Bitcoin Treasury Companies That Promised Never to Sell Are Now Selling. Why?

marsbitPublicado em 2026-05-08Última atualização em 2026-05-08

Resumo

The narrative of "never selling" Bitcoin treasuries is unraveling as major holders pivot to using BTC as a liquidity tool. MicroStrategy has formally integrated selling Bitcoin into its financial framework, stating it will sell when beneficial—for instance, to pay dividends if its mNAV ratio falls below 1.22x. CEO Michael Saylor outlined a model where selling BTC is preferable to equity issuance under certain conditions, based on quantified thresholds like a 2.3% annual Bitcoin appreciation break-even. Similarly, Marathon Digital (MARA) sold 15,133 BTC to repay convertible debt, framing it as "balance sheet optimization." Sequans Communications has sold Bitcoin for two consecutive quarters to service maturing convertible bonds, using its BTC holdings as collateral and operational liquidity amidst revenue declines. The shift redefines these companies from pure "belief-based reserves" to leveraged treasuries where capital management decisions—driven by debt obligations, financing costs, and shareholder returns—can override holding dogma. The future path hinges on Bitcoin's price: a bull market above $112,000 would ease financing pressure and absorb tactical sales, while a drop toward $50,000–$58,000 could force more defensive selling to meet liabilities, potentially creating a downward spiral of selling pressure and price declines. Investors must now price in debt maturities, collateral calls, and specific financial triggers alongside Bitcoin exposure.

Author: Gino Matos, CryptoSlate

Compiled by: TechFlow

TechFlow Introduction: Strategy has publicly stated it may sell Bitcoin to pay dividends, MARA sold 15,000 BTC to repay debt, and Sequans used Bitcoin to pay off convertible bonds for two consecutive quarters. The "never sell" narrative of Bitcoin treasuries is collapsing, as these companies transform Bitcoin from a "belief reserve" into a "liquidity tool." When falling prices trigger more selling, and selling further depresses prices, a spiral begins.

Saylor Softens His Stance: Selling Can Be More Cost-Effective Than Issuing Shares

During Strategy's earnings call on May 5, CEO Phong Le stated directly: "We will sell Bitcoin when it is beneficial for the company." Saylor added: Strategy might sell some Bitcoin to pay dividends, "to let the market get used to this idea."

As of May 3, Strategy holds 818,334 BTC, a 22% increase year-to-date, with a market value of $64.14 billion.

This call officially established one thing: BTC selling behavior has been formally incorporated into the company's financial toolkit, backed by a quantitative framework.

Management drew a line—when the mNAV (market cap/net asset value) falls below 1.22 times, selling Bitcoin to pay dividends enhances per-share value more than issuing common stock. According to Saylor's calculation: as long as Bitcoin's annualized appreciation exceeds 2.3%, Strategy's existing Bitcoin reserves can pay dividends "forever"; even if Bitcoin appreciation is zero, the reserves are sufficient for 43 years.

Caption: Illustration of Strategy's 1.22x mNAV threshold—when mNAV falls below this line, selling Bitcoin for dividends is more beneficial to shareholders than issuing stock.

The slogan "never sell" has given way to a model: buy when it enhances value, issue shares when it enhances value, issue preferred shares when it enhances value, and sell Bitcoin when it enhances value. These companies are essentially leveraged treasuries + credit vehicles.

Investors who bought these stocks initially purchased a Bitcoin proxy built on scarcity and a promise of permanent holding. The 1.22x mNAV threshold and the 2.3% break-even appreciation rate represent a more honest version, and a more complex one.

When Bitcoin Becomes Working Capital

Sequans' Q1 report is more straightforward. Revenue fell 24.8% year-over-year to $6.1 million, with an operating loss of $50.5 million. The net realized loss from selling Bitcoin in Q1 was $11.7 million, with proceeds mainly used to repay convertible bonds and repurchase ADS.

As of March 31, Sequans held 1,514 BTC, of which 1,217 BTC served as collateral for $66.2 million in convertible bonds. By April 30, holdings decreased to 1,114 BTC, with 817 BTC securing $35.9 million in debt (due June 1).

This mirrors the operation from November 2025—when Sequans sold 970 BTC, redeeming 50% of its convertible bonds, reducing debt from $189 million to $94.5 million.

For two consecutive quarters, the same pattern: declining revenue, maturing debt, Bitcoin becoming operational working capital. The BTC used as collateral was locked into debt obligations long before any active selling decision.

Sequans is not in the same league as Strategy—its underlying business is weaker, and its treasury position is more fragile. When Bitcoin must be used to repay debt, the logic of "inventory management" takes over.

MARA did the same in March, on a larger scale—selling 15,133 BTC, cashing out approximately $1.1 billion to repurchase convertible notes, slashing 30% of its convertible bond balance at once, and locking in a spread gain of about $88.1 million.

MARA framed this move as "balance sheet optimization," driven by debt structure and financing conditions. This establishes a precedent: BTC selling can be a capital allocation decision independent of Bitcoin belief. The real question is—under what conditions is selling the highest-return choice?

The Bull-Bear Fork: Financing Conditions Determine Everything

If Bitcoin rebounds to Citi's 12-month base case target of $112,000 or the bull case target of $165,000, the equity premium of treasury companies will expand, the window for share issuance will reopen, and large new purchases will be sufficient to absorb tactical BTC sales.

Strategy's 1.22x mNAV threshold would become a technical detail. Companies like Sequans, facing debt pressure during Bitcoin's weak periods, could also resolve their debt issues and enter the next cycle with unrestricted BTC.

If Bitcoin falls toward Citi's adverse scenario of $58,000 (Standard Chartered has hinted at a further drop to $50,000), companies trading near or below NAV will lose the value-enhancing effect of issuing shares.

In such a scenario, dividend obligations on preferred shares accumulate, and BTC selling transitions from capital management to balance sheet defense. Sequans' model could spread to all treasury companies with "thin-margin operations + BTC-collateralized borrowing"—selling Bitcoin to repay debt, shrinking collateral, and reducing free float becoming the only option.

At that point, corporate Bitcoin buying becomes a vicious cycle: falling prices trigger more selling, and more selling depresses prices.

Caption: Two paths for Bitcoin treasury companies—under a bear market scenario ($50,000-$58,000), they face balance sheet pressure; under a bull market scenario (above $112,000), financing pressure eases.

The corporate Bitcoin treasury trade was built on the promise of "permanent holding," which led investors to price these companies as Bitcoin proxies. Once selling becomes an openly acknowledged tool in the model, investors must factor debt maturities, collateral requirements, dividend obligations, and the mNAV level at which management would choose to sell Bitcoin rather than issue shares into their pricing.

Saylor's 2.3% annualized break-even and 1.22x mNAV threshold are more honest. In the next phase of the Bitcoin treasury trade, the weight of financing conditions will not be lower than that of Bitcoin belief.

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhy are Bitcoin treasury companies like Strategy and MARA starting to sell their BTC holdings after previously promoting a 'never sell' narrative?

AThese companies are shifting their strategy from viewing Bitcoin solely as a 'faith-based reserve' to a 'liquidity tool.' The change is driven by financial models and practical needs. For instance, Strategy has established a quantitative framework, stating that selling BTC for dividends becomes more beneficial to shareholders when its mNAV (market cap to net asset value) falls below a 1.22x threshold. Meanwhile, companies like MARA and Sequans have sold BTC to repay convertible debt, viewing it as a strategic move for capital allocation and 'balance sheet optimization' rather than a departure from belief.

QWhat is the '1.22x mNAV threshold' mentioned in the article for Strategy, and what does it signify?

AThe 1.22x mNAV threshold is a financial model established by Strategy. It signifies the point at which the company deems it more value-accretive for shareholders to sell Bitcoin to pay dividends rather than issuing new common shares. When Strategy's market capitalization divided by its net asset value (predominantly the value of its BTC holdings) falls below this 1.22 multiple, the model suggests selling BTC is the superior financial tool for distributing value, officially incorporating BTC sales into its corporate financial toolkit.

QHow is Sequans Communications using its Bitcoin holdings differently from a company like Strategy?

ASequans is using its Bitcoin holdings primarily as a source of operational liquidity to service debt obligations, unlike Strategy's strategic model for shareholder returns. Faced with declining revenue, significant operating losses, and maturing convertible bonds, Sequans has been forced to sell BTC in consecutive quarters to repay these debts. A substantial portion of its BTC is also held as collateral for its loans, meaning sales are often driven by debt covenants and repayment needs rather than optional capital management, highlighting a more financially pressured and fragile treasury position.

QAccording to the article, what are the potential market scenarios for Bitcoin price and their impact on treasury companies?

AThe article outlines two divergent scenarios based on Bitcoin's price movement: 1) Bull Case (e.g., $112,000 or $165,000): Equity premiums for treasury companies would expand, reopening equity issuance windows. New, large BTC purchases could easily offset any tactical sales, and financial pressures (like Sequans's debt) would ease. 2) Bear Case (e.g., $50,000 - $58,000): Companies trading near or below NAV would lose the ability to issue accretive equity. BTC sales would transition from capital management to balance sheet defense, potentially creating a downward spiral where price declines trigger more forced selling, which further depresses the price.

QWhat key factor does the article suggest will become as important as 'Bitcoin belief' in the next phase of corporate Bitcoin treasury strategy?

AThe article suggests that 'funding conditions' will become a factor with weight equal to or greater than 'Bitcoin belief' in the next phase. Investors must now price in practical elements like debt maturity dates, collateral requirements, dividend obligations, and specific financial thresholds (like Strategy's mNAV model) that dictate when a company might sell BTC. The commitment has shifted from an ideological 'never sell' to a complex financial calculus where liquidity needs, debt management, and shareholder value optimization are paramount.

Leituras Relacionadas

After Tokenized U.S. Treasury Bonds, Tokenized Stocks Are Becoming the New Battleground for RWA

**Tokenized Stocks Emerge as the New RWA Battleground** Following the initial surge of tokenized U.S. Treasuries, the tokenized stock market is rapidly expanding in both scale and quality. Unlike the currently stagnating treasury tokenization market, tokenized stock offerings are seeing significant growth and attracting major players from traditional finance, fintech, crypto exchanges, and native Web3 platforms. The U.S. SEC has outlined a framework for tokenized securities, which applies to stocks: **Issuer-Sponsored Tokenized Securities** (direct tokenization by the issuer, inheriting all shareholder rights but with strict compliance, e.g., Securitize); **Custodial Tokenized Securities** (tokenization of custodied interests, e.g., DTCC, Ondo's recent IVV/MU tokens); **Linked Securities** (tokenized debt notes backed by the stock, offering price exposure and greater on-chain utility, e.g., Ondo, xStocks, Robinhood's new Stock Tokens); and **Security-Based Swaps** (tokenized derivatives contracts, e.g., Robinhood's earlier Classic Stock Tokens). Key platforms are pursuing different strategies: * **Securitize** leads with an issuer-sponsored model, ensuring full rights but limiting on-chain interactions via its compliance-enforcing DS Protocol. * **Ondo** and **xStocks** use the linked security structure for broad accessibility on CEXs and DeFi, though this fragments liquidity and excludes U.S. users. * **Robinhood** recently launched linked security-based Stock Tokens, leveraging its user base and new Robinhood Chain. * Traditional infrastructure giants like **DTCC**, the **NYSE**, and **Nasdaq** are actively developing pilots and platforms for tokenized settlement and trading. * **Coinbase** has announced plans for tokenized stocks, likely using a structure that offers on-chain utility while excluding U.S. customers. Despite different approaches, all players are converging on tokenized stocks as the next major catalyst for the RWA sector. The evolving regulatory landscape and market adoption will shape this competitive new battlefield.

marsbitHá 12m

After Tokenized U.S. Treasury Bonds, Tokenized Stocks Are Becoming the New Battleground for RWA

marsbitHá 12m

Nvidia Faces Collective Selling by Funds: What Are Private Equity Firms Sniffing Out?

Several prominent Chinese private equity funds, including Gaoyi Asset and Dantoo's Orient Harbor, made significant portfolio adjustments in Q2 2024, as revealed in their latest SEC 13F filings. The most notable move was a collective retreat from AI chip leader NVIDIA, with Gaoyi reducing its stake by over 70%, Jilin Asset selling out completely, and Orient Harbor trimming its holdings. This shift does not signal a loss of faith in the AI trend, but rather a change in investment focus from "expectation-driven" to "realization-driven" valuation. Capital is flowing from crowded, high-valuation names towards segments with clearer profitability visibility and better risk-reward profiles. The funds' new major conviction is Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC), which Gaoyi built into its top holding. The thesis centers on TSMC's role as a critical bottleneck in the AI supply chain due to its dominance in advanced semiconductor manufacturing and, crucially, advanced CoWoS packaging capacity. As demand for AI chips explodes, TSMC's "must-pass" foundry services grant it significant pricing power, suggesting a potential migration of profits from chip designers to manufacturers. Simultaneously, both Gaoyi and Orient Harbor substantially increased positions in memory chip companies like Micron and SanDisk. The investment logic here is twofold: a cyclical recovery in the memory market combined with a new, structural growth driver from AI. High Bandwidth Memory (HBM), essential for AI processor performance, is supply-constrained and its production diverts capacity from standard DRAM and NAND, creating a broad-based pricing tailwind for the memory sector. The collective reduction in NVIDIA reflects a view that its massive prior gains have compressed its future upside potential ("lowered赔率"). The market now demands flawless execution and faces new risks like rising costs from TSMC and HBM suppliers, as well as competition from cloud companies' custom chips. The funds' reallocation highlights a broader thematic: as the AI boom matures, investment opportunities and excess profits are shifting along the supply chain—from design to the physical constraints of manufacturing and memory. The next phase of AI investing may be defined by pricing power derived from tangible bottlenecks like advanced packaging and HBM capacity.

marsbitHá 44m

Nvidia Faces Collective Selling by Funds: What Are Private Equity Firms Sniffing Out?

marsbitHá 44m

Reverse Turing Test: This 'Pure Handcrafted Large Model' Is Driving Netizens Crazy

An art project called ChatTJB, humorously billed as a "next-generation, single-operator Large Language Experience" (LLE), gained viral attention in San Francisco. Promoted via a billboard, its website mimicked a genuine AI service with a chat interface, documentation, and even a "Pro" subscription. The twist? It was entirely manual. A single person, named Tucker, personally read, thought about, and typed replies to thousands of user queries using his thumbs, even hand-drawing images. He coined terms like "human-powered reasoning layer" to describe this process, highlighting its inherent human limitations: speed depended on his alertness, capacity was strictly one conversation at a time, and errors were traceable to a specific individual. The project's popularity overwhelmed Tucker, forcing a pause on new users and leading to plans for a community version with volunteer "AIs" (Average Individuals). While initially a source of amusement, Tucker noted that some users began sharing genuine personal concerns, valuing the knowledge that a real person was attentively listening and responding. The project satirizes AI hype while underscoring the irreplaceable value of human connection and attention in an age of automated, scalable interactions. A similar platform, "Your AI Slop Bores Me," was mentioned, where users either submit requests or role-play as the "AI" to fulfill others' text or drawing prompts, further emphasizing the human element behind the interface. The core message: sometimes, knowing there's a real person on the other end is what truly matters.

marsbitHá 48m

Reverse Turing Test: This 'Pure Handcrafted Large Model' Is Driving Netizens Crazy

marsbitHá 48m

Overnight, GPT-5.6 Sol Was Accelerated 14x by OpenAI

OpenAI, in collaboration with chipmaker Cerebras, has unveiled a limited preview of an "Ultrafast Mode" for its flagship GPT-5.6 Sol model. This new service tier reportedly achieves output speeds of up to 750 tokens per second—a 14x increase over the standard mode's baseline of ~53 tokens/s—without any loss in quality. Key to this acceleration is Cerebras's wafer-scale architecture (WSE-3), which houses model parameters entirely in on-chip SRAM to eliminate the memory bandwidth bottlenecks typical of traditional GPU clusters. In benchmark testing on the challenging "Humanity's Last Exam" (HLE), GPT-5.6 Sol in Ultrafast Mode answered all 2500 questions in 11 hours and 11 minutes, compared to over 78 hours for a competitor model, while maintaining similar accuracy. The speed boost also translated to a 5.6x faster end-to-end performance on the GDP-Val benchmark for economically valuable knowledge work. OpenAI highlights several potential applications for such rapid inference, including real-time event response and reliability analysis, dynamic financial research and security, complex customer support, interactive shopping assistance, and accelerated research and experimentation workflows that enable multiple iterative cycles within a single workday. This advancement may allow users to deploy the highest-tier models for tasks previously requiring slower secondary models, significantly compressing multi-step agent workflows from hours to minutes.

marsbitHá 51m

Overnight, GPT-5.6 Sol Was Accelerated 14x by OpenAI

marsbitHá 51m

Just Now, DeepSeek Harness Shocks the Open Source World: Everything as a Plugin

DeepSeek Harness, an open-source AI agent framework, has been released. Built on a "everything is a plugin" architecture using Cordis, it provides a modular SDK for constructing, running, and extending agents. The framework separates capabilities—like file systems, shells, web access, and sub-agents—into independent, swappable packages, assembled via a configuration file (`cordis.yml`). This allows creation of diverse agent types, from web UIs to headless automation. Key features include a structured Agent Loop for managing model requests and tool execution with concurrency and safety controls, and an authoritative Session Log that records all events to ensure state can be perfectly reconstructed. It offers multiple interaction modes (Web UI, TUI, Headless) and four preset agent configurations (Standard, PTC, Minimalist, Creative), with the Creative mode allowing agents limited self-modification. Security is built-in with a default `workspace-write` sandbox and an "ask for approval" policy for privileged operations. The framework demonstrates DeepSeek's aim to provide not just another coding assistant, but a foundational, auditable, and extensible system for deploying AI agents into real-world environments, complementing their model ecosystem with robust engineering infrastructure.

marsbitHá 57m

Just Now, DeepSeek Harness Shocks the Open Source World: Everything as a Plugin

marsbitHá 57m

Trading

Spot
活动图片

Categorias popularesright-arrow

Etiquetas Popularesright-arrow