B. Riley Cuts Price Targets Across Digital Asset Treasury Companies as LiquidChain Momentum Builds

bitcoinistPublicado em 2026-02-04Última atualização em 2026-02-04

Resumo

B. Riley has lowered price targets for several Digital Asset Treasury Companies (Datcos), signaling a shift in how institutional analysts value corporate crypto holdings. The downgrade reflects growing caution regarding equity valuations tied to Bitcoin reserves, citing sector-wide pressures and weaker accumulation trends. Analysts indicate a market transition from valuing passive asset strategies toward prioritizing operational utility and capital efficiency, especially in a high-cost capital environment. This recalibration coincides with rising interest in infrastructure protocols that solve liquidity fragmentation, such as LiquidChain ($LIQUID), which aims to unify Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana into a single execution layer. Investors are rotating toward projects that enable cross-chain functionality and yield generation rather than passive treasury proxies.

Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure

Quick Facts:

  • ➡️ B. Riley has lowered price targets for Digital Asset Treasury Companies, citing sector pressures and changing accumulation trends.
  • ➡️ The analyst downgrades signal a market shift from valuing passive asset holding to prioritizing operational utility and capital efficiency.
  • ➡️ LiquidChain counters market fragmentation by fusing Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana liquidity into a single, seamless execution layer.
  • ➡️ Investors are increasingly rotating focus toward infrastructure plays that solve interoperability issues rather than simple corporate proxies.

Investment bank B. Riley has formally lowered its price targets for several prominent Digital Asset Treasury Companies (Datcos), signaling a potential shift in how institutional analysts value corporate crypto holdings.

The move, affecting major publicly traded entities with significant Bitcoin reserves, reflects growing caution regarding the correlation between equity valuations and underlying asset volatility.

Analysts at the firm cited sector-wide pressure and weaker accumulation trends as the primary drivers. But frankly, the specific dollar figures matter less than the shift in market psychology: a transition from valuing passive holding strategies to scrutinizing operational utility.

When Bitcoin trades sideways or faces resistance, companies acting as leveraged proxies often see their premiums erode faster than the asset itself. The data suggests the “proxy trade” fever that dominated earlier in the year is cooling, investors are starting to demand more than just exposure to beta.

This recalibration coincides with a macroeconomic environment where the cost of capital remains high. That makes the carrying cost of non-yielding assets a focal point for equity researchers. While Datcos have historically outperformed during aggressive bull runs, the current market structure forces a re-evaluation of capital efficiency.

Smart money is looking beyond companies that simply store value, pivoting instead toward infrastructure protocols that move value and generate yield through activity.

You can see this rotation in the divergence between stagnant equity proxies and the surging interest in specialized infrastructure layers. As the traditional “hold and hope” strategy faces analyst headwinds, capital is flowing toward solutions that solve the industry’s most persistent bottleneck: fragmentation.

It’s within this liquidity vacuum that LiquidChain ($LIQUID) has begun to capture market attention, positioning itself as the connective tissue for a disjointed ecosystem.

You can buy $LIQUID here.

Beyond Passive Holding: The Shift Toward Unified Execution Layers

While B. Riley’s analysts downgrade the outlook for passive treasury models, the smart money narrative is shifting toward Layer 3 (L3) infrastructure designed to unify the crypto economy.

The fundamental issue isn’t a lack of assets, Datcos hold massive treasuries, but the inability to use them efficiently. Currently, liquidity is siloed: Bitcoin remains trapped in its secure but rigid network, Ethereum struggles with high execution costs during peak demand, and Solana operates as a high-speed island.

LiquidChain ($LIQUID) tackles this capital inefficiency with a Unified Liquidity Layer. Unlike traditional bridges (which often rely on vulnerable wrapping mechanisms), LiquidChain operates as a dedicated execution environment that fuses Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana liquidity.

For developers, this represents a paradigm shift: a ‘Deploy-Once Architecture’ where a single application accesses users and assets from the three largest chains simultaneously. This utility-driven approach offers a stark contrast to the passive accumulation models currently being de-rated by Wall Street.

By solving the user flow complexity that plagues DeFi, the protocol creates verifiable demand for its infrastructure, independent of simple asset price speculation.

Check out $LIQUID’s presale now.

LiquidChain ($LIQUID) Merges Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana Ecosystems

Technically, LiquidChain ($LIQUID) is positioning itself as the transaction fuel for the next cycle of interoperability. The secret sauce here is the Cross-Chain Virtual Machine (VM), which allows for single-step execution across disparate networks.

In a typical scenario, a user moving value from Bitcoin to Solana faces multiple friction points, high fees, and settlement delays. LiquidChain compresses this into a verifiable settlement process that feels instantaneous to the end-user.

This infrastructure is critical because it unlocks liquidity that’s currently dormant in treasury reserves and disconnected wallets. By enabling ‘Liquidity Staking’ and providing developer grants, the project is incentivizing the migration of capital from static storage into active circulation.

The risk for legacy chains is irrelevance in a multi-chain future; LiquidChain mitigates this by allowing legacy assets like $BTC to function natively within complex DeFi applications.

As the market digests B. Riley’s conservative outlook on treasury companies, the focus is logically drifting toward protocols that generate velocity of money rather than just balance sheet expansion.

Check the official LiquidChain presale.

This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, including presales and new protocols, carry high risks, and markets can be volatile. Always perform your own due diligence before investing.

Editorial Process for bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We uphold strict sourcing standards, and each page undergoes diligent review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.

patrubogdan

Follow

Full Profile

Related Posts

Aave Scraps Avara and Family Wallet as SUBBD Momentum Builds

Binance Crushes Competition With $155B Asset Surge; $HYPER Emerging as Bitcoin L2 Leader

Criptomoneda prometedora para invertir ante el cambio de sentimiento: el auge de la infraestructura Bitcoin

Criptomoneda prometedora para invertir mientras cambia el sentimiento del mercado: Bitcoin Hyper redefine la Capa 2

Quale criptovaluta comprare oggi in base alle condizioni di mercato: Il superciclo dei Layer 2 su Bitcoin

El mercado de las criptomonedas a la baja hoy: ¿qué está pasando?

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhy did B. Riley lower its price targets for Digital Asset Treasury Companies (Datcos)?

AB. Riley lowered its price targets due to sector-wide pressures and weaker accumulation trends, reflecting a shift in market psychology from valuing passive holding strategies to scrutinizing operational utility and capital efficiency.

QWhat is the main issue with current liquidity in the crypto market that LiquidChain aims to solve?

ALiquidChain aims to solve the fragmentation of liquidity, where assets like Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana are siloed in their respective networks, by creating a unified execution layer that fuses liquidity from these chains into a seamless, interoperable system.

QHow does LiquidChain's Cross-Chain Virtual Machine (VM) improve user experience?

ALiquidChain's Cross-Chain VM allows for single-step execution across disparate networks like Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana, compressing multi-step, high-fee processes into a verifiable settlement that feels instantaneous to the end-user.

QWhat market shift is indicated by B. Riley's downgrade and the rise of projects like LiquidChain?

AThe market is shifting from valuing passive asset holding and corporate proxies to prioritizing infrastructure that solve interoperability issues, generate yield through activity, and improve capital efficiency in a high-cost environment.

QWhat advantage does LiquidChain offer to developers building decentralized applications?

ALiquidChain offers a 'Deploy-Once Architecture' that allows developers to build applications that can simultaneously access users and assets from Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana, reducing complexity and friction in multi-chain DeFi.

Leituras Relacionadas

If the AI Bubble Is Already Bursting, Who Will Truly Survive?

If the AI Bubble is Bursting, Who Will Remain? The debate over an AI bubble is intensifying, with figures like Ray Dalio warning of high levels and Jensen Huang seeing immense, early-stage opportunity. Both views hold truth: a speculative bubble in capital markets likely exists, mirroring the dot-com era, but the underlying technological shift is real and transformative. History shows that while bubbles burst—wiping out overvalued companies and speculative capital—they often leave behind critical physical and digital infrastructure. The dot-com bust, for instance, eliminated many firms but left the global fiber optic networks and data centers that enabled the rise of Amazon, Netflix, and cloud computing. Today's massive AI infrastructure investments (projected at trillions by 2030) in data centers, power, cooling, and GPUs may follow a similar path, creating the foundation for future applications. A key divergence from past bubbles is the "Jevons Paradox" effect in AI. As the cost of AI inference has plummeted by over 99.7% since 2023, enterprise spending on AI has skyrocketed. Cheap "tokens" have unlocked vast, previously uneconomical use cases, moving AI from simple chatbots into core business workflows—code generation, legal document review, scientific simulation, and financial analysis. The market is now in a phase of self-correction, weeding out superficial "API-wrapper" startups, but this cleansing process strengthens the ecosystem. The long-term trajectory is clear. The value is gradually shifting from capital expenditure (CapEx) on hardware to operational expenditure (OpEx) on transformative applications. As AI becomes a utility, the winners will be firms that deeply integrate it to solve vertical industry problems in law, healthcare, finance, and manufacturing. The泡沫 will recede, but the foundational shift towards an AI-powered era across all sectors is irreversible. The underlying productive force of AI contains no bubble.

marsbitHá 24m

If the AI Bubble Is Already Bursting, Who Will Truly Survive?

marsbitHá 24m

If the AI Bubble Is Already Bursting, Who Will Truly Remain?

**Summary: If the AI Bubble is Bursting, What Will Remain?** The debate around an AI bubble is intensifying, with figures like Ray Dalio warning of high valuations while Jensen Huang sees immense opportunity. This echoes the dot-com bubble, which saw massive wealth destruction but ultimately left behind critical infrastructure like undersea cables and broadband, enabling future giants like Amazon and Netflix. Similarly, today's AI boom involves trillions invested in data centers, power, cooling, and GPUs, while application-layer revenue remains comparatively modest. This investment-disparity signals a bubble. However, the core technological progress is real and accelerating. AI inference costs have plummeted by over 99.7% since 2023, making intelligence increasingly cheap and accessible. This cost collapse is unlocking vast new demand. Instead of reducing spending, enterprises are tripling their AI cloud expenditure. Cheap "tokens" enable AI to move beyond simple chatbots into complex workflows—automating code writing, legal document review, financial analysis, and scientific research. This follows "Jevons's paradox": improved efficiency leads to greater total consumption. The market is now undergoing a necessary purification, weeding out "API-wrapper" startups with no real moat. The deeper evolution involves a shift from capital expenditure (CapEx) on infrastructure to operational expenditure (OpEx) on value-creation in applications. While hardware vendors currently profit most, long-term value will migrate to AI-native firms solving vertical industry problems. Ultimately, a market correction will cleanse speculative excess but will not reverse the AI+ trend. The massive physical and algorithmic infrastructure being built will endure, becoming a cheap, utility-like foundation. Just as the internet became indispensable to all industries post-2000, AI is poised to empower and redefine every sector, moving society irreversibly toward an intelligence-augmented era. The bubble may burst, but the underlying productive momentum is solid.

链捕手Há 31m

If the AI Bubble Is Already Bursting, Who Will Truly Remain?

链捕手Há 31m

Microsoft CEO: In the AI Era, How Do You Define a Company's Moat?

Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella argues that in the AI era, a company's true competitive edge, or "moat," is not determined by choosing the single most powerful model, but by its ability to build a continuous "learning loop." This system integrates and evolves by connecting human workflows, domain expertise, organizational judgment, and employee experience. He posits that future companies will accumulate two types of capital: Human Capital (employee knowledge, judgment, creativity) and "Token Capital" (a firm's own built and owned AI capabilities). Importantly, AI amplifies rather than devalues human capital. Human direction is essential to guide progress, as computational power alone is aimless. The core opportunity lies in creating a closed-loop system where human and token capital reinforce each other in a compound, self-improving cycle. A company must be able to preserve its unique institutional knowledge—its "company veteran" expertise—even if it switches underlying general-purpose AI models. This requires private evaluation benchmarks, reinforcement learning environments based on internal data, and queryable knowledge bases. Nadella warns against a future where economic value is concentrated by a few dominant models that commoditize entire industries' knowledge. Instead, the priority should be building a broad "frontier ecosystem" where every company, industry, and nation can own its learning loop. This allows organizations to retain control of their intellectual property, amplify employee capabilities, and ensure the economic value created by AI is captured within their own businesses and communities. True corporate sovereignty in the AI age comes from turning organizational knowledge into a compounding system that creates enduring, defensible value.

marsbitHá 1h

Microsoft CEO: In the AI Era, How Do You Define a Company's Moat?

marsbitHá 1h

ETFs Are Just the Ticket: The True Institutionalization of Bitcoin Is Happening Where You Can't See It

Beyond the Bitcoin ETF spotlight, a deeper institutionalization is underway, leveraging Bitcoin as a foundational financial primitive. Institutions are using Bitcoin for purposes long reserved for assets like U.S. Treasuries and gold: as collateral for loans, insurance reserves, and the backbone of rated bonds. Examples include a Barbados-based insurer capitalizing with $40M in Bitcoin reserves and Ledn's $188M securitization of Bitcoin-backed loans, which received the first-ever investment-grade rating (BBB-) from S&P for a digital asset-backed security. This structure was stress-tested during a 27% price drop in early 2026, triggering automatic liquidations that functioned as designed but revealed the systemic risk of synchronized selling across leveraged positions. Infrastructure is evolving to support this, with platforms like Anchorage Digital's Atlas network enabling secure, institutional-grade settlement and collateral management. Strategies like basis trades and corporate treasuries (exemplified by companies like MicroStrategy issuing billions in equity and debt to fund Bitcoin acquisitions) further integrate Bitcoin into financial mechanics. While ETFs solved "how to own" Bitcoin, these developments answer "what to do with it," embedding the asset into the working machinery of finance—as collateral upon which loans, derivatives, and structured products are built. The real, enduring institutional shift is happening in these largely invisible plumbing and financing systems.

marsbitHá 1h

ETFs Are Just the Ticket: The True Institutionalization of Bitcoin Is Happening Where You Can't See It

marsbitHá 1h

ZEC Co-Founder Responds to Orchard Vulnerability: No Signs of Theft, Orchard Pool to Be Sealed

ZEC Co-Founder Addresses Orchard Vulnerability: No Signs of Theft, Plans to Sunset Orchard Pool A security vulnerability was recently discovered in Zcash's Orchard shielded pool, raising key concerns. The primary questions are whether the flaw was exploited, if user funds are safe, whether users can verify the total ZEC supply, and if other similar vulnerabilities exist. Analysis suggests the vulnerability was likely not exploited prior to its discovery. It was found proactively by a researcher using specialized tools, not due to an active breach. The development team and mining pools acted quickly to contain the issue. Typical financially-motivated attacks would likely have left visible on-chain evidence, which has not been observed. User funds in Orchard are considered safe and should be recoverable, assuming no prior exploitation. If the flaw was never used, all legitimate funds can be withdrawn. The article outlines risks associated with moving funds to transparent addresses or other pools, but concludes that leaving assets in place is a reasonable option. Currently, users cannot independently verify that the total ZEC supply hasn't been inflated due to this bug. However, the planned Ironwood network upgrade is designed to resolve this. It will permanently close the Orchard pool to new deposits and internal transfers, allowing only withdrawals. This mechanism will cap total withdrawals at the amount of legitimately deposited funds, enabling anyone to cryptographically verify the supply post-upgrade. Multiple teams, including Shielded Labs, have conducted extensive audits focused on counterfeiting vulnerabilities, assisted by advanced AI tools. No additional flaws of this type have been found so far, increasing confidence that no other similar undisclosed vulnerabilities exist. In summary, evidence indicates the Orchard bug was probably not used, user funds are secure, and no other counterfeiting flaws are currently known. The upcoming Ironwood upgrade will restore users' ability to independently verify the total ZEC supply, closing this chapter.

Foresight NewsHá 1h

ZEC Co-Founder Responds to Orchard Vulnerability: No Signs of Theft, Orchard Pool to Be Sealed

Foresight NewsHá 1h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片