Bitcoin's Price Rally Pauses, and Arthur Hayes Says Strategy Is Paying the Price

cryptonews.ruPublicado em 2026-08-28Última atualização em 2026-08-28

Resumo

Bitcoin's price appreciation has stalled, and Arthur Hayes argues this undermines the core business model of MicroStrategy (MSTR). The company has historically traded at a large premium to the value of its bitcoin holdings (mNAV), allowing it to issue new shares to buy more bitcoin. With bitcoin currently moving sideways in the $70,000-$81,000 range, that premium has collapsed to near zero, leaving MicroStrategy unable to fund new purchases through equity issuance without diluting shareholders. Hayes outlines three problematic options for CEO Michael Saylor: issue shares at little to no premium (diluting shareholders), sell bitcoin directly (violating the "never sell" principle), or cut dividends on preferred shares (alienating income-focused investors). He highlights the burden of ~$1.5 billion in annual dividend obligations from these preferred shares, noting Saylor had previously suggested possibly selling some bitcoin to cover them—a statement Hayes mocks. Hayes's broader point is that MicroStrategy's original purpose—providing a leveraged equity play on bitcoin—loses its rationale when bitcoin's price is flat. Investors seeking direct exposure can now simply buy a spot bitcoin ETF without taking on MicroStrategy's leverage or dividend burden.

For years, the stock of Strategy Inc. (Nasdaq: MSTR) traded as a speculative, leveraged bet on the price of bitcoin, often reaching valuations two or three times the value of the coins held on the company's balance sheet. It was this gap, known as the market-to-net asset value (mNAV) ratio, that allowed the company to issue new shares, buy more bitcoin, and repeat the cycle.

In a recent episode of Laura Shin's "Unchained" podcast, Hayes stated that this cycle is coming to an end as bitcoin's price surge has not reversed but merely paused. He noted that for Strategy's model to break down, it isn't necessary for bitcoin's price to fall. It is enough for it to stop rising.

On August 25, bitcoin briefly surpassed the $81,000 mark before retreating to levels in the upper $70,000 range—a kind of sideways movement that Hayes says is damaging to Strategy's structure. With the company's mNAV shrinking to approximately 1.01x, and the basic and diluted figures as of August 27 at 0.73x and 0.74x respectively, Strategy's stock is now trading close to the book value of the 840,447 $BTC reflected in its accounts. As a result, there is virtually no premium left to fund another buying cycle.

Three Options, None Ideal

Hayes notes that the shrinking premium leaves Saylor with three levers to pull, each carrying costs. He outlined the following scenarios:

  • Strategy could issue new shares, but doing so without a significant premium would dilute existing shareholders rather than reward them.
  • It could directly sell bitcoin, which would go against the "never sell" principle that built investor loyalty to the company's stock.
  • It could cut dividends on its preferred shares, risking the loss of trust from income-focused investors who bought the shares for yield, not as a bitcoin play.

This tension is very real, given that, as Bitcoin.com News reported in May, Strategy owned 818,334 $BTC with an average cost of $75,537 per coin, while the aggregate obligations for its two preferred share instruments amounted to roughly $1.5 billion per year: STRK with an 8% yield and STRC with a 10% to 11.5% yield.

At the dividend payout rates observed in May, the company had roughly 18 months of coverage left before it would need a new source of funding. Saylor said at the time that the company would "probably sell some bitcoin to pay the dividends, just to placate the market"—a phrase Hayes has since mocked, accusing Saylor of using "Jedi mind tricks" on investors by confusing them about how far these sales might ultimately go.

Hayes's broader argument is not that Strategy will collapse overnight, but that the original raison d'être for the stock—providing investors a way to pay a premium for equity-based access to bitcoin—ceases to make sense once bitcoin's price moves sideways rather than exponentially higher.

He told investors that anyone wanting direct exposure to bitcoin through a brokerage account could instead simply buy a spot exchange-traded fund (ETF), without paying for Strategy's leverage or bearing the burden of its dividend obligations.

end-content

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the main argument made by Arthur Hayes regarding MicroStrategy's business model in the podcast 'Unchained'?

AArthur Hayes argues that MicroStrategy's business model, which relies on issuing new shares at a premium to buy more Bitcoin, is coming to an end because the price of Bitcoin has stopped its rapid growth and entered a period of sideways movement. This eliminates the significant premium needed to fuel the company's buy cycle.

QWhat is the mNAV (market-to-net asset value) ratio of MicroStrategy as mentioned in the article, and why is it significant?

AAs of the article's data, MicroStrategy's mNAV had shrunk to approximately 1.01x, with its basic and diluted ratios around 0.73x and 0.74x respectively. This is significant because it means the company's stock is trading close to the value of the Bitcoin on its balance sheet, leaving almost no premium to finance new Bitcoin purchases through share issuance.

QWhat are the three imperfect options MicroStrategy has for raising funds, according to Arthur Hayes?

AThe three imperfect options are: 1) Issuing new shares without a significant premium, which dilutes existing shareholders. 2) Selling Bitcoin directly, which contradicts the company's 'never sell' principle and investor loyalty. 3) Cutting dividends on its preferred shares, risking the loss of trust from income-focused investors.

QWhat financial pressure does MicroStrategy face regarding its preferred stock dividends?

AMicroStrategy faces annual dividend obligations of approximately $1.5 billion from its two preferred stock instruments (STRK and STRC). At the payout rate observed in May, the company had about 18 months of coverage before needing a new source of financing, potentially forcing it to sell Bitcoin to pay dividends.

QWhy does Arthur Hayes believe direct Bitcoin ETFs are a better option for investors than MicroStrategy stock?

AHayes argues that if Bitcoin's price moves sideways instead of growing exponentially, the original purpose of MicroStrategy stock—providing leveraged exposure to Bitcoin—loses its appeal. Investors seeking direct Bitcoin exposure can now buy a spot Bitcoin ETF through a brokerage account without paying for MicroStrategy's leverage or bearing the burden of its dividend obligations.

Leituras Relacionadas

Transaction Substitution Vulnerability Discovered in Ledger's Ethereum Application

A vulnerability involving transaction substitution has been identified and confirmed in the Ethereum application for Ledger hardware wallets. The issue was a race condition between the transaction data displayed on the device's screen and the buffer holding the actual transaction data. This flaw allowed a malicious actor to overwrite a pending transaction while the user was reviewing a legitimate one on the display, potentially leading to the signing of an unseen transaction. The vulnerability was independently discovered by multiple parties. On August 22, 2026, researcher TestMachine disclosed it after detection by the Azimuth scanning tool. Later, on August 27, OneKey's founder Yishi Wang announced his team had successfully replicated the attack in a lab environment on app version 1.22.1. Ledger's security team, Donjon, responded that no real-world exploits or user losses occurred. They stated the flaw was internally identified and patched in Ethereum app version 1.22.2, released on August 13, 2026—prior to the public disclosures. An update to the underlying Ledger Secure SDK (v26.6.1) followed on August 21. Official security bulletin LSB 023, published August 27, details the vulnerability as residing in the SDK's I/O handling. While there is minor public discrepancy over whether version 1.22.2 or 1.22.3 fully resolved the issue, all parties strongly urge users to update their Ethereum application to the latest version via Ledger Live. The incident highlights a critical security principle: the safety of a hardware wallet depends on the entire chain of components—firmware, SDK, and applications—with a flaw in any link compromising the overall system.

cryptonews.ruHá 7m

Transaction Substitution Vulnerability Discovered in Ledger's Ethereum Application

cryptonews.ruHá 7m

Trading

Spot
活动图片