A New Red Line for Crypto? Washington Targets On‑Chain “Death Bets” In Prediction Markets

bitcoinistPublicado em 2026-03-11Última atualização em 2026-03-11

Resumo

A new U.S. bill called the DEATH BETS Act, introduced by Senator Adam Schiff and Representative Mike Levin, aims to explicitly ban prediction market contracts related to terrorism, assassination, war, or an individual’s death on CFTC-regulated platforms. The legislation responds to concerns over platforms like Kalshi and Polymarket offering contracts tied to events such as assassinations, military actions, or political removals. Critics argue these markets allow unethical profiting from real-world violence and human suffering. If passed, the law would push such trading to unregulated offshore platforms while allowing conventional prediction markets (e.g., elections or economic data) to continue. The move signals broader regulatory scrutiny over what crypto-based prediction markets can offer.

A Democratic U.S. Senator from California is introducing new legislation targeting crypto‐driven prediction markets

An Act Against Death

On March 10, Democrat U.S. Senator Adam Schiff (California) and Representative Mike Levin (CA-49) introduced the DEATH BETS Act, a bill aimed explicitly at banning prediction market contracts tied to terrorism, assassination, war or an individual’s death on any platform registered in the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CTFC). This includes regulated venues like Kalshi or Polymarket’s newly U.S. licensed arm, plus other designated contract markets (DCM) that list event contracts via brokers.

The current law, the Commodity Exchange Act, gives authority to the CFTC to bar contracts tied to terrorism, war or assassination if they are deemed to be “contrary to the public interest”. Schiff’s proposed bill would revoke such flexibility: the senator argues that the agency has too much discretion as it rewrites prediction‐market rules under Chair Mike Selig:

At a time when CFTC Chair Selig has indicated that he will rewrite the rules on prediction markets, the CFTC can no longer be granted this discretion. The DEATH BETS Act will unequivocally ban these contracts.

The DEATH BETS Act And The Crypto World

The proposed bill follows the Senate Democrats pressure to the CFTC to “halt prediction contracts that involve betting on physical injury, death or war”, as stated on a letter sent to Chair Michael Selig in February 23. The letter specifically quotes Polymarket’s on-chain “dangerous prediction contracts” on whether the Artemis II would explode, if Venezuela’s former regime head Nicolás Maduro would be removed from power and if Ukraine’s Myrnohad would be captured by Russian forces.

“The Wild West”

In Senator Schiff’s words, the prediction markets have turned into “the Wild West”:

There is no justification for gambling on lives, or public benefit to be derived by such a market. With regulators turning a blind eye, prediction markets have rapidly become the Wild West.

Now, the Iran war episode takes the spotlight, as the Senator’s office highlights that a bet on whether Iran’s Ali Khamenei would be “out as Supreme Leader” had $54 million in trading volume on Kalshi before it was paused. There are hundreds of millions in Iran‐related bets, with a reported 10 wallets making over $1.2–1.4 million in profit right before U.S. strikes.

Rep. Levin stressed the importance of not letting “someone make money off the outbreak of war or the deaths of American service members”.

We already saw what that looks like: over half a billion dollars was wagered on the timing of U.S. military strikes on Iran alone. That is unacceptable, and this legislation puts a stop to it.

What The DEATH BET Act Means For Traders

Under the DEATH BET Act, CFTC‐supervised platforms will likely become safer but more limited, while riskier war/death flows are pushed further into offshore or permissionless crypto venues, where legal and reputational risks spike. Bets on elections, inflation points and macro data will continue to be safe game, but Washington aims to draw the line on banally “gambling” with the lives of real people.

The DEATH BET Act isn’t a ban on crypto prediction markets, but it is a signal that the next regulatory battles in crypto won’t just be over Bitcoin or ETFs: they’ll be over what the industry considers acceptable to let people bet on.

BTC’s price trends to the downside on the daily chart. Source: BTCUSDT on Tradingview

Cover image from Perplexity, BTCUSDT chart from Tradingview

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the main purpose of the DEATH BETS Act introduced by Senator Schiff?

AThe DEATH BETS Act aims to explicitly ban prediction market contracts tied to terrorism, assassination, war, or an individual's death on any platform registered with the CFTC.

QWhich specific examples of prediction contracts did Senate Democrats cite in their letter to CFTC Chair Michael Selig?

AThe letter cited Polymarket's on-chain contracts on whether the Artemis II would explode, if Venezuela's Nicolás Maduro would be removed from power, and if Ukraine's Myrnohad would be captured by Russian forces.

QHow does Senator Schiff characterize the current state of prediction markets in his statement?

ASenator Schiff characterized prediction markets as 'the Wild West' where regulators have been turning a blind eye to gambling on lives.

QWhat significant trading activity was mentioned regarding Iran-related prediction markets?

AA bet on whether Iran's Ali Khamenei would be 'out as Supreme Leader' had $54 million in trading volume on Kalshi before being paused, with reported profits of $1.2-1.4 million for some traders before U.S. strikes.

QWhat will be the practical effect of the DEATH BET Act on trading platforms according to the article?

ACFTC-supervised platforms will become safer but more limited, while riskier war/death betting will be pushed to offshore or permissionless crypto venues, increasing legal and reputational risks there.

Leituras Relacionadas

No Sales Team, $20 Million in Revenue: How Did AI Employee Viktor Win Over 30,000 Companies?

The AI employee Viktor, developed by a team with DeepMind background, has achieved $20 million in annual revenue without a traditional sales team, serving over 30,000 companies. Its core innovation lies in positioning itself as a "Tier 3 AI Coworker" capable of "end-to-end execution and delivery of results," moving beyond the "draft and wait for human completion" model of typical AI assistants. Users can simply mention Viktor in Slack or Microsoft Teams using natural language commands, and it autonomously performs tasks like pulling sales data from a CRM, generating reports, or even cross-tool operations like creating board meeting PPTs by aggregating data from six different sources. Key to its growth is a pure Product-Led Growth (PLG) model, eliminating complex implementation cycles and per-seat licensing. Instead, it charges based on task credits or consumption, lowering the trial barrier with a $100 free credit offer and no credit card required. This enabled viral, bottom-up adoption within organizations. Viktor's interaction paradigm removes the barrier of prompt engineering, allowing non-technical employees to delegate complex workflows seamlessly. It also features proactive, automated task execution (e.g., overnight bookkeeping, scheduled reports) based on triggers, effectively embedding AI as an automated "process layer" within business operations. However, its expansion into Microsoft Teams—a platform with 320 million users—highlights challenges. Large enterprises require stringent IT compliance, security reviews (e.g., SOC 2), and governance, potentially hindering the frictionless, user-driven adoption that succeeded in Slack. Additionally, the "black box" nature of its autonomous decision-making raises concerns about operational risks, data integrity, and the need for robust audit logs and permission controls. Balancing efficiency gains with security and trust remains a critical hurdle for Viktor and similar AI agents aiming to become core enterprise infrastructure.

marsbitHá 38m

No Sales Team, $20 Million in Revenue: How Did AI Employee Viktor Win Over 30,000 Companies?

marsbitHá 38m

Manus Buyback Plan Emerges: Chinese Investors Plan to Repurchase Equity with $2 Billion, Path to Hong Kong IPO Becomes Clearer

According to a report by The Information, early Chinese investors of Manus, including Tencent, Sequoia Capital China, and ZhenFund, are planning to repurchase the company from Meta for $2 billion—the same price Meta paid in its acquisition last December. This move is a direct response to the Chinese government's prohibition of the foreign acquisition in April. As part of the repurchase plan, Manus is considering establishing a Sino-foreign joint venture within China. This structure is seen as a way to ensure regulatory compliance for its Chinese investors and to pave the way for a future IPO in Hong Kong. Notably, U.S. investor Benchmark will not participate in the buyback, which will concentrate ownership even more among Chinese capital. Since its acquisition by Meta, Manus's business has grown rapidly, with its annualized revenue run rate reportedly increasing four-to-fivefold to $400-$500 million in roughly six months. This strong growth underpins the investors' willingness to repurchase at the original price. Financially, the forced unwinding of the deal may benefit the early investors, allowing them to regain equity at a cost far below the company's current implied valuation, with the added prospect of an independent future listing. However, specific terms of the repurchase, including funding proportions and the joint venture's equity structure, are still under negotiation. This "repurchase-joint venture-Hong Kong IPO" approach could serve as a reference model for other Chinese AI startups navigating cross-border M&A regulations.

marsbitHá 1h

Manus Buyback Plan Emerges: Chinese Investors Plan to Repurchase Equity with $2 Billion, Path to Hong Kong IPO Becomes Clearer

marsbitHá 1h

STRC Loses Peg by 11%, Can Strategy's Perpetual Motion Machine Keep Running?

The article discusses the significant and concerning depegging of MicroStrategy's (MSTR) preferred stock, STRC. Designed to trade near its $100 target par value, STRC has recently fallen sharply, reaching a low of $83.26 and closing at $88.59, representing an over 11% discount. STRC is a core component of MicroStrategy's financial strategy. As a perpetual preferred stock, it allows the company to raise capital through an "at-the-market" (ATM) issuance program without diluting common shareholders (MSTR). This capital is primarily used to purchase Bitcoin, creating a "capital flywheel": issuing STRC → raising cash → buying BTC → increasing net assets → supporting STRC's value. The flywheel's operation depends on STRC maintaining its $100 price. To enforce this, MicroStrategy employs a dynamic dividend mechanism, recently raising the rate to 11.5% and increasing payout frequency. However, this has failed to halt the depegging, indicating market concerns extend beyond yield. Analysts cite two main reasons. First, technical factors like forced liquidations from leveraged arbitrage trades may have exacerbated the sell-off. Second, and more fundamentally, is waning confidence in MicroStrategy's financial resilience. A JPMorgan report highlighted the company's limited cash relative to its ~$1.7 billion annual dividend obligation, raising liquidity concerns. While MicroStrategy counters that its massive Bitcoin holdings provide decades of coverage, this argument relies on the potential need to sell BTC—a departure from its long-standing "never sell" narrative. The company's recent sale of a small amount of Bitcoin for "testing," despite being framed as minor, has intensified these fears. The persistent depegging threatens to cripple MicroStrategy's primary funding channel. If STRC remains discounted, the company's ability to fund further Bitcoin purchases weakens. Should cash reserves dwindle while financing is constrained, the market may increasingly price in the risk of MicroStrategy becoming a forced seller of Bitcoin to meet obligations. This shift from a major marginal buyer to a potential seller could pose significant downside risk to the broader Bitcoin market.

链捕手Há 1h

STRC Loses Peg by 11%, Can Strategy's Perpetual Motion Machine Keep Running?

链捕手Há 1h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片