A Whale is Betting Big Against Crypto: Will BTC, ETH, and SOL Face Fresh Pressure?

TheNewsCryptoPublicado em 2026-06-22Última atualização em 2026-06-22

Resumo

A new crypto wallet has placed a large bearish bet against the market, opening 20x-leveraged short positions on Bitcoin (BTC), Ethereum (ETH), and Solana (SOL) worth nearly $48 million on Hyperliquid. This significant leveraged trade signals strong expectations of a near-term price decline but also carries high risk of liquidation if prices rise. Currently, Bitcoin trades around $63,888, with key support at ~$63,641 and resistance near $64,273. Ethereum hovers at $1,732, facing potential support near $1,619 and resistance around $1,811. Solana trades near $73.96, with immediate resistance at ~$74.52 and support at $72.04. The price action for all three assets is described in terms of potential bullish "golden cross" or bearish "death cross" technical patterns influencing their near-term direction.

A newly created wallet has caught the attention of the crypto traders after making a sizable bearish bet on the market through Hyperliquid. As per the data, wallet address 0xaeaa deposited 6.68 million USDC and used the capital to open multiple 20x-leveraged short positions in 3 of the largest tokens by market value.

The positions include 430.64 BTC worth $27.46 million, 4,280 ETH valued at around $7.37 million, and 181,245 SOL, roughly at $13.24 million. In total, the trader has gained exposure to nearly $48 million in short positions, signalling a strong expectation that prices could move lower in the near term.

Large leveraged trades attract market attention because they can reflect the outlook of well-capitalised traders or institutions. However, such positions carry significant risk. Moreover, with 20x leverage, even small price increases in Bitcoin, Ethereum, or Solana could trigger substantial losses or force liquidations.

Bitcoin Attempts to Move Higher

The dominant asset, Bitcoin (BTC), is currently trading at $63,888. Besides, the daily trading volume is settled at $18.9 billion after a 9.87% surge over the last 24 hours. The asset’s lowest and highest trading range is found at $63,221 and $64,712.

If the bears gained more traction, the nearest support could be at $63,641. Upon the death cross taking place, the Bitcoin price would fall below $63,420. On the flip side, when the bulls enter, the BTC price might immediately jump to the resistance at $64K. Assuming the market is moving up, with the emergence of the golden cross, the price could climb above $64,273.

Why is Ethereum Stalled?

After the recent price dip, the largest altcoin, Ethereum (ETH), is hovering at $1,732. Notably, a 23.29% increase is noted in the trading volume, reaching $9.85 billion. The lowest trading point is at $1,701, and the highest level is $1,756.

The asset’s trading pattern shows that the support is likely to be found at around $1,619. With the death cross popping out, the ETH price may fall even deeper toward the $1.5K range. Upon a reversal in the Ethereum market, the resistance levels would be at around $1,811 and above. If the potent golden cross shows up, the price would gradually move higher.

Where is Solana Heading?

At press time, Solana is trading within the $73.96 mark, with the trading volume at $2.16 billion, after a surge of over 14.95%. According to the price chart, the lowest and highest trading prices have been noted at $72.38 and $74.75, respectively.

With the 4-hour pricing pattern, the SOL momentum might climb to the resistance at around $74.52. If the bulls strengthen and initiate the golden cross to emerge, the price could go even higher. If a bearish reversal occurred, the Solana price would instantly slip to the support at $72.04. More losses could trigger the death cross and send the price below the $71 range.

Crypto Market Highlights

Battle Lines Drawn for Zcash (ZEC): Can Bulls Defend Against Growing Bearish Pressure?

Perguntas relacionadas

QAccording to the article, what is the total exposure value of the bearish bets placed by the wallet address 0xaeaa, and which three cryptocurrencies are targeted?

AThe wallet address 0xaeaa has gained exposure to nearly $48 million in short positions. The bets target Bitcoin (BTC), Ethereum (ETH), and Solana (SOL).

QWhat leverage level did the trader use for the short positions mentioned in the article, and what is the primary risk associated with such leverage?

AThe trader used 20x leverage for the short positions. The primary risk is that even small price increases in the targeted cryptocurrencies could trigger substantial losses or force liquidations.

QWhat are the potential support and resistance levels discussed for Bitcoin (BTC) in the article?

AFor Bitcoin, the nearest potential support is at $63,641, with a deeper fall possible below $63,420 if a 'death cross' occurs. The immediate resistance is at $64,000, with a potential climb above $64,273 if a 'golden cross' emerges.

QWhat price levels does the article suggest as key support and resistance for Ethereum (ETH) in its current market condition?

AFor Ethereum, the article suggests support is likely around $1,619, with a potential deeper fall toward the $1.5K range. The resistance levels would be around $1,811 and above.

QBased on the 4-hour pricing pattern, what is the identified resistance level for Solana (SOL), and what could trigger a price drop to the $72.04 support?

ABased on the 4-hour pattern, the identified resistance level for Solana is around $74.52. A bearish reversal could trigger a price drop to the support at $72.04.

Leituras Relacionadas

Channel Dividends Are Dwindling, What Can DeFi Protocols Rely on to Resist Giants' Harvesting?

As the era of channel-driven growth ends, major tech giants like Coinbase, Stripe, and Kraken are vertically integrating by acquiring or building core infrastructure, capturing profits from underlying protocols. For instance, Coinbase leverages its Base blockchain to earn sequencing fees from protocols like Morpho, while Stripe acquired Bridge to internalize stablecoin yields, and Kraken bought NinjaTrader for derivatives licenses. This trend creates a power imbalance: entities controlling distribution channels can extract value from open-source DeFi protocols. However, protocols are developing a defense through multi-chain expansion. Examples like Morpho (with significant TVL on Ethereum and Base) and Uniswap (dominant across many chains) show that by deploying across multiple blockchains, protocols reduce dependency on any single chain operator, making them costly and risky to replace. The article argues that the future landscape will be shaped by the race between institutional vertical integration and protocol horizontal, multi-chain scaling. Protocols that embed themselves deeply across ecosystems and become indispensable due to high switching costs are most likely to survive and thrive amidst this consolidation.

Foresight NewsHá 10m

Channel Dividends Are Dwindling, What Can DeFi Protocols Rely on to Resist Giants' Harvesting?

Foresight NewsHá 10m

Uniswap v4 Hook Analysis: Architecture Design, Common Vulnerabilities, and Protection Practices

Uniswap v4's Hook mechanism is a major innovation, enabling custom logic injection into liquidity pool lifecycle events like swaps and liquidity provisioning. This transforms the AMM into programmable infrastructure, shifting the security model from protocol-level to pool-level, as each pool's safety now depends on its bound Hook contract. The core architecture revolves around the singleton PoolManager contract, which manages all pools via a flash accounting system. State changes are tracked in transient storage and must be settled by the end of a transaction. Hook contracts are permanently bound to pools via a PoolKey, with their permissions encoded directly into their address via specific low-order bits. This design introduces unique security considerations and challenges for future upgrades. Key vulnerabilities and best practices identified include: - **Access Control Gaps:** Early versions of the BaseHook abstract contract only protect `unlockCallback()`, leaving other lifecycle functions (`beforeSwap`, `afterSwap`, etc.) exposed unless explicitly secured by developers. - **Unrestricted Pool Binding:** The `initialize()` function does not validate if a Hook "consents" to a new pool. Hooks must implement their own whitelisting in `beforeInitialize` to prevent unauthorized pool creation. - **Async/Custom Curve Hooks:** These high-risk Hooks can completely replace Uniswap's swap logic. Their security depends entirely on their own implementation, as they operate outside the native protocol's pricing safeguards. - **Delta Accounting Risks:** The system ensures final balance (NonzeroDeltaCount == 0) but cannot guarantee the *correctness* of intermediate delta states, which attackers could manipulate. - **Token Confusion:** Protocols must implement semantic validation for tokens in user-created markets, not just interface checks, to prevent cross-market confusion attacks. The article emphasizes that Hook auditing requires a "sub-protocol" approach due to extended interaction chains, highlighting a significant shift in security methodology for the v4 ecosystem.

marsbitHá 17m

Uniswap v4 Hook Analysis: Architecture Design, Common Vulnerabilities, and Protection Practices

marsbitHá 17m

Chips, Open-Source Models, and $50 Trillion: Joe Tsai Reassesses Alibaba Once Again

Alibaba Executive Chairman Joe Tsai recently outlined the company's comprehensive AI strategy in a public discussion. He believes AI represents a massive opportunity, estimating its potential economic impact at up to $50 trillion, stemming from the automation of human intelligence and productivity. Tsai detailed Alibaba's four-layer investment approach across the AI stack: starting from the chip level, moving to cloud infrastructure (Alibaba Cloud), then the model layer with its open-source Qwen model, and finally applications within its vast digital ecosystem (e-commerce, logistics, etc.). The company avoids the energy layer due to China's efficient infrastructure. This broad strategy is designed to ensure Alibaba captures value regardless of where it ultimately concentrates in the AI value chain. He dismissed concerns about an AI investment bubble, pointing to the enormous $50 trillion opportunity. While acknowledging U.S. cloud giants' higher capital expenditure, he argued Chinese firms, including Alibaba (funded by its cash-generative e-commerce core), need to invest more in AI infrastructure. A key theme was technological sovereignty. Tsai positioned open-source models like Qwen as a solution for companies, especially in Europe, seeking independence from proprietary U.S. models and greater data privacy control. He contrasted this with the trend of U.S. giants keeping their models closed-source. Tsai highlighted Alibaba's collaborations with European manufacturers like Bosch and Siemens, using AI for design and quality control. He concluded with an optimistic vision of AI agents enhancing productivity, ultimately freeing up human time for leisure, family, and experiences like live entertainment.

marsbitHá 31m

Chips, Open-Source Models, and $50 Trillion: Joe Tsai Reassesses Alibaba Once Again

marsbitHá 31m

This Generation of East Asian Commoners Enriched by TSMC and AI-related South Korean Stocks

An AI-driven stock market boom fueled by semiconductor giants like TSMC and Samsung is transforming personal finances and lifestyles across East Asia. Young professionals, such as 24-year-old South Korean programmer Na Se-bin who invested her life savings, are experiencing dramatic gains and losses, reflecting a widespread retail trading frenzy. In Taiwan, telling someone you work at TSMC has become a notable social advantage, while its stock surge has propelled the local market. Similarly, Korean markets, dominated by Samsung and SK Hynix, have seen massive growth, with even schoolteachers reporting quintupled investments. The AI hardware demand from U.S. tech giants is funneling trillions into Asian exports, creating a wealth effect evident in luxury spending and real estate. The phenomenon underscores the region's pivotal role as the "pick-and-shovel" suppliers of the AI revolution, reshaping ordinary lives through market participation and soaring tech sector salaries.

Odaily星球日报Há 35m

This Generation of East Asian Commoners Enriched by TSMC and AI-related South Korean Stocks

Odaily星球日报Há 35m

This Generation of East Asian Ordinary People Getting Rich Thanks to TSMC and AI-Related Korean Stocks

The article describes how the global AI boom, driven by demand for semiconductors, is creating newfound wealth for ordinary young investors and professionals in East Asia, particularly in South Korea and Taiwan. Fueled by massive capital expenditure from tech giants, the surge in AI-related exports has propelled stock markets in South Korea, Taiwan, and Japan to significant gains. This has led to a widespread retail investing frenzy. In South Korea, individuals like 24-year-old programmer Na Se-bin and 35-year-old teacher Choi Sung-ho are investing heavily and seeing substantial returns, altering their spending habits. In Taiwan, the chipmaker TSMC, a dominant force in advanced manufacturing, is central to the economic euphoria, offering high salaries and social prestige. The company's stock surge has significantly boosted the local market. The phenomenon extends to Japan, where even companies in seemingly unrelated sectors are benefiting from the AI supply chain. The narrative highlights a region capitalizing on its role as the essential hardware provider for the AI "gold rush," with its tech giants acting as the "sellers of shovels." This has translated into rapid wealth accumulation, a booming luxury market, and a pervasive culture of stock trading among everyday people, including younger generations.

marsbitHá 42m

This Generation of East Asian Ordinary People Getting Rich Thanks to TSMC and AI-Related Korean Stocks