Are Rising U.S. Stocks Getting More Dangerous? Goldman Sachs: Downside Protection Mechanisms Have Almost Failed

marsbitPublicado em 2026-06-01Última atualização em 2026-06-01

Resumo

The US stock market rally is showing signs of becoming increasingly precarious as key downside protection mechanisms fail, according to Goldman Sachs. Derivatives strategist Brian Garrett notes that the S&P 500 options volatility skew has plunged to an 18-month low, indicating the market now prices an 8% probability for both a 10% drop and a 10% rise—a sign of "skew failure." Concurrently, Goldman's Panic Index hit a two-year low, reflecting minimal demand for tail-risk hedging. This complacency emerges amid a relentless market surge, with the S&P 500 setting new records frequently in 2024. Garrett highlights three major concerns: extreme concentration in the top ten stocks (40% of index weight), heavy reliance on AI-themed performance, and a price pattern eerily similar to the 1998-1999 period. Despite pervasive media pessimism, this fear is absent in options pricing. Downside hedge costs are historically low. Goldman suggests tactical trades: buying RSP outperformance options versus the SPX for a broadening rally, purchasing VIX calls for protection, and going long on Bitcoin ETF volatility. Hedge funds have been net buyers for two weeks, with sector rotation into financials and out of industrials. Notably, the global single-stock leveraged/ inverse ETF AUM has doubled to over $60 billion in two months, underscoring growing speculative activity.

The market's fear of downside risk has nearly vanished, and a core pricing mechanism in the options market is failing.

In a latest weekend report, Goldman Sachs derivatives strategist Brian Garrett pointed out that the volatility skew of S&P 500 options has fallen to an 18-month low. The market is pricing a roughly 8% probability for both a 10% decline and a 10% rise—a phenomenon directly characterized by Goldman's volatility team as 'Skew Failure.'

At the same time, the Goldman Sachs Panic Index closed in single digits, hitting a two-year low, indicating that market demand for hedging against tail risks has fallen to extremely low levels.

This signal appears against the backdrop of the U.S. stock market's continued surge. The S&P 500 has been hitting record highs on average every five trading days this year, and Micron's stock price surpassed $1,000 for the first time after hours on Sunday.

Garrett admitted that internal team discussions have evolved from 'Make it stop' in March to 'This is still going up?' in May. However, his own stance is shifting from cautious optimism to increasing pessimism, and he clearly listed several bearish reasons.

Three Bearish Signals Emerge, Cracks Appear Between Market Sentiment and Fundamentals

Garrett listed three major concerns in the current market.

First, market leadership is extremely narrow. The top ten weighted stocks in the S&P 500 now account for 40% of the index's weight, and the last four record highs occurred when overall market breadth was negative—a phenomenon that has never occurred before.

Second, thematic concentration is extremely high. Year-to-date, the S&P 500 excluding AI-related stocks has lagged the overall index by 700 basis points.

Third, price action is highly similar to history. Garrett noted that the 2026 price pattern closely resembles that of late 1998 to 1999.

Although bearish voices are flooding media headlines and social media, Garrett emphasized that this concern is not reflected in the pricing of the options market—at least, the fear of downside risk is almost nowhere to be seen.

Skew Failure: Downside Hedging Costs Fall to Historic Lows

Goldman's volatility team provided three key observations from the options market.

First, the S&P 500 volatility skew has fallen to an 18-month low. This move is driven by two forces: the put wing is unusually cheap, while the call wing is relatively expensive.

Second, the Goldman Sachs Panic Index closed in single digits last Friday, hitting a two-year low. This index synthesizes the two-year percentile rankings of VVIX, VIX, Skew, and at-the-money volatility.

Third, and most crucially: the market prices the probability of a 10% decline and a 10% rise as exactly the same, both around 8%. This means the options market no longer assigns extra premium to downside risk; the protective function of Skew has effectively failed.

Garrett pointed out that the direct implication of the above phenomena is: for investors looking to hedge correlation risk, the current hedging cost is extremely low.

Low-Cost Hedging Paired with Right-Tail Positioning

Based on the above assessment, Garrett provided several specific trade recommendations.

For investors bullish on market style rotation, expecting the rally to shift from concentration to dispersion, Goldman recommends buying RSP (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF) outperformance options relative to SPX, with a 1-month 100% outperformance option costing about 145 basis points. It also recommends buying VIX call options as a hedging tool, noting that the term structure for August and beyond is extremely flat, with VVIX at 86.

For investors seeking simple downside protection, Garrett suggests directly buying S&P 500 put options—given the extremely low put skew, the payout structure is quite attractive.

Additionally, Goldman recommends going long Bitcoin ETF volatility with delta-neutral hedging. Garrett noted that Bitcoin has historically performed like a 'leveraged Nasdaq,' but its current pricing is at a two-year low and about 10 volatility points lower than SMH.

Fund Flows: Hedge Funds Net Buyers for Two Consecutive Weeks, Single-Stock ETF Assets Double

According to Goldman's latest Prime Brokerage data, hedge funds have been net buyers for two consecutive weeks, at the fastest pace this year, mainly reflected in long additions and macro short covering.

Significant sector rotation is evident: Financials (down 6% YTD) saw net buying, while Industrials (up 11.5% YTD) saw net selling.

On the futures side, end-user positioning has rebounded to near 2024 highs. Goldman's team specifically noted that levered ETFs are mechanically expanding their balance sheet size; CTA strategies are currently positioned near neutral, but systematic strategies show clear asymmetry towards the left tail—buying about $12 billion in a flat 1-month scenario versus selling about $100 billion in a down 1-month scenario.

Notably, global leveraged and inverse single-stock ETF assets under management have surpassed $60 billion, doubling in two months. The size of this niche market can no longer be ignored.

Criptomoedas em alta

Perguntas relacionadas

QAccording to Goldman Sachs, what is currently malfunctioning in the equity options market and what does it indicate?

AGoldman Sachs states that the volatility skew (Skew) for S&P 500 options is malfunctioning, having dropped to an 18-month low. This indicates that the market is pricing the probability of a 10% decline and a 10% rise as virtually identical (both around 8%), meaning the protective mechanism against downside risk has nearly failed.

QWhat are the three major concerns or bearish signals listed by Goldman's Brian Garrett regarding the current market?

AThe three concerns are: 1) Extremely narrow market leadership, where the top 10 stocks account for 40% of the S&P 500 weight and recent highs occurred with negative market breadth. 2) High thematic concentration, with the S&P 500 ex-AI significantly underperforming the full index. 3) Price action that is highly similar to the 1998-1999 period.

QWhat is the Goldman Sachs Panic Index, and what level did it recently reach?

AThe Goldman Sachs Panic Index is a composite index that incorporates the 2-year percentile rankings of the VVIX, VIX, Skew, and at-the-money volatility. It recently closed in single digits, hitting a two-year low, signaling extremely low demand for hedging tail risks.

QWhat specific trading recommendations did Goldman Sachs provide based on its market analysis?

ARecommendations include: 1) Buying RSP (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF) outperform options vs. SPX for investors betting on a market rotation. 2) Buying VIX call options for hedging. 3) Buying S&P 500 put options for direct downside protection. 4) Going long Bitcoin ETF volatility with delta-neutral hedging.

QWhat notable trend was observed in hedge fund activity and single-stock ETFs according to Goldman's prime brokerage data?

AHedge funds have been net buyers for two consecutive weeks at the fastest pace this year, driven by long additions and macro short covering. Meanwhile, the assets under management (AUM) for global leveraged and inverse single-stock ETFs surpassed $60 billion, doubling in two months.

Leituras Relacionadas

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Following the collapse of Huione Pay—dubbed the "Alipay of Southeast Asia"—seven months ago, the region's underground financial guarantee platform sector is undergoing a significant reshuffle. This power vacuum has been swiftly filled by emerging platforms such as XinBi, Tiger/Navigator, JinBei (renamed JinBo), Dali/Tiancheng, and FullyLight. These platforms, operating largely via Telegram and offering services like escrow for illicit transactions, have absorbed the vast user base and markets left behind by Huione. While positioning themselves as "trust intermediaries," their primary clientele consists of networks involved in online scams, money laundering, illegal gambling, and even human trafficking. For instance, the Tiger/Navigator platform explicitly provides "escrow" services for kidnapping-for-ransom operations ("强押车交易"). Data underscores the immense scale: Huione alone processed over $103 billion in cryptocurrency payments and facilitated over $31 billion through its escrow market before its downfall, linking it to Cambodia's notorious Prince Group. Since its collapse, competitors have seen explosive growth. For example, the XinBi platform has accumulated over $1.6 billion in total USDT revenue, while platforms like NewPay, OkPay (under Dali), and FullyLight Wallet collectively processed over $4.8 billion in USDT in a single year. This ecosystem thrives in regions like Cambodia and Myanmar, where regulatory gaps allow these platforms to act as critical financial infrastructure for sprawling cybercrime industries, from scam compounds to online casinos. The article concludes that the moniker "Southeast Asian Alipay" is a misnomer, obscuring the platforms' fundamental role in enabling serious criminal enterprises rather than representing legitimate financial innovation.

Odaily星球日报Há 37m

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Odaily星球日报Há 37m

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Title: The Shifting Landscape of Crypto Venture Capital The era of dedicated crypto venture capital funds is undergoing a significant transformation. Once essential for navigating the sector's complexity and high risk, these specialized funds are now facing an identity crisis as the market matures. This shift mirrors historical patterns in other specialized investment classes like cleantech and SPACs, where initial information advantages dissipate as technologies become mainstream and integrated into existing industry frameworks. The article argues that crypto is reaching a critical inflection point, transitioning from a "building phase" to an "integration phase." Major players like Stripe, BlackRock, and Visa now engage with crypto not for its novel mechanics but as a foundational financial infrastructure. Their needs—regulatory compliance, banking partnerships, distribution channels—align with traditional fintech, a domain easily understood by large, generalist funds like Sequoia and Founders Fund. This evolution creates a "barbell effect" within the VC landscape. On one end are massive, diversified platforms that can incorporate crypto as one vertical among many. On the other are small, nimble funds focused on niche, experimental projects. The middle ground—medium-sized dedicated crypto funds—is being squeezed out. Their typical fund size makes it impossible to generate sufficient returns solely from early-stage crypto bets, yet they cannot compete with giants for later-stage deals. Consequently, leading crypto-native firms like Paradigm and Framework Ventures are expanding into AI, robotics, and other sectors, driven partly by LP pressure for better returns amid a broader VC DPI crisis. Others, like Dragonfly and a16z, have narrowed their crypto focus predominantly to financial infrastructure like stablecoins, reframing the sector's core narrative. For crypto entrepreneurs, this consolidation presents challenges. While generalist funds offer larger checks and broader resources, crypto projects now compete fiercely with AI for attention and capital within these firms. Furthermore, the long-term, non-commercial foundational work that built the ecosystem—funded by dedicated crypto VCs—is less likely to attract generalist capital focused on direct returns. The conclusion is that "crypto investor" as a standalone category is becoming obsolete, akin to "internet investor." Crypto is becoming a baseline infrastructure layer. The future will see a barbell structure: large-scale growth financing handled by generalist funds, while pioneering, speculative projects are funded by small, specialized vehicles. The dedicated crypto funds of the 2017-2021 boom, which incubated core infrastructure, are giving way to this new, bifurcated reality.

Foresight NewsHá 54m

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Foresight NewsHá 54m

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

Title: As Consensus Forms Faster, What Are Young Investors Betting On? In the rapid evolution of tech investment, a new generation of young investors is navigating a landscape where AI, robotics, commercial aerospace, and quantum computing are advancing simultaneously. Traditional investment logic based on financial models is giving way to a need for deep technical understanding and the ability to act before industry consensus forms. An analysis of trends from the "WAIC FUTURE TECH" list of young investment leaders reveals key shifts in focus. The first major trend is the movement of AI from the digital screen into the physical world. Investment is shifting from large language models and chatbots towards embodied AI, robotics, AI hardware, and edge computing. While demonstrations generate excitement, the real challenge lies in achieving scalable, reliable, and cost-effective delivery in complex real-world environments like factories and logistics. Success depends not just on algorithms but on the integration of sensors, actuators, and control systems. Second, the competitive focus for large models is moving beyond raw capability toward building an "intelligence flywheel." The goal is to create self-reinforcing systems where user interaction generates data, improving the model, which in turn enhances the user experience and attracts more engagement. Companies that successfully embed AI into workflows to create these closed-loop systems can build lasting value that isn't easily erased by the next model upgrade. Third, facing a potential bottleneck in high-quality human-generated data, investors are looking at new underlying technologies. Reinforcement learning and self-play, as demonstrated by AlphaGo Zero, offer paths for AI to generate its own experience. Scientific foundation models, which aim to build general AI capabilities for fields like life sciences and materials discovery, represent a non-consensus direction that could unlock new frontiers of knowledge and data. Finally, in deep-tech areas like quantum computing, commercial aerospace, and space-based infrastructure, patient capital is essential. These fields have long, uncertain development and validation cycles involving complex engineering, supply chains, and regulations. Investment here requires a long-term view, focusing on foundational team capabilities and the eventual emergence of market demand, even if commercial returns are distant. Collectively, these trends illustrate how young investors are adapting to a new era. They are learning to make earlier, technically-informed judgments, balance hype with real-world viability, and provide the patient capital needed to build the deep-tech foundations of the future.

marsbitHá 1h

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

marsbitHá 1h

Trading

Spot

Artigos em Destaque

Como comprar CORE

Bem-vindo à HTX.com!Tornámos a compra de CORE (CORE) simples e conveniente.Segue o nosso guia passo a passo para iniciar a tua jornada no mundo das criptos.Passo 1: cria a tua conta HTXUtiliza o teu e-mail ou número de telefone para te inscreveres numa conta gratuita na HTX.Desfruta de um processo de inscrição sem complicações e desbloqueia todas as funcionalidades.Obter a minha contaPasso 2: vai para Comprar Cripto e escolhe o teu método de pagamentoCartão de crédito/débito: usa o teu visa ou mastercard para comprar CORE (CORE) instantaneamente.Saldo: usa os fundos da tua conta HTX para transacionar sem problemas.Terceiros: adicionamos métodos de pagamento populares, como Google Pay e Apple Pay, para aumentar a conveniência.P2P: transaciona diretamente com outros utilizadores na HTX.Mercado de balcão (OTC): oferecemos serviços personalizados e taxas de câmbio competitivas para os traders.Passo 3: armazena teu CORE (CORE)Depois de comprar o teu CORE (CORE), armazena-o na tua conta HTX.Alternativamente, podes enviá-lo para outro lugar através de transferência blockchain ou usá-lo para transacionar outras criptomoedas.Passo 4: transaciona CORE (CORE)Transaciona facilmente CORE (CORE) no mercado à vista da HTX.Acede simplesmente à tua conta, seleciona o teu par de trading, executa as tuas transações e monitoriza em tempo real.Oferecemos uma experiência de fácil utilização tanto para principiantes como para traders experientes.

334 Visualizações TotaisPublicado em {updateTime}Atualizado em 2026.06.02

Como comprar CORE

Discussões

Bem-vindo à Comunidade HTX. Aqui, pode manter-se informado sobre os mais recentes desenvolvimentos da plataforma e obter acesso a análises profissionais de mercado. As opiniões dos utilizadores sobre o preço de CORE (CORE) são apresentadas abaixo.

活动图片