Andreessen Horowitz-Backed Entropy Announces Shutdown

TheNewsCryptoPublicado em 2026-01-26Última atualização em 2026-01-26

Resumo

Decentralized crypto custody startup Entropy, backed by Andreessen Horowitz (a16z), is shutting down and returning remaining capital to investors, according to founder and CEO Tux Pacific. After four years, multiple pivots, and two rounds of layoffs, Pacific announced the decision on January 25. The company had recently shifted to a crypto automation platform but failed to meet venture-scale growth expectations. Entropy raised $25 million in a 2022 seed round led by a16z crypto, with participation from Dragonfly Capital, Coinbase Ventures, and others. Initially offering a decentralized alternative to custody providers like Fireblocks, the startup ultimately could not achieve sustainable growth. Pacific expressed gratitude to investors and indicated a personal shift away from crypto towards pharmaceuticals.

A decentralised crypto custody startup supported by Andreessen Horowitz (a16z), Entropy is terminating and plans to return the rest of the capital to investors, as per the founder and CEO Tux Pacific.

Pacific publicised through writing on X on January 25 that, “I am winding up Entropy, and after four years, various pivots and two rounds of layoffs, I have decided to terminate Entropy and return capital to the investors.”

The termination is followed by a late-stage push last year to reposition the firm around a crypto automation platform, which Pacific referred to as “basically n8n/Zapier/etc. for crypto”, having automated signing through threshold cryptography, safe computation leveraging trusted execution environments, and deep AI amalgamations.

That product direction was still not able to clear a venture-style growth bar. After the first feedback request disclosed that the business model was not venture scale, Pacific said that he was left with the choice to navigate a creative way forward or pivot once more.

The Heartful Gratitude

Entropy first captivated attention in 2022 when it generated $25 million in a seed round headed by a16z crypto, and the participants were Dragonfly Capital, Coinbase Ventures, Robot Ventures, Ethereal Ventures, Variant and Inflection. Before this, the company had so far accumulated $1.95 million in a pre-seed round.

At rollout, Entropy pitched itself as a decentralised alternative to custody providers like Fireblocks and Coinbase, depending on cryptographic approaches such as multi-party computation to allow users to control how funds move, comprising rule-based constraints.

Pacific also showed gratitude towards a16z crypto and Guy Wuollet for aiding in steering the wind-down and called their guidance “invaluable”. Pacific has also mentioned that they plan to step back before deciding what comes after Entropy.

He added that my time in crypto might be coming to a conclusion, as I feel myself drawn mainly into pharmaceuticals, and they want to work on hormone delivery and validate research on new oestradiol drug formulations.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Las Vegas Businesses Use Bitcoin as a Mainstream Payment to Avoid High Credit Card Fees

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is Entropy and why is it shutting down?

AEntropy is a decentralized crypto custody startup backed by Andreessen Horowitz (a16z). It is shutting down because, after four years, multiple pivots, and two rounds of layoffs, its founder and CEO Tux Pacific decided to terminate the company as its latest product direction failed to meet venture-scale growth expectations.

QWho were the major investors in Entropy's seed funding round?

AEntropy's $25 million seed round in 2022 was led by a16z crypto, with participation from Dragonfly Capital, Coinbase Ventures, Robot Ventures, Ethereal Ventures, Variant, and Inflection.

QWhat was Entropy's final product pivot before shutting down?

AEntropy's final pivot was to reposition itself as a crypto automation platform, described by its CEO as 'basically n8n/Zapier/etc. for crypto', which featured automated signing through threshold cryptography, safe computation using trusted execution environments, and deep AI integrations.

QWhat did Entropy's founder, Tux Pacific, announce about his future plans?

ATux Pacific announced that he plans to step back before deciding his next move and expressed that his time in crypto might be concluding. He stated he is drawn to the pharmaceutical industry and wants to work on hormone delivery and validate research on new oestradiol drug formulations.

QHow did Entropy initially position itself in the market at its launch?

AAt its launch, Entropy positioned itself as a decentralized alternative to custody providers like Fireblocks and Coinbase, relying on cryptographic approaches such as multi-party computation to give users control over fund movements with rule-based constraints.

Leituras Relacionadas

Three Months, 35 Billion Yuan: Investors Rush to Grab the OpenAI of the Physical World

Investors flock to a physical AI startup as the race for the "OpenAI of the physical world" heats up. Ji Jia Shi Jie (GigaWorld), a company dedicated to developing Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) for the physical world, has raised 3.5 billion RMB (approximately $490 million) in just three months, according to a report from investment media outlet Touzijie. The latest B2 funding round of 1 billion RMB attracted a wide range of top-tier investors, including sovereign wealth funds, industrial capital, and financial institutions. This brings the total funding for the young company, now valued over 10 billion RMB, to 3.5 billion RMB across three recent rounds. The company is led by Huang Guan, a post-90s Tsinghua University PhD with extensive experience in AI, autonomous driving, and entrepreneurship. Its core innovation is a "dual-pyramid" system comprising a five-layer data pyramid (from internet videos to real-world robot data) and a three-layer algorithm pyramid focused on world simulation, action alignment, and reinforcement learning. This system underpins its key models: the "World Action Model" (e.g., GigaBrain series for robot control) and the "World Generation Model" (e.g., GigaWorld series for simulating and understanding the physical world). Its models have reportedly achieved top rankings in global robotics benchmarks. Ji Jia Shi Jie argues that while current digital AGI excels in information processing, the next frontier is physical AGI—systems that can understand and interact with the real world. The company believes the field is approaching its "GPT-3 moment," a key inflection point in capability scaling. To achieve this, the company is pursuing a dual-market strategy. For the consumer (C) market, it launched the "SeeLight" brand and its S1 general-purpose humanoid robot, which has secured initial orders for deployment in real homes. For the business (B) market, it focuses on industrial automation with its Maker series robots, having signed agreements for large-scale deployment in factories, and its DriveDreamer world model for autonomous driving, which is already in use with over 30 automakers and tech companies. The report concludes that by bridging the gap between digital intelligence and physical action, Ji Jia Shi Jie aims to unlock a new wave of productivity, ultimately bringing physical AGI into everyday life.

marsbitHá 9m

Three Months, 35 Billion Yuan: Investors Rush to Grab the OpenAI of the Physical World

marsbitHá 9m

What's the Connection Between Pinduoduo's Huang Zheng and Blockchain?

This text explores the unexpected connection between Pinduoduo founder Colin Huang and blockchain, as suggested in his article *Turning Capitalism Upside Down*. Huang argues Pinduoduo's core business is about managing "uncertainty." He posits that wealth flows to the rich because they absorb life's uncertainties (e.g., illness, job loss) that devastate the poor, who pay a premium for certainty through insurance or stable prices. Pinduoduo's model attempts a "reverse insurance": by aggregating consumer demand via group-buying and flash sales, it creates a large, predictable order for manufacturers. This certainty allows factories to remove risk premiums, passing savings back as lower prices, thus partially reversing the wealth flow. The key obstacle, Huang notes, is that an individual's buying intent is an unreliable promise. He then asks if blockchain is the natural solution for this "reverse insurance." The text elaborates that blockchain, through smart contracts with binding deposits, could transform casual intent into a costly-to-break, enforceable commitment. This replaces interpersonal trust with coded rules, making promises credible, pricable, and resistant to fraud. Finally, the author draws a parallel to Bitcoin, framing two paths to creating certainty: the "Pinduoduo path" of aggregating decentralized will into scale, and the "Bitcoin path" of locking rules into immutable code. Both sacrifice something—personal freedom or system flexibility—to manufacture trust and predictability.

链捕手Há 1h

What's the Connection Between Pinduoduo's Huang Zheng and Blockchain?

链捕手Há 1h

The Storage Magnate Who Conquered a Trillion-Dollar Kingdom, Yet Ultimately Could Not Become the Richest

**Summary:** "The Memory Magnate Who Built a Trillion-Dollar Empire, Yet Never Became the Richest" explores the journey of Zhu Yiming, founder of GigaDevice (603986) and co-founder of the soon-to-IPO ChangXin Memory Technologies (CXMT). The article positions GigaDevice, a fabless chip designer now valued at ~¥340 billion, as a prequel to the massive IDM (Integrated Device Manufacturer) venture, CXMT. Starting in 2005 with minimal capital, Zhu strategically "picked up the pieces" by focusing on niche markets like NOR Flash and microcontrollers (MCUs), areas major players were exiting. This allowed GigaDevice to grow into a diversified semiconductor company, maintaining robust profitability even during industry downturns by controlling costs. However, the piece argues that in the highly cyclical and capital-intensive memory chip industry, the fabless model has limits. True resilience and scale require the ability for "counter-cyclical expansion" – investing heavily during downturns – a tactic only possible for IDMs like Samsung or SK Hynix. This insight led Zhu to partner with the Hefei city government in 2016 to establish CXMT, an IDM focused on DRAM. Zhu's symbolic moves, like forfeiting salary and diluting his equity, were crucial in securing the massive state and bank funding needed. CXMT's equipment base is now valued even higher than that of BYD's vast auto manufacturing empire. Despite the potential for CXMT to reach a market cap of ¥1-2 trillion upon its IPO, Zhu's indirect stake in both companies is estimated below 3%, placing his personal wealth far below that of China's top billionaires. The article concludes that his strategic vision built a trillion-yuan memory landscape, but the capital structure necessary to achieve it precluded a personal fortune of similar scale.

marsbitHá 1h

The Storage Magnate Who Conquered a Trillion-Dollar Kingdom, Yet Ultimately Could Not Become the Richest

marsbitHá 1h

Token Of Power Governance Exploit Drains $1.58 Million In WETH, TRM Says

Blockchain intelligence firm TRM Labs reports a governance exploit against the Token of Power protocol, resulting in a loss of approximately $1.58 million in WETH. The attacker exploited a missing timelock in the protocol's Aragon DAO setup, allowing them to propose, vote on, and execute a malicious action within a single block. The attacker funded the operation with 662 ETH from Tornado Cash, purchased enough TOP tokens to gain majority voting power, minted 10 billion new TOP tokens, and swapped them for WETH via a Balancer pool before moving funds back through Tornado Cash. The incident underscores that governance design is a critical security risk in DeFi, where parameters like timelocks provide essential reaction time. It also highlights how mixers and liquidity pools can be utilized in exploits without being directly compromised. Observers are now watching for any movement of the stolen funds and further remediation details from involved parties. This event is part of a broader shift in crypto, emphasizing the importance of underlying infrastructure, security, and governance alongside market movements.

bitcoinistHá 4h

Token Of Power Governance Exploit Drains $1.58 Million In WETH, TRM Says

bitcoinistHá 4h

XRP Ledger Daily Fees Drop Below $400 As Network Activity Question Returns

The XRP Ledger is drawing attention as daily network fees have fallen below $400. While low fees align with XRPL's design for affordable transactions and are often seen as a strength, the metric can also serve as an indicator of network demand and paid transaction volume. This data point of around $3,100 in weekly fee burn highlights the stark contrast with higher-fee chains like Ethereum and Bitcoin. The development fuels an ongoing debate. Proponents view low fees as a sign of efficiency and accessibility, while critics may question if the network is generating sufficient high-value activity relative to its market cap and payments-focused narrative. The article cautions against overstating the finding, noting a single low-fee day does not signify network failure. It instead adds context to discussions about XRPL's usage, especially alongside Ripple's broader initiatives in stablecoins (RLUSD), AI payments, and enterprise infrastructure. The report recommends monitoring for a fee rebound, checking transaction counts for a fuller picture, and confirming the trend via native explorers like Bithomp. It frames the story within a larger market shift where on-chain data, protocol updates, and infrastructure developments are becoming crucial alongside price action. The editorial stance is to present the verified data, explain its significance for assessing network activity, and avoid hype, positioning it as part of the daily crypto conversation.

bitcoinistHá 6h

XRP Ledger Daily Fees Drop Below $400 As Network Activity Question Returns