Amplify ETFs for stablecoins, tokenization go live for trading

cointelegraphPublicado em 2025-12-24Última atualização em 2025-12-24

Resumo

Amplify has launched two new exchange-traded funds: the Amplify Stablecoin Technology ETF (STBQ) and the Amplify Tokenization Technology ETF (TKNQ), both now trading on NYSE Arca. These ETFs track indexes of companies involved in stablecoin and tokenization infrastructure, including major players like Visa, Circle, Mastercard, PayPal, BlackRock, and JPMorgan. The launch comes amid growing regulatory clarity in the U.S. and Europe, with laws like the GENIUS Act and MiCA positioning stablecoins as compliant digital finance tools. Tokenization and stablecoins have gained significant traction this year as institutions explore digitizing traditional financial services.

Digital asset manager Amplify has launched two exchange-traded funds tracking blockchain projects across stablecoins and tokenization.

The company said on Tuesday that its Amplify Stablecoin Technology ETF (STBQ) and Amplify Tokenization Technology ETF (TKNQ) both went live on the NYSE Arca exchange.

Both funds track a diversified index of companies working on products or infrastructure, along with projects that generate revenue from tokenization and stablecoins.

“These new ETFs expand Amplify’s lineup at a time when the infrastructure behind stablecoins and the growth of tokenization are shaping the next phase of digital finance,” the company said.

Source: Amplify ETFs

Stablecoins and tokenization have been among the most popular themes in crypto this year, with the US passing laws that have given institutions confidence to launch stablecoins, and regulators opening dialogue on how they should treat assets such as tokenized stocks.

Amplify said its stablecoin-focused ETF tracks shares of companies “generating significant revenue from payments technology, digital asset infrastructure, and trading platforms.”

It holds shares in companies working on stablecoins such as Visa, Circle, Mastercard and PayPal, alongside crypto ETFs from Grayscale, iShares and Bitwise.

The firm pointed to regulatory developments in the US and EU, noting that the “GENIUS Act in the US and MiCA in Europe are positioning stablecoins as the compliant backbone of digital finance.”

Related: Clarity Act delays led to $952M in crypto fund outflows: CoinShares

Meanwhile, the tokenization fund includes exposure to BlackRock, JPMorgan, Figure Technology Solution, Citigroup and the Nasdaq, which all have made tokenization plays over the past few years as they seek opportunities to digitize traditional financial services.

Crypto and blockchain ETFs stormed onto the market in 2025 after the US Securities and Exchange Commission under chair Paul Atkins loosened requirements for crypto ETFs.

Magazine: Big questions: Would Bitcoin survive a 10-year power outage?

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat are the names of the two new ETFs launched by Amplify and on which exchange did they go live?

AThe two new ETFs are the Amplify Stablecoin Technology ETF (STBQ) and the Amplify Tokenization Technology ETF (TKNQ). They both went live on the NYSE Arca exchange.

QWhat is the primary focus of the Amplify Stablecoin Technology ETF (STBQ)?

AThe Amplify Stablecoin Technology ETF (STBQ) tracks shares of companies generating significant revenue from payments technology, digital asset infrastructure, and trading platforms related to stablecoins.

QWhich major companies are included in the stablecoin-focused ETF's holdings?

AThe stablecoin-focused ETF holds shares in companies such as Visa, Circle, Mastercard, PayPal, as well as crypto ETFs from Grayscale, iShares, and Bitwise.

QWhat regulatory developments does Amplify cite as supporting the growth of stablecoins?

AAmplify points to the GENIUS Act in the US and the Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulation in Europe, which are positioning stablecoins as the compliant backbone of digital finance.

QWhich types of companies does the Amplify Tokenization Technology ETF (TKNQ) provide exposure to?

AThe tokenization fund provides exposure to companies like BlackRock, JPMorgan, Figure Technology Solution, Citigroup, and Nasdaq, which are involved in tokenizing traditional financial services.

Leituras Relacionadas

SharpLink CEO: How to Understand Ethereum Developers Just Exceeded 1 Million?

SharpLink CEO reflects on the milestone of Ethereum surpassing 1 million historical developers, emphasizing that this figure represents the largest pool of technical talent ever assembled around an open, permissionless blockchain network. While approximately 232,000 developers remain active, the key question for the crypto industry is not which chain is fastest, but where the best builders choose to build long-term. Ethereum's advantage lies in a decade-long accumulation of infrastructure, standards, tools, liquidity, and a cohesive culture, making it the default operating system for programmable finance. This developer base is tackling complex challenges: the Glamsterdam upgrade aims to enhance scalability while preserving core principles; synchronous composability seeks to unify Rollup ecosystems; and significant efforts are underway for post-quantum security. Ethereum's deeper network effects stem from composability and shared standards (like the EVM and Solidity), creating a flywheel of more developers, tools, and liquidity. Three reinforcing strengths cement Ethereum's lead: credible neutrality (secured by ~900k validators), a modular architecture with interconnected Rollups, and a culture that attracts top researchers. The ecosystem is consolidating as the trusted coordination layer for internet-native finance, favored by large institutions valuing security and liquidity. The future of Ethereum is being built by this global community of founders and architects.

链捕手Mesmo agora

SharpLink CEO: How to Understand Ethereum Developers Just Exceeded 1 Million?

链捕手Mesmo agora

A Clod of Chinese Soil Chokes Two Japanese Giants

"Chinese Soil Chokes Japanese Giants" The production of a key electronic specialty gas, tungsten hexafluoride (WF6), vital for manufacturing AI chips, was halted by two leading Japanese producers—Kanto Denka and Central Glass. Their shutdown was not due to a technological failure but a sudden, critical shortage of a raw material they had long taken for granted: ultra-high-purity (6N-grade) tungsten powder, which is almost entirely sourced from China. Following a quiet Chinese export announcement in January 2026, tungsten powder shipments to Japan dropped to zero for months. Despite frantic efforts, Japanese companies found no viable alternative; imported powder was three times more expensive and lacked the required purity. Their existing stockpiles were exhausted by mid-2026. WF6 is essential for depositing tungsten into the microscopic contact holes of High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) chips, which are crucial for advanced processors like those from Nvidia. While Japanese firms had mastered producing ultra-pure WF6 gas, their entire supply chain relied on China's 6N tungsten powder—a dependency now revealed as a fatal vulnerability. China's dominance in this "soil" results from decades of painstaking R&D by companies like Xiamen Tungsten and China Tungsten & Hightech. They overcame immense technical hurdles, such as separating chemically similar molybdenum from tungsten, to achieve mass production of the world's purest tungsten powder. With their primary suppliers gone, Kanto Denka and Central Glass announced a permanent halt to WF6 production starting July 1, 2026. This immediately created a supply crisis for major semiconductor manufacturers like Samsung and SK Hynix, forcing them to urgently seek and certify new Chinese suppliers for WF6 itself. The reversal marks a dramatic shift: China has moved from exporting low-value raw materials to controlling the high-purity foundation of a critical global tech supply chain, upending a long-established industrial hierarchy.

marsbitHá 31m

A Clod of Chinese Soil Chokes Two Japanese Giants

marsbitHá 31m

Without Tencent, What's Left for Suiyuan?

The article centers on the crucial question posed in the title: what is Seyond Technology really worth if its dominant customer, Tencent, were to stop purchasing its AI chips? As the last of China's "Four AI Chip Dragons" to secure approval for a public listing, Seyond's IPO filing reveals a profound and controversial dependency. In 2025, 74.9% to over 80% of its revenue came from Tencent. The piece argues that this extreme customer concentration is not merely a vulnerability but a strategic outcome of China's AI industry evolution. It contrasts Seyond's path with its peers (Moore Thread, Biren Technology, and MetaX), noting that while others raced to market with ambitious stories, Seyond focused first on securing and delivering for a major client. Its explosive revenue growth—with Q1 2026 up 1474.85% year-on-year—is driven by concentrated orders from Tencent, which itself faces massive, escalating AI compute demands for products like its Yuanbao and Hunyuan models. The relationship is framed as a deliberate, symbiotic cultivation of a supply chain. As both a major shareholder (20.26%) and primary client, Tencent is actively fostering Seyond to build a controllable, stable alternative to NVIDIA, similar to how global tech giants historically nurtured key suppliers. The high switching costs—involving software stacks and deployed systems—create a deep "ecological moat" for Seyond within Tencent's ecosystem. The analysis positions the AI chip landscape in three tiers: NVIDIA as the global leader, Huawei's Ascend as the state-backed player, and commercial firms like Seyond competing for market orders. Seyond is increasingly seen as "Tencent's compute foundation," with its product roadmap closely aligned with the tech giant's needs. The conclusion is that the industry's metric for success is shifting from fundraising and technical specs to real orders, delivery capability, and ecosystem binding. Seyond's value, therefore, lies not just in its chips but in holding a massive, multi-year procurement order from China's largest internet company—a tangible asset arguably more telling than any technical whitepaper in the current climate. The core insight is that for domestic chips, the ultimate challenge isn't just catching up technologically with NVIDIA, but earning the trust, scenarios, and recurring orders from a major anchor client.

marsbitHá 1h

Without Tencent, What's Left for Suiyuan?

marsbitHá 1h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片