BIT Research: Five Signals Flash Simultaneously, Has the Bitcoin Bear Market Ended?

marsbitPublicado em 2026-04-17Última atualização em 2026-04-17

Resumo

According to a BIT research report, multiple independent technical indicators are signaling that the Bitcoin bear market, which began in October 2025, may be nearing its end or has already concluded. Unlike the prolonged 2022 bear market, the current cycle shows structural changes due to the introduction of spot Bitcoin ETFs and reduced regulatory uncertainty, limiting excessive downside volatility. Key technical signals include: the weekly stochastic oscillator rising above 20 (historically a bottoming signal), price approaching the critical 21-week moving average (~$77,592), and the monthly RSI potentially moving above its average. Additionally, Bitcoin is testing the key resistance zone of $66,000–$73,000. A decisive break above $73,084 (the March 2024 high) would confirm a trend reversal. The convergence of these five signals—rather than any single indicator—increases confidence that the market is transitioning from a downtrend to a bottoming phase. The focus now shifts to whether price can sustain a breakout, potentially targeting $88,000 or higher, with $64,972 acting as crucial support. The report emphasizes that while trends are improving, investors should remain cautious and consult professionals, as digital asset trading carries significant risk.

The market is currently at a critical turning point. Multiple independent technical indicators are gradually pointing to the same conclusion: the Bitcoin bear market that began in October 2025 may be nearing its end, or may have already concluded. Unlike the prolonged and repeatedly bottom-testing bear market of 2022, this cycle has seen significant changes in market structure. The launch of spot Bitcoin ETFs and the phased alleviation of regulatory uncertainty have created an environment lacking "excessive passive sell-offs" during the price decline. Furthermore, historical experience shows that Bitcoin rarely enters a one-way rally without undergoing consolidation; the current phase is more likely a "consolidation stage following bottom confirmation."

In this context, the reference value of a single indicator is limited. However, when multiple signals begin to appear simultaneously, the conclusion they point to is becoming clearer: the market is gradually transitioning from a downward trend to a phase of confirming a turning point.

Technical Signals Converge: From Bottoming Patterns to Trend Recovery

From a technical structure perspective, the most critical change in this market is the "signal resonance." Firstly, the weekly Stochastic oscillator has moved back above 20. This pattern typically appears after the worst phase of the market and has historically corresponded more often with bottom formation rather than a continuation of the decline. Simultaneously, a new trend signal has appeared again. Having triggered twice before without fulfillment, its reference value is now significantly enhanced.

Secondly, the Bitcoin price is gradually approaching the 21-week moving average (approximately $77,592), a level long regarded as a key reference line distinguishing bull and bear cycles. The current price is oscillating around $75,000, and a reclaim of this level seems more a matter of time. A decisive break and hold above it would constitute a clear trend confirmation signal.

Additionally, the monthly RSI also shows potential to move back above its average. Historically, this signal has often appeared near bear market bottom areas. If it materializes again in this cycle, it would further strengthen the judgment that the market has completed its bottom building. Overall, while these indicators hold limited meaning when appearing alone, their concentrated emergence within the same time window suggests the market state has shifted from "continuation of the downtrend" to "gradual establishment of a bottom structure."

Key Price Range Confirmation: From Consolidation to Preparation for Upside

Beyond technical indicators, the price itself remains the core validation variable. The market is currently testing the key range of $66,000–$73,000. The high of approximately $73,084 reached in March 2024 has formed a medium-term top structure. If the price can effectively break out and stabilize above this range, it would mean the previous downtrend has been substantially reversed.

Structurally, the current price action shares some similarities with that of a year ago: the market experienced a rapid decline due to external shocks, followed by narrow-range consolidation, ultimately completing the trend shift through an upward breakout. The price has now begun testing the upper bound of the range. If this rhythm continues, a near-term probe towards $88,000 or even higher would not be considered aggressive. Meanwhile, the level of $64,972 below has become an important support level for the current phase. As long as the price holds above this level, the overall trend will gradually shift from neutral to bullish. Therefore, rather than judging whether the market has "already entered a bull market," the more critical question is: can the price complete the range breakout, thereby confirming the trend switch?

Currently, five signals are gradually pointing in the same direction: the weekly Stochastic strengthening, the trend signal reappearing, the price approaching the 21-week MA, the potential confirmation of the monthly RSI, and the effective break of the previous downtrend. A single signal is still insufficient for a definitive conclusion, but when these signals appear concentrated in the same phase, the credibility of the conclusion they point to increases significantly. Overall, the bear market that began in October 2025 may be nearing its end.

For the market, the focus is also shifting: the question is no longer whether Bitcoin will continue to recover, but rather, once the trend truly switches, how the speed and extent of the upside will unfold. In this process, the breakout of price ranges and changes in the liquidity environment will become the most critical variables to observe in the next phase.

Some of the views above are from BIT on Target. Contact us to get the full BIT on Target report.

Disclaimer: The market carries risks, and investment requires caution. This article does not constitute investment advice. Trading digital assets can be extremely risky and volatile. Investment decisions should be made after careful consideration of personal circumstances and consultation with financial professionals. BIT is not responsible for any investment decisions based on the information provided in this content.

Perguntas relacionadas

QAccording to the article, what are the five key signals suggesting that the Bitcoin bear market may have ended?

AThe five key signals are: 1) The weekly stochastic indicator has moved back above 20. 2) A new trend signal has been triggered. 3) The price is approaching the 21-week moving average (~$77,592). 4) The monthly RSI has the potential to move back above its average. 5) The previous downtrend has been effectively broken.

QWhat is the critical price range that the market is currently testing, as mentioned in the analysis?

AThe market is currently testing the critical price range of $66,000 to $73,000. The high of approximately $73,084 from March 2024 is identified as a mid-term top structure.

QHow does the article describe the difference between the current bear market and the one in 2022?

AThe article states that unlike the long and repeatedly bottom-testing bear market of 2022, the current cycle has seen significant changes in market structure. The launch of spot Bitcoin ETFs and a phase of reduced regulatory uncertainty have created an environment that lacks 'passive excessive selling pressure' during price declines.

QWhat is identified as the important support level for the current phase of the market?

AThe price of $64,972 is identified as an important support level for the current stage. As long as the price remains above this level, the overall trend is expected to shift from neutral to bullish.

QWhat does the article suggest is the market's current state, rather than being in a full bull market?

AThe article suggests that the market is more likely in a 'consolidation phase after bottom confirmation' rather than having directly entered a one-way rally. The key question is not if the repair continues, but whether the price can achieve a range breakout to confirm a true trend switch.

Leituras Relacionadas

From 'Old Dogs' to 'New Darlings': How AI is Revaluing Old Infrastructure, from Dell to Nokia

"Old Dogs" Become AI's New Darlings: Revaluing Legacy Infrastructure The AI investment narrative is shifting. Beyond the spotlight on core chipmakers like Nvidia, a new wave of interest is rising for legacy tech companies—Dell, HPE, Nokia, Cisco, Corning, Western Digital—once labeled as slow-growth, outdated stories. This resurgence stems from AI's evolution from model development to real-world deployment, creating massive demand for physical infrastructure. As AI moves into data center construction and enterprise adoption, the focus turns to who can actually build and deliver complex systems. These established players hold decades of experience in supply chains, integration, networking, and enterprise delivery—assets now critical for scaling AI. The revaluation can be grouped into three key infrastructure areas: 1. **Servers & Integration (e.g., Dell, HPE):** They are becoming essential system integrators, transforming GPUs into full-scale AI servers with networking, power, and cooling, then delivering them to clients. Strong recent earnings and AI-specific revenue/order growth for Dell and HPE underscore this shift. 2. **Networking & Connectivity (e.g., Corning, Nokia, Cisco):** As AI clusters grow, high-speed data transfer becomes paramount. Corning benefits from fiber demand for data center links, Nokia is exploring AI-integrated wireless networks (AI-RAN), and Cisco sees surging orders for data center switches—all critical for efficient AI operations. 3. **Storage (e.g., Western Digital, Seagate):** The AI data explosion requires vast capacity. Beyond high-speed memory (HBM), there's growing need for high-capacity HDDs to store training data, logs, video, and cold/archival data cost-effectively. This revaluation, however, is not a blanket endorsement. True reassessment requires concrete proof: AI-driven orders and revenue growth, upward revisions to company guidance, and sustainable improvements in profit quality, not just top-line sales. In essence, AI is not turning all old tech firms into high-growth stocks; it is selectively re-pricing the "old assets" of companies that are mission-critical for building the new AI infrastructure, transforming their legacy capabilities into renewed growth engines.

marsbitHá 7m

From 'Old Dogs' to 'New Darlings': How AI is Revaluing Old Infrastructure, from Dell to Nokia

marsbitHá 7m

The Bitcoin Roadmap To $500,000: Analyst Shows How Price Will Get There

An analyst projects Bitcoin could reach $500,000 based on technical chart analysis, mapping out a multi-phase roadmap within a long-term ascending channel. The analyst, Crypto Tice, states Bitcoin has completed the first phase ("First touch") of the pattern and is entering a second phase that could trigger its strongest rally yet, potentially driving a more than 693% increase from current levels above $63,000. This would be followed by a final pullback. This outlook comes as Bitcoin faces significant selling pressure, having fallen 17% over three days to around $61,300, erasing roughly $250 billion in market cap. The downturn has also impacted other major cryptocurrencies like Ethereum. Despite the crypto market decline, U.S. equities remain near highs, creating a notable divergence that some suggest could indicate market manipulation or crypto front-running a potential stock market correction.

bitcoinistHá 18m

The Bitcoin Roadmap To $500,000: Analyst Shows How Price Will Get There

bitcoinistHá 18m

Expected $1 Billion Crypto Windfall Shrinks To Fraction In Israel Disclosure Program

Israel's voluntary crypto disclosure program has seen a much weaker response than expected, with only 58 individuals coming forward. Tax authorities had projected up to $1 billion in revenue from the initiative, but early reports indicate declared crypto capital totals only about $50 million. The program offered immunity from criminal charges for correcting past reporting errors, but its lack of an anonymous option reportedly deterred many holders who feared putting their names on record. With an estimated $1 billion in digital assets held by Israeli residents, the disclosures so far represent only a small fraction of the market. The filing window, which has specific conditions and runs until August 2026, remains open.

bitcoinistHá 31m

Expected $1 Billion Crypto Windfall Shrinks To Fraction In Israel Disclosure Program

bitcoinistHá 31m

Breaking News! Anthropic Calls for a Universal Pause in AI Research

Anthropic warns of AI self-evolution, reporting that over 80% of its internal code is now written by its AI, Claude. Productivity has surged, with engineers merging 8x more code than in 2024. Claude's performance on complex, open-ended tasks jumped from 26% to 76% success in six months, nearing human parity. The company introduces a new metric: "AI task duration." In 2024, AI handled 4-minute tasks; by 2026, it manages 16-hour tasks, with capability doubling every 4 months. Claude also reviews code, catching bugs that previously caused outages, and significantly outperforms humans in research tasks like optimizing code (52x speedup) and conducting AI safety experiments. Anthropic outlines three potential futures: 1) Progress plateaus, 2) AI accelerates but humans remain in control, or 3) AI achieves full recursive self-improvement (RSI), designing its own successors. This final path could revolutionize fields like medicine but also risks catastrophic alignment failure if control is lost. The call echoes similar concerns from OpenAI. Anthropic proposes a coordinated pause on AI development—if a verifiable mechanism to ensure all labs comply can be established.

marsbitHá 35m

Breaking News! Anthropic Calls for a Universal Pause in AI Research

marsbitHá 35m

Probability in the Price: How World Cup Odds Are Calculated

**The Probability in the Price: How World Cup Odds Are Calculated** Two major systems released their "championship probabilities" before the 2026 World Cup, and they disagreed on the favorite. Prediction market aggregators listed France at around **17%**, while the Opta supercomputer gave European champion Spain **16.1%**. These numbers look similar, but their production methods are fundamentally different. The market's **17%** is the **price** that clears after hundreds of millions of dollars in trading across platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi, where contracts trade between 0 and 100 cents, directly representing implied probability. This liquidity is provided by crypto-native market makers like Wintermute, though the market still has "the liquidity profile of an early-stage" asset class. In contrast, Opta's **16.1%** is a **simulated frequency**. Its model uses team data (including betting market odds as an input) to estimate match probabilities, then runs **10,000 full tournament simulations**, counting how often each team wins. Which is more accurate? There is **no rigorous, cross-tournament academic study** directly comparing their track records. However, a persistent **longshot bias**—where low-probability outcomes are systematically overvalued—observed in traditional betting for nearly a century, has also been found in modern crypto prediction markets. Research shows low-price contracts on Kalshi/Polymer less likely to pay out than their implied odds suggest. Unlike traditional bookmakers, prediction markets operate on **public blockchain ledgers**, making every transaction auditable and enabling such research. However, price formation is also influenced by **regulatory uncertainty**, as seen in recent US state-level bans and legal battles over jurisdiction. In summary, the "probability" you see is either a **market-clearing price** subject to behavioral biases and liquidity constraints, or a **model-simulated frequency** that partially incorporates market data. The question of which method is more reliable remains open, highlighting the importance of asking: **How was this number produced?**

marsbitHá 36m

Trading

Spot

Futuros