A new altcoin has entered the top ten cryptocurrencies! Today's surge triggered a wave of liquidations

cryptonews.ruPublicado em 2026-09-06Última atualização em 2026-09-06

Resumo

Zcash ($ZEC) surged by approximately 15% in the past 24 hours, reaching $1,170, and became the focal point for market liquidations. According to CoinGlass, total cryptocurrency liquidations over this period amounted to roughly $212 million, with about $156 million from short positions. $ZEC led with liquidations of around $45.32 million, followed by Ethereum (ETH), Bitcoin ($BTC), and Arbitrum (ARB). This price spike also propelled $ZEC into the top ten cryptocurrencies by market capitalization. The rally inflicted significant losses on a major short position held by trader Garrett Bullyish (aka "October 10 whale") on Hyperliquid. He held a 2x leveraged short of 32,759.57 $ZEC (~$38.18 million) with an average entry price of $444 and a liquidation price of $2,566, resulting in an unrealized loss of approximately $23.57 million. Concurrently, the same trader held a long position of 1,331.88 $BTC, which generated an unrealized profit of about $3.6 million. *This is not investment advice.

In the last 24 hours, Zcash ($ZEC) rose by approximately 15%, reaching a mark of $1170, and became the central asset for liquidations in the cryptocurrency market. According to CoinGlass, the total amount of cryptocurrency liquidations over the past 24 hours was approximately $212 million. Of this amount, about $156 million came from the liquidation of short positions.

During this period, $ZEC became the cryptocurrency with the highest amount of liquidations, amounting to approximately $45.32 million. It was followed by Ethereum (ETH) with $35.16 million, Bitcoin ($BTC) with $16.79 million, and Arbitrum (ARB) with $12.94 million. The sharp price change in $ZEC also allowed it to enter the top ten cryptocurrencies by market capitalization.

On the other hand, the rise of $ZEC significantly increased losses on a large short position on Hyperliquid. Garret Bullish, previously known as the "October 10 whale" who had previously liquidated positions worth about $230 million, reportedly held a 2x leveraged short position of 32,759.57 $ZEC, worth approximately $38.18 million. The average opening price of the position was about $444, with a liquidation level of $2566, resulting in an unrealized loss of approximately $23.57 million.

It was also noted that the same large investor held a long position of 1,331.88 $BTC, from which he obtained an unrealized profit of approximately $3.6 million.

*This is not investment advice.

end-content

Criptomoedas em alta

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhich cryptocurrency saw the most liquidations in the past 24 hours according to the article?

AZcash (ZEC) was the cryptocurrency with the highest amount of liquidations, at approximately $45.32 million.

QWhat significant market event caused Zcash (ZEC) to enter the top 10 cryptocurrencies by market capitalization?

AA sharp price increase of ZEC, which rose about 15% to reach $1,170, allowed it to enter the top 10 cryptocurrencies by market capitalization.

QWhat was the total amount of cryptocurrency liquidations over the reported 24-hour period?

AThe total amount of cryptocurrency liquidations was approximately $212 million over the past 24 hours.

QWho is 'October 10th whale' Garret Bullish, and what was the result of his large short position on ZEC?

AGarret Bullish, also known as the 'October 10th whale', held a large leveraged short position on ZEC. Due to ZEC's price surge, this position incurred an unrealized loss of approximately $23.57 million.

QHow did the same large investor ('October 10th whale') offset some losses from his ZEC short position?

AThe same investor held a long position on Bitcoin (BTC) which generated an unrealized profit of approximately $3.6 million, partially offsetting the losses from the ZEC short.

Leituras Relacionadas

Forget Ctrl+F, a New AI Paper Tool Helps You Search for Needles in the Haystack of Full-Text Literature

This article introduces a new AI-powered academic paper writing tool called "Open Academic Paper Gen." Unlike typical AI writing assistants that generate content and citations, this tool features a unique multi-step workflow designed to ensure the validity of references. After generating an initial draft based on a user-provided research topic, the system performs a crucial verification step: it locates and analyzes the full text of cited papers to check if the referenced claims are genuinely supported by the source material. It can even pinpoint relevant paragraphs and PDF page numbers. The tool's workflow involves nine stages: defining the research scope, literature retrieval, filtering, trend analysis, identifying research gaps, outlining, writing, citation verification, and final export. It searches databases like OpenAlex and arXiv, builds an evidence table from gathered papers, and includes an "innovation diagnosis" to assess a proposed angle against existing work. A key focus is its three-layer citation verification process: 1) ensuring citations exist in the collected literature pool, 2) cross-referencing metadata like DOI and author details with official records, and 3) using AI to analyze the source's full text (or abstract if unavailable) to confirm it supports the claim made in the draft. Unverifiable citations are flagged rather than assumed correct. The tool offers both manual review checkpoints and a fully automatic mode, requiring OpenAI or GLM API keys. The project is developed by independent developer "Uncle Cat" and aims to provide researchers with a more reliable starting point for paper drafting by adding a layer of evidence-based validation to AI-generated content.

marsbitHá 24m

Forget Ctrl+F, a New AI Paper Tool Helps You Search for Needles in the Haystack of Full-Text Literature

marsbitHá 24m

U.S. CS Professor Claims: The End of Mathematics Has Arrived, AI Has Destroyed Humanity's Thousand-Year Mathematical Hall

The article titled "Math Doomsday: AI Destroys Millennia of Human Mathematics, Says US CS Professor" details a dramatic upheaval in the mathematical community following OpenAI's release of 722 papers containing AI-generated proofs for major unsolved problems. US computer science professor Scott Aaronson describes this event as a "mathematical doomsday." One notable proof solved the decades-old Unique Games Conjecture, the life's work of complexity theorist Dana Moshkovitz, reportedly in just three hours of compute time. Other breakthroughs include proofs for L=BPL derandomization and a new matrix multiplication bound using methods described as alien and incomprehensible to human mathematicians. The core crisis is twofold: the speed and scale of these AI solutions, perceived as "naked computational hegemony," and the fact that the proofs are written in a style humans struggle to understand, reducing researchers to "archaeologists" translating alien artifacts. This has sparked a furious backlash. Led by figures like Terence Tao, the Association for Human Mathematics (AHM) issued a statement condemning OpenAI's actions, urging a boycott and a return to science centered on human understanding. However, not all voices are in opposition. Turing Award winner Yann LeCun argues this represents the discovery of a "new continent," comparing AI to a ship that, while making swimming less crucial, enables exploration of uncharted territories. Some researchers express relief at being freed from grueling work. A deeply unsettling subplot is the noted absence of cryptography papers in OpenAI's release. Speculation arises that AI companies may be secretly testing whether their models can break modern encryption protocols like RSA, preparing for a potential security collapse. Aaronson concludes his commentary by referencing the film *Terminator 2*, implicitly framing the event as an existential warning.

marsbitHá 29m

U.S. CS Professor Claims: The End of Mathematics Has Arrived, AI Has Destroyed Humanity's Thousand-Year Mathematical Hall

marsbitHá 29m

Samsung HBM, Achieving a Comeback?

The competition in next-generation HBM is extending from DRAM chip performance to advanced packaging technology. A recent report, based on technician interviews, suggests Samsung has begun delivering samples using hybrid bonding to customers, potentially gaining an early lead in verification. SK Hynix reportedly faces challenges in developing its hybrid bonding process but has already delivered 12-layer HBM4E samples using its existing Advanced MR-MUF packaging, indicating it continues to progress on its current path. Hybrid bonding, which directly connects copper interconnects between chips, is seen as crucial for future HBM with 16+ layers, offering benefits like higher interconnect density, lower signal loss, and improved thermal performance. Samsung has promoted its Hybrid Copper Bonding (HCB) technology for such applications. However, the real challenge lies in manufacturing. Achieving stable, high-yield production requires precise control over processes like Chemical Mechanical Planarization (CMP), surface cleanliness, and managing wafer thinness and warpage. Moving from lab samples to mass production involves overcoming hurdles in yield, cost, and reliability across multiple bonded interfaces. While delivering samples provides a potential lead in customer validation, it doesn't guarantee commercial success. SK Hynix's continued progress with MR-MUF shows that traditional packaging remains viable. The competition is shifting to a systemic contest involving memory design, bonding technology, thermal management, and advanced packaging. The ultimate winner will be determined by which company can achieve stable high-volume production at a competitive cost. Separately, market data indicates Samsung's HBM market share rose from 21% in Q1 to 33% in Q2, closing the gap with SK Hynix. Analysts project Samsung's HBM revenue and its proportion of HBM4 sales to grow significantly by 2027.

marsbitHá 34m

Samsung HBM, Achieving a Comeback?

marsbitHá 34m

The Mystery of Ledger Hardware Wallet Theft: Implanted with Spy Modules, Chinese-Background Distributor Surfaces

A major security breach involving Ledger hardware wallets has been traced to the official authorized distributor CryptoBilis in Southeast Asia. Users who purchased devices from this supplier reported significant cryptocurrency losses, with initial estimates from on-chain analysts ranging from $72 million to over $92 million across Bitcoin, Ethereum, and USDT wallets. This incident is potentially the largest recorded supply chain attack on a hardware wallet. Ledger has warned affected customers and instructed those who bought from CryptoBilis in the past 90 days to transfer assets to a new device with a freshly generated seed phrase if already in use, or not to power on unused devices. Investigations reveal that CryptoBilis underwent a change in ownership in March 2026, with full control transferred to an individual based in China. Technical analysis by experts, including a former Mt. Gox CEO, suggests the attack was executed via a sophisticated hardware implant. A spy module containing a SIM/eSIM chip was allegedly hidden inside some devices, intercepting and transmitting the seed phrase as it appeared on the screen during setup, bypassing the device's secure element. While Ledger has not officially confirmed the exact attack vector, possibilities include this hardware tampering, pre-seeded wallets, or phishing. The event underscores a critical vulnerability: even "official authorized" distributors can become an attack vector in the supply chain. The key takeaway for users is to purchase hardware wallets directly from the manufacturer whenever possible to minimize third-party risks.

marsbitHá 35m

The Mystery of Ledger Hardware Wallet Theft: Implanted with Spy Modules, Chinese-Background Distributor Surfaces

marsbitHá 35m

From Start to Give-up: Why I'm No Longer Working on Web3 Payments

Title: From Start to Abandonment: Why I Stopped Working on Web3 Payments Summary: This article details the author's six-month journey from exploring to ultimately leaving the Web3 payments space. Initially drawn by the promise of faster, cheaper, and more transparent cross-border settlements—seemingly a solution to long-standing frictions in global business—the author immersed in the industry. This involved field research in key global trade hubs and hands-on development of Web3 payment tools. However, deeper engagement revealed a fundamental mismatch between perception and reality. The author concluded that Web3 payments is not a "build a better product and win" industry. Its core competencies lie not in product features but in long-term infrastructure: bank relationships, licenses, compliance, risk management, and capital efficiency. Much perceived profitability is actually "risk premium"—revenue from operations that have not yet encountered problems, rather than sustainable capability advantages. The industry's essence is a "water flow" business. Success depends not on diverting the flow but on possessing the structural capacity to control its volume, pressure, and purity while withstanding regulatory scrutiny—capabilities built over years, not through rapid iteration. While the author remains convinced of the long-term, structural opportunity for Web3 in backend treasury and settlement upgrades, especially in emerging markets, these require a specific resource profile. Ultimately, the decision to step back was one of respecting resource constraints. The team's strengths did not align with the heavy, long-term, relationship-intensive nature of the payments battlefield. The author shifts focus from competing for the "waterway" to analyzing the flow itself, exploring how to help users understand and manage assets once they enter the Web3 ecosystem, seeing this as the next logical layer of value creation.

marsbitHá 1h

From Start to Give-up: Why I'm No Longer Working on Web3 Payments

marsbitHá 1h

Trading

Spot

Artigos em Destaque

Como comprar ZEC

Bem-vindo à HTX.com!Tornámos a compra de Zcash (ZEC) simples e conveniente.Segue o nosso guia passo a passo para iniciar a tua jornada no mundo das criptos.Passo 1: cria a tua conta HTXUtiliza o teu e-mail ou número de telefone para te inscreveres numa conta gratuita na HTX.Desfruta de um processo de inscrição sem complicações e desbloqueia todas as funcionalidades.Obter a minha contaPasso 2: vai para Comprar Cripto e escolhe o teu método de pagamentoCartão de crédito/débito: usa o teu visa ou mastercard para comprar Zcash (ZEC) instantaneamente.Saldo: usa os fundos da tua conta HTX para transacionar sem problemas.Terceiros: adicionamos métodos de pagamento populares, como Google Pay e Apple Pay, para aumentar a conveniência.P2P: transaciona diretamente com outros utilizadores na HTX.Mercado de balcão (OTC): oferecemos serviços personalizados e taxas de câmbio competitivas para os traders.Passo 3: armazena teu Zcash (ZEC)Depois de comprar o teu Zcash (ZEC), armazena-o na tua conta HTX.Alternativamente, podes enviá-lo para outro lugar através de transferência blockchain ou usá-lo para transacionar outras criptomoedas.Passo 4: transaciona Zcash (ZEC)Transaciona facilmente Zcash (ZEC) no mercado à vista da HTX.Acede simplesmente à tua conta, seleciona o teu par de trading, executa as tuas transações e monitoriza em tempo real.Oferecemos uma experiência de fácil utilização tanto para principiantes como para traders experientes.

837 Visualizações TotaisPublicado em {updateTime}Atualizado em 2026.06.02

Como comprar ZEC

Discussões

Bem-vindo à Comunidade HTX. Aqui, pode manter-se informado sobre os mais recentes desenvolvimentos da plataforma e obter acesso a análises profissionais de mercado. As opiniões dos utilizadores sobre o preço de ZEC (ZEC) são apresentadas abaixo.

活动图片