, our investment philosophy centers on enabling individuals to own their money, identity, and data. We believe all tokens fall into two categories: stores of value (SOV) or equity-like instruments. The SOV framework is particularly useful for evaluating Layer 1 (L1) blockchains, which are major monetary coordination protocols. A good store of value should possess: 1) Technical durability, 2) Scarcity, 3) Censorship resistance, 4) Economic productivity, 5) Strong memetics, and 6) Liquidity. The total addressable market for SOV assets is massive, with gold alone valued at $31 trillion. Three L1 assets stand out as prime candidates for becoming major stores of value: Bitcoin (BTC), Ethereum (ETH), and ZCash (ZEC). Bitcoin excels in memetic dominance as "digital gold." Ethereum demonstrates superior technical durability and adaptability through its upgradeable roadmap. ZCash offers exceptional censorship resistance and privacy via its shielded transactions. While digital SOVs outperform traditional ones like gold on many metrics, they still represent a small fraction of the overall SOV market, presenting a significant growth opportunity.

marsbitHá 49m

Variant: Bitcoin, Ethereum, and ZCash Highly Likely to Become Major Stores of Value

marsbitHá 49m

Can DeepSeek Save China One Trillion Dollars?

"DeepSeek and the $1 Trillion Infrastructure Question" The article examines whether DeepSeek's AI optimization breakthroughs could potentially save China $1 trillion in future AI infrastructure costs. The analysis begins with Nvidia's upcoming Vera Rubin AI platform, costing ~$7.8 million, where memory (HBM4/LPDDR5X) constitutes $2 million—a 435% cost increase in one year, highlighting how AI hardware spending is shifting toward expensive memory components. DeepSeek's approach works in the opposite direction. Through three key technical innovations showcased in DeepSeek V4, the company dramatically improves hardware efficiency: 1. **Memory Compression (MLA)**: Re-engineers the attention mechanism to compress long-context memory (KV Cache) by over 90%, drastically reducing expensive HBM usage. 2. **Selective Activation (MoE)**: Employs Mixture-of-Experts architecture where only a small fraction of parameters (e.g., 49B out of 1.6T in V4-Pro) are activated per token, allowing most parameters to reside in cheaper memory/SSD. 3. **Computation Caching**: Reuses previously computed results via cache hits, replacing expensive GPU computations with cheap memory reads. Combined, these optimizations allow the same hardware to produce approximately 4x more tokens, effectively reducing required hardware investment by 75%. DeepSeek's pricing reflects this: a 10-billion token workload costs ~$522 monthly versus ~$9,000-$10,000 for competitors. The $1 trillion savings projection stems from McKinsey's estimate that global AI infrastructure will require ~$5.2 trillion investment by 2030. As China's daily token consumption grows toward quadrillions, even marginal efficiency gains scale massively. With a conservative 4x throughput improvement, China could avoid building tens of thousands of AI data centers equivalent to ~7 trillion RMB ($1 trillion) in saved investment. Critically, this strategy shifts dependency from scarce, expensive GPU/HBM—where China lags—toward more accessible storage, caching, and systems engineering where domestic suppliers like CXMT are gaining strength. Rather than "replacing Nvidia," DeepSeek rebalances AI's value chain away from monolithic hardware dependency. Ultimately, DeepSeek's technical breakthroughs could lower the barrier to AI adoption across Chinese industries by making advanced capabilities affordable at scale—transforming who can access next-generation AI.

marsbitHá 49m

Can DeepSeek Save China One Trillion Dollars?

marsbitHá 49m

Overturning the Mainstream Approach to Hallucinations: Metacognition is the New Solution for Large Models to Break the Hallucination Barrier

This paper, "Hallucinations Undermine Trust; Metacognition is a Way Forward," proposes a paradigm shift in combating AI hallucination. It argues that the current mainstream approaches—striving for omniscience by scaling data/models or having AI abstain from uncertain answers—are fundamentally flawed. The former has inevitable knowledge gaps, while the latter imposes a crippling "utility tax," requiring the rejection of many correct answers to achieve high accuracy, due to models' poor "discrimination" (the ability to distinguish correct from incorrect answers internally). The core contribution is redefining hallucination not as "being wrong," but as "expressing false information with unwarranted certainty." The proposed solution is **Faithful Uncertainty** or **Metacognition**: enabling AI to accurately perceive its internal uncertainty and honestly express it in its language (e.g., using hedging phrases when unsure). This creates a more reliable assistant that provides useful information while signaling its confidence, minimizing harm from errors. The paper emphasizes that metacognition is critical for the era of AI Agents. Without it, Agents cannot intelligently decide when to use tools like search engines, leading to inefficiency and misuse. Key implementation challenges are highlighted: the "bootstrapping paradox" of training with static uncertainty data, the "alignment distortion signal" where human preference training suppresses internal uncertainty cues, and the difficulty of causally evaluating true metacognition vs. its superficial imitation. The paper concludes that the goal should not be an infallible AI, but one that is honest about the limits of its knowledge, thereby building user trust through transparent communication of its certainty.

marsbitHá 53m

Overturning the Mainstream Approach to Hallucinations: Metacognition is the New Solution for Large Models to Break the Hallucination Barrier

marsbitHá 53m

Hedge by Buying Gold and Oil, Chase Soaring Returns with AI. ‘Dated’ Bitcoin Enters a Bear Market

Bitcoin has recently declined, hitting a two-month low near $66,123, while Ethereum fell to a three-month low around $1,837. Analysts suggest the drop is not merely due to factors like ETF outflows or MicroStrategy's selling but reflects a deeper issue: Bitcoin is losing a broader asset competition. In a near-zero interest rate environment, Bitcoin previously thrived as an outlet for investor dissatisfaction with inflation and limited options. However, the market landscape has shifted. Bitcoin now occupies an "awkward middle ground," facing competition on three fronts. For inflation hedging, investors prefer gold, energy stocks, and commodity producers—assets with tangible backing and clearer pricing power. For growth exposure, AI-related companies with actual revenues and profits are more attractive. Even within crypto, investors can choose stablecoins, exchanges, or infrastructure firms tied directly to adoption, offering clearer business models and leverage. Thus, Bitcoin is no longer the top choice for hedging, growth, or crypto exposure. This shift is evident in market reactions: despite recent warnings about persistent inflation from a Fed official, Bitcoin did not rally as it might have in the past. Instead, capital flowed to assets with direct commodity or energy exposure. The recent ETF outflows and MicroStrategy sales are symptoms, not causes, of this new reality. Investors are becoming more selective, demanding clearer value propositions beyond mere scarcity. The emerging bear case for Bitcoin is not about it being a bubble or failed technology, but that scarcity alone is no longer sufficient.

华尔街日报Há 56m

Hedge by Buying Gold and Oil, Chase Soaring Returns with AI. ‘Dated’ Bitcoin Enters a Bear Market

华尔街日报Há 56m

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片

Categorias popularesright-arrow

Etiquetas Popularesright-arrow