Bitwise Files With SEC to Launch First Uniswap ETF in U.S. Markets

TheNewsCryptoPublicado em 2026-02-06Última atualização em 2026-02-06

Resumo

Bitwise Asset Management has filed with the SEC to launch the first U.S. ETF focused solely on Uniswap’s UNI token. The proposed fund aims to provide regulated exposure to UNI through a conventional investment vehicle, without staking the tokens. Coinbase Custody is set to serve as the custodian. This filing follows the SEC’s recent conclusion of its investigation into Uniswap Labs, easing regulatory concerns. If approved, the ETF would mark a significant step in offering institutional and retail investors traditional access to a DeFi governance token, reflecting growing demand for regulated crypto investment products.

Bitwise Asset Management has filed a registration statement with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to launch an exchange-traded fund focused on Uniswap. The offering would give investors regulated exposure to the governing UNI token via a traditional investment vehicle. If approved, it will become the first ETF to focus on a DeFi protocol token in the United States.

The Bitwise Uniswap ETF would have the UNI token as its main asset for tracking investor exposure. “The Trust’s investment objective is to provide exposure to the value of UNI, less the Trust’s expenses”. If approved, Coinbase Custody Trust Company will serve as the ETF custodian. Meanwhile, Bitwise has confirmed there will be no staking of UNI tokens associated with the proposed ETF at the time of its inception.

On Thursday, the SEC officially made the filing, bringing the product a step closer to the general financial markets. Indeed, access to DeFi coins via traditional applications has been a major focus for the firm, as stated, as an emerging trend with institutional investment demand. Brokerage accounts could potentially facilitate the ETF, opening more avenues for the UNI asset class. This filing will be part of a trend in crypto ETF filings in the U.S., which started in 2021 with the change in regulations.

Regulatory and Market Context

This comes when the SEC concluded its investigation into the case involving Uniswap Labs last year, which eased regulation issues facing the decentralized finance protocols. Delaware statutory trust filings were the foundation before submitting to the SEC for its approval. Trust filings are technical processes before an actual filing is made to the SEC.

An actual filing of the S-1 form signifies their readiness to start the regulatory process for their Uniswap ETF product. Analysts have revealed that it remains to be seen when the ETF will complete the review and approval process when it is sent to the SEC for processing. The ETF’s standard to trade on the US stock exchange will be determined by the SEC.

Bitwise filing for a Uniswap ETF with the SEC marks a new milestone for bringing a DeFi governance token into a regulated investment product. The new fund would be designed to give investors traditional exposure to UNI without token staking, pending regulatory approval. This action underscores ongoing institutional appetite for regulated crypto-investment vehicles linked to decentralized finance protocols.

Highlighted Crypto News:

Public Retirement Funds Hit by Sharp Decline Amid Bitcoin Slump

TagsBitwiseBlockchainDeFiETFSECUniswapUniswap (UNI)

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the main asset that the Bitwise Uniswap ETF will use to track investor exposure?

AThe UNI token.

QWhich company will serve as the custodian for the proposed Bitwise Uniswap ETF?

ACoinbase Custody Trust Company.

QWhat significant regulatory event involving Uniswap Labs occurred last year, as mentioned in the article?

AThe SEC concluded its investigation into the case involving Uniswap Labs.

QWhat type of filing with the SEC signifies Bitwise's readiness to start the regulatory process for the Uniswap ETF?

AThe filing of an S-1 form.

QAccording to the article, what will the proposed ETF NOT involve at the time of its inception?

AStaking of UNI tokens.

Leituras Relacionadas

Hands-on with Hunyuan Hy3 Preview: Tencent's AI, Finally Competitive?

Tencent's Hunyuan AI team has released its latest language model, Hy3 preview, marking a significant step forward for the company's AI capabilities. With 295B total parameters and support for 256K context length, the model employs a mixture-of-experts architecture. It shows improvements in complex logic, instruction following, contextual learning, code generation, and agent task execution. In testing, Hy3 preview demonstrated strong performance in multi-step logical reasoning but showed occasional instability in identifying traps in trick questions. It performed well in extracting key information from disordered meeting transcripts and accurately followed new linguistic rules. As an AI agent, it successfully built functional applications like a Snake game and generated data analysis dashboards, though it sometimes fell short in fully completing complex open-ended tasks. In natural language use, it produced coherent and stylistically appropriate narratives with reduced “AI-like” tone. Priced competitively, Hy3 preview is already integrated into Tencent’s key products, including Tencent Cloud and WorkBuddy. While not leading in every benchmark, it represents a solid, practical model that signals Tencent’s renewed momentum in AI development.

marsbitHá 1h

Hands-on with Hunyuan Hy3 Preview: Tencent's AI, Finally Competitive?

marsbitHá 1h

From Theft to Re-entry: How Was $292 Million "Laundered"?

A sophisticated crypto laundering operation was executed following the $292 million hack of Kelp DAO on April 18. The attack, attributed to the North Korean Lazarus group, began with anonymous infrastructure preparation using Tornado Cash to fund wallets untraceably. The hacker exploited a vulnerability in Kelp’s cross-chain bridge, stealing 116,500 rsETH. To avoid crashing the market, the attacker used Aave and Compound as laundering tools—depositing the stolen rsETH as collateral to borrow $190 million in clean, liquid ETH. This move triggered a bank run on Aave, causing an $8 billion drop in TVL. After consolidating funds, the attacker fragmented them across hundreds of wallets to evade detection. A major breakpoint was THORChain, where over $460 million in volume—30 times its usual activity—was processed in 24 hours, converting ETH into Bitcoin. This shift to Bitcoin’s UTXO model exponentially increased tracing complexity by shattering funds into countless untraceable fragments. The final destination was Tron-based USDT, the primary channel for illicit crypto flows. From there, funds were cashed out via OTC brokers in China and Southeast Asia, using unlicensed underground banks and UnionPay networks outside Western sanctions scope. Ultimately, the laundered money supports North Korea’s weapons programs, which rely heavily on crypto hacking for foreign currency. The incident underscores structural challenges in DeFi: its openness, composability, and lack of central control make such laundering not just possible, but inherently difficult to prevent.

marsbitHá 1h

From Theft to Re-entry: How Was $292 Million "Laundered"?

marsbitHá 1h

Behind DeepSeek V4's Stunning Debut: Silicon Valley Is 'Building Walls,' China Is 'Paving Roads'

China's AI landscape is witnessing a strategic divergence from Silicon Valley’s closed-source competition to a collaborative open-source ecosystem. On April 24, DeepSeek released V4, a top-ranked open-source model on Hugging Face, featuring breakthroughs like million-token context length with minimal KV cache and native support for domestic chips like Huawei’s Ascend. Similarly, Kimi’s K2.6, released days earlier, also adopted open-source principles. Unlike U.S. giants such as OpenAI and Anthropic—locked in revenue disputes and tactical product clashes—Chinese firms embrace shared innovation. DeepSeek and Kimi openly build on each other’s advances, like the MLA architecture and Muon optimizer, avoiding redundant R&D and driving down costs. DeepSeek V4 focused on pushing base model capabilities, while Kimi specialized in Agent-based applications. Although U.S. firms lead in revenue and valuation, China’s open-source models achieve comparable performance at a fraction of the cost (e.g., DeepSeek V3 trained for $5.58M vs. GPT-5’s $500M+). With token usage growing exponentially, China’s collaborative model promises scalable, affordable AI built on domestic hardware, shaping a more accessible path to AGI.

marsbitHá 1h

Behind DeepSeek V4's Stunning Debut: Silicon Valley Is 'Building Walls,' China Is 'Paving Roads'

marsbitHá 1h

OpenClaw vs. Hermes: Which One Is Right for You?

Two leading AI agent projects, OpenClaw and Hermes, represent a fundamental divergence in design philosophy rather than just a feature competition. OpenClaw, a GitHub phenomenon, prioritizes user control and customization, offering a powerful, flexible platform for building and orchestrating agents. It boasts a massive ecosystem with over 44,000 skills, extensive model flexibility (supporting Anthropic, OpenAI, and others), and deep integrations across multiple messaging platforms. In contrast, Hermes Agent, developed by Nous Research, champions automation and efficiency. It is designed for lower cost and a lower barrier to entry, learning and improving automatically from user workflows. It runs tasks in isolated environments for security and offers significantly lower token costs out-of-the-box. The choice between them mirrors historical tech divides like Windows vs. Mac. OpenClaw is for users who want maximum control, customization, and don't mind a complex setup. Hermes is the smarter default for those seeking an affordable, easy-to-use agent that learns autonomously. The real competition is not about which is better, but which philosophy—a programmable personal OS or a self-evolving work proxy—better suits the user's needs for control, cost, and ease of use.

marsbitHá 1h

OpenClaw vs. Hermes: Which One Is Right for You?

marsbitHá 1h

Google and Amazon Simultaneously Invest Heavily in a Competitor: The Most Absurd Business Logic of the AI Era Is Becoming Reality

In a span of four days, Amazon announced an additional $25 billion investment, and Google pledged up to $40 billion—both direct competitors pouring over $65 billion into the same AI startup, Anthropic. Rather than a typical venture capital move, this signals the latest escalation in the cloud wars. The core of the deal is not equity but compute pre-orders: Anthropic must spend the majority of these funds on AWS and Google Cloud services and chips, effectively locking in massive future compute consumption. This reflects a shift in cloud market dynamics—enterprises now choose cloud providers based on which hosts the best AI models, not just price or stability. With OpenAI deeply tied to Microsoft, Anthropic’s Claude has become the only viable strategic asset for Google and Amazon to remain competitive. Anthropic’s annualized revenue has surged to $30 billion, and it is expanding into verticals like biotech, positioning itself as a cross-industry AI infrastructure layer. However, this funding comes with constraints: Anthropic’s independence is challenged as it balances two rival investors, its safety-first narrative faces pressure from regulatory scrutiny, and its path to IPO introduces new financial pressures. Globally, this accelerates a "tri-polar" closed-loop structure in AI infrastructure, with Microsoft-OpenAI, Google-Anthropic, and Amazon-Anthropic forming exclusive model-cloud alliances. In contrast, China’s landscape differs—investments like Alibaba and Tencent backing open-source model firm DeepSeek reflect a more decoupled approach, though closed-source models from major cloud providers still dominate. The $65 billion bet is ultimately about securing a seat at the table in an AI-defined future—where missing the model layer means losing the cloud war.

marsbitHá 7h

Google and Amazon Simultaneously Invest Heavily in a Competitor: The Most Absurd Business Logic of the AI Era Is Becoming Reality

marsbitHá 7h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片

Categorias popularesright-arrow

Etiquetas Popularesright-arrow