Bitwise: ETFs to consume over 100% of Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana’s new supply in 2026

ambcryptoPublicado em 2025-12-17Última atualização em 2025-12-17

Resumo

Bitwise Asset Management predicts that by 2026, U.S.-listed crypto ETFs will collectively purchase more than 100% of the new supply of Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana. This would mark a historic supply squeeze, shifting market dynamics toward institutional dominance. The firm estimates new annual supplies of approximately 166,000 BTC, 960,000 ETH, and 23 million SOL. Current data shows Bitcoin ETFs have already bought twice the newly mined supply since their launch. Major financial institutions are expanding access to these ETFs, reinforcing demand. This trend is expected to create upward price pressure and structurally constrain supply, potentially raising long-term price floors significantly.

Bitwise Asset Management has released its 2026 outlook, and its most striking prediction is a potential historic supply squeeze.

The firm expects U.S.-listed crypto ETFs to collectively purchase more than 100% of all newly issued BTC, ETH, and SOL next year—a milestone that would mark a new phase of institutional dominance in digital assets.

According to Bitwise, demand dynamics have shifted far beyond the traditional four-year crypto cycle. ETF inflows, institutional approvals, and broad market accessibility now outweigh halving patterns and speculative leverage.

Fresh ETF flow data provides a glimpse of how this could happen.

What Bitwise is predicting for 2026

Bitwise calculates roughly:

  • 166,000 BTC in new supply
  • 960,000 ETH
  • 23 million SOL

But ETF demand is expected to exceed these totals as more institutions gain access in 2026. Since ETF launches in 2024, Bitcoin funds alone have bought 710,777 BTC, compared to just 363,047 BTC newly mined in the same period—an early sign of the imbalance.

With major wealth platforms like Morgan Stanley, Merrill Lynch, Wells Fargo, Citi, and Vanguard expanding retail and institutional ETF access, Bitwise expects this consumption gap to widen.

Real-world ETF flows show why Bitwise is confident

Bitcoin ETFs remain the largest market force

Despite volatility, U.S. Bitcoin spot ETFs sit on $114.28 billion in assets [6.54% of Bitcoin’s market cap], with $57.27 billion in cumulative net inflows.

Even on a red day like 16 December — when flows dipped –$277.09 million — trading volumes exceeded $4.26 billion, showing persistent institutional activity.

The scale: BTC ETFs generated more inflow this year than the entire supply produced by the network.

Ethereum ETFs are tracking a similar trajectory

U.S. Ethereum ETFs now hold $18.17 billion in assets, equal to 5.11% of ETH’s market cap. Cumulative inflows sit at $12.64 billion, with daily trading volumes at $1.17 billion.

Even after a daily outflow of –$224.26 million on 16 December, net accumulation remains strong — a dynamic Bitwise expects to accelerate as ETF access expands to more U.S. wealth platforms.

Solana ETFs are the early growth story

While smaller in size, Solana ETFs have quickly gained traction:

  • $714.92 million cumulative inflows
  • $926.33 million in total net assets
  • 1.28% of SOL’s market cap already held by ETFs

Daily flows remain positive at +$3.64 million, and the sector traded $39.53 million on 16 December — notable for a product less than a year old.

XRP’s ETF debut adds another layer

XRP ETFs, launched even more recently, recorded:

  • +$10.89 million daily inflow
  • $1.12 billion cumulative inflow

With XRP trading near $1.88, inflows have been consecutive for several days, signalling steady adoption by retail and advisors integrating XRP into diversified crypto baskets.

Together, these flow patterns support Bitwise’s thesis: ETF demand is deep, persistent, and broadening across multiple assets.

Why 2026 could be the tipping point

Bitwise lists several drivers behind its prediction:

  • Institutional onboarding — Morgan Stanley, Merrill Lynch, Citi, Wells Fargo and others are now opening access to crypto ETFs.
  • The pro-crypto regulatory shift, including bipartisan support for digital asset clarity.
  • Growing demand for tokenized assets, stablecoins and onchain financial products.
  • Declining volatility, which Bitwise argues reflects “the derisking of Bitcoin as an investable asset.”

The firm also expects crypto-linked equities to outperform tech stocks next year, onchain vaults to double AUM, Polymarket to hit new open-interest highs, and Ivy League endowments to accelerate their allocation to crypto.

Market implications of Bitwise prediction

If ETFs absorb more than 100% of newly issued BTC, ETH and SOL, crypto’s supply side becomes structurally constrained.

That scenario mirrors traditional commodity markets where financial vehicles consume more supply than miners can produce.

For crypto, this dynamic introduces upward pressure on prices — especially as ETF access broadens globally.


Final Thoughts

  • ETF accumulation across BTC, ETH, SOL and XRP already shows the structural demand trend Bitwise forecasts for 2026.
  • If ETFs do consume more than 100% of new supply next year, crypto’s long-term price floor could rise significantly.

Leituras Relacionadas

Why Does Hyperliquid Earn Less Than Coinbase?

Hyperliquid, a decentralized exchange, processes near-Nasdaq-level perpetual trading volumes but captures significantly lower fees compared to centralized platforms like Coinbase and Robinhood. While Hyperliquid cleared $205.6 billion in notional volume over 30 days, it generated only $80.3 million in fees—an effective take rate of ~3.9 bps. In contrast, Coinbase and Robinhood achieve take rates of ~35.5 bps and ~33.5 bps, respectively, by operating as retail brokers that monetize multiple layers: distribution, balances, subscriptions, and order flow. This gap stems from a structural difference: Hyperliquid positions itself as a low-fee *market layer* (like Nasdaq), providing high-throughput execution and清算 infrastructure, while brokers like Coinbase control user relationships and extract value through higher-margin activities. Hyperliquid’s model includes permissionless distributor frontends (Builder Codes) and product deployment (HIP-3), which drive ecosystem growth but also create long-term fee compression risks by outsourcing high-value distribution. To defend its economics, Hyperliquid is taking steps to retain distribution control, integrate HIP-3 markets natively, and introduce balance-driven revenue streams like USDH (a native stablecoin with 50% reserve收益 sharing) and portfolio margin (10% interest fee on borrows). These moves aim to shift its model from pure exchange-level execution toward a hybrid approach that captures broker-like profit pools—without sacrificing its core infrastructure advantages. The key challenge remains balancing open ecosystem growth with tighter economic integration to avoid being commoditized as a wholesale execution venue.

marsbitHá 10m

Why Does Hyperliquid Earn Less Than Coinbase?

marsbitHá 10m

Public Chains 2025: The Bustle Belongs to the Casino, the Desolation to the Ecosystem

The 2025 public blockchain landscape reveals a stark divide between hype and reality, with a severe concentration of value and widespread "zombification" of projects. Analysis of DeFiLlama's on-chain fee data exposes a critical structural issue: the crypto space is dominated by a "profit concentration and long-tail zombie" era. Notable examples highlight this crisis. Algorand, a chain with a $1 billion market cap and advanced technology, generated a mere $17 in daily fees, while Cardano, a top-10 asset, saw only around $6,000. These "classic chains" are likened to empty, expensive cities with no real economic activity. The biggest value capturers are not the most technologically elegant chains. Tron leads with $1.24 million in daily fees, succeeding as a low-cost payment rail for USDT transfers—crypto's only true mass-adoption use case. Solana ($600k daily) thrives as a high-frequency casino for meme coins and speculation, and Base ($105k daily) demonstrates that distribution (via Coinbase) is more critical than pure technology. The only validated business models generating significant fees are low-cost payments, high-frequency speculation, and, to a lesser extent, Ethereum's asset settlement layer. The VC-driven model is failing. New chains like Sui, Sei, and Starknet, which raised hundreds of millions, show a severe disconnect between their high valuations and meager daily fee revenue (ranging from $320 to $12,000). Their lifecycle often follows a "pump and dump" pattern: VC funding -> airdrop farming -> token listing -> user exodus -> collapsed on-chain activity. The industry suffers from a massive oversupply of block space with a dire lack of killer applications. The article concludes that investors must shift from valuing narratives to scrutinizing financials. They should avoid "zombie coins" with high valuations and negligible fees, focus on chains with organic, fee-generating demand, acknowledge that distribution and community are now more valuable than pure tech, and see through the VC subsidy game. This is a necessary market correction; only by paying for real, generated value—not promised future stories—can the industry achieve healthy growth.

比推Há 37m

Public Chains 2025: The Bustle Belongs to the Casino, the Desolation to the Ecosystem

比推Há 37m

Trading

Spot
Futuros

Discussões

Bem-vindo à Comunidade HTX. Aqui, pode manter-se informado sobre os mais recentes desenvolvimentos da plataforma e obter acesso a análises profissionais de mercado. As opiniões dos utilizadores sobre o preço de S (S) são apresentadas abaixo.

活动图片