Bills on Cryptocurrency Market Regulation to Be Submitted to the State Duma Within Six Months

RBK-cryptoPublicado em 2025-12-30Última atualização em 2025-12-30

Resumo

Russian Finance Minister Anton Siluanov announced that cryptocurrency market regulation bills will be submitted to the State Duma in the first half of 2026. The Ministry of Finance supports allowing non-qualified investors to access the crypto market through Russian platforms, but with investment limits. The Central Bank's published concept permits such investors to purchase the "most liquid" cryptocurrencies after passing a test, with an annual limit of 300,000 rubles per intermediary. Siluanov emphasized the need for clear legislation to define permissible activities and participants, as crypto transactions are occurring without regulation. The Central Bank's proposals are under government review, and it plans to introduce penalties for illegal crypto intermediary activities starting July 1, 2027, similar to those for illegal banking. Access to the digital financial assets (DFA) market will also be simplified starting in 2026.

Finance Minister Anton Siluanov stated in an interview with "Russia 24" that bills regulating the cryptocurrency market will be submitted to the State Duma in the first half of 2026. According to him, the Ministry of Finance supports allowing non-qualified investors access to the cryptocurrency market through Russian platforms, but with limitations on the volume of such investments.

On December 23, the Bank of Russia published a concept for regulating the cryptocurrency and digital asset market, which, among other things, allowed "non-qualified" investors to purchase "the most liquid" cryptocurrencies, but only after passing a test and within a limit—no more than 300,000 rubles per year through a single intermediary.

Siluanov explained that transactions in cryptocurrencies are taking place, but there is no regulation, so this topic requires legislative definition: "what is allowed, what is not, and who can participate." All of this is defined in the legislative acts jointly prepared by the Ministry of Finance and the Central Bank, the minister added.

"I am confident that we will be able to submit these draft decisions to the State Duma in the first half of next year and will ask lawmakers to consider these draft legislative acts," said Siluanov.

The Central Bank's proposals on crypto regulation have already been submitted to the government for consideration. The regulator also plans to introduce liability for illegal activities of intermediaries in the cryptocurrency market, similar to liability for illegal banking activities, starting from July 1, 2027.

Access to the market of digital financial assets (DFAs) will also be simplified. Starting from 2026, the classification of DFAs available to qualified and non-qualified investors will change.

The Central Bank Decides to Make Budget Payments in Digital Rubles Without Commission for Everyone

How Cryptocurrency Mining in Russia Has Changed. Results of 2025

Recognition, Rise and Fall of Bitcoin. Top Events of the Cryptocurrency Market in 2025

Leituras Relacionadas

AI "Transfer Station" Earning Millions Monthly? Five Questions Uncover the Truth of Token Arbitrage

The article "AI 'Transfer Station' Earns Millions Monthly? Five Questions Uncover the Truth of Token Arbitrage" explores the emerging business of API token transfer stations, which profit from global AI service price disparities and access barriers. These intermediaries purchase low-cost tokens from overseas AI providers (e.g., OpenAI, Claude) through grey-market methods—such as exploiting enterprise credits, bulk accounts, or subscription benefits—and resell them to Chinese users at a markup. Key drivers include the high cost of using top AI models (e.g., Claude Code costs ~$5 per million tokens), the performance gap between domestic and foreign models, and mismatches between subscription and API pricing. However, the practice carries significant risks: upstream token sources may be unstable or illegal; user data passing through intermediaries can be harvested or injected with hidden prompts; and models might be downgraded without disclosure. The market is evolving, with some operators now exporting cheaper Chinese models (e.g., Qwen3.5 at ~$0.11 per million tokens) to overseas users, leveraging price gaps. Yet, sustainability is low due to compliance crackdowns, instability, and reputational risks. Users are advised to employ detection methods (e.g., prompt adherence tests) and avoid sensitive data usage. The authors caution that while transfer stations offer short-term arbitrage, they lack long-term reliability and security compared to official APIs.

marsbitHá 30m

AI "Transfer Station" Earning Millions Monthly? Five Questions Uncover the Truth of Token Arbitrage

marsbitHá 30m

The Cost of an 11.5% Annualized Return: Will MicroStrategy's STRC Face a Moment of Reckoning?

This article analyzes the potential risks associated with MicroStrategy's (MSTR) use of structured financial products like STRC to leverage its BTC exposure. While these tools have enabled impressive returns (e.g., 11.5% annualized) and fueled significant capital inflows ($13.5B outstanding), they also create substantial annual dividend obligations (~$400M). The author argues that this structure, while effective in a bull market, could become a liability if BTC price stagnates or declines. The core risk is a potential negative feedback loop: the growing dividend burden from continued STRC issuance may eventually outweigh the benefits of increased BTC holdings. To meet these obligations, MicroStrategy might need to use new issuance proceeds for dividends instead of buying more BTC, which could disappoint equity investors. If the market capitalization (mNAV) falls below the value of its BTC holdings, the company could be forced to sell BTC instead of issuing new shares, potentially triggering a panic. The author estimates a potential inflection point in 6 months, where annual dividend costs reach $3-4B. At that stage, CEO Michael Saylor might face a difficult choice: sell BTC to meet obligations or sacrifice the credibility of the preferred shares by halting dividends. The article concludes that this financial engineering, while powerful, could ultimately "backfire" on MicroStrategy if market conditions turn.

marsbitHá 1h

The Cost of an 11.5% Annualized Return: Will MicroStrategy's STRC Face a Moment of Reckoning?

marsbitHá 1h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片