Behind NEAR's Doubling: Three Major Catalysts Driving the Token Price

marsbitPublicado em 2026-05-26Última atualização em 2026-05-26

Resumo

NEAR token's price surged from $1.24 to over $2.5 in May 2026, significantly outperforming the broader market. This rally is driven by three key factors: 1) A strong AI narrative, bolstered by co-founder Illia Polosukhin's background as a co-author of the seminal Transformer paper and NEAR's strategic focus on decentralized AI infrastructure. 2) The launch of privacy features like Confidential Payments and Confidential Intents within the NEAR Intents layer, enabling private cross-chain transfers for major assets and addressing MEV concerns. 3) A sustainable tokenomics model with nearly 100% circulation unlocked and a new buyback mechanism where all protocol fees from the growing NEAR Intents ecosystem (with TVL exceeding $80M) are used to repurchase and stake NEAR tokens, reducing sell-side pressure.

Author: Ma He, Foresight News

On May 25, the price of the NEAR blockchain token stood at $2.37. Since early May, NEAR has surged from a low of $1.24 to a high of $2.5, with its market cap returning to over $3 billion. While mainstream crypto assets like Bitcoin experienced volatility, NEAR charted an independent course, emerging as one of the most outstanding performers alongside tokens like ZEC, ONDO, and HYPE. What exactly are the reasons behind its explosive growth?

The AI Narrative

NEAR co-founder Illia Polosukhin is a seasoned figure in the AI field. Illia is one of the eight co-authors of the seminal Transformer paper, alongside others including Ashish Vaswani and Noam Shazeer, who were from Google Brain / Google Research. This paper introduced the Transformer architecture, which relies entirely on attention mechanisms, greatly enhancing parallel training efficiency and model scale. This is the origin of today's mainstream large model frameworks like ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini.

NEAR has made AI a core strategy from its early days. In February this year, NEAR officially launched the Near.com super-app, integrating cross-chain swaps, privacy tools, and smart contract management into one platform, with built-in AI capabilities supporting autonomous agent application scenarios. In November 2023, Illia officially assumed the role of CEO of the NEAR Foundation, primarily focusing on the core AI narrative.

In May, Nvidia's earnings report spurred a resurgence in the overall AI sector, with NEAR being viewed as a representative of decentralized AI infrastructure, alongside projects like TAO.

On May 22, BitMEX co-founder Arthur Hayes, in an article, listed NEAR alongside HYPE and ZEC, directly igniting market sentiment.

Privacy-Focused Blockchain

Blockchain has long faced the privacy dilemma of "transparency equals publicity." The surge of privacy coins like ZEC and XMR has refocused industry attention on the privacy sector, prompting various protocols, including public chains, to integrate privacy features.

Founded in 2018, NEAR's initial core positioning was not AI, but scalability. Its earliest progress also centered on continuously optimizing sharding technology, positioning itself as one of the hot "Ethereum killer" public chains of that time.

Because of this, NEAR's public sale on CoinList once crashed the platform's website. During the 2020-2021 bull cycle, NEAR skyrocketed from $0.5 to a peak of $20.59, becoming one of the most eye-catching star tokens of that era.

However, fast-forwarding to the current cycle, the vast majority of older tokens and new VC tokens have been shunned by the market. Therefore, even in this bull cycle, NEAR only peaked at $9 in 2024 before declining steadily, hitting a low of $0.84 in 2026.

After the official launch of NEAR Intents, privacy demand became crucial. Intents are core to cross-chain transactions, allowing users to express their intent for execution. However, public on-chain large transactions are vulnerable to MEV (Maximum Extractable Value) attacks, a significant drawback for institutions, large holders, and ordinary DeFi users alike.

The NEAR team began planning privacy as a key complement to Intents. In late May this year, the NEAR Intents team launched Confidential Payments and Confidential Intents features, supporting private cross-chain transfers of assets like ETH, BTC, SOL, and USDC across 35+ chains. The sender, amount, and path are all hidden, with only the result displayed on the target chain, utilizing private sharding and TEE (Trusted Execution Environment) bridging.

NEAR also opened a privacy mode, where user balances, transfers, and transaction activities are privatized by default. This ensures data doesn't leak, whether for ordinary users, enterprise users, or AI agents executing complex strategies. Concurrently launched Confidential Treasuries (Trezu) further support private multi-sig, payroll, and cross-chain payments, having cumulatively processed $68 million in confidential transactions.

Compared to pure privacy coins like Zcash, NEAR strikes a more practical balance between privacy, usability, and cross-chain capabilities, directly targeting enterprise-level demand and driving a recovery in TVL and developer activity.

NEAR Intents Fee Buyback

In October 2025, NEAR completed the unlocking of the final batch of its initial supply, achieving nearly 100% circulation.

NEAR implemented a dual mechanism of inflation and burning from its mainnet's early days: a maximum annual inflation of 5% (permanently halved to 2.5% via an upgrade in October 2025), with 90% allocated as rewards to validators and 10% going to the protocol treasury. Entering 2026, the project has no more major or linear unlock events, only regular epoch reward emissions (approximately 5.4 million NEAR released in the last 30 days, about 0.4% of total supply).

Additionally, the fee revenue generated by NEAR Intents is directly used to buy back NEAR tokens in the market, providing significant buying pressure.

The Intent-driven cross-chain transaction layer on the NEAR protocol allows users to simply express their desired outcome (e.g., swap BTC for SOL), and it provides the optimal execution path, supporting multiple chains, no bridging/wrapped assets, and low fees.

NEAR Intents previously had two fee components: protocol fees and distribution fees (shared with third-party integrators), but protocol fees now all go through the buyback path. The repurchased NEAR is not necessarily burned immediately; instead, it can be staked, locked, or removed from liquidity after repurchase. While still counted in total supply, this reduces circulating supply pressure and can also generate staking rewards.

According to the latest data from defiLlama, NEAR Intents' TVL has exceeded $80 million, generating daily fees fluctuating around $100,000, translating to a monthly buyback amount near $3 million.

At the end of this month, its core development team, Near One, also announced the latest technical progress. By the end of Q2 2026, the team will release dynamic re-sharding, significantly improving scalability. Additionally, the team will introduce and upgrade NEAR's post-quantum secure signature scheme in June this year, enhancing its resistance to quantum computing.

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat are the three main factors mentioned in the article driving NEAR's recent price surge?

AThe three main factors are: 1) AI Narrative, leveraging the co-founder's AI background and NEAR's strategic focus on decentralized AI. 2) Privacy-Focused Public Chain features, enhancing cross-chain privacy for users and institutions. 3) NEAR Intents fee buyback mechanism, which uses protocol fees to purchase NEAR tokens, reducing selling pressure.

QWho is Illia Polosukhin, and what is his connection to the AI field?

AIllia Polosukhin is a co-founder of NEAR. He is a seminal figure in AI, being one of the eight co-authors of the original Transformer paper from Google Brain/Research. This paper introduced the Transformer architecture, which is the foundation for all major large language models like ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini.

QHow does NEAR's privacy technology, specifically Confidential Intents, work to protect user transactions?

ANEAR's Confidential Intents and Confidential Payments functions hide the sender, amount, and transaction path during cross-chain transfers of assets like ETH, BTC, SOL, and USDC across 35+ chains. Only the final result is visible on the destination chain. This privacy is achieved using a combination of private sharding and TEE (Trusted Execution Environment) bridging.

QWhat is the NEAR Intents fee buyback mechanism and how does it impact the token's supply?

AThe NEAR Intents protocol uses its fee revenue to buy back NEAR tokens from the open market. These bought-back tokens are then typically staked, locked, or have their liquidity removed. This action reduces the circulating supply and selling pressure on the token, while the staked tokens can also generate yield.

QAccording to the article, what is the current approximate monthly buyback amount driven by NEAR Intents fees?

ABased on data from defiLlama cited in the article, NEAR Intents generates approximately $300,000 in fees per month, which is used for the token buyback program.

Leituras Relacionadas

Buyback and Burn: Just Empty Promises? The Unbridgeable Rights Gap Between Tokens and Equity

"Token Repurchase and Burn: An Empty Promise? The Unbridgeable Rights Gap Between Tokens and Equity" Holding company stock grants shareholders residual claim rights - a legally enforceable entitlement to remaining assets after all other obligations are paid. This comes with rights like voting, dividends, and a share in sale proceeds. Crypto protocols have long promised token holders similar benefits: governance participation and a share of future growth. However, this narrative is fundamentally flawed and built on voluntary promises, not enforceable legal rights. The core difference is that token holders lack any legally enforceable claim to a protocol's underlying value or revenues. Common mechanisms like using protocol revenue to buy back and burn tokens are purely discretionary; the team can alter or stop the policy at any time. Token holders have no legal recourse. This rights gap becomes critically apparent when protocols introduce traditional equity alongside tokens, as seen with Venice AI's $65M funding round. Equity investors hold legal contracts with rights to company assets and profits, while token holders' benefits depend entirely on the continued goodwill of the protocol's management. The acquisition of Houdini Swap, where equity holders were paid while token holders received nothing, starkly illustrates this disparity. Upcoming legislation like the CLARITY Act threatens to eliminate the regulatory gray area that has allowed this ambiguous "pseudo-equity" narrative. The Act would classify tokens as either digital commodities (regulated by CFTC) or investment contract assets/securities (regulated by SEC). Protocols aiming for the "digital commodity" classification would be explicitly prohibited from granting token holders any legal claim to corporate revenue, profits, or assets. Promising that tokens will appreciate from protocol profits would likely classify them as securities. Projects like Aave are attempting technical solutions, such as its automated, on-chain "Aavenomics 3.0" buyback mechanism. However, this remains code that the governance body could still vote to change, not an immutable legal contract. The industry faces a clear fork: either acknowledge tokens as digital commodities and stop promising economic rights tied to corporate profits, or formally register tokens as securities and bear the associated compliance burden. The decade-long narrative equating tokens with ownership is built on unenforceable promises. The entry of traditional equity investors with real legal rights exposes this foundational weakness, which may unravel with the next major funding deal.

Foresight NewsHá 1h

Buyback and Burn: Just Empty Promises? The Unbridgeable Rights Gap Between Tokens and Equity

Foresight NewsHá 1h

Navigating the World of Event Trading: Top 5 Prediction Markets for Every Type of User

The prediction market industry has grown significantly, with trading volumes exceeding $20 billion monthly by mid-2026, driven by sports, politics, and macroeconomics. Success now depends heavily on platform choice and execution logistics. This guide compares five leading networks: **Polymarket**: A high-volume, decentralized platform on Polygon, using USDC for international and crypto-native users. It offers diverse markets but lacks built-in risk tools. **Kalshi**: A CFTC-regulated U.S. exchange for institutional traders, using direct fiat. It leads in regulated volume, especially for major sports and economic events, but has limited contract listings. **Outpoll**: A CeDeFi platform for advanced traders, focusing on professional tools. It uniquely features built-in stop-loss/take-profit orders, 0.1% fees, and full API support, with settlement in USDC. **OG Predictive**: A CFTC-regulated, sports-focused platform from Crypto.com. It offers granular player props and a flat fee structure, appealing to long-term position traders. **Manifold Markets**: A play-money, no-KYC platform for casual users and developers. It allows user-generated markets on any topic with zero fees, serving as a sandbox for strategy testing. Key differentiators include regulatory models (regulated vs. decentralized), funding (fiat vs. crypto), order types, risk management features, API access, and mobile support. The conclusion emphasizes that in today's event trading, profitability hinges not just on accurate predictions but on optimizing execution through platform infrastructure, liquidity, fees, and risk tools.

TheNewsCryptoHá 2h

Navigating the World of Event Trading: Top 5 Prediction Markets for Every Type of User

TheNewsCryptoHá 2h

Trading

Spot
活动图片