ARK Invest Heavily Buys Crypto-Related Stocks: Lower Risk, or Double Pressure?

marsbitPublicado em 2026-07-06Última atualização em 2026-07-06

Resumo

During Bitcoin's worst monthly performance in four years, ARK Invest, led by Cathie Wood, purchased $77 million worth of stock in crypto-related public companies in June, including Coinbase, Circle, and Bullish. The investment thesis suggests these stocks offer compliant exposure to the crypto sector without directly holding Bitcoin. However, analysis reveals significant drawbacks: these stocks exhibit nearly double the volatility of Bitcoin itself (68%-90% vs. 37.6% over 30 days) and only moderate correlation with Bitcoin prices (0.55-0.58 for several firms). This indicates investors are exposed to both partial crypto price movements and a full suite of company-specific business risks like earnings, competition, and financing. MicroStrategy (MSTR) is the closest to a pure Bitcoin proxy with high correlation and leverage (beta of 1.59). In contrast, Circle's price is heavily influenced by stablecoin competition, while Robinhood's diversified business buffers crypto downturns but also limits upside. Notably, some mining stocks (RIOT, MARA) have risen sharply in 2024 due to AI-related ventures, decoupling from Bitcoin's decline. The case of MicroStrategy highlights additional equity-specific risks like potential shareholder dilution and the breakdown of its premium valuation model (mNAV), which recently forced it to consider selling Bitcoin for liquidity. While some stocks like Coinbase have outperformed Bitcoin year-to-date, the data suggests investing in crypto equities gener...

Original Author: Andjela Radmilac

Original Compilation: Luffy, Foresight News

Cathie Wood's ARK Invest accumulated $77 million worth of publicly listed crypto company stocks in June. According to ARK's daily trading disclosures, during Bitcoin's worst monthly performance in four years, the fund increased its positions by $44 million in Coinbase, $25.25 million in Circle, and $8.2 million in Bullish.

Wood and several institutions have adhered to the same investment thesis for years: publicly listed crypto companies provide investors with a compliant channel to share in the cyclical gains of the crypto industry without directly holding Bitcoin. However, CryptoSlate's analysis of market data as of July 2nd reveals the hidden significant cost of this stock investment path.

The 30-day annualized realized volatility of nine US-listed crypto companies ranges from 68% to 90%, almost double Bitcoin's 37.6% volatility. Extending to a 90-day period, Circle's volatility reaches 103.6%, while Bitcoin's is only 37.8%. The gap in price drawdowns is also significant: Circle has retreated 51.4% from its high, MSTR 48.6%, Bullish 43.6%; whereas Bitcoin has declined 36.4% from its near $97,000 high in January, with all drawdowns smaller than those of the aforementioned stocks.

30-day annualized realized volatility of BTC, ETH, and nine US-listed crypto company stocks from January 1, 2026, to July 2, 2026

Judging by volatility alone, crypto stocks appear to be leveraged Bitcoin. However, correlation data reveals a completely different truth. Over the past 90 trading days, the correlation coefficients between Circle, Robinhood, Bullish, and Bitcoin were only 0.55–0.58 (correlation range is 0 to 1, where 1 represents perfectly synchronized movements, and 0 represents no association). This means Bitcoin's price movements explain only about one-third of the stock volatility of these crypto companies. The remaining volatility stems entirely from company-specific risks: quarterly earnings reports, industry competition, financing activities, equity dilution from share issuance, etc. Investors aiming to gain crypto industry exposure via stocks ended up with only partial Bitcoin price exposure while additionally bearing a whole set of operational risks unique to the stock market.

Only One Stock Truly Tracks Bitcoin

The table below summarizes the correlation of crypto company stocks with Bitcoin from late 2025 to the present. The Beta coefficient represents the percentage change in the individual stock for every 1% movement in Bitcoin.

Only MSTR in the entire market qualifies as a Bitcoin alternative. With a Beta of 1.59 and a correlation of 0.85, it is essentially an equity instrument for holding leveraged Bitcoin. In the current downturn, its year-to-date decline and drawdown from highs far exceed Bitcoin's.

Coinbase is a relatively balanced choice, with a year-to-date decline of -26.8%, slightly less than BTC's. Its Beta coefficient is 1.26 and correlation is 0.75, making it the second strongest correlated with Bitcoin within the sector. However, its volatility is still nearly double that of Bitcoin. The stock is down 60.6% from its historical high of $419.78 in July 2025, meaning losses for investors who bought at that peak are much greater than for those who entered at Bitcoin's historical high in October 2025.

Circle perfectly illustrates "company-specific risks beneath a crypto facade." It has the lowest correlation with Bitcoin in the sector and the highest 90-day volatility. The trigger occurred on June 30th: the Open USD stablecoin, backed by over 140 companies including Coinbase, Stripe, Visa, Mastercard, and BlackRock, officially launched. CRCL plummeted 17.5% that day. This sharp drop was almost entirely unrelated to Bitcoin's performance, purely a company-specific negative stemming from competition for market share in the stablecoin race.

Robinhood serves as a counter-example, similarly confirming that individual stock performance operates independently of crypto trends. The stock has declined only 0.3% year-to-date, with a maximum intra-year drawdown of just 8.5%. Crypto is only a small part of its overall brokerage business encompassing stocks, options, and derivatives; diversified operations cushion the downturn. Conversely, during crypto bull markets, it is unlikely to provide investors with substantial gains from crypto price appreciation.

Mining company movements are most anomalous. While Bitcoin fell 29.5% year-to-date, RIOT surged 74.5%, MARA rose 38.1%, and CleanSpark gained 24.7%. The core logic is their pivot to becoming AI high-performance computing service providers, securing tens of billions in computing power leasing contracts while consistently reducing their Bitcoin holdings. Although their daily movements still follow Bitcoin (Beta coefficients all greater than 1), their full-year returns are entirely driven by AI hosting services, decoupled from coin prices.

Year-to-date price changes of BTC, ETH, and nine US-listed cryptocurrency stocks

Bitcoin itself is not low in volatility. Volmex's Bitcoin 30-day Volatility Index dropped to a low of 24.5 in late May, peaked at 68.7 in early February, and rebounded to 41.6 in early July. Despite this, the volatility of most crypto stocks remains approximately double.

Strategy Case: Equity Structure Brings Additional Risks

Holding Bitcoin only entails the risk of price fluctuations; buying publicly listed crypto company stocks adds layers of corporate operational risks, equity dilution, disappearance of valuation premiums, financing pressures, changes in capital structure, and other variables.

Strategy recently exposed all these vulnerabilities within a single month. In late June, its price-to-net-asset-value (mNAV) ratio fell below 1 for the first time. This metric measures the company's total valuation against its net assets. A ratio below 1 means the market values the entire company less than the cash and Bitcoin it holds. According to disclosures as of June 22nd, Strategy held 847,363 Bitcoin. On the day mNAV fell below 1, this Bitcoin was worth approximately $50 billion.

An mNAV greater than 1 is the foundation of Strategy's entire growth flywheel. Previously, the company could issue common and preferred shares at a premium, use the raised funds to acquire more Bitcoin, thereby increasing Bitcoin holdings per share. Once mNAV falls below 1, this cycle can erode shareholder value in reverse—issuing new shares to raise funds for buying Bitcoin equates to selling existing Bitcoin assets at a discount.

CryptoSlate reported as early as January that Bitcoin-holding companies are divided into valuation premium and discount types. By late June, Strategy's total market cap was $29.54 billion, less than half of its peak exceeding $71 billion in 2024, with all four classes of preferred stock at historical lows.

Strategy announced a response plan. On June 29th, it revealed a stock repurchase program of up to $1.25 billion while authorizing Bitcoin sales to supplement liquidity, covering preferred stock dividends and debt interest. In the preceding weeks, on June 1st, the company conducted its first Bitcoin sale since 2022, selling only 32 Bitcoin. Following the news, the stock surged 12.6% in a single day, ending an eight-day losing streak. The world's largest Bitcoin-holding company needing to sell its holdings in a bear market to secure cash flow is a constraint not encountered when directly holding Bitcoin and a risk unique to stocks.

This is precisely the backdrop against which ARK increased its positions against the trend. On June 25th, as crypto stocks collectively plummeted, Wood's funds bought $3.27 million worth of Robinhood in a single day, simultaneously adding to positions in Coinbase, Circle, and Bullish. Wood believes Bitcoin's long-term target price is in the millions of dollars and is currently positioning at a significant discount in crypto companies that have deeply corrected from their 2025 highs.

The data reveals the true nature of these companies.

  • Strategy = Leveraged Bitcoin + Equity Dilution Risk;
  • Circle = Payment company in the stablecoin track, deeply embroiled in market share battles;
  • Robinhood = Comprehensive brokerage firm, crypto is just a side business.

Wood's bulk purchase of these company stocks is essentially a bet on a combination of different business models, with vastly differing levels of crypto exposure among them.

Each individual stock has its own independent investment thesis. Coinbase has outperformed Bitcoin year-to-date, Robinhood has maintained its January price level, and the mining sector overall has led in returns. But the core question remains: Are crypto stocks really less risky than holding coins directly?

Data from nine listed companies shows that stocks either amplify Bitcoin's volatility or layer on company-specific operational risks unrelated to coin prices.

This year's truly strong-performing crypto stocks rely on independent growth drivers like AI computing power, brokerage user traffic, and payment products, with Bitcoin being only a secondary influencing factor.

Perguntas relacionadas

QAccording to the article, why did ARK Invest increase its holdings in cryptocurrency-related stocks in June?

ACathie Wood of ARK Invest increased holdings in cryptocurrency-related stocks like Coinbase, Circle, and Bullish during Bitcoin's worst monthly performance in four years, viewing it as an opportunity to buy into deeply corrected companies at a discount, in line with her long-term bullish outlook on Bitcoin (targeting a million-dollar price).

QWhat is the key finding from the analysis of volatility between cryptocurrencies and crypto stocks?

AThe analysis shows that the annualized 30-day realized volatility for nine US-listed crypto companies ranges from 68% to 90%, which is nearly double Bitcoin's volatility of 37.6%. This indicates that crypto stocks generally exhibit significantly higher volatility than the underlying cryptocurrencies themselves.

QWhich stock is described as the only true Bitcoin tracking alternative, and what are its characteristics?

AMSTR (MicroStrategy) is described as the only stock that truly tracks Bitcoin. It has a beta of 1.59 and a correlation of 0.85 with Bitcoin, meaning it essentially acts as a leveraged equity tool for holding Bitcoin, but consequently suffers greater drawdowns during market declines.

QWhat specific company risk did Circle (CRCL) recently face that was unrelated to Bitcoin's price movement?

ACircle faced a company-specific risk on June 30th when the Open USD stable币, backed by over 140 companies including Coinbase and BlackRock, launched. This intensified competition in the stablecoin sector, causing CRCL's stock to plummet 17.5% in a single day, an event largely disconnected from Bitcoin's price action.

QWhat dilemma did Strategy face when its mNAV (market price to Net Asset Value) fell below 1, and how did it respond?

AWhen Strategy's mNAV fell below 1, it threatened its growth model of issuing premium shares to buy more Bitcoin, as new share issuance would effectively mean selling existing Bitcoin holdings at a discount. In response, the company announced a $1.25 billion stock buyback plan and authorized the sale of Bitcoin to cover liquidity needs like dividends and debt interest, highlighting a stock-specific risk not present when holding Bitcoin directly.

Leituras Relacionadas

MSTR Discloses Sale of 3,588 Bitcoins, Stock Price Drops Over 5% at One Point During Trading

MicroStrategy, the world's largest corporate holder of Bitcoin, has significantly shifted its business model. Between June 29 and July 5, the company sold 3,588 bitcoins for approximately $216 million to fund quarterly dividends for its preferred stock. This marks its largest-ever Bitcoin sale and signals a strategic pivot: Bitcoin is transitioning from a "buy-and-hold" reserve asset to a liquidity management tool for the company. This move follows a recent authorization allowing Bitcoin sales when equity fundraising is less attractive. The announcement contributed to a more than 5% intraday drop in MicroStrategy's stock price, while Bitcoin fell to around $61,800—below the company's average holding cost of roughly $75,700. The sale represents a major departure from MicroStrategy's long-standing "never sell" commitment, which saw its first minor breach in May with a $2.5 million sale. The latest, hundred-times-larger transaction underscores growing financial pressures. Analysts note the company faces about $1.5 billion in annual preferred dividend obligations, far exceeding cash flow from its software business. As of July 5, MicroStrategy holds 843,775 bitcoins. Its current operational logic involves buying Bitcoin during favorable financing conditions and selling portions to cover dividends when needed, creating a flexible capital management cycle amidst a challenging market environment.

华尔街日报Há 2h

MSTR Discloses Sale of 3,588 Bitcoins, Stock Price Drops Over 5% at One Point During Trading

华尔街日报Há 2h

Q-Day Countdown: Will Quantum Computing End Cryptocurrencies?

Quantum Computing's Threat to Cryptocurrency: A Countdown to Q-Day Quantum computing, specifically Shor's algorithm, poses a fundamental threat to the public-key cryptography (e.g., ECDSA, RSA) that secures blockchain networks like Bitcoin and Ethereum. This critical juncture, known as Q-Day, is estimated to occur potentially within the next 5-15 years. The core vulnerability stems from the public and immutable nature of blockchains. Assets in addresses where the public key is already exposed on-chain (e.g., spent outputs) are at direct risk, as a sufficiently powerful quantum computer could derive the private key. This threatens the very trust model of cryptocurrencies. The response lies in Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC)—algorithms like lattice-based ML-DSA and hash-based SLH-DSA, which are resistant to quantum attacks. NIST has standardized key PQC algorithms (FIPS 203, 204, 205), providing a migration path. However, the primary challenge is not technical but socio-economic and involves complex governance: * **Bitcoin's** path is constrained by its conservative ethos. Migrating requires a soft-fork to new address types, facing hurdles like significantly larger signature sizes and, most critically, the divisive governance question of how to handle at-risk legacy UTXOs without violating core principles. * **Ethereum** is pursuing a "cryptographic agility" strategy, with a multi-layered roadmap. It leverages account abstraction for user accounts and is developing compressed hash-based signatures (e.g., leanXMSS) for its consensus layer, aiming for a full-stack upgrade over time. In conclusion, quantum computing does not spell an instant end for cryptocurrency but initiates a critical countdown. The industry has a limited "engineering comfort window" to orchestrate a coordinated, ecosystem-wide migration to PQC. The ultimate bottlenecks are the immense coordination efforts and governance decisions required for this foundational transition.

marsbitHá 3h

Q-Day Countdown: Will Quantum Computing End Cryptocurrencies?

marsbitHá 3h

Trump, the President Who Knows Best How to 'Trade Stocks'

Former US President Donald Trump reported a record-breaking $2.2 billion in personal income for 2025, the highest annual income ever disclosed by a sitting president. This figure, from a 927-page government ethics filing, represented a 3.5-fold increase from his $600 million income in 2024 and boosted his net worth to $6.5 billion. The primary drivers were cryptocurrency (64% of income, approximately $1.4 billion) and real estate (26%, approximately $575 million). His crypto earnings stemmed largely from the launch of his personal meme coin, $TRUMP, generating over $600 million in licensing fees, and substantial profits from the WLFI token and its parent company. Despite a sluggish property market, his Mar-a-Lago resort and associated golf clubs saw revenue surges of 50% and 27%, respectively, attributed to their use as venues for presidential events. Trump's financial disclosure also revealed an unprecedented level of stock market activity, with over 22,000 trades executed in 2025, averaging 87 trades per market day. Media analyses noted several instances where significant trading coincided with major policy announcements, such as proposed tariffs, raising questions about potential conflicts of interest. While the White House stated these trades were handled by a family-managed trust fund and not Trump directly, critics highlighted this as a departure from the blind trusts traditionally used by presidents post-Watergate. The report has intensified debate over the commercialization of the presidency. Supporters view it as a success story of a businessman-president, while critics argue it demonstrates an unprecedented conversion of public influence into private wealth, with policy decisions potentially linked to personal financial gains. The controversy centers on whether Trump's earnings represent innovative entrepreneurship or a fundamental conflict of interest, sparking renewed calls for stricter ethics reforms in US governance.

marsbitHá 4h

Trump, the President Who Knows Best How to 'Trade Stocks'

marsbitHá 4h

Countdown to Q-Day: Will Quantum Computing End Cryptocurrencies?

The article explores the existential threat quantum computing poses to cryptocurrencies and the urgent need for "post-quantum" migration. It outlines that quantum computers, through Shor's algorithm, could break the elliptic-curve cryptography (ECC) underlying blockchain security, potentially allowing private keys to be derived from public keys. The core challenge is not a lack of post-quantum cryptography (PQC) standards—like NIST's ML-KEM and ML-DSA—but the immense complexity of upgrading entire ecosystems before "Q-Day" (when quantum computers become capable of such attacks, estimated around 2035-2045). Key points include: * **Bitcoin's** risk is concentrated in legacy UTXOs with exposed public keys (e.g., early P2PK outputs). Migration faces massive hurdles: PQC signatures are much larger, increasing transaction size and cost, and the governance dilemma of handling un-migrated assets threatens its "code is law" ethos. * **Ethereum's** strategy focuses on "cryptographic agility," using Account Abstraction for user accounts and developing compressed hash-based signatures (like leanXMSS with SNARK aggregation) for consensus. Its migration is a complex, full-stack overhaul of execution, consensus, and data layers. * The "security debt" is enormous. The comfortable engineering window for a coordinated, ecosystem-wide upgrade is only 5-8 years. High-value infrastructure (exchanges, bridges) may face pressure before mainnet protocols. In conclusion, quantum computing is not an instant "doomsday" event but a forcing function for systemic change. Bitcoin's ultimate test is social consensus and property rights governance, while Ethereum's is technical complexity. Failure to migrate in time could lead to a fundamental re-pricing of crypto assets.

链捕手Há 4h

Countdown to Q-Day: Will Quantum Computing End Cryptocurrencies?

链捕手Há 4h

Trading

Spot
活动图片