Bittensor (TAO) Loses Support: Are Traders Eyeing the Next Downside Levels?

TheNewsCryptoPublicado em 2026-03-19Última atualização em 2026-03-19

Resumo

Bittensor (TAO) is trading around $245.36, down 8.28% in 24 hours, with a daily trading volume of $349.48 million. Despite a 15.59% weekly gain, the price faces potential downside risks, with support near $239.46. A further drop could lead to a death cross, pushing prices below $232.19. A bullish reversal might test resistance at $253.74, possibly rising above $260 with a golden cross. Technical indicators are mixed: MACD shows a bearish trend with a potential reversal attempt. The CMF at -0.09 indicates mild selling pressure, while the Bull Bear Power of -33.8 reflects strong bearish momentum. The RSI at 37.40 suggests bearish sentiment but not yet oversold. If it nears 30, a short bounce may occur. Overall, sellers currently dominate, but a bullish turnaround is possible if buying pressure increases.

At press time, Bittensor (TAO) is trading within the $245.36 range after an 8.28% loss in value over the last 24 hours. Notably, the daily trading volume has reached the $349.48 million zone. The opening price of the asset was at $274.84, and gradually, it hit a low for the day at around $246.

Over the last 7-days, the price chart of TAO reveals its bullish wave, with a 15.59% surge. It opened the week, trading on the downside and followed by multiple ups and downs; it managed to climb higher.

Upon the momentum correction steadily happening on the downside, the Bittensor price might retrace to the $239.46 support range. A continuous loss may trigger the formation of the death cross, and it could push the asset’s price below $232.19. If a bullish reversal emerges for Bittensor, the price could see a move upward, immediately testing the resistance at around $253.74. Assuming the price reinforces, with the emergence of the golden cross, it likely drives the price above $260.

Will the Bulls Keep Bittensor’s Momentum Alive?

TAO’s Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) line has crossed below the zero line, but the signal line stays above it, and gives mixed signals. The broader trend looks bearish, but the recent momentum is trying to turn positive. This setup can hint at a possible reversal attempt.

In addition, the Chaikin Money Flow (CMF) indicator stationed at -0.09 shows mild selling pressure in the Bittensor market. The capital is flowing out of the asset, and the sellers have a small edge. There will be sideways movements, unless the selling pressure starts to build further.

The Bull Bear Power (BBP) indicator reading of -33.8 implies strong bearish pressure. Moreover, the sellers are clearly in control, pushing the price below its average level. This reflects solid downward momentum, and it may trend lower unless the buyers step in to slow down.

Besides, TAO’s daily Relative Strength Index (RSI), at 37.40, indicates the market is leaning bearish. The price has been under selling pressure, but it is not deeply oversold yet. If the value moves closer to 30, the market may get oversold, where a short bounce might happen.

Top Updated Crypto News

Momentum Shift for FARTCOIN: Will It Stay Range-Bound?

TagsAltcoinBittensorCryptoCryptomarketTAO

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the current trading range of Bittensor (TAO) and how much value did it lose in the last 24 hours?

ABittensor (TAO) is trading within the $245.36 range after an 8.28% loss in value over the last 24 hours.

QWhat is the potential downside support level for Bittensor if the bearish momentum continues?

AIf the bearish momentum continues, the Bittensor price might retrace to the $239.46 support range, and a continuous loss could push the price below $232.19.

QWhat does the Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) indicator suggest about TAO's trend?

ATAO's MACD line has crossed below the zero line, while the signal line stays above it, giving mixed signals. The broader trend looks bearish, but the recent momentum is trying to turn positive, hinting at a possible reversal attempt.

QAccording to the Chaikin Money Flow (CMF) indicator, what is the current pressure in the Bittensor market?

AThe Chaikin Money Flow (CMF) indicator is stationed at -0.09, showing mild selling pressure and indicating that capital is flowing out of the asset, with sellers having a small edge.

QWhat does the Bull Bear Power (BBP) indicator reading of -33.8 imply for TAO?

AThe Bull Bear Power (BBP) indicator reading of -33.8 implies strong bearish pressure, indicating that sellers are in control and pushing the price below its average level, reflecting solid downward momentum.

Leituras Relacionadas

Prediction Markets Under Bias

The article "Prediction Markets Under Bias" by Jeff Park of Bitwise argues against the common media portrayal of prediction markets as mere gambling or a social ill. It distinguishes between gambling and investment based on whether a participant's strategy has a positive expected value (+EV), not the market's structure. The author contends that prediction markets, like poker, are skill-based and can be a legitimate form of investment, offering individuals autonomy, truth discovery, and decentralized value. The piece critiques the common conflation of prediction markets with casino gambling, highlighting their role in risk hedging and capital efficiency, similar to insurance and securitization. A key differentiator is their precision and finite expiration, which makes prices directly anchor to factual outcomes, rewarding deep research and information advantage rather than punishing the uninformed. The author concludes that media opposition often stems from a structural bias, as these markets challenge traditional information gatekeepers and promote a more democratic, transparent system for pricing truth. The real debate is not about information having a price, but about who controls and profits from it.

marsbitHá 20m

Prediction Markets Under Bias

marsbitHá 20m

Why Do You Always Lose Money on Polymarket? Because You're Betting on News, While the Pros Read the Rules

Why do you always lose money on Polymarket? Because you bet on news, while the pros study the rules. This article explains how top traders ("che tou") profit by meticulously analyzing market rules, not just predicting events. Polymarket, a prediction market platform, often sees disputes over event outcomes due to ambiguous rule wording. For instance, a market asking "Who will be the leader of Venezuela by the end of 2026?" was misinterpreted by many who bet on Delcy Rodríguez, assuming she held power. However, the rules specified "officially holds" as the formally appointed, sworn-in individual. Since Nicolás Maduro was still recognized as president officially, he won the market—even being in prison. To resolve such disputes, Polymarket uses a decentralized arbitration system via UMA protocol. The process involves: 1. Proposal: Anyone can propose a market outcome by staking 750 USDC, earning 5 USDC if unchallenged. 2. Dispute: A 2-hour window allows challenges with a 750 USDC stake; successful challengers earn 250 USDC. 3. Discussion: A 48-hour period on UMA Discord for evidence and debate. 4. Voting: UMA token holders vote in two 24-hour phases (blind then public). Outcomes require >65% consensus and 5M tokens voted; otherwise, four re-votes occur before Polymarket intervention. 5. Settlement: Results are final and automatic. Unlike traditional courts, Polymarket’s system lacks separation between arbitrators and stakeholders—voters often hold market positions, creating conflicts of interest. This leads to herd mentality in discussions and non-transparent outcomes without explanatory rulings, preventing precedent formation. Thus, success on Polymarket hinges on deep rule interpretation, not just event prediction, exploiting gaps between reality and contractual wording.

marsbitHá 31m

Why Do You Always Lose Money on Polymarket? Because You're Betting on News, While the Pros Read the Rules

marsbitHá 31m

DeepSeek Funding: Liang Wenfeng's 'Realist' Pivot

DeepSeek, a leading Chinese AI company, has initiated its first external funding round, aiming to raise at least $300 million at a valuation of no less than $10 billion. This move marks a significant shift from its founder Liang Wenfeng’s previous idealistic stance of rejecting external capital to maintain independence. Despite strong financial backing from its parent company, quantitative trading firm幻方量化 (Huanfang Quant), which provided an estimated $700 million in revenue in 2025 alone, DeepSeek faces mounting challenges. Key issues include a 15-month gap in major model updates, delays in its flagship V4 release, and the loss of several core researchers to competitors offering significantly higher compensation. The company is also undergoing a strategic pivot by migrating its infrastructure from NVIDIA’s CUDA to Huawei’s Ascend platform, a move aligned with China’s push for technological self-reliance amid U.S. export controls. However, DeepSeek lags behind rivals like智谱AI and MiniMax—both now publicly listed—in areas such as product ecosystem, multimodal capabilities, and commercialization. The funding round, though relatively small in scale, is seen as a way to establish a market-validated valuation anchor, making employee stock options more competitive and facilitating talent retention. It also signals DeepSeek’s transition from a pure research-oriented organization to a commercially-driven player in the global AI ecosystem.

marsbitHá 1h

DeepSeek Funding: Liang Wenfeng's 'Realist' Pivot

marsbitHá 1h

Warsh, Trump's Next 'Scapegoat' at the Federal Reserve?

Kevin Warsh, a nominee for the Federal Reserve chair, faces a challenging confirmation hearing amid political pressure from former President Donald Trump to implement immediate and significant interest rate cuts. Warsh has proposed reforms including reducing the Fed’s communication frequency and shrinking its $6.7 trillion balance sheet. However, market expectations for rate cuts remain limited, creating tension with Trump’s demands. Warsh’s stance has shifted over time, from hawkish during the financial crisis to more dovish recently, citing AI-driven productivity gains. His confirmation is further complicated by Republican Senator Thom Tillis’s threat to block the nomination unless an investigation into current Chair Jerome Powell is dropped. Trump has warned of firing Powell if he doesn’t leave on time. Observers note that Warsh risks becoming a "scapegoat"—either by yielding to political pressure and fueling inflation, or by resisting and facing Trump’s backlash. His ties to Trump’s circle and Wall Street support may aid his nomination, but his ability to balance political demands with the Fed’s credibility remains uncertain. Historical precedents, like Arthur Burns’s compliance with Nixon, highlight the risks of political interference in monetary policy.

marsbitHá 1h

Warsh, Trump's Next 'Scapegoat' at the Federal Reserve?

marsbitHá 1h

Plunging 10% Then Surging: Weekend Crude Oil Market Watch

Following a 10% plunge, oil prices surged over the weekend as geopolitical tensions in the Strait of Hormuz escalated dramatically. The initial market optimism, driven by the strait’s brief reopening on Friday, quickly reversed on Saturday when Iran reinstated restrictions and fired on vessels, halting nearly all traffic. In response, oil contracts rose approximately 4.52%, while S&P futures fell nearly 0.8%. U.S. President Trump alternated between diplomatic gestures—sending an envoy for talks—and threats to destroy Iranian infrastructure if no deal was reached. Iran rejected further negotiations, fearing a U.S. attack before the midweek ceasefire deadline. This triggered another spike in oil, surpassing Saturday’s highs, and further pressured equity markets. Crypto-related stocks underperformed significantly. Market optimism is expected to be punished, and the week ahead hinges on whether Iran maintains its refusal to negotiate.

marsbitHá 1h

Plunging 10% Then Surging: Weekend Crude Oil Market Watch

marsbitHá 1h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片

Categorias popularesright-arrow

Etiquetas Popularesright-arrow