A Bullish Pennant Just Appeared On The Dogecoin Monthly Chart, Here’s What To Expect

bitcoinistPublicado em 2026-03-10Última atualização em 2026-03-10

Resumo

A massive bullish pennant pattern is forming on the Dogecoin (DOGE/USD) monthly chart, a development that began after the cryptocurrency's historic rally in 2021. The pattern started with a sharp "flagpole" surge that took DOGE from under $0.01 to its all-time high of $0.73. Since that peak, the price has been compressing between two converging trendlines, creating a symmetrical triangle with a series of lower highs and higher lows. The price is currently testing a critical juncture, trading near the lower, rising support trendline around $0.09. Holding this support is crucial for the pattern's validity; a monthly close below it would weaken the bullish outlook. For the pattern to confirm and trigger a significant breakout, DOGE must first push above the upper, descending trendline, which requires closing consecutive months above the $0.32 level. If a breakout occurs, the measured move target—calculated from the height of the 2021 flagpole—projects a substantial upward move. Conservative estimates suggest a target well above $1, with more optimistic projections reaching the $3 to $4 range.

Most traders are watching Dogecoin on the daily or weekly chart, reacting to intraday price action. However, the monthly candlestick chart tells a different story, one that has been developing since the 2021 cycle and is now approaching an inflection point.

Technical analysis shows a massive bullish pennant is forming on the DOGE/USD monthly timeframe. Dogecoin is now at a lower high support in the pennant, and the technical implications are significant.

Giant Pennant Has Been Forming Since The 2021 Rally

The monthly chart shows Dogecoin’s price compressing between two converging trendlines, forming what appears to be a large bullish pennant. The structure begins with the flagpole: the near-vertical surge that launched Dogecoin from below $0.01 to its all-time high of $0.73 in May 2021.

Since that peak, DOGE’s price action has been forming a symmetrical triangle on the monthly chart, a series of lower highs and higher lows converging steadily toward an apex. The upper boundary slopes downward from the peak reached during the 2021 surge, creating a descending resistance line that has rejected several major rallies since then.

Source: Chart from TheMoonHailey on X

The lower boundary, on the other hand, rises gradually from the base that formed once the previous rally cooled to create a higher low. The lower trendline has provided consistent support, and critically, it held last month when the price tested the $0.08 zone.

As shown in the Dogecoin monthly candlestick chart below, these two lines have created a triangular formation that has continued to narrow since 2021. Multiple turning points on the chart show price reacting precisely at these boundaries, and the structure has been respected repeatedly over time.

Here’s What To Expect From The Bullish Pennant

One of the most important details in the chart is the most recent interaction with the lower trendline. Dogecoin dipped to the rising support boundary in February and bounced. That rebound occurred around the same area where Dogecoin has been trading recently, just below the $0.09 level.

At the time of writing, Dogecoin is trading at $0.094, still close to the support. Holding this support and closing above it in March is important for the structure because a bullish pennant depends on price remaining inside the converging boundaries. If DOGE were to close the month below the lower trendline, then the bullish outlook would weaken.

On the other hand, the bullish outlook depends on Dogecoin breaking above the upper end of the bullish pennant. The measured move target of a bullish pennant is calculated from the height of the flagpole, projected from the breakout point. Given the scale of Dogecoin’s 2021 flagpole, even conservative projections point well above $1, with upper-range targets in the $3 to $4 territory.

However, there is still much work to do for DOGE to return to the upper trendline before a breakout. Particularly, Dogecoin needs to push above $0.32 and close consecutive months above this level.

DOGE trading at $0.09 on the 1D chart | Source: DOGEUSDT on Tradingview.com

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat pattern is forming on the Dogecoin monthly chart according to the article?

AA massive bullish pennant is forming on the DOGE/USD monthly timeframe.

QWhat was the starting point (flagpole) of this bullish pennant pattern?

AThe flagpole was the near-vertical surge that launched Dogecoin from below $0.01 to its all-time high of $0.73 in May 2021.

QWhat is the critical support level that Dogecoin recently tested and held?

ADogecoin recently tested and held the support at the lower trendline around the $0.08 zone in February.

QWhat is the significance of Dogecoin closing a month above the $0.32 level?

AClosing consecutive months above the $0.32 level is necessary for Dogecoin to push towards the upper trendline and attempt a breakout from the pennant.

QWhat is the potential price target if the bullish pennant pattern completes with a successful breakout?

AThe measured move target, based on the height of the 2021 flagpole, points well above $1, with upper-range targets in the $3 to $4 territory.

Leituras Relacionadas

When Doing Cryptocurrency Payment, the First Thing is Licenses, What is the Second?

When launching a crypto payment business, obtaining the necessary licenses is the crucial first step. However, the second, and arguably more critical, step is designing a comprehensive operational framework that forms a coherent business loop. This loop must be clearly understood and executable by all stakeholders: banks, payment partners, exchanges, on-chain analytics providers, regulators, and your internal team. Many projects mistakenly believe a single license permits all operations. Licenses merely grant entry; they don't define how the specific business functions. The real challenge lies in detailing every aspect of the workflow. This involves clarifying the customer base, the flow of fiat and crypto assets, the settlement process, and establishing clear lines of responsibility for risks like AML compliance, sanctions screening, chargebacks, and regulatory inquiries. A robust framework must answer seven core questions: Who are the clients and merchants? Who collects fiat and crypto? Who handles conversion and custody? And who is ultimately accountable for compliance and risk management? Projects often fail not from a lack of licensing, but during due diligence when they cannot convincingly explain these operational details. Therefore, beyond securing licenses, the priority must be constructing a closed-loop system. This system ensures the business model is transparent, risks are managed, responsibilities are delineated, contracts are aligned, and the entire process is comprehensible to partners and regulators. The true competitive edge in crypto payments lies not in acquiring a license quickly, but in integrating licensing, banking, compliance, and operations into a sustainable and executable whole.

marsbitHá 34m

When Doing Cryptocurrency Payment, the First Thing is Licenses, What is the Second?

marsbitHá 34m

Arthur Hayes Analysis: AI Bubble Nears Burst, Crypto Market Faces Short-Term Pressure

Arthur Hayes argues that the current AI market is a bubble poised to burst, which will exert downward pressure on the crypto market in the near term. The core trigger is rising oil prices due to the US-Iran conflict and a blockade of the Strait of Hormuz. Higher energy costs directly increase the operational expenses of AI data centers, squeezing profit margins for companies like Google, Anthropic, and OpenAI. Hayes predicts that persistent inflation from high oil prices will force Trump, in a bid to win the November election, to turn public sentiment against the AI industry. He may propose regulations and taxes on data centers and AI companies to appeal to voters concerned about costs and job displacement. Such political rhetoric could shatter market confidence. Furthermore, the market is unlikely to healthily absorb the massive concurrent IPOs of SpaceX, Anthropic, and OpenAI, which together seek valuations in the trillions. The combination of soaring energy costs, overwhelming equity supply, and negative political pressure will puncture the AI bubble. Hayes notes that nearly all new USD liquidity since 2022 has flowed into AI, leaving crypto like Bitcoin behind. When the AI bubble bursts, liquidity will contract sharply, pulling down all risk assets, including cryptocurrencies. In response, Hayes's fund, Maelstrom, has sold all AI-related stocks and non-core cryptocurrencies. It maintains core positions in Bitcoin and Ethereum while increasing exposure to energy sector equities, betting on rising oil and gas prices. He expects Bitcoin to bottom after the AI-led market decline, before rallying again with future monetary easing.

Foresight NewsHá 48m

Arthur Hayes Analysis: AI Bubble Nears Burst, Crypto Market Faces Short-Term Pressure

Foresight NewsHá 48m

To C, To B, and the Next Big Thing Called To A

After To C and To B, the Next Wave is To A: Serving AI Agents In a recent quarterly earnings call, Meituan's Wang Xing introduced a new concept: To A (To Agent), signifying that future business services will increasingly target AI Agents as primary clients, not just consumers or merchants. This shift implies that internet giants must now consider how to make their services more appealing for AI Agents to recommend, fundamentally altering traditional distribution logic. This "To A era" is prompting an unusual trend of alliances among major tech companies. Unlike previous competitive battles, firms like Meituan, Tencent, JD.com, Huawei, OPPO, and OpenAI are rapidly forming partnerships. The reason is strategic: as AI Agents become the primary user interface, handling tasks from a single command (e.g., "Book a Japanese restaurant for tomorrow"), the risk for platforms is being bypassed entirely. Companies are positioning themselves within this new value chain. Three primary strategies are emerging: 1. **Super-Entry Points + Service Providers:** Platforms like Tencent's Yuanbao, WeChat, and ChatGPT aim to be the first-stop Agent, integrating various services (food delivery, shopping, travel) from partners like Meituan and JD.com. 2. **Apps as Callable Services:** Companies like Meituan, JD.com, and Uber are ensuring their core services remain accessible and callable by external Agents, shifting from front-end apps to back-end capabilities. 3. **System-Level Agent Entry Points:** Smartphone makers (Huawei, Honor, OPPO) are leveraging their OS-level AI assistants to control the initial user command, redistributing it to relevant service apps. While alliances offer mutual benefit—entry points gain service capabilities, and service providers gain traffic—inherent conflicts of interest exist. A dominant Agent platform could eventually attempt to connect directly with suppliers (restaurants, hotels), bypassing current aggregators like Meituan or Ctrip. Other unresolved challenges include the potential for Agent recommendations to become a new form of paid ranking and unclear accountability for faulty recommendations. The current rush to form alliances is a defensive move by service providers to secure their position before the landscape solidifies. In this To A-driven restructuring, the greatest risk is not losing the race but failing to hear the starting gun.

marsbitHá 57m

To C, To B, and the Next Big Thing Called To A

marsbitHá 57m

The More Lifelike the Robot, the More Terrifying? Unveiling the 'Uncanny Valley Effect' in the Era of Humanoid Robots

As humanoid robots become increasingly lifelike, they confront a significant psychological barrier known as the "Uncanny Valley Effect," a concept proposed by Japanese roboticist Masahiro Mori in 1970. This phenomenon describes a dip in human comfort and acceptance when robots appear almost, but not perfectly, human. Minor imperfections in facial expressions, eye movements, or skin texture trigger a subconscious sense of unease, as the brain detects something trying, yet failing, to mimic a person. Examples range from the controversial human-like robot Sophia to animated characters in films like *The Polar Express*. The effect poses a key design challenge for robotics companies. Some, like Boston Dynamics, avoid it entirely by creating highly capable but visibly mechanical robots. Others, like Hanson Robotics, push for greater human likeness despite the risk. For consumer robots, especially in homes, most manufacturers opt for stylized or clearly mechanical designs to ensure broader acceptance. While the Uncanny Valley remains a powerful force, its impact may diminish over time through technological advancements that achieve near-perfect realism or through generational familiarity as people grow accustomed to interacting with humanoid machines. Ultimately, navigating this psychological frontier requires as much understanding of human perception as of robotics technology itself.

marsbitHá 58m

The More Lifelike the Robot, the More Terrifying? Unveiling the 'Uncanny Valley Effect' in the Era of Humanoid Robots

marsbitHá 58m

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片