BitMart Research Institute Weekly Highlights: A Comprehensive Review of Macro Environment, Crude Oil, AI Tech Stocks, and Crypto Market

marsbitPublicado em 2026-05-12Última atualização em 2026-05-12

Resumo

**Weekly Market Review: Macro, Oil, AI Tech Stocks & Crypto Market** **Macroeconomic & Traditional Finance** The April U.S. Non-Farm Payrolls report of 115K new jobs exceeded expectations, but the data's quality was questioned. Growth was heavily concentrated in healthcare, while other sectors contracted, and manufacturing employment turned negative. A statistical model accounted for a large portion of the gains, conflicting with household survey data showing a loss of 226K jobs. Meanwhile, AI's impact on jobs is emerging, with information sector roles declining, though overall unemployment remains at ~4.3%. Oil prices hovered near $100 per barrel. Global oil buffer inventories have drawn down significantly, supporting prices, but high costs are suppressing demand. China's recent reduction in crude imports acted as a market stabilizer. Geopolitically, the U.S. and Iran are likely to reach a tentative agreement to keep the Strait of Hormuz open and avoid price spikes. For AI tech stocks, short-term prospects are mixed. A potential SpaceX IPO in June could pressure current index heavyweights like Nvidia, while smaller components might benefit. The mid-term focus shifts to Q2 earnings, emphasizing AI's return on investment. Long-term risks include potential election policy shifts and massive IPOs from companies like OpenAI, which could test the sector's sustainability. **Crypto Market & Ecosystem** Crypto markets rose moderately, with BTC climbing from ~$77K to ~$82K, driv...

I. Macro Economy & Traditional Financial Markets (Macro)

1 U.S. Employment Data and the Impact of AI on Jobs

Nonfarm payrolls increased by 115,000 in April, superficially higher than expectations, but market doubts exist regarding data quality. Job growth is heavily reliant on the healthcare industry, which added approximately 618,000 jobs over the past year, while other sectors combined saw a decrease of about 367,000 jobs; manufacturing employment also turned negative for the first time this year, indicating a deepening structural divergence in the labor market.

The strong April nonfarm payrolls were significantly influenced by the "Business Birth/Death Model." This model contributed a positive adjustment of approximately 391,000 jobs in April, implying that part of the job growth is more a model estimate than actual survey results. In contrast, the household survey showed a decrease of about 226,000 in actual employment in April. This clear divergence between the two surveys has heightened market skepticism about the reliability of the employment data.

Attention is beginning to turn to AI's impact on employment. Information sector jobs decreased by about 30,000 in April and have been declining consistently this year, sparking discussions about "AI replacing jobs." However, the U.S. unemployment rate remains around 4.3%, making it difficult to conclude that AI has yet exerted a systemic impact on the overall labor market. Future observation is needed to see if new demand can absorb the displaced workforce.

2 Crude Oil Market and Geopolitics

Oil prices have recently hovered around $100 per barrel. The global available crude oil buffer inventory is about 800 million barrels, of which approximately 300 million barrels have been drawn down by the end of April, providing support for prices from the inventory side. However, high oil prices are also clearly suppressing demand, with global daily oil demand falling by about 2.8 million barrels and 4.3 million barrels in March and April, respectively.

China has played a "ballast" role in this round of oil price movements. Its current crude oil reserves stand at about 1.4 billion barrels. In April, China significantly reduced crude oil imports, cutting daily imports by about 3.5 million barrels to the lowest level since 2024. By pausing or slowing its stockpiling, China has somewhat eased global crude oil supply-demand tensions and also restrained further oil price increases.

Regarding U.S.-Iran relations, the probability of a phased memorandum of understanding agreement this month is relatively high, likely centering on keeping the Strait of Hormuz open, reducing conflict risks, and curbing oil prices. Maintaining controllable short-term situations and avoiding runaway oil prices aligns with the interests of both parties.

3 Short-, Medium-, and Long-Term Analysis of AI Tech Stocks

In the short term, AI tech stocks face mixed signals. Positive factors include potential marginal easing in China-U.S. trade relations and improved market risk appetite if the U.S. and Iran reach a phased agreement. Negative factors stem from potential index weight adjustment pressures. If SpaceX lists in June and is included in the Nasdaq-100 Index, passive funds may need to sell top-five weighted tech stocks like Nvidia and Microsoft to make room, creating temporary liquidity pressure on AI leaders. However, lower-ranked constituent stocks like Micron (MU) might benefit.

In the medium term, the mid-July earnings season will be a crucial validation point for AI tech stocks. The market's valuation framework for AI stocks is entering a "second half," shifting from thematic narrative-driven to placing greater emphasis on AI ROI (return on investment), commercialization efficiency per unit cost, and actual profitability.

In the long term, year-end could pose a significant test for the AI bubble. U.S. elections may bring policy disruptions. If trillion-dollar valuation AI application companies like OpenAI and Anthropic initiate IPOs, they could also drain liquidity from the secondary market. Meanwhile, if corporate capital expenditures persistently exceed their own cash flows and rely on debt financing, AI stocks may enter the late stage of a bubble and face stress tests similar to those in the later stages of the internet bubble.

II. Crypto Market Trends & Ecosystem

1 Market Overview and Trading Data

The Crypto market has recently been primarily driven by a recovery in overall market risk appetite, showing a mild bullish trend. BTC price rose from around $77,000 last week to approximately $82,000. While spot trading volume has rebounded somewhat, it remains relatively low; the CVD indicator shows strong performance, indicating clear active buying intent on the spot side, with buying power dominating.

Looking at the futures side, open interest has increased with the price rise, but perpetual swap funding rates remain negative, suggesting that some funds in the market are still persistently taking short positions, mainly focused on altcoins or the ETH direction. In the options market, investors' willingness to buy Puts for downside protection has decreased, bearish demand has retreated, and bullish sentiment is spreading. The overall structure suggests that this round of gains may have moved from the early stages to the mid-phase, but attention is still needed on whether subsequent trading volume can expand.

Regarding large capital flows, ETFs continued net inflows last week, amounting to approximately $791 million. BMBMR purchased about 26,000 ETH, below the market's previously expected baseline of 70,000; Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy) made a small purchase of 535 BTC, with an average purchase price around $80,000. Overall, institutional buying momentum persists but appears more moderate than expected.

2 Stablecoin & Institutional Chain Launch Trends

Circle's recent earnings report showed revenue falling short of expectations, but its stock price performance has been relatively resilient, indicating the market still recognizes its long-term narrative. Meanwhile, Circle's self-built public chain ARC secured a financing valuation of about $30 billion, further solidifying the trend of stablecoin issuers extending into underlying infrastructure.

The industry is forming a dual-track arbitrage model of "listing + token/chain launch." On one hand, projects achieve compliant status, access traditional capital market funds, and gain credit endorsement through listing a traditional entity. On the other hand, they build a public chain and issue tokens through another entity to capture Crypto market liquidity, enjoying a dual premium from equity valuation and token valuation.

Circle has provided a relatively clear demonstration effect. Subsequently, other projects with user bases, payment scenarios, or social ecosystems are likely to follow a similar path. For example, the probability of ecosystems related to Telegram, PM, and other projects launching chains or tokens to capture on-chain liquidity in the future is rising. Stablecoins, payment networks, and institutionally-built chains may become important structural opportunities in the next phase of the Crypto market.

This article is for market analysis only and does not constitute any investment advice. Investment involves high risks. Please fully assess your own risk tolerance and implement strict risk management before trading.

Perguntas relacionadas

QAccording to the article, what are the key factors affecting AI tech stocks in the short term?

AIn the short term, AI tech stocks are influenced by both positive and negative factors. Positives include potential marginal easing of China-US trade relations and an improved risk appetite if the US and Iran reach a provisional agreement. A key negative factor is potential pressure from index weight adjustments. If SpaceX lists and joins the Nasdaq 100 in June, passive funds may need to sell top-weighted AI stocks like Nvidia and Microsoft to make room, creating temporary liquidity pressure, though stocks like Micron (ranked lower) might benefit.

QWhat does the article identify as a potential major test for the AI market bubble in the long term?

AThe article suggests the end of the year could be a major stress test for the AI bubble. Potential factors include policy disruptions from the US election, liquidity pressure if high-valuation AI application companies like OpenAI or Anthropic launch IPOs, and the risk of AI stocks entering a late-bubble phase if sustained corporate capital expenditures rely on debt and outpace cash flow generation.

QWhat role does China play in the current crude oil market dynamics, according to the BitMart article?

AChina acts as a 'ballast' in the current crude oil market. With strategic petroleum reserves of about 1.4 billion barrels, China significantly reduced its crude oil imports in April (by approximately 3.5 million barrels per day to a 2024 low). This pause or slowdown in stockpiling has alleviated global supply-demand tension and helped suppress further oil price increases.

QWhat trend in the Crypto market is highlighted regarding stablecoin issuers and institutional projects?

AThe article highlights a trend of stablecoin issuers and institutional projects extending into underlying infrastructure, specifically by building their own blockchains. Circle's ARC chain, valued at around $30 billion in funding, is cited as an example. This is part of a growing 'dual-track' arbitrage model where projects leverage a traditional corporate entity for an IPO (gaining compliance and traditional capital) while also using a separate entity to launch a chain/token to capture Crypto market liquidity and dual valuation premiums.

QWhat does the divergence between the two key US employment surveys in April indicate, as per the market analysis?

AThe significant divergence between the surveys indicates potential issues with the quality and reliability of the strong headline non-farm payroll number. The establishment survey reported a gain of 115,000 jobs, heavily boosted by a model-based adjustment of ~391,000 jobs. In contrast, the household survey showed an actual decrease of ~226,000 employed persons. This contradiction deepens market skepticism about the true strength of the labor market.

Leituras Relacionadas

Selling Block Space Is No Longer Profitable, Arbitrum and MegaETH Venture into Applications

Selling block space is no longer a sustainable core business for blockchains, as it is easily commoditized and generates insufficient revenue to support their valuations, especially when compared to the high fees generated by applications built on them. This report, following up on the "Verticalization" thesis, examines how chains like Arbitrum, Polygon, MegaETH, and Sophon are adapting. It categorizes their strategies into two main paths: **Ecosystem Expansion** and **Product Expansion**. **Ecosystem Expansion** involves chains extending their reach by offering their technology stack to others. Examples include Arbitrum, which earns revenue from chains like Robinhood's L2 built on Arbitrum Stack, and Polygon, which is positioning itself as a payment chain for fintech. However, this model faces challenges, as seen with Optimism's revenue drop after Base left its Superchain, and often fails to translate chain success into sustained token value due to ongoing emissions. **Product Expansion** sees chains vertically integrating by building their own applications to capture more value internally. MegaETH shifted focus to developing first-party consumer apps and launched a native stablecoin, USDm, to capture yield. Similarly, Sophon pivoted from being an independent chain to becoming an application builder on Base. The goal is to directly own the lucrative application fee streams that typically don't flow back to the underlying chain. The conclusion is that with hundreds of chains offering similar block space, differentiation through liquidity alone is not enough. To justify high valuations and ensure sustainability, chains are moving beyond their foundational role. They are evolving into broader ecosystems or application builders themselves, actively working to internalize the value generated within their networks. This represents a pragmatic shift towards utility, where chains are becoming more than just infrastructure providers in a highly competitive landscape.

marsbitHá 9m

Selling Block Space Is No Longer Profitable, Arbitrum and MegaETH Venture into Applications

marsbitHá 9m

A Glimpse into Crypto Miners in Q2: Rushing into AI Data Centers – Are They Profiting?

Mining companies presented mixed Q2 results as they navigate the shift towards AI data centers alongside their core Bitcoin mining operations. While mining output increased for some, declining Bitcoin prices and rising network difficulty pressured revenues. For instance, MARA mined more Bitcoin year-over-year but saw a 27% revenue drop and a significant net loss, partly due to unrealized losses on Bitcoin holdings. The standout trend is the growing contribution of AI/high-performance computing (HPC) hosting revenue. Core Scientific now derives over 80% of its revenue from high-density hosting, while TeraWulf generates about 71% from HPC leasing. However, the transition is at varying stages. Companies like Riot Platforms and Cipher Digital are in earlier phases, with AI-related revenue still a smaller portion of their total income. The article cautions against conflating massive, long-term AI hosting contracts (often valued in billions) with current quarterly revenue, as income recognition depends on capacity delivery and lease commencement. Financially, net losses were common but driven by different factors: some by Bitcoin price revaluations or warrant fair value changes, others by operational costs exceeding revenue. The sector is diverging into three paths: pure-play miners focusing on efficiency, companies successfully transitioning to AI hosting, and those in a challenging transitional phase where legacy mining income is declining before new AI revenue scales up. The key to future performance lies in reliable power access, timely data center delivery, and converting long-term contracts into consistent quarterly income.

marsbitHá 12m

A Glimpse into Crypto Miners in Q2: Rushing into AI Data Centers – Are They Profiting?

marsbitHá 12m

DeepSeek's "Self-Evolution" Blueprint, Revealed

DeepSeek, in collaboration with Peking University, has unveiled a new research paper titled "A Programming Paradigm for Spatiotemporal Composability," which outlines the core architecture behind its "Harness" agent platform. The paper introduces **Cordis**, a foundational "Lego-like baseboard" that enables a highly modular and composable system where **everything is a plugin and everything can be reassembled**. The core innovation addresses two major challenges for self-evolving AI agents: **temporal composability** (the ability to dynamically load, unload, and update plugins at runtime without restarting the entire process) and **spatial composability** (managing complex, dynamic dependencies between components). Cordis solves these using two key theoretical concepts adapted for dynamic environments: **revertible effects** (which allow state changes to be cleanly rolled back) and **reactive coeffects** (which enable automatic, declarative dependency resolution). This design is not merely theoretical. It has been validated over four years in the **Koishi** chatbot framework, which is built on Cordis and hosts over 4,000 community plugins. The framework demonstrates live plugin management—enabling, disabling, or updating plugins without disrupting others—and robust handling of dependencies across a decentralized ecosystem. The paper represents DeepSeek's vision for a foundational infrastructure that supports true **self-evolution** in AI agents, allowing them to dynamically modify their own capabilities and tools at runtime. The authors are Yifan Shi (Peking University/DeepSeek, creator of Koishi), Wei Zhang (Peking University), and Tianyi Cui (DeepSeek Harness team lead).

marsbitHá 14m

DeepSeek's "Self-Evolution" Blueprint, Revealed

marsbitHá 14m

On-Chain Finance Finally Posts a Profitable Ledger: Figure's Quarterly Revenue Doubles, Net Profit Hits $87 Million

Blockchain finance firm Figure Technology Solutions reported a strong second-quarter earnings report, potentially serving as the first major proof of profitability for the sector. The company’s GAAP net revenue reached $226 million, up 113% year-over-year, while net profit surged 192% to $87.4 million, yielding a net profit margin of 38.8%. Its quarterly consumer loan origination volume hit $4.3 billion, marking 132% growth. Figure's business focuses on streamlining the U.S. Home Equity Line of Credit (HELOC) market by shifting the entire loan lifecycle—from origination to securitization—onto its proprietary Provenance blockchain. This backend infrastructure significantly reduces processing time and costs while remaining invisible to end borrowers, who simply benefit from faster, cheaper loans. A key growth driver is the Figure Connect platform, a blockchain-based marketplace connecting loan originators and institutional investors. It accounted for 65% ($2.8 billion) of the quarter's volume, demonstrating strong network effects with 489 partner firms. The company is building an integrated on-chain finance ecosystem that includes its SEC-approved yield-generating stablecoin, YLDS. Notably, Figure has achieved this scale and profitability without relying on token sales or speculative crypto economics, instead choosing a traditional IPO path. Its success suggests blockchain's most practical application in finance may be as an efficient, invisible infrastructure layer that solves specific real-world inefficiencies rather than attempting to overhaul the entire system.

marsbitHá 15m

On-Chain Finance Finally Posts a Profitable Ledger: Figure's Quarterly Revenue Doubles, Net Profit Hits $87 Million

marsbitHá 15m

Trading

Spot
活动图片