Algorand Foundation cuts 25% of workforce, citing macro and market pressures

ambcryptoPublicado em 2026-03-20Última atualização em 2026-03-20

Resumo

The Algorand Foundation has laid off 25% of its workforce, citing macroeconomic environment and a broader crypto market downturn as reasons. The foundation stated this restructuring allows it to sustainably align resources with its long-term goals. This follows similar cuts at other crypto entities like the Hedera Foundation, Blockworks, and Crypto.com, the latter also pointing to AI disruption. Community reaction was mixed, with some criticizing the foundation's leadership and spending. A transparency report noted the AF spent $12 million after selling millions of ALGO tokens, while a critic pointed to a lack of liquidity, users, and funding. Data confirms a significant decline in the chain's activity; its DeFi Total Value Locked (TVL) has halved since last year to under $40 million, and daily fees remain below $50. Consequently, the price of ALGO dropped roughly 10% amid a wider market pullback.

The Algorand Foundation (AF), the steward of the Algorand chain, is in the news after it announced it has axed 25% of its workforce.

According to the AF, the restructuring was informed by the ongoing “global macro environment” and “broader downturn in crypto markets.”

Source: X

Following the layoffs, AF now believes it is lean enough to “sustainably align” the remaining resources with the protocol’s long-term goals.

However, the ongoing crypto rout is not affecting Algorand alone. In January, the Hedera Foundation declared some of its core functions redundant and let go of employees who handled them.

Beyond protocols, crypto media has also been hit, with Blockworks axing its entire newsroom last year.

Besides, pressure is also coming from AI adoption, which, like other global segments, is disrupting the crypto market labour sector. This week, crypto exchange Crypto.com let go 12% of its workforce, citing the need to position itself to rising AI capabilities.

That said, the AF layoffs were met with mixed reactions.

Community and ALGO reaction

As expected, a section of the community sympathized with those affected by the AF layoffs and the disrupted livelihoods.

However, one user pointed out that the AF spent $100 million last year and yet, saw no meaningful impact.

He added,

Using macro uncertainty as cover for doing this feels piss weak. Love the tech. Hate the leadership. Same issues as always. No liquidity. No users. No funding. No mindshare.

According to the AF transparency report, it spent about $12 million as of September 2025 after selling 66.4 million ALGO tokens. Its overall expenditure has been around $18 million per year, covering even staff, which includes 65 employees.

However, the critic was right about lagging chain activity. Its stablecoin liquidity has been declining alongside DeFi activity, as shown by the TVL (total value locked) drop.

Source: DeFiLlama

Since last year, DeFi activity has dropped by half, slipping from $80 million to below $40 million. In fact, the chain’s fees have been hovering below $50 throughout last year.

Meanwhile, ALGO was down about 10% and traded at $0.088 at the time of writing, amid a broader pullback following de-risking linked to traders’ caution after the Fed rate decision.


Final Summary

  • Algorand Foundation axed 25% of its workforce, as bear market, geopolitical tensions, and AI disrupted the labor sector in the space.
  • Algorand chain activity has slowed down with DeFi activity by half, generating less than $50 in daily average fees.

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhy did the Algorand Foundation lay off 25% of its workforce?

AThe Algorand Foundation cited the ongoing 'global macro environment' and 'broader downturn in crypto markets' as reasons for the layoffs.

QHow has the Algorand chain's DeFi activity changed in the past year?

ADeFi activity on the Algorand chain has dropped by half, falling from $80 million to below $40 million in total value locked (TVL).

QWhat was the community's reaction to the Algorand Foundation's decision?

AThe community had mixed reactions. Some sympathized with the affected employees, while others criticized the leadership for poor performance, citing a lack of liquidity, users, funding, and mindshare despite significant spending.

QHow much did the Algorand Foundation spend according to its transparency report as of September 2025?

AAccording to its transparency report, the Algorand Foundation spent about $12 million as of September 2025 after selling 66.4 million ALGO tokens, with an overall annual expenditure of around $18 million.

QWhat other companies in the crypto space have recently announced layoffs?

AOther companies that have recently announced layoffs include the Hedera Foundation, which declared some core functions redundant, crypto media outlet Blockworks, which axed its entire newsroom last year, and Crypto.com, which let go of 12% of its workforce citing the need to adapt to rising AI capabilities.

Leituras Relacionadas

Following US Ban on Fable 5, Zhipu AI's Stock Soars 47%

On June 15th, shares of Zhipu AI surged dramatically on the Hong Kong stock market, peaking at a 47.6% gain before closing 32.82% higher. This sharp increase was directly triggered by two recent industry events. On June 12th, Anthropic announced it was suspending global access to its latest flagship models, Claude Fable 5 and Claude Mythos 5, to comply with a U.S. government export control order. The next day, Zhipu AI announced it would open access to its latest open-source flagship model, GLM-5.2, under the permissive MIT license. The Anthropic incident highlighted a critical issue beyond raw model capability: the risk of sudden, unpredictable loss of access to advanced AI models, especially for developers and enterprises deeply integrated with them. This has shifted industry and market focus toward factors like stability, sustainable access, and controllability. Zhipu's move, promoting "frontier intelligence for all," positions its openly available model as a reliable and accessible alternative. The GLM-5.2 model emphasizes "Long Horizon Task" capabilities with a 1M context window, targeting complex, multi-step coding and engineering workflows where maintaining context is crucial. Analysts note this event exposes the risk of dependency on closed-source models subject to single jurisdictional controls, potentially accelerating a shift toward domestic base models and localized deployments. The market's reaction signals a new valuation dimension in AI: providers who can offer stable, long-term, and sustainably accessible AI capabilities are gaining strategic importance.

marsbitHá 10m

Following US Ban on Fable 5, Zhipu AI's Stock Soars 47%

marsbitHá 10m

Fully Entering the AI Era: Alipay Bets on Conversation, WeChat Holds Fast to Social

In May 2026, Alipay announced over 300 million AI payment transactions. Shortly after, WeChat opened its mini-programs for AI integration, sparking controversy by requiring developer source code access. This highlights their diverging approaches to AI integration. Alipay is testing "Project Treasure," an optional AI-native interface replacing traditional app grids with a conversational window. Users can command complex tasks (e.g., "book a ride and order coffee") handled end-to-end by AI. This shift follows an abandoned standalone AI app, focusing instead on enhancing its existing user base. For unmodified mini-programs, Alipay's AI uses "screen-reading" to simulate user interactions, bypassing the need for developer overhaul. It also introduced "Token Pay" for micro-transactions and "AI Wallets" for autonomous agent spending. WeChat, prioritizing its core social function, is taking an embedded approach. Its AI agent will operate within existing contexts like group chats and official accounts, assisting without a separate interface. To enable this, WeChat offers developers two paths: granting source code access for direct AI control ("Automatic Mode") or manually encapsulating services into standardized "Skills." Both place significant burden on developers. Key differences emerge in handling legacy services: WeChat demands developer cooperation (code or labor), while Alipay's screen-reading offers immediate, if potentially less stable, compatibility. Alipay's 3 billion AI transactions demonstrate user acceptance of AI-driven commercial actions. The divergent strategies may reshape mini-program ecosystems—Alipay passively "AI-fying" services, WeChat potentially favoring resource-rich developers—and set competing technical standards. Ultimately, the competition centers on where users entrust the command to "help me get things done."

marsbitHá 10m

Fully Entering the AI Era: Alipay Bets on Conversation, WeChat Holds Fast to Social

marsbitHá 10m

Apple Also Has to Pay Rent Now

Apple Pays Rent Too: The Two-Way Flow of "Traffic Tax" and "AI Capability Rent" Between Tech Giants For over two decades, Google has paid Apple an estimated $20 billion annually to remain the default search engine on Safari, a "traffic tax" for a critical user entry point. However, in 2026, the direction of this cash flow partially reversed. Apple agreed to pay Google roughly $1 billion per year to license its Gemini AI models, as Apple's own models reportedly struggled with complex tasks. This creates a unique dynamic: Apple acts as the "landlord" in the established search ecosystem, collecting rent from Google for access. Simultaneously, in the emerging AI arena, Apple becomes the "tenant," paying Google for access to cutting-edge AI capabilities it cannot currently match internally. While Apple claims its new models are "distilled" from Gemini outputs and contain "not a drop" of Google's original code, core dependencies remain. Its knowledge base is refined using Gemini's outputs, and its most powerful cloud model runs on Google's infrastructure. Apple has structured the deal as non-exclusive, allowing it to theoretically switch AI suppliers—a hedge against over-reliance. The future hinges on whether advanced AI models become a commodity (cheap and abundant) or remain a concentrated, scarce resource (expensive and controlled by few). Apple is betting on the former, leveraging its massive device ecosystem to be a powerful, choosy customer. If the latter proves true, its bargaining power could erode. This power dynamic is extending to developers. Apple, Google, and WeChat are all pushing for apps to expose their core functions as standardized "actions" or "intents" that their respective AI assistants (Siri, Gemini, WeChat AI) can directly call. The new scarce resource is no longer just app store visibility, but "being selected by the AI." The currency of "rent" has changed from a 30% revenue share to ceding control over how users interact with an app's functions.

marsbitHá 1h

Apple Also Has to Pay Rent Now

marsbitHá 1h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片