Senate to Vote on CLARITY Act Before August Recess, Lummis Says

cryptonews.ruPublicado em 2026-08-06Última atualização em 2026-08-06

Resumo

U.S. Senator Cynthia Lummis (R-WY), chair of the Senate's digital assets subcommittee, stated the Senate may work past Friday and through the weekend to secure a vote on the CLARITY Act before the August recess. This vote would force senators to take a public position on the bill. Over 300 pages of amendments, requested by Democrats, have been prepared after 11 months of negotiations, with final discussions ongoing regarding CFTC jurisdiction, law enforcement provisions, and ethics rules for senior federal officials. Key unresolved issues, per Democratic staff, include securities protection, illicit finance, national security, and presidential conflicts of interest. A bipartisan counterproposal, allowing state attorneys general to enforce federal crypto ethics rules, has been sent to President Trump, who reportedly agreed to broader restrictions than those applied to previous presidents. Lummis asserted that if the bill fails, it will be due to Democratic opposition. Regulators have expressed support. CFTC Chairman Michael S. Selig endorsed congressional action for clearer digital asset rules, while SEC Chairman Paul Atkins expressed optimism about the bill's passage. The CLARITY Act aims to divide oversight between the CFTC and SEC, providing distinct regulatory frameworks for cryptocurrencies and securities. Proponents argue this clarity will help retain crypto companies, capital, and innovation within the United States, preventing an exodus to jurisdictions like Switzerl...

U.S. Senator Cynthia Lummis (R-WY), chair of the Senate Digital Assets Subcommittee, stated that the Senate may continue working beyond Friday as lawmakers insist on holding a vote on the CLARITY Act before the August recess. In an interview with Fox Business on August 5th, she noted that the vote would allow the position of each senator to be recorded.

Given that the Senate was initially expected to begin its August recess on Friday, Lummis remarked:

"I don't think we will leave on Friday. I think we will work through the weekend."

The senator explained the extended session by noting that several bills are still awaiting votes. "In addition to the CLARITY Act, there are other bills that we need to vote on before we leave for the August recess. CLARITY is one of those bills," she continued.

The legislator from Wyoming reported that as a result of 11 months of negotiations, over 300 pages of amendments requested by Democrats have been prepared, while discussions continue regarding sections concerning the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), law enforcement provisions, and ethics rules for high-ranking federal officials.

She emphasized:

"I truly believe we will hold a vote on the CLARITY Act and record the positions of all participants."

Ethics and Enforcement Provisions Shape Final Negotiations

On August 5th, staff of the Senate Banking Committee from the Democratic Party highlighted five unresolved issues, including securities protection, illicit financing, national security, and presidential conflicts of interest. Their analysis of the bill reveals key contentious points that continue to shape the course of negotiations.

President Donald Trump received a bipartisan counter-proposal that would allow state attorneys general to enforce federal ethics rules in the cryptocurrency sphere. This counter-proposal on ethics, sent to the White House, resulted from negotiations led by U.S. Senators Thom Tillis (R-NC) and Ruben Gallego (D-AZ).

Lummis noted that Trump agreed to ethics restrictions broader than those imposed on previous presidents, while Democrats sought additional safeguards. The proposal remained under presidential review as senators prepared for the vote.

The legislator stated:

"We will vote on it so that it doesn't fail due to a lack of votes. And if it fails, it will only be because the Democrats block it."

Regulators Support Federal Regulatory Framework for Cryptocurrencies

Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) Chairman Michael S. Selig endorsed Congressional action after the Senate Agriculture Committee advanced the Digital Asset Market Structure bill on January 29. His statement supporting clearer rules for digital assets bolstered efforts to make the U.S. a leading financial technology market.

The CLARITY Act provides for the allocation of supervisory authority between the CFTC and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), with separate regulatory mechanisms for relevant cryptocurrencies and securities. SEC Chairman Paul Atkins also expressed optimism that Congress would pass this law, adding support from another key regulator.

Proponents argue that clearly defined agency authorities will help exchanges, developers, investors, and law enforcement personnel operate under uniform rules. Lummis stated that such a regulatory framework would keep crypto companies, capital, and innovation in the U.S.

She explained:

"We want to keep this industry in the country. We don't want it to go to Switzerland, the UAE, or Singapore. This is an important industry for the U.S."

"We've been trying to find a way that allows innovation to flourish while maintaining a clear regulatory framework that this industry can follow. And they want to follow the rules. They want to stay in the United States. Let's give them that opportunity by passing the CLARITY Act," the legislator concluded.

Deadline Before Recess Increases Pressure

Senator Lummis had previously warned that the existing regulatory system is failing companies, consumers, and law enforcement. In her call for a vote before the recess, she also emphasized asset custody rules, disclosure, and federal oversight.

The approaching congressional recess has narrowed the window to secure the 60 votes typically needed to advance major legislation. Republicans hold 53 seats, so they require Democratic support. A Senate vote will record each lawmaker's position before negotiations with the House of Representatives on the final bill text.

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is Senator Lummis's stance on when the Senate will vote on the CLARITY Act, and why?

ASenator Cynthia Lummis believes the Senate will work through the weekend and vote on the CLARITY Act before the August recess begins. She explains that several bills, including CLARITY, still need to be voted on before lawmakers leave for the break, and the vote is needed to get senators' positions on the record.

QAccording to the article, what are the key unresolved issues still being negotiated in the CLARITY Act?

AThe key unresolved issues highlighted by Senate Banking Committee Democrats are securities protection, illicit financing, national security, and presidential conflicts of interest. Additionally, provisions concerning the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), law enforcement, and ethics rules for senior federal officials are under active discussion.

QWhat is the significance of the bipartisan counter-offer on ethics mentioned in the article, and who is involved?

AThe bipartisan counter-offer, which would allow state attorneys general to enforce federal crypto ethics rules, is significant because it addresses presidential conflicts of interest. It was sent to the White House following negotiations led by U.S. Senators Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) and Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz.). President Trump has reportedly agreed to ethics restrictions broader than those for previous presidents.

QHow do major U.S. financial regulators view the CLARITY Act, according to the article?

AMajor U.S. financial regulators support the CLARITY Act. CFTC Chairman Rostin Behnam has endorsed Congressional action for clearer digital asset rules. SEC Chairman Gary Gensler has also expressed optimism about the bill's passage. The act aims to create a clear regulatory framework by delineating oversight between the CFTC and SEC.

QWhy does Senator Lummis argue it is crucial for the U.S. to pass the CLARITY Act?

ASenator Lummis argues that passing the CLARITY Act is crucial to keep the cryptocurrency industry, along with its capital and innovation, within the United States. She warns that without a clear regulatory framework, the industry may move to jurisdictions like Switzerland, the UAE, or Singapore, which would be a loss for the U.S. The act aims to provide clear rules that the industry wants to follow while fostering innovation.

Leituras Relacionadas

Home Furnishing Listed Companies Are Trying to Turn Around with AI and Semiconductors

Chinese home furnishing listed companies are increasingly turning to AI and semiconductor cross-border ventures to revive their fortunes amid declining core businesses. A prominent example is PVC flooring giant **Elegant Home Furnishing**, whose stock price skyrocketed with 10 consecutive trading limits after announcing a plan to acquire a majority stake in **Ou Kang Nuo**, a semiconductor storage testing equipment and services company. Despite Elegant Home's own financial struggles—including recent losses and tight cash flow—the acquisition, funded through asset sales and loans, has dramatically boosted its market value. The deal involves a cross-shareholding structure with Ou Kang Nuo's controlling shareholder. This trend is widespread. Over the past year, numerous home furnishing firms with stagnant main operations have seen their stock prices surge after announcing moves into hot sectors like AI, semiconductors, or computing power. Key cases include: * **Markor Home Furnishings** ("high-end home furnishing first share"), after years of heavy losses, acquired an AI server high-speed copper cable company and later introduced AI computing power investors. * **Zhenai Meijia** ("blanket king") became the first A-listed manufacturer controlled by an AI large model company following a takeover. * **Fasilon** (integrated ceiling) saw its stock soar after establishing an AI subsidiary. * **Jinlong Decoration** experienced multiple trading limits after being linked to "commercial aerospace" and "AI computing," despite clarifying these segments contribute less than 1% of its business. Statistics show over 20 A-share companies announced semiconductor crossovers in 2025, with home furnishing and building materials firms being the most active. This shift is largely driven by pressures from the real estate downturn, shrinking overseas demand, and trade tariffs, pushing companies to seek growth through trendy concepts rather than core business improvement. However, the article warns that such speculative frenzies often end when the hype fades, leaving stock prices to eventually reflect the companies' weak fundamentals, as seen in Jinlong Decoration's subsequent sharp price correction. The repeated attempts to "ride the trend" highlight a desperate struggle for survival in a challenging traditional industry.

marsbitHá 15m

Home Furnishing Listed Companies Are Trying to Turn Around with AI and Semiconductors

marsbitHá 15m

"Sell America" Trade Resurfaces: Global Funds Reprice Washington Policy Risks, Dollar and Treasuries Bear the Brunt

"Sale of America" Trade Resurges as Global Funds Reprice Washington Policy Risks, Hitting Dollar and Treasuries First Recent policy signals from Washington are prompting global bond and foreign exchange investors to reignite the "Sale of America" debate. Uncertainty stems from Fed Chair Wash's shift towards less policy communication, Treasury Secretary Bessant's approval of joint intervention with Japan to support the Yen (the first such coordinated move in nearly 30 years), expanding fiscal deficits, and trade war fears. These factors are undermining confidence in U.S. assets. The 30-year Treasury yield recently broke above 5%, hitting a high not seen since 2007, while the Bloomberg Dollar Spot Index has fallen about 2% from its June peak. This dollar weakness is unusual given still-high U.S. interest rates. Investors cite policy uncertainty as a key driver, with one manager calling the Fed Chair and Treasury Secretary a "double whammy" creating a "Trump administration premium." While the S&P 500 continues hitting record highs and foreign holdings of U.S. Treasuries remain high, parts of the bond and FX markets are adjusting. A core concern is whether the Fed under Wash can effectively anchor inflation expectations; analysts warn that if the Fed lags the hiking cycle, long-end yields could face further upward pressure. The 30-year term premium has risen sharply. The U.S.-backed Yen intervention has also sparked debate on the dollar's structural outlook. While framed by Bessant as a "reallocation of reserves," market participants caution that if Japan—America's largest foreign creditor—must sell Treasuries to fund interventions, ripple effects could hit the bond market. Strategists predict moderate dollar depreciation ahead. Most experts are not predicting an end to dollar hegemony or the safe-haven status of Treasuries. However, a key underlying risk is highlighted: the pace of foreign buying of U.S. debt may not keep up with the speed of American borrowing, gradually eroding the structural advantages that have long supported "American exceptionalism."

marsbitHá 17m

"Sell America" Trade Resurfaces: Global Funds Reprice Washington Policy Risks, Dollar and Treasuries Bear the Brunt

marsbitHá 17m

Trading

Spot
活动图片