a16z Partner: Perpetual Contracts Are Rewriting Global Trading Rules

marsbitPublicado em 2026-04-10Última atualização em 2026-04-10

Resumo

Perpetual contracts ("perps"), a crypto-native innovation, are transforming global trading behavior and market structure. These non-expiring futures contracts have seen explosive on-chain growth in 2025, with decentralized exchange (DEX) volume surging 346% year-over-year to $6.7 trillion. Perps now extend beyond crypto to traditional assets like stocks, commodities, and even private company valuations. Key drivers include structural advantages over options for directional leverage: 24/7 trading, no expirations or rollovers, simpler risk exposure, and capital efficiency. Real-World Asset (RWA) perps have gained significant traction, at times comprising 44% of volume on leading DEXs like Hyperliquid. The ecosystem is expanding rapidly with new exchanges, front-ends, market creators, and liquidity providers. While challenges remain around liquidity, oracle reliability, and regulation, perps are evolving from a niche crypto instrument into a dominant global trading primitive. The open question is whether value will accumulate at the exchange layer or within applications built atop perpetual trading infrastructure.

Author: jay

Compiled by: Jiahuan, ChainCatcher

Perpetual contracts ("perps") are futures contracts that never settle. As a crypto-native innovation, they experienced an explosion on-chain in 2025. Today, they have become one of the largest markets in the crypto space, covering traditional assets with trading volumes reaching trillions of dollars.

Last year, the trading volume of perpetual contracts settled by top centralized exchanges reached $86.2 trillion (a 47% year-on-year increase), while the growth of on-chain perpetual contracts was even more astonishing: leading decentralized exchanges (DEX) reached a trading volume of $6.7 trillion (a 346% year-on-year increase). Currently, DEX trading volume accounts for about 7.8% of centralized exchange (CEX) volume, whereas just over a year ago, this proportion was only around 2.5%. [Note: While a few US-regulated centralized platforms offer US investors products similar to perpetual contracts, all centralized and decentralized exchanges restrict US investors from trading true perpetual contracts.]

But more importantly, perpetual contracts are gradually shedding their image as a marginal crypto-native primitive and beginning to demonstrate the transformative power to reshape trading behavior and market structure fundamentally.

So, what is driving the popularity of perpetual contracts? Why now? The following will explore why global traders are increasingly favoring perpetual contracts, the scale of the market opportunity, and the opportunities seen by builders.

A Brief History and Evolution of Perpetual Contracts

The idea itself is actually older than the crypto industry. Theoretically, perpetual contracts existed as early as 1993, when Nobel laureate Robert Shiller proposed perpetual futures contracts, initially conceived as a tool to hedge against real estate value risks. But it wasn't until 2016, with the rise of BitMEX and XBTUSD (the longest-running Bitcoin perpetual swap contract), that perpetual contracts became popular in the crypto space.

A decade later, modern exchanges now offer perpetual contracts covering stocks, indices, commodities, interest rates, startup valuations, and even the price of Nvidia's H100 GPUs.

For years, perpetual contracts have been a multi-billion dollar revenue engine for centralized exchanges. As retail demand for leverage has grown, perpetual contracts have become the primary venue for short-term price discovery, liquidity, and trading activity—in many large Asian CEXs, their volume is multiple times that of spot trading.

What changed in the past year and a half is that decentralized perpetual exchanges began to meaningfully eat into the perpetual market share of CEXs. With the structural advantage of self-custody, perpetual DEXs are rapidly closing the gap with CEXs in terms of liquidity, performance, and features for active traders.

With the breakthrough success of perpetual DEXs like Hyperliquid, leading crypto wallets and applications began to support perpetual contracts and launched high-quality trading experiences, reaching millions of users. In the second half of 2025, the front-end for perpetual DEXs exploded—ranging from casual mobile apps to complex multi-venue trading terminals.

Hyperliquid, in particular, pushed the boundaries of what a DEX can offer through HIP-3 (Builder-Deployed Perpetuals). This mechanism allows anyone to permissionlessly launch a perpetual market on the exchange. With HIP-3, builders can list almost any asset and earn a 50% fee share while managing their own oracles and risk parameters.

At the same time, new entrants and competitors like Avantis, Lighter, Ostium, and Variational have emerged or accelerated product development. Increasing competition has forced perpetual DEXs to differentiate in exchange design, market structure, asset support, and permissionlessness, and has led some platforms to find strong product-market fit in new categories like real-world asset (RWA) perpetuals.

For years, perpetual traders only speculated on crypto assets—BTC, ETH, SOL, and various long-tail altcoins. But late last year, when perpetual volume cooled significantly from recent peaks amid a broader crypto market sell-off, RWA perpetuals began to gain traction. A few perpetual DEXs listed commodities, stocks, and stock indices, expanding the universe of tradable assets to include Nvidia, Samsung, even private companies like SpaceX, and commodities like silver and palladium.

This year, the growth of RWA perpetuals has accelerated further. In recent weeks, RWAs have accounted for up to 44% of Hyperliquid's total volume, and RWA pairs have consistently become some of the highest fee-generating pairs on the exchange. On Ostium, RWAs have constituted the vast majority of the exchange's volume for months.

Decentralized exchanges have excelled at facilitating price discovery for RWAs like crude oil, especially on weekends when traditional exchanges are closed.

With the takeoff of RWA perpetuals, we see more companies developing products and businesses related to perpetual contracts. In the past 6 months alone, new exchanges, trading interfaces, market deployers, and liquidity providers have emerged.

Players flooding into this space include brand-new startups, startups pivoting to perpetuals, and some of the world's largest fintech companies integrating perpetual trading into their existing products.

All these diverse players are converging on the same opportunity: perpetual contracts have the potential to become one of the dominant trading instruments in global finance.

The Market Opportunity for Perpetual Contracts

Stepping back to look at traditional finance (TradFi), options are one of the largest and most actively traded markets globally. They exist in currencies, stocks, indices, commodities, and ETFs, and are extremely powerful and expressive tools that enable people to trade based on many different predictions: timing, volatility, price ranges, etc.

But if you zoom in on retail trading behavior, you find a huge amount of activity concentrated in a specific category of options: short-term, leveraged, directional exposure. A prominent example is 0DTE (zero days to expiration) options—traders pay a small cost to bet on high-magnitude intraday moves.

This type of trading is one of the fastest-growing option categories. In 2025, average daily volume for 0DTE SPX (S&P 500 Index) options reached 2.3 million contracts, up 51% year-on-year, accounting for 59% of total SPX option volume. Responding to this demand, the market introduced several new daily-expiring index products, including CBTX and MBTX Bitcoin ETF index options, and options on the equal-weight Cboe Magnificent 10 Index.

So, while options have many sophisticated uses—structured hedging, volatility trading, discrete trading, convexity (referring to the asymmetric特性 of收益与风险 : your maximum loss is fixed, but potential gains are theoretically unlimited), etc.—an enormous and growing flow of retail capital is essentially just looking for short-term, leveraged directional exposure. This is precisely the need that perpetual contracts fulfill perfectly.

The trade-offs are real: options excel at defined risk and convex payoffs, and remain the default tool for expressing volatility. Traders can lose at most the premium they pay. With perpetual contracts, the entire margined position can be liquidated. But for the directional leverage that most retail traders actually want, perpetual contracts have several structural advantages:

  • Always on. The latest generation of perpetual markets trade 24/7, with no trading hours or market close gaps. For a global, crypto-native user base, continuous access is an expected norm.
  • No strike prices, no expiration, no rollover. With a single continuous position, traders don't have to choose parameters, manage expiries, or rebuild positions daily or weekly. They can hold for seconds, months, or theoretically forever.
  • Simpler risk exposure. For perps, the primary considerations are price, collateral, and liquidation thresholds. For options, even if you're right on direction, you can lose due to time decay, implied volatility changes, and path dependence. Perps strip out this complexity. The trade is a pure expression of directional conviction.
  • Capital efficiency for continuous exposure. Short-term options require paying the full premium upfront and rolling over repeatedly. Perps require margin—often a fraction of the notional value—which is typically more capital efficient for intraday to multi-day directional positions.

Options aren't going away. They have long been part of financial history and will likely remain dominant for a significant subset of trading use cases, especially those involving defined risk and more complex payoff structures. But for the huge and growing flow of capital looking for Delta-1 directional leverage, perpetual contracts have already captured trillions in volume and billions in revenue.

This raises the question: as perpetual contracts evolve from niche tool to mainstream trading primitive, where will the value accrue in the tech stack?

In traditional markets, the most valuable companies are often built on top of exchange infrastructure, not at the exchange layer itself. For example, the retail broker Robinhood has a higher market cap than its underlying exchange, Nasdaq.

Whether this pattern holds in crypto—or whether platforms like Hyperliquid, Lighter, or Ostium can accumulate sufficiently powerful network effects at the exchange layer—is one of the most interesting open questions in the space.

Regardless, builder activity is expanding rapidly. We see developer growth in the following areas:

  • Customized distribution layers: Vertical or audience-specific frontends that not only present markets but also package narratives, strategies, gamification, or social hooks.
  • Market creators and operators (e.g., HIP-3 deployers): Operating a popular market on Hyperliquid essentially gives a deployer a "mini-exchange" without building the most complex exchange infrastructure. Today's deployers may only be scratching the surface of the data or price feeds that could be "perp-ified" in the future.
  • Specialized liquidity provision: Market makers focused on long-tail markets, event-driven order books, and cross-venue inventory management.
  • Perp-specific data infrastructure: An ecosystem of community-driven dashboards, block explorers, heatmaps, and analytics tools has already emerged around positions, funding rates, liquidations, trader signals, leverage exposure, retention cohorts, etc. More mature, high-quality, real-time data will make the entire ecosystem more transparent and efficient for all participants.

Of course, there are still significant open questions and challenges, spanning distribution, liquidity depth for new trading venues, oracle reliability as asset scope expands, inevitable tail events ("10/10" events), and regulation (which currently restricts US investor access to these products). These are the expected growing pains as perpetual contracts "graduate" from the crypto-native bubble and step onto the main stage of global finance. As the perpetual ecosystem matures, the question is no longer whether perps can scale, but who will build the most valuable applications and infrastructure around them when they do.

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat are perpetual contracts and why are they considered a crypto-native innovation?

APerpetual contracts, or 'perps', are futures contracts that never expire and do not require settlement. They are considered a crypto-native innovation because they were popularized within the cryptocurrency space, starting with BitMEX's XBTUSD in 2016, and have since evolved to become a dominant trading instrument in crypto, with significant growth on both centralized and decentralized exchanges.

QHow has the growth of decentralized perpetual exchanges (DEX) compared to centralized exchanges (CEX) in recent years?

ADecentralized perpetual exchanges have grown at an astonishing rate. In the past year, leading DEXs saw a 346% increase in trading volume, reaching $6.7 trillion, while top CEXs settled $86.2 trillion in perpetual trading volume, a 47% increase. DEX volume now accounts for about 7.8% of CEX volume, up from just 2.5% a little over a year ago.

QWhat is HIP-3 on Hyperliquid and how does it impact the perpetual contract market?

AHIP-3, or Builder-Deployed Perpetuals, is a mechanism on Hyperliquid that allows anyone to permissionlessly launch a perpetual market on the exchange. It enables builders to list almost any asset, manage their own oracles and risk parameters, and earn 50% of the fees generated, significantly expanding the range of tradable assets and democratizing market creation.

QWhat are the key structural advantages of perpetual contracts over options for retail traders seeking directional leverage?

APerpetual contracts offer several advantages over options for directional leverage: they are always on (24/7 trading), have no strike prices or expiration dates (eliminating the need for rollovers), provide simpler risk exposure (focused on price, collateral, and liquidation thresholds without time decay or volatility complications), and offer capital efficiency for continuous exposure through margin requirements rather than full premium payments.

QWhat types of real-world assets (RWA) are being traded via perpetual contracts on DEXs, and how significant is their volume?

APerpetual contracts on DEXs now include a wide range of real-world assets such as commodities (e.g., silver, palladium, crude oil), stocks (e.g., Nvidia, Samsung), stock indices, and even private companies like SpaceX. RWA perpetuals have seen substantial growth, at times accounting for up to 44% of Hyperliquid's total volume and consistently being among the highest fee-generating pairs, with platforms like Ostium also seeing RWA dominate their trading activity.

Leituras Relacionadas

Strategy's Loss in the Second Quarter Reaches $8.22 Billion Amid Bitcoin Decline

Strategy, the largest corporate holder of Bitcoin, reported a net loss of $8.22 billion for the second quarter. This loss was primarily driven by an $8.32 billion unrealized loss on its Bitcoin holdings due to a decline in the asset's price during the period. Despite these paper losses, the company increased its Bitcoin holdings to 843,775 BTC, a 25% growth since the start of the year. As part of a new monetization strategy, Strategy sold approximately $218.4 million worth of Bitcoin, mainly to fund dividends for preferred shareholders, with $216 million of that sold after Q2 ended. The company also built a $3.75 billion cash reserve, which it claims is sufficient to cover over two years of dividend and interest payments, aiming to insulate itself from Bitcoin's volatility while meeting obligations. Following the earnings release, Strategy's stock (MSTR) rose 4.7% in regular trading but corrected slightly after-hours. This pattern reflects how the company's accounting results are heavily tied to Bitcoin's price swings, even as its long-term strategy remains unchanged. The report indicates that Strategy is maintaining its core strategy of accumulating Bitcoin while building a financial buffer. This quarterly loss follows a recognizable pattern, with the company posting significant unrealized losses in previous quarters (e.g., $12.4 billion in Q4 2025 and ~$12.5 billion in Q1 2026) due to fair-value accounting. A key technical shift is its new monetization program, which introduces periodic selling pressure on the market, transitioning Strategy from a pure accumulator to a participant that occasionally adds supply. A critical question remains: how long can the cash reserve cover dividend obligations if a Bitcoin price downturn persists beyond two years?

cryptonews.ruHá 21m

Strategy's Loss in the Second Quarter Reaches $8.22 Billion Amid Bitcoin Decline

cryptonews.ruHá 21m

Will Terrorist Durov Ban Russian Officials?

Telegram founder Pavel Durov publicly reacted to being labeled a "terrorist" by Russian authorities, stating the designation came after he refused demands for mass surveillance and censorship on the platform. In a Telegram post, he highlighted that this status formally bans him from "publishing information online." Durov concluded with a statement widely circulated: Russian officials "clearly don't understand who can ban whom on the internet." This remark suggests Durov could potentially restrict official Russian government and officials' channels on Telegram, which continue to operate on the platform despite its formal blocking in Russia. The situation parallels previous, slow-moving state directives, like switching officials to domestic cars, contrasted with the current push to migrate all government communication to the Russian-made messenger MAX by 2030. However, reports indicate many officials still use Telegram via workarounds, fearing surveillance on MAX, while alternatives like BiP and KakaoTalk recently became inaccessible in Russia without a VPN. Durov has not specified any immediate actions against state channels. His statement is an initial response, with further developments depending on the authorities' reaction. The dynamic differs from 2020 when Russian regulators lifted a block on Telegram; now, Durov implies control from within the platform itself over the official accounts that persisted through that earlier blockade.

cryptonews.ruHá 21m

Will Terrorist Durov Ban Russian Officials?

cryptonews.ruHá 21m

DeepSeek V4 Official Version Arrives, New Capabilities Emerge, Value-for-Money King Enters the Fray

On July 31st, DeepSeek officially launched the public API beta for its DeepSeek-V4-Flash model. A key highlight is its performance on multiple Agent benchmark tests, reportedly nearing or even surpassing the level of the V4-Pro preview version from three months ago. Notably, the Flash model achieves this with significantly smaller scale (130B active parameters vs. Pro's 490B), suggesting that post-training optimization and data quality may be as crucial as raw model size. DeepSeek emphasized that the V4-Flash-0731 uses the same model architecture and size as its preview version, with improvements attributed solely to "re-trained post-training." The update also marks the official debut of DeepSeek's self-developed Agent framework, "Harness." The move signals DeepSeek's strategic push to position its cost-effective Flash model as a competitive base for Agent applications—scenarios requiring autonomous planning, tool usage, and complex task execution—where inference speed and cost are critical. By natively supporting OpenAI's Responses API format and adapting for code-generation scenarios, DeepSeek aims not just to be a cheaper alternative but to establish its own ecosystem in the Agent era. This release follows DeepSeek's record-breaking ~$50 billion fundraising round roughly two months prior, underscoring market confidence in its technology and commercialization prospects. The company is reportedly preparing for another funding round at a valuation of approximately $71 billion. The Flash model's advancement represents a step in fulfilling the high expectations that come with this valuation, setting the stage for the impending release of the V4-Pro official version and intensifying competition in the global Agent landscape.

marsbitHá 25m

DeepSeek V4 Official Version Arrives, New Capabilities Emerge, Value-for-Money King Enters the Fray

marsbitHá 25m

Trading

Spot
活动图片