Behind NEAR's Doubling: Three Major Catalysts Driving the Token Price

marsbitPublicado em 2026-05-26Última atualização em 2026-05-26

Resumo

NEAR token's price surged from $1.24 to over $2.5 in May 2026, significantly outperforming the broader market. This rally is driven by three key factors: 1) A strong AI narrative, bolstered by co-founder Illia Polosukhin's background as a co-author of the seminal Transformer paper and NEAR's strategic focus on decentralized AI infrastructure. 2) The launch of privacy features like Confidential Payments and Confidential Intents within the NEAR Intents layer, enabling private cross-chain transfers for major assets and addressing MEV concerns. 3) A sustainable tokenomics model with nearly 100% circulation unlocked and a new buyback mechanism where all protocol fees from the growing NEAR Intents ecosystem (with TVL exceeding $80M) are used to repurchase and stake NEAR tokens, reducing sell-side pressure.

Author: Ma He, Foresight News

On May 25, the price of the NEAR blockchain token stood at $2.37. Since early May, NEAR has surged from a low of $1.24 to a high of $2.5, with its market cap returning to over $3 billion. While mainstream crypto assets like Bitcoin experienced volatility, NEAR charted an independent course, emerging as one of the most outstanding performers alongside tokens like ZEC, ONDO, and HYPE. What exactly are the reasons behind its explosive growth?

The AI Narrative

NEAR co-founder Illia Polosukhin is a seasoned figure in the AI field. Illia is one of the eight co-authors of the seminal Transformer paper, alongside others including Ashish Vaswani and Noam Shazeer, who were from Google Brain / Google Research. This paper introduced the Transformer architecture, which relies entirely on attention mechanisms, greatly enhancing parallel training efficiency and model scale. This is the origin of today's mainstream large model frameworks like ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini.

NEAR has made AI a core strategy from its early days. In February this year, NEAR officially launched the Near.com super-app, integrating cross-chain swaps, privacy tools, and smart contract management into one platform, with built-in AI capabilities supporting autonomous agent application scenarios. In November 2023, Illia officially assumed the role of CEO of the NEAR Foundation, primarily focusing on the core AI narrative.

In May, Nvidia's earnings report spurred a resurgence in the overall AI sector, with NEAR being viewed as a representative of decentralized AI infrastructure, alongside projects like TAO.

On May 22, BitMEX co-founder Arthur Hayes, in an article, listed NEAR alongside HYPE and ZEC, directly igniting market sentiment.

Privacy-Focused Blockchain

Blockchain has long faced the privacy dilemma of "transparency equals publicity." The surge of privacy coins like ZEC and XMR has refocused industry attention on the privacy sector, prompting various protocols, including public chains, to integrate privacy features.

Founded in 2018, NEAR's initial core positioning was not AI, but scalability. Its earliest progress also centered on continuously optimizing sharding technology, positioning itself as one of the hot "Ethereum killer" public chains of that time.

Because of this, NEAR's public sale on CoinList once crashed the platform's website. During the 2020-2021 bull cycle, NEAR skyrocketed from $0.5 to a peak of $20.59, becoming one of the most eye-catching star tokens of that era.

However, fast-forwarding to the current cycle, the vast majority of older tokens and new VC tokens have been shunned by the market. Therefore, even in this bull cycle, NEAR only peaked at $9 in 2024 before declining steadily, hitting a low of $0.84 in 2026.

After the official launch of NEAR Intents, privacy demand became crucial. Intents are core to cross-chain transactions, allowing users to express their intent for execution. However, public on-chain large transactions are vulnerable to MEV (Maximum Extractable Value) attacks, a significant drawback for institutions, large holders, and ordinary DeFi users alike.

The NEAR team began planning privacy as a key complement to Intents. In late May this year, the NEAR Intents team launched Confidential Payments and Confidential Intents features, supporting private cross-chain transfers of assets like ETH, BTC, SOL, and USDC across 35+ chains. The sender, amount, and path are all hidden, with only the result displayed on the target chain, utilizing private sharding and TEE (Trusted Execution Environment) bridging.

NEAR also opened a privacy mode, where user balances, transfers, and transaction activities are privatized by default. This ensures data doesn't leak, whether for ordinary users, enterprise users, or AI agents executing complex strategies. Concurrently launched Confidential Treasuries (Trezu) further support private multi-sig, payroll, and cross-chain payments, having cumulatively processed $68 million in confidential transactions.

Compared to pure privacy coins like Zcash, NEAR strikes a more practical balance between privacy, usability, and cross-chain capabilities, directly targeting enterprise-level demand and driving a recovery in TVL and developer activity.

NEAR Intents Fee Buyback

In October 2025, NEAR completed the unlocking of the final batch of its initial supply, achieving nearly 100% circulation.

NEAR implemented a dual mechanism of inflation and burning from its mainnet's early days: a maximum annual inflation of 5% (permanently halved to 2.5% via an upgrade in October 2025), with 90% allocated as rewards to validators and 10% going to the protocol treasury. Entering 2026, the project has no more major or linear unlock events, only regular epoch reward emissions (approximately 5.4 million NEAR released in the last 30 days, about 0.4% of total supply).

Additionally, the fee revenue generated by NEAR Intents is directly used to buy back NEAR tokens in the market, providing significant buying pressure.

The Intent-driven cross-chain transaction layer on the NEAR protocol allows users to simply express their desired outcome (e.g., swap BTC for SOL), and it provides the optimal execution path, supporting multiple chains, no bridging/wrapped assets, and low fees.

NEAR Intents previously had two fee components: protocol fees and distribution fees (shared with third-party integrators), but protocol fees now all go through the buyback path. The repurchased NEAR is not necessarily burned immediately; instead, it can be staked, locked, or removed from liquidity after repurchase. While still counted in total supply, this reduces circulating supply pressure and can also generate staking rewards.

According to the latest data from defiLlama, NEAR Intents' TVL has exceeded $80 million, generating daily fees fluctuating around $100,000, translating to a monthly buyback amount near $3 million.

At the end of this month, its core development team, Near One, also announced the latest technical progress. By the end of Q2 2026, the team will release dynamic re-sharding, significantly improving scalability. Additionally, the team will introduce and upgrade NEAR's post-quantum secure signature scheme in June this year, enhancing its resistance to quantum computing.

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat are the three main factors mentioned in the article driving NEAR's recent price surge?

AThe three main factors are: 1) AI Narrative, leveraging the co-founder's AI background and NEAR's strategic focus on decentralized AI. 2) Privacy-Focused Public Chain features, enhancing cross-chain privacy for users and institutions. 3) NEAR Intents fee buyback mechanism, which uses protocol fees to purchase NEAR tokens, reducing selling pressure.

QWho is Illia Polosukhin, and what is his connection to the AI field?

AIllia Polosukhin is a co-founder of NEAR. He is a seminal figure in AI, being one of the eight co-authors of the original Transformer paper from Google Brain/Research. This paper introduced the Transformer architecture, which is the foundation for all major large language models like ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini.

QHow does NEAR's privacy technology, specifically Confidential Intents, work to protect user transactions?

ANEAR's Confidential Intents and Confidential Payments functions hide the sender, amount, and transaction path during cross-chain transfers of assets like ETH, BTC, SOL, and USDC across 35+ chains. Only the final result is visible on the destination chain. This privacy is achieved using a combination of private sharding and TEE (Trusted Execution Environment) bridging.

QWhat is the NEAR Intents fee buyback mechanism and how does it impact the token's supply?

AThe NEAR Intents protocol uses its fee revenue to buy back NEAR tokens from the open market. These bought-back tokens are then typically staked, locked, or have their liquidity removed. This action reduces the circulating supply and selling pressure on the token, while the staked tokens can also generate yield.

QAccording to the article, what is the current approximate monthly buyback amount driven by NEAR Intents fees?

ABased on data from defiLlama cited in the article, NEAR Intents generates approximately $300,000 in fees per month, which is used for the token buyback program.

Leituras Relacionadas

STAR 50 Soars 10.73%, Why Did A-Shares Stage a "V-Shaped Reversal"?

After a prolonged decline, the Chinese A-share market staged a strong rally on July 21. The STAR 50 index surged 10.73%, its largest single-day gain in nearly a year, leading a broad-based "V-shaped" reversal. The Shanghai Composite Index rose 1.79%, the Shenzhen Component Index gained 4.81%, and the ChiNext Index jumped 7.05%. Total market turnover reached 2.97 trillion yuan, an increase of 256.1 billion yuan from the previous session, with over 3,100 stocks advancing. The semiconductor sector spearheaded the rebound, with related ETFs posting significant gains. Analysts attribute the surge to three converging factors. First, coordinated capital inflows from "national team" institutions, insurance funds, listed company buybacks, and fund house self-purchases have bolstered market liquidity and confidence. Second, supportive policy signals, including commitments from regulators to ensure stable market operations, provided a favorable backdrop. Third, a stabilization and recovery in overseas markets, notably South Korea, created a positive external environment. Institutions suggest the most severe panic selling phase for the tech sector has likely passed, following a significant digestion of crowded positions and leveraged funds. While short-term volatility may persist, the medium to long-term outlook remains underpinned by enduring trends like AI computing demand expansion and semiconductor localization. The market's focus now shifts to the sustainability of supportive fund flows, earnings reports, and upcoming catalysts from the global AI industry chain.

marsbitHá 5m

STAR 50 Soars 10.73%, Why Did A-Shares Stage a "V-Shaped Reversal"?

marsbitHá 5m

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Post Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, But Is the Plunge Over?

US tech momentum stocks staged a sharp rebound on Tuesday (July 21st). Morgan Stanley's TMT Momentum Factor surged over 12%, marking its largest single-day gain on record, exceeding even peaks from the 2000 dot-com bubble. Key momentum indices from Goldman Sachs also posted their strongest daily performances in years. The rally was led by semiconductors, with the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index jumping 4.6%. This rebound followed three consecutive down days and a cumulative 33% plunge in momentum stocks, one of the steepest drawdowns since the dot-com era. Analysts attribute the surge largely to a short squeeze. Heavy selling had pushed high-beta momentum stocks into deeply oversold territory, forcing many short sellers, particularly in Asia, to cover their positions, creating a self-reinforcing buying spiral. However, the rebound's internals appear weak. Trading volume was notably low, and advancing stocks still lagged decliners on the S&P 500, indicating a narrow, concentrated rally rather than broad market participation. Diverging views emerge on the outlook. BTIG warns the bounce has hit key resistance and recommends selling into strength, citing extreme volatility and historical parallels to past market tops. Conversely, Goldman Sachs and UBS believe the momentum unwind is nearing its end, suggesting it may be time to gradually add exposure, as positioning has been significantly reduced. They caution, however, that high volatility warrants a measured approach, potentially using defined-risk strategies. The upcoming earnings season, particularly reports from major tech firms like Alphabet, is seen as a critical test for the rally's sustainability. Simultaneously, bond markets flashed a warning, with yields rising partly due to spiking oil prices. Analysts note that if long-term Treasury yields break decisively higher, it could pose a significant headwind for equities, especially growth stocks.

marsbitHá 13m

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Post Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, But Is the Plunge Over?

marsbitHá 13m

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Record Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, but Has the Rout Ended?

U.S. tech momentum stocks staged a dramatic rebound on Tuesday, July 21st. Key momentum indices like the Morgan Stanley TMT Momentum Factor and Goldman Sachs' High Beta Momentum Long Index posted historic or near-historic single-day gains, fueled largely by semiconductor stocks. This sharp rally followed a severe three-day sell-off that saw momentum stocks plunge 33%, marking one of the steepest pullbacks since the dot-com bubble. Analysts attribute the bounce primarily to a short squeeze, as forced covering from over-leveraged traders, particularly in Asia, created a buying spiral. However, the rally's health is questioned due to weak market breadth—overall trading volume was low, and decliners outnumbered advancers in the S&P 500 despite the index's gain—suggesting a narrow, concentrated surge rather than broad recovery. Opinions on the sustainability diverge. BTIG strategists warn the rebound has hit key resistance levels, citing extreme volatility and historic stock dispersion as signs of an ongoing broader correction, and recommend selling into strength. Conversely, Goldman Sachs and UBS view the aggressive momentum unwinding as nearing its end, noting reduced positioning and a lack of new fundamental catalysts. They suggest the sell-off presents a selective opportunity to add exposure, albeit cautiously and gradually using defined-risk strategies. The immediate trajectory hinges on the ongoing earnings season, with market focus on Alphabet's capital expenditure guidance for AI investment clarity. Meanwhile, bond markets present a risk, with rising Treasury yields—potentially heading toward 5.5%—and widening credit spreads for mega-cap tech companies posing a threat to equity valuations. The combination of technical factors, earnings results, and macro conditions leaves the durability of the rebound in doubt.

链捕手Há 15m

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Record Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, but Has the Rout Ended?

链捕手Há 15m

Long-Divided Must Unite, Long-United Must Divide: When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup, What Is Ethereum's Endgame?

"The Inevitable Cycle: When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup – What is Ethereum's Endgame?" For years, the Ethereum community grappled with concerns that L2s were fragmenting the ecosystem and eroding L1's value. While L2s provided cheaper execution, they also splintered liquidity and the unified user experience of a single chain. This has prompted a fundamental reassessment of the relationship between L1 and L2. Ethereum's roadmap is evolving. The "Scale" initiative merges L1 and L2 expansion into a holistic framework. L1 itself is advancing with higher gas limits, statelessness, and zkEVM verification, no longer content to be just a low-throughput settlement layer. Consequently, the primary value proposition of L2s is shifting from merely providing cheap blockspace to offering L1 cannot easily provide: application-specific optimizations, privacy features, and flexible governance models. L2s are becoming a spectrum of execution environments with varying degrees of security inheritance from Ethereum. A critical challenge in this multi-chain future is interoperability. The vision is to make Ethereum "feel like one chain again." This relies on advancements in native account abstraction (like EIP-7702) and intent-based architectures (Open Intents Framework), where users declare desired outcomes, and solvers handle the complex cross-chain execution. Furthermore, shortening Ethereum's finality time from minutes to seconds is crucial, as it underpins trust between chains for bridges, stablecoins, and cross-chain applications. Perhaps the most provocative idea is that Ethereum L1 itself could become a form of "its own Rollup." As zkEVM and proof systems mature, high-performance nodes could execute transactions and generate validity proofs. Regular validators would then verify these proofs instead of re-executing all transactions. This blurs the traditional L1/L2 hierarchy, making "Rollup" more of a general execution-verification architecture. Native Rollup aims to integrate L2 validation more directly into the Ethereum protocol, allowing L2s to inherit L1's security more fully and move away from reliance on security councils. In the end, L2s are not destined to replace L1 or be made obsolete by it. The likely future is a unified system where diverse execution environments—each optimized for specific use cases like DeFi, gaming, or privacy—coexist. They will share a common foundation of security, liquidity, and verifiable state, seamlessly connected to restore a cohesive user experience. The next phase for Ethereum is not just about scaling through separation, but about intelligently reintegrating what was separated back into a coherent whole.

链捕手Há 31m

Long-Divided Must Unite, Long-United Must Divide: When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup, What Is Ethereum's Endgame?

链捕手Há 31m

Trading

Spot
活动图片