Betting on Tesla and SpaceX Merger? Cathie Wood's Space ETF Buys Tesla for the First Time

marsbitPublicado em 2026-02-09Última atualização em 2026-02-09

Resumo

Cathie Wood's Ark Invest has made a significant move by adding Tesla to its Ark Space & Defense Innovation ETF (ARKX) for the first time, purchasing 35,766 shares. This decision has sparked market speculation that Wood may be positioning for a potential merger between Tesla and Elon Musk’s SpaceX-xAI combined entity. The timing is notable, as reports suggest SpaceX and xAI have recently merged, fueling discussions about further integration with Tesla. While the investment could be a strategic bet on such a consolidation, it may also reflect Tesla’s growing focus on robotics—specifically its Optimus project—which aligns with ARKX’s theme of adaptive robotics and space exploration. Tesla is already a top holding across several other Ark ETFs. Additionally, Ark’s Venture Fund holds significant stakes in SpaceX and xAI. Market analysts, including Chamath Palihapitiya and Wedbush’s Dan Ives, have suggested that a reverse merger of SpaceX into Tesla is a growing possibility, though it would face regulatory and shareholder approval hurdles. With SpaceX remaining private and publicly accessible investment avenues limited, Ark’s move offers investors indirect exposure to Musk’s broader commercial ambitions, including potential future IPO activity.

Author: Ye Huiwen, Wall Street News

Renowned investor Cathie Wood ("Wood Sister")'s space exploration-themed ETF has initiated a position in Tesla for the first time, sparking market speculation that she is betting on a potential major restructuring within Musk's business empire.

According to Benzinga, the Ark Space & Defense Innovation ETF (ARKX) purchased 35,766 shares of Tesla stock on Wednesday, February 4th. Prior to this transaction, the fund held no Tesla shares. As of Thursday, this holding accounted for 1.99% of the ETF's total assets.

Although Wood's Ark Invest has long held significant Tesla positions through its other innovation-focused funds, this marks the first time it has been included in the space and defense-themed portfolio. This asset allocation adjustment comes at a sensitive time: recent reports indicate that SpaceX and xAI have completed a merger, and market discussions are heating up about Musk potentially seeking to further integrate this combined entity with Tesla.

This rare buying activity has not only drawn investor attention to the lack of public avenues for investing in SpaceX but has also sparked associations with potential capital operations. A merger between Tesla and the SpaceX/xAI entity would involve complex regulatory scrutiny and shareholder approval processes, and Ark Invest's move might be intended to position itself early.

Investment Logic: Betting on Merger or Positioning for Robotics

Regarding the motivation behind ARKX's new position, the market offers two main interpretations. First, Ark Invest might be building a stake in preparation for a potential future shareholder vote on whether Tesla merges with SpaceX/xAI. This purchase is seen by some observers as a direct bet on the integration of Musk's business empire.

Secondly, this investment decision could also be based on fundamental logic. The ETF lists "adaptive robotics" as one of its core investment themes. Given Tesla's significant development efforts on the Optimus robot and its commitment to using robotics technology to help build a "planetary civilization," this aligns with the macro vision of the space exploration fund. Therefore, even as an electric vehicle manufacturer, Tesla's potential in the robotics field provides justification for its entry into the space ETF.

Holdings Landscape: Ark's Broad Exposure to Musk-Linked Companies

This purchase further solidifies Ark Invest's position as a staunch supporter of Musk-linked companies. Tesla holds a core position in several other ETFs under Ark Invest. Specifically, Tesla is the top holding in the Ark Innovation ETF (ARKK), the Ark Next Generation Internet ETF (ARKW), and the Ark Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ), with weightings of approximately 10.99%, 10.39%, and 9.93% respectively.

Furthermore, the Ark Venture Fund, which invests in both private and public companies, also holds stakes in Musk-related companies. Data as of January 31st shows SpaceX is the fund's largest holding at 11.23%; xAI is the second largest at 6.31%; and Tesla ranks thirtieth at 1.05%. These figures do not yet reflect the latest changes following the SpaceX and xAI merger.

Market Views: Rising Integration Expectations

Wall Street analysts are paying close attention to the possibility of Musk integrating his business empire. Investor Chamath Palihapitiya has publicly stated that he believes Musk will ultimately complete a "reverse merger," integrating SpaceX into Tesla, calling this his "contrarian prediction" for 2026.

Wedbush analyst Dan Ives recently also noted that the "opportunity is increasing" for Tesla to attempt a merger with the newly formed SpaceX/xAI entity. Ives believes this growing AI ecosystem will focus on both "space and earth," and that Musk not only has the motivation to consolidate forces, but that such integration is also logical. However, any such merger would require not only approval from Tesla shareholders but also must pass strict scrutiny from regulatory authorities.

SpaceX's Capital Path and Investment Scarcity

Currently, SpaceX remains one of the world's largest private companies, with extremely limited avenues for ordinary investors to participate. Besides funds under Ark Invest, investors currently gain indirect exposure to SpaceX mainly by holding shares of listed companies like Bank of America, Alphabet, and EchoStar.

Regarding SpaceX's IPO prospects, Musk has previously seemed to confirm plans but has not formally filed documents. Market speculation suggests that a potential IPO could occur as early as June 2026. Against this backdrop, Ark Invest's direct purchase of Tesla through its space ETF, whether based on optimism about robotics technology or expectations of a future merger, provides a new signal for investors seeking exposure to related assets.

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhy did Cathie Wood's ARK Space & Defense Innovation ETF (ARKX) buy Tesla stock for the first time?

AThe purchase could be a strategic move anticipating a potential merger between Tesla and the combined SpaceX/xAI entity, or it could be based on Tesla's fundamental value in robotics development, particularly its Optimus robot, which aligns with the ETF's focus on adaptive robotics and space exploration.

QWhat percentage of ARKX's total assets does the new Tesla position represent?

AThe Tesla position represents 1.99% of the ARK Space & Defense Innovation ETF's total assets.

QWhich other Ark Invest funds hold Tesla as a major position?

ATesla is the top holding in the Ark Innovation ETF (ARKK), Ark Next Generation Internet ETF (ARKW), and Ark Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ), with weightings of approximately 10.99%, 10.39%, and 9.93% respectively.

QWhat is the market speculation regarding a potential merger of Elon Musk's companies?

AMarket speculation, supported by analysts like Chamath Palihapitiya and Dan Ives, suggests Elon Musk may eventually pursue a 'reverse merger' to combine SpaceX (and potentially xAI) with Tesla to integrate his AI and space exploration ecosystems, though this would require shareholder approval and face rigorous regulatory scrutiny.

QHow can most ordinary investors currently gain exposure to SpaceX?

AMost ordinary investors have extremely limited direct access to SpaceX as it is a private company. Indirect exposure is primarily available by investing in public companies that are shareholders, such as Bank of America, Alphabet, and EchoStar, or through certain funds like the Ark Venture Fund.

Leituras Relacionadas

Hands-on with Hunyuan Hy3 Preview: Tencent's AI, Finally Competitive?

Tencent's Hunyuan AI team has released its latest language model, Hy3 preview, marking a significant step forward for the company's AI capabilities. With 295B total parameters and support for 256K context length, the model employs a mixture-of-experts architecture. It shows improvements in complex logic, instruction following, contextual learning, code generation, and agent task execution. In testing, Hy3 preview demonstrated strong performance in multi-step logical reasoning but showed occasional instability in identifying traps in trick questions. It performed well in extracting key information from disordered meeting transcripts and accurately followed new linguistic rules. As an AI agent, it successfully built functional applications like a Snake game and generated data analysis dashboards, though it sometimes fell short in fully completing complex open-ended tasks. In natural language use, it produced coherent and stylistically appropriate narratives with reduced “AI-like” tone. Priced competitively, Hy3 preview is already integrated into Tencent’s key products, including Tencent Cloud and WorkBuddy. While not leading in every benchmark, it represents a solid, practical model that signals Tencent’s renewed momentum in AI development.

marsbitHá 1h

Hands-on with Hunyuan Hy3 Preview: Tencent's AI, Finally Competitive?

marsbitHá 1h

From Theft to Re-entry: How Was $292 Million "Laundered"?

A sophisticated crypto laundering operation was executed following the $292 million hack of Kelp DAO on April 18. The attack, attributed to the North Korean Lazarus group, began with anonymous infrastructure preparation using Tornado Cash to fund wallets untraceably. The hacker exploited a vulnerability in Kelp’s cross-chain bridge, stealing 116,500 rsETH. To avoid crashing the market, the attacker used Aave and Compound as laundering tools—depositing the stolen rsETH as collateral to borrow $190 million in clean, liquid ETH. This move triggered a bank run on Aave, causing an $8 billion drop in TVL. After consolidating funds, the attacker fragmented them across hundreds of wallets to evade detection. A major breakpoint was THORChain, where over $460 million in volume—30 times its usual activity—was processed in 24 hours, converting ETH into Bitcoin. This shift to Bitcoin’s UTXO model exponentially increased tracing complexity by shattering funds into countless untraceable fragments. The final destination was Tron-based USDT, the primary channel for illicit crypto flows. From there, funds were cashed out via OTC brokers in China and Southeast Asia, using unlicensed underground banks and UnionPay networks outside Western sanctions scope. Ultimately, the laundered money supports North Korea’s weapons programs, which rely heavily on crypto hacking for foreign currency. The incident underscores structural challenges in DeFi: its openness, composability, and lack of central control make such laundering not just possible, but inherently difficult to prevent.

marsbitHá 1h

From Theft to Re-entry: How Was $292 Million "Laundered"?

marsbitHá 1h

Behind DeepSeek V4's Stunning Debut: Silicon Valley Is 'Building Walls,' China Is 'Paving Roads'

China's AI landscape is witnessing a strategic divergence from Silicon Valley’s closed-source competition to a collaborative open-source ecosystem. On April 24, DeepSeek released V4, a top-ranked open-source model on Hugging Face, featuring breakthroughs like million-token context length with minimal KV cache and native support for domestic chips like Huawei’s Ascend. Similarly, Kimi’s K2.6, released days earlier, also adopted open-source principles. Unlike U.S. giants such as OpenAI and Anthropic—locked in revenue disputes and tactical product clashes—Chinese firms embrace shared innovation. DeepSeek and Kimi openly build on each other’s advances, like the MLA architecture and Muon optimizer, avoiding redundant R&D and driving down costs. DeepSeek V4 focused on pushing base model capabilities, while Kimi specialized in Agent-based applications. Although U.S. firms lead in revenue and valuation, China’s open-source models achieve comparable performance at a fraction of the cost (e.g., DeepSeek V3 trained for $5.58M vs. GPT-5’s $500M+). With token usage growing exponentially, China’s collaborative model promises scalable, affordable AI built on domestic hardware, shaping a more accessible path to AGI.

marsbitHá 1h

Behind DeepSeek V4's Stunning Debut: Silicon Valley Is 'Building Walls,' China Is 'Paving Roads'

marsbitHá 1h

OpenClaw vs. Hermes: Which One Is Right for You?

Two leading AI agent projects, OpenClaw and Hermes, represent a fundamental divergence in design philosophy rather than just a feature competition. OpenClaw, a GitHub phenomenon, prioritizes user control and customization, offering a powerful, flexible platform for building and orchestrating agents. It boasts a massive ecosystem with over 44,000 skills, extensive model flexibility (supporting Anthropic, OpenAI, and others), and deep integrations across multiple messaging platforms. In contrast, Hermes Agent, developed by Nous Research, champions automation and efficiency. It is designed for lower cost and a lower barrier to entry, learning and improving automatically from user workflows. It runs tasks in isolated environments for security and offers significantly lower token costs out-of-the-box. The choice between them mirrors historical tech divides like Windows vs. Mac. OpenClaw is for users who want maximum control, customization, and don't mind a complex setup. Hermes is the smarter default for those seeking an affordable, easy-to-use agent that learns autonomously. The real competition is not about which is better, but which philosophy—a programmable personal OS or a self-evolving work proxy—better suits the user's needs for control, cost, and ease of use.

marsbitHá 1h

OpenClaw vs. Hermes: Which One Is Right for You?

marsbitHá 1h

Google and Amazon Simultaneously Invest Heavily in a Competitor: The Most Absurd Business Logic of the AI Era Is Becoming Reality

In a span of four days, Amazon announced an additional $25 billion investment, and Google pledged up to $40 billion—both direct competitors pouring over $65 billion into the same AI startup, Anthropic. Rather than a typical venture capital move, this signals the latest escalation in the cloud wars. The core of the deal is not equity but compute pre-orders: Anthropic must spend the majority of these funds on AWS and Google Cloud services and chips, effectively locking in massive future compute consumption. This reflects a shift in cloud market dynamics—enterprises now choose cloud providers based on which hosts the best AI models, not just price or stability. With OpenAI deeply tied to Microsoft, Anthropic’s Claude has become the only viable strategic asset for Google and Amazon to remain competitive. Anthropic’s annualized revenue has surged to $30 billion, and it is expanding into verticals like biotech, positioning itself as a cross-industry AI infrastructure layer. However, this funding comes with constraints: Anthropic’s independence is challenged as it balances two rival investors, its safety-first narrative faces pressure from regulatory scrutiny, and its path to IPO introduces new financial pressures. Globally, this accelerates a "tri-polar" closed-loop structure in AI infrastructure, with Microsoft-OpenAI, Google-Anthropic, and Amazon-Anthropic forming exclusive model-cloud alliances. In contrast, China’s landscape differs—investments like Alibaba and Tencent backing open-source model firm DeepSeek reflect a more decoupled approach, though closed-source models from major cloud providers still dominate. The $65 billion bet is ultimately about securing a seat at the table in an AI-defined future—where missing the model layer means losing the cloud war.

marsbitHá 7h

Google and Amazon Simultaneously Invest Heavily in a Competitor: The Most Absurd Business Logic of the AI Era Is Becoming Reality

marsbitHá 7h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片

Categorias popularesright-arrow

Etiquetas Popularesright-arrow