Assessing Useless Coin’s 12% price dip below KEY support

ambcryptoPublicado em 2026-01-09Última atualização em 2026-01-09

Resumo

Memecoins are pausing their recent rally, with Useless Coin (USELESS) dropping over 12% in 24 hours. It broke a key ascending trendline support, and technical indicators like the Money Flow Index show capital outflow. On-chain data reveals institutions like Wintermute and Coinbase moved over $600K worth of tokens to hot wallets, likely for selling, though Kraken accumulated. Open Interest fell sharply from $40M to $33M, and trading volume dropped from $122M to $82M. If the decline continues, USELESS may retest $0.069. A short squeeze could occur at $0.1242, but breaking below $0.1020 may intensify losses. The rally could be over or just pausing.

Memecoins appear to be pausing their rally that began earlier this year.

For example, Useless Coin [USELESS] has dropped more than 12% in the past 24 hours, with its price still trending downward at the time of writing.

USELESS Coin breaks trendline support

The price action charts showed that USELESS broke an ascending trendline support that had been in place since the start of this month. The first week of January 2026 saw the memecoin reach $0.12, but bulls were unable to break past this level.

The MACD was bearish over the past two days, though its momentum was weak. Moreover, the Money Flow Index (MFI) had also declined from a peak of 77 to 35 at press time.

This indicated capital was flowing out of the token.

In case the decline continues, the price could retest the breakout level at $0.06958 of the range that ignited this rally. However, a resurgence of bulls could invalidate such an undertaking.

The decline was not only dependent on a technical breakdown; on-chain data also supported this trend.

Institutions offload the memecoin

As per on-chain data from Solscan, institutions were offloading their tokens. Wintermute and Coinbase were moving their USELESS coins to the hot wallet, potentially for selling.

Wintermute moved more than $131K worth of the tokens, while Coinbase moved over $500K in capital. In total, more than $600K in USELESS was ready for selling.

However, this was not the case for the Kraken exchange. The exchange moved more than $194K to their cold wallet, indicating accumulation.

As a result, the institutional activity showed mixed sentiments, though the selling activity was more impactful on price. In fact, the Long/Short Ratio was at 0.9 as of writing, suggesting more trades, even from retail, were being sold.

A look into volume, OI, and max pain levels!

More data showed why USELESS’s price was declining.

At press time, Open Interest (OI) dropped sharply from $40 million to $33 million within a single day. This decline followed a steady uptrend that had been in place since the 30th of December.

Trading volume mirrored the move, plunging from $122 million to $82 million over the same period.

Meanwhile, the maximum liquidation pain for the memecoin indicated that a short squeeze could occur if the price reached $0.1242 again.

On the other hand, the decline could be intensified if the price broke below $0.1020. This was the max pain level for bulls.

Altogether, the rally could be over, indicating a seasonal tendency where cryptos start the year with a surge.

Conversely, it could be a pause before the price rally continuation, especially now that memecoins have added over $8 billion to their capitalization.

Final Thoughts

  • USELESS crashes 12% amid a technical breakdown, but this could be a temporary pause.
  • Institutions offloading, volume and OI declining, and shorts contributed to the downside movement.

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat was the percentage drop in Useless Coin's price in the past 24 hours and what key support level did it break?

AUseless Coin's price by more than 12% in the past 24 hours, breaking an ascending trendline support that had been in place since the start of the month.

QWhich two specific institutions were offloading their USELESS tokens according to on-chain data from Solscan?

AAccording to on-chain data from Solscan, Wintermute and Coinbase were offloading their USELESS tokens.

QWhat did the sharp decline in Open Interest (OI) and Trading Volume indicate for USELESS?

AThe sharp decline in Open Interest (OI) from $40 million to $33 million and the plunge in Trading Volume from $122 million to $82 million indicated a loss of market interest and participation, contributing to the price decline.

QAt what price level could a short squeeze occur for USELESS, and at what level could the decline intensify for bulls?

AA short squeeze could occur if the price reached $0.1242 again. The decline could be intensified if the price broke below $0.1020, which was the max pain level for bulls.

QWhat does the article suggest are the two possible scenarios for the future of the USELESS price rally?

AThe article suggests that the rally could be over, indicating a seasonal tendency, or it could just be a temporary pause before the price rally continuation.

Leituras Relacionadas

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

NEAR Returns to AI Origins: From Payroll Struggles to Blockchain, Now Focusing on AI Agents and Privacy NEAR Protocol's journey began not with grand blockchain ambitions, but from a practical hurdle: its AI startup founders, including Transformer paper co-author Illia Polosukhin, couldn't efficiently pay international developers in 2017. This led them to pivot and build a high-performance, scalable blockchain. After years navigating various crypto narratives like sharding and cross-chain interoperability, NEAR is now leveraging its AI roots to re-enter the AI arena. A key driver is its "NEAR Intents" layer, which abstracts complex cross-chain transactions. Users simply state their goal (e.g., swap BTC for ETH), and a solver network finds the optimal route. This system has processed over $20B in cross-chain volume, generating significant fee revenue. A major growth area is private transactions via "Confidential Intents/Swaps," which hide trade details until settlement to protect against MEV and front-running. Remarkably, private swaps recently accounted for over 40% of NEAR's transaction volume, highlighting strong demand but also potential regulatory scrutiny. With its AI-founder pedigree, NEAR is positioning itself at the intersection of blockchain, AI agents, and privacy, aiming to become infrastructure for the emerging agent economy while navigating the challenges of its rapid adoption.

marsbitHá 2h

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

marsbitHá 2h

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

In recent discussions, Vitalik Buterin has frequently emphasized the concept of "CROPS," a framework defining core values for Ethereum's development. CROPS stands for Censorship Resistance, Capture Resistance, Open Source, Privacy, and Security. Initially outlined in the Ethereum Foundation's "EF Mandate," it represents a commitment to user sovereignty, ensuring that the network resists external control, remains open, protects privacy, and prioritizes security. The relevance of CROPS extends beyond Ethereum's foundational principles, becoming crucial in the context of AI integration. As AI agents begin handling wallet operations and automated transactions, the risk increases that users may cede control over their digital assets, privacy, and intentions to centralized AI service providers. A "CROPS AI" would therefore emphasize local execution where possible, privacy-preserving remote model calls (e.g., using zero-knowledge proofs), and transparent, verifiable processes to maintain user agency. Vitalik highlights a significant convergence between "CROPS Ethereum access layer" and "CROPS AI." Both address the same fundamental challenge: how users can access powerful services—be it blockchain data via RPCs or AI models—without exposing sensitive information or relinquishing ultimate control. This intersection points toward a future digital entry point that is more private, secure, and user-controlled. Ultimately, CROPS is not merely an abstract ideal but a practical guidepost. It steers development—from protocol resilience and wallet design to AI agent safety—towards a future where users retain self-sovereignty even as digital systems grow more complex and powerful. In an era of accelerating AI adoption, these "slow variables" of censorship resistance, openness, privacy, and security may define Ethereum's enduring value.

marsbitHá 2h

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

marsbitHá 2h

Zcash Bug Could Have Minted Unlimited ZEC Undetected

A critical vulnerability in Zcash's Orchard shielded pool, discovered by researcher Taylor Hornby on May 29, 2026, could have allowed an attacker to create an unlimited amount of undetectable counterfeit ZEC. The flaw, involving an under-constrained element in the Orchard circuit, existed from the pool's 2022 activation until an emergency fix was deployed by June 2, 2026. Hornby identified the bug using AI-assisted auditing tools and confirmed its exploitability in a test environment. Due to Orchard's privacy features, which hide transaction amounts and history, there is no cryptographic way to prove whether the vulnerability was exploited before the fix. While Shielded Labs assesses prior exploitation as unlikely, this uncertainty has sparked a debate on proving supply integrity in privacy-preserving systems. In response, Shielded Labs and other developers are exploring a network upgrade, potentially involving a new shielded pool and formal verification of the circuit rules to prevent future vulnerabilities and allow verification of the ZEC supply's integrity. ZEC's price fell nearly 45% following the disclosure.

bitcoinistHá 2h

Zcash Bug Could Have Minted Unlimited ZEC Undetected

bitcoinistHá 2h

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbitHá 3h

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbitHá 3h

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbitHá 3h

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

marsbitHá 3h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片

Categorias popularesright-arrow

Etiquetas Popularesright-arrow