Bitwise: Crypto Becomes a Contrarian Investment, Three Logics to Understand the Current Market

marsbitPublicado em 2026-06-04Última atualização em 2026-06-04

Resumo

**Summary** Matt Hougan, Bitwise's CIO, analyzes the current crypto market through three key lenses, arguing it has shifted from a momentum-driven to a contrarian investment. **1) Crypto Becomes a Contrarian Play:** The market is weak, with major assets like Bitcoin and Ethereum down significantly. Capital has moved to hot sectors like AI, leaving crypto as an "unloved" asset class. This transforms crypto investing from trend-following to a test of patience and fundamental analysis. Investors now favor projects with solid fundamentals (e.g., Hyperliquid) over speculative ones. **2) Regulatory Overhang:** The uncertain fate of the U.S. CLARITY Act, a major crypto regulatory framework, is a key headwind. With its passage in 2024 seen as far from guaranteed (estimates range from 30-55%), institutional capital remains on the sidelines, choosing less risky alternatives like AI stocks. The market needs clarity—whether the bill passes or fails—more than any specific outcome to move decisively. **3) Capital Rotates to New Fundamentals:** This cycle differs from past bear markets where money fled to Bitcoin. Now, capital seeks smaller assets with strong use cases. While major cryptos fell in May 2024, tokens like Hyperliquid (+72%), Zcash (+50%), and XLM (+44%) rallied on their specific fundamentals. This rotation confirms the new contrarian, fundamentals-driven logic and signals the bear market may be in its later stages. **Conclusion:** Short-term pressure persists due to regul...

Original Author: Matt Hougan, Bitwise Chief Investment Officer

Original Compilation: Chopper, Foresight News

In previous memos, I usually focused on the single most important event in the market. However, the current industry variables are complex, making it difficult to center on just one logic. This article interprets the market from three dimensions.

1) Crypto Assets Become a Contrarian Investment Choice

The current crypto market is performing poorly. Bitcoin has fallen 21% year-to-date, and mainstream assets like Ethereum, Solana, and XRP have suffered deeper declines, plummeting 33%, 37%, and 31% respectively. Crypto ETFs continue to experience net outflows, and spot trading volumes have dropped to multi-year lows.

The key reason for the weak performance is that crypto is no longer the hot trend in capital markets. Concepts like artificial intelligence stocks, robotics companies, and SpaceX are in the spotlight, with the Nasdaq 100 Index surging 43% year-to-date. Naturally, capital has little interest in lingering in the crypto sector.

In an environment where the AI sector is siphoning off capital from the entire market, the crypto industry is undergoing a painful transformation: shifting from a momentum-driven hot topic to a contrarian investment target.

This is a crucial turning point affecting the industry's direction. Momentum investing rides market trends, offering excellent experiences during uptrends; contrarian investing, however, is a long and arduous test of investor patience, long-term thinking, and fundamental analysis, with returns realized intermittently.

This also explains why crypto capital increasingly values project revenue, with protocols boasting solid fundamentals like Hyperliquid being highly favored. The market has not abandoned the crypto track, but under the contrarian investment logic, capital is ditching speculative hype and turning towards assets with strong fundamentals.

The crypto industry will not vanish; only the types of investors and projects rewarded by the market have fundamentally changed. Understanding this point is key to seizing profit opportunities in the next bull market.

2) Market Awaits Regulatory Clarity, but the CLARITY Act is Likely Stalled

The second major factor contributing to the weak crypto market is the significant regulatory uncertainty brought by the CLARITY Act.

This act is a core framework bill for the crypto sector in the United States, currently progressing through Congress to establish unified national crypto regulations. Although the bill recently cleared a hurdle in the Senate, prediction market Polymarket data shows only a 55% probability of it being approved and enacted this year. My personal view is more pessimistic: recent consultations with industry insiders in Washington suggest Republicans estimate around 30%. Whether the probability is 5%, 30%, or 50%, the bill's passage is far from guaranteed.

This uncertainty keeps institutional capital on the sidelines. From the perspective of large institutional investors, it's a binary choice:

· Invest in AI stocks, whose prices are continuously hitting new all-time highs;

· Allocate to crypto assets, but face a nearly 50% downside risk if the bill fails in the next two months.

The latter is difficult to attract capital.

Therefore, it is judged that until regulatory clarity is achieved, major crypto assets are unlikely to sustain a bull run. Compared to the final outcome of the bill passing or failing, eliminating the uncertainty itself is more critical. If the bill passes, crypto rallies; if it fails, the industry can gradually digest the negative news; it is only the protracted tug-of-war stage of uncertainty that makes it hard for the market to strengthen.

3) Capital Shifts Towards New Generation Fundamental Assets

This bear market is fundamentally different from past crypto winters: in previous downturns, capital collectively sought refuge in Bitcoin, causing altcoins to collapse across the board; but this time, capital is not piling into safe-haven assets. Instead, it is flowing into smaller-cap, fundamentally sound emerging assets.

Looking at the monthly return data for major crypto assets in May 2026: the most notable aspect of the market is not the widespread decline, but the assets performing strongly against the trend. While Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana weakened simultaneously, Hyperliquid surged 72% monthly, Zcash gained 50%, and XLM rose 44%. These are not super large-cap assets; they garnered capital favor based on their own unique fundamental logic.

This is a concrete manifestation of the aforementioned "contrarian investment logic": as crypto moves away from momentum speculation, fundamentals become the core of pricing, and the capital rotation has already materialized.

Simultaneously, the fact that some assets are profiting against the trend also indicates this bear market is entering its mid-to-late stages. In deep bear markets, the entire market declines uniformly. When a batch of assets begins to chart independent upward trajectories based on genuine fundamentals, it signals an impending shift in the market cycle.

Summary

To be honest, the market will likely remain under pressure in the short term. The CLARITY Act approval tug-of-war continues, SpaceX is nearing its IPO, Anthropic has filed its prospectus, and AI themes continue to dominate financial headlines. Adding to crypto positions now will probably be an unpleasant experience, but the essence of contrarian investing is precisely to build positions in neglected areas and make counter-intuitive decisions against the trend.

This is exactly the case with today's crypto market. Patience and conviction are the keys to success. Anchoring on fundamentals and value to discover quality assets will yield substantial long-term returns.

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat are the three main reasons or dimensions according to Matt Hougan, the CIO of Bitwise, that explain the current weak performance of the cryptocurrency market?

A1) Cryptocurrency assets have turned into a contrarian investment choice as capital has flowed away from crypto to hot trends like AI. 2) The market is waiting for regulatory clarity, with the CLARITY Act creating significant uncertainty and making institutional investors hesitant. 3) Investment capital is shifting towards a new generation of fundamentally sound projects rather than simply fleeing to Bitcoin.

QWhy does the author believe the crypto market has become a 'contrarian investment'?

AThe author believes crypto has become a contrarian investment because it is no longer the popular, trend-following asset class. Capital is now heavily concentrated in hot sectors like artificial intelligence stocks, drawing funds away from crypto. Investing in crypto now requires patience, long-term thinking, and fundamental analysis rather than riding a wave of hype.

QWhat is the CLARITY Act and how does its uncertainty affect the crypto market according to the article?

AThe CLARITY Act is a key regulatory framework bill for cryptocurrencies in the U.S. that aims to establish unified national rules. According to the article, the uncertainty surrounding whether it will pass or fail is a major factor keeping institutional investors on the sidelines. The market struggles during this prolonged period of ambiguity more than it would if the outcome were simply a clear 'yes' or 'no'.

QHow is the current bear market different from previous ones in terms of where capital is flowing?

AIn previous bear markets, capital typically fled to the perceived safety of Bitcoin, causing altcoins to collapse. In the current cycle, capital is not simply flocking to Bitcoin but is instead selectively moving into smaller projects with strong fundamentals, such as Hyperliquid, Zcash, and XLM, which have posted significant gains.

QWhat does the author suggest is the key to success for investors in the current crypto market environment?

AThe author suggests that patience and conviction are the keys to success. Investors should focus on fundamental analysis and seek out undervalued, high-quality projects in this contrarian environment, as this approach will likely yield substantial long-term returns.

Leituras Relacionadas

Seeking Alpha's Hot Article: Why Might the U.S. Stock Market Crash in June?

In a recent Seeking Alpha article, financial professor and analyst Damir Tokic argues that the US stock market may be poised for a significant crash in June 2026. The core thesis centers on a "mega-bubble" in equities, particularly within the technology sector, which has driven the S&P 500 to near-record valuations, with a Shiller P/E ratio exceeding 40—a level comparable to the 2000 dot-com bubble. Tokic identifies two primary catalysts for a potential collapse. First, he points to unsustainable market exuberance fueled by what he terms the "Trump Stimulus"—massive AI capital expenditure by tech giants, which he believes is politically driven and cannot last. Second, and more urgently, he highlights the escalating Iran war as a critical threat. The ongoing closure of the Strait of Hormuz has created a severe global energy supply crunch. Strategic petroleum reserves are projected to hit critically low operational levels by June, potentially causing oil prices to spike above $200 per barrel and triggering a severe, supply-driven inflationary shock. This scenario, Tokic warns, would force the Federal Reserve's hand. Despite currently maintaining a dovish bias, the Fed would likely be compelled to officially pivot to a hawkish stance at its June FOMC meeting to combat soaring inflation and bond yields. He contends that such a shift—or even a failure to act, which would destroy Fed credibility—could be the trigger that punctures the market bubble. The resulting downturn, he concludes, could rival the bear markets of 2000 and 2008, advising investors to prepare for a major correction.

marsbitHá 14m

Seeking Alpha's Hot Article: Why Might the U.S. Stock Market Crash in June?

marsbitHá 14m

AI PC Battle: Bet on the Toll Booth, Not the Camp

**Title:** The AI PC Battle: Don't Bet on Sides, Bet on the Tollbooth **Summary:** The AI PC competition is moving beyond simple "x86 vs. Arm" narratives. The core investment thesis should focus on identifying which players can sustain margins, cash flow, and pricing power throughout the upgrade cycle, rather than backing a particular architecture. The opportunity is analyzed in three layers: 1. **The Advanced Foundry Tollbooth:** TSMC is positioned to collect "tolls" regardless of which chip designer wins, due to its dominant ~70% share in advanced semiconductor manufacturing, which is essential for high-end AI PC chips. 2. **Compute & Platform Spillover:** AMD represents an offensive in the x86 CPU+GPU space, while NVIDIA leverages its GPU and CUDA software stack dominance. Both benefit from the demand for increased local AI compute. 3. **Architecture Diffusion & Turnaround Plays:** ARM and Intel offer potential for significant upside (elasticity), but investments here require stricter discipline due to higher execution risks and competitive challenges. The industry is transitioning from concept to shipment validation. While short-term forecasts for AI PC adoption have been revised down slightly due to tariffs and procurement delays, the long-term trend towards AI becoming a standard PC feature remains intact. The key driver for upgrade cycles will be whether compelling enterprise applications (e.g., privacy-sensitive computing, low-latency inference) emerge beyond consumer-focused features like meeting summarization. Investment strategy should prioritize companies with platform-level advantages and recurring revenue streams. TSMC offers high certainty as the foundational tollbooth. AMD presents a strong offensive play within the established ecosystem. ARM and Intel are higher-risk, higher-potential-reward turnaround bets. The report cautions against chasing short-term hype and emphasizes a disciplined, long-term approach focused on buying ecosystem strength and cash-flow certainty after market enthusiasm subsides. **Key Risks:** Underwhelming AI PC applications slowing upgrade cycles; slow improvement in Windows on Arm compatibility; macro/tariff impacts on PC demand; potential advanced node supply-demand mismatches affecting TSMC; high overall AI sector valuations making stocks vulnerable to a risk-off shift in markets.

marsbitHá 28m

AI PC Battle: Bet on the Toll Booth, Not the Camp

marsbitHá 28m

Ten-Thousand-Word Analysis: From $10 to $290, MRVL Wins the Entire AI Era by 'Not Making GPUs'

Marvell Technology's stock price surged from under $10 in 2016 to a record $290 in June 2026, fueled not by making GPUs, but by dominating AI infrastructure connectivity. This analysis argues the market misvalues MRVL as merely a smaller Broadcom in custom AI chips, overlooking its true, unique position. Marvell's core strength lies in enabling high-speed data flow for AI clusters through three interconnected businesses. First, it holds a commanding ~70% market share in high-speed optical DSPs (essential for data center light modules), a deep-moat business with accelerating growth. Second, its custom AI chip design business serves hyperscalers like AWS, Microsoft, and Google, with a significant revenue pipeline despite lower margins. Third, stable cash flows come from Ethernet switch chips and enterprise storage controllers. Together, they form a full-stack "AI data movement" platform. CEO Matt Murphy's transformative leadership since 2016, involving strategic divestments, key acquisitions (like Inphi for optical DSPs), and securing long-term agreements with major cloud providers, repositioned the company. A pivotal $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA in 2026 underscored Marvell's critical role in the AI ecosystem, particularly through collaborations like NVLink Fusion. While Marvell faces risks—including client concentration (losing the Amazon Trainium3 design), lower-margin business mix, competitive threats, insider selling, and complex supply chains—its fundamentals remain strong. The optical interconnect moat is widening with the acquisition of Celestial AI (photonics fabric), and financial metrics show accelerating revenue growth and operating leverage. With a PEG ratio suggesting undervaluation relative to its growth, the thesis is that the market undervalues Marvell's monopolistic position in AI "plumbing" while overemphasizing its competitive custom chip segment. The story transcends investing, symbolizing how in any complex system—from the internet to AI—the value of "connection" ultimately surpasses that of individual "nodes."

marsbitHá 58m

Ten-Thousand-Word Analysis: From $10 to $290, MRVL Wins the Entire AI Era by 'Not Making GPUs'

marsbitHá 58m

AI Relay Stations Spark Heated Debate on Zhihu: Behind Cheap Tokens, What Are Users Really Worried About?

A discussion on Zhihu about "AI relay stations" shifted the niche developer topic of "cheap tokens" into broader user awareness. Users moved beyond simply questioning the legitimacy of these services to focus on practical concerns: Where do cheap tokens truly come from? Is the model being accessed the real one? Can relay stations see prompts, code, and API keys? For occasional users, are the risks worth it? The core debate centered less on price and more on trust. A primary worry is model authenticity—the risk of "model swapping," where users paying for a premium model might be routed to a cheaper one, creating an information asymmetry. Others argued that cost comparisons matter; while cheaper than official pay-as-you-go APIs, relay stations may not be the lowest-cost option versus subscriptions, domestic models, or free tiers, making user needs assessment crucial. Speculation about token sources ranged from legitimate bulk discounts to gray-area methods like account sharing or exploiting regional pricing. This opacity makes risk assessment difficult for users. Data security emerged as a critical concern, especially for enterprise use. When processing sensitive information like code, contracts, or client data, the inability to verify a relay station's data handling, retention, or access policies poses significant compliance and confidentiality risks. The evolving consensus suggests relay stations can be used cautiously for low-sensitivity, disposable tasks (e.g., summarizing public info, simple translation). However, they should not be the default for sensitive, professional, or production workflows involving proprietary data, Agents, or automated systems. Recommendations include avoiding large prepayments, not relying on a single service, using test prompts to monitor quality, anonymizing data where possible, and keeping official channels as backups. Ultimately, the discussion framed tokens not just as a billing unit but as a measure of real cost encompassing price, model integrity, data security, and service stability. The popularity of relay stations highlights user demand for affordable access, but the debate underscores a key trade-off: the savings from cheap tokens may come at the price of trust, transparency, and control over one's data and AI experience.

marsbitHá 1h

AI Relay Stations Spark Heated Debate on Zhihu: Behind Cheap Tokens, What Are Users Really Worried About?

marsbitHá 1h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片