As New Rules Approach, UK Lawmakers Pressure Banks to Ensure Crypto Access

cryptonews.ruPublicado em 2026-08-13Última atualização em 2026-08-13

Resumo

UK lawmakers are intensifying scrutiny of banks' treatment of cryptocurrency companies as the country prepares to enact official regulation for much of the digital asset industry. Gurinder Singh Josan MP and Lord Vazi of Didcot, co-chairs of the All-Party Parliamentary Group (APPG) on Crypto and Digital Assets, sent a letter to leading UK banks on August 11th. They requested the banks detail their account policies for crypto firms, transaction restrictions, and any planned changes once the new regulatory regime takes effect. The legislators warn that banking access is a major potential obstacle for UK crypto businesses and could undermine the success of the incoming regulatory framework. The APPG has received numerous complaints from licensed and compliant crypto companies facing difficulties in opening or maintaining bank accounts, along with payment limits on crypto-related transactions. While acknowledging banks' anti-money laundering and consumer protection duties, the lawmakers question whether broad restrictions should persist for firms once they are licensed under the new system. They argue banks should assess companies based on their individual risk profiles rather than their sector alone. This view echoes earlier comments from Economic Secretary to the Treasury, Lucy Rigby. The letter is part of a broader APPG inquiry launched in July, examining the scale of the banking access problem, its impact on investment and growth, and whether further government action is n...

UK lawmakers are stepping up scrutiny of how banks treat crypto companies as the country prepares to subject much of the digital assets industry to formal regulation.

MP Gurinder Singh Josan and Lord Weizi of Didcot, co-chairs of the All-Party Parliamentary Group on Crypto and Digital Assets, sent a letter to the heads of major UK banks and banking service providers on August 11.

The letter asks the lenders to explain whether they provide accounts to crypto companies, what restrictions they place on digital asset transactions, and whether these rules will change after the new regulatory regime takes effect.

"Access to banking services could be one of the biggest obstacles to the growth of UK-based crypto and digital asset companies and potentially undermine the success of the UK's upcoming crypto regulatory regime," the lawmakers wrote.

Banks Asked to Clarify Risk Policy

The APPG said it has repeatedly received submissions from crypto companies having difficulty opening or maintaining bank accounts. Furthermore, the group has received reports of payment limits and restrictions affecting crypto-related transactions.

The lawmakers acknowledged that banks have obligations to meet anti-money laundering requirements, consumer protection, and other regulatory duties. However, they questioned whether companies should still face broad restrictions after being licensed under the new system.

The letter argues that banks' decisions should more closely reflect "the individual risk profile of a company rather than simply the sector in which it operates."

Economic Secretary to the Treasury, Lucy Rigby, expressed a similar view earlier this year. She stated in Parliament that the government does not expect crypto companies licensed by the FCA to be "subject to restrictions by banking service providers simply because of the sector
they are in."

Banks were also asked to identify the regulatory, legal, compliance, as well as commercial and risk factors that determine their approach.

Inquiry Could Shape UK Crypto Policy

This letter is part of a broader APPG inquiry into crypto companies' access to banking services, launched on July 21.

The group is examining the scale of the problem, its impact on investment and growth, and the need for additional government or regulatory action. Banks are being asked what policymakers could do to make it easier for legitimate crypto companies to access financial services.

The inquiry covers a broad range of companies, including exchanges, custodians, payment networks, wallet providers, tokenization companies, and stablecoin issuers.

Written responses are due by August 31. The parliamentary group plans to use the feedback to develop recommendations for the government.

The timing is deliberate. The UK aims to attract digital asset companies while introducing clearer regulatory standards. If licensed companies continue to struggle to access basic banking services, lawmakers fear the new regime may fail to achieve its broader competitiveness goals.

end-content

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat action are UK legislators taking regarding banks and crypto companies?

AUK legislators from the All-Party Parliamentary Group (APPG) are pressuring major banks and payment service providers. They have sent letters asking banks to explain their account policies for crypto firms, any transaction restrictions they impose, and if these rules will change under the upcoming regulatory regime.

QWhat main concern prompted the APPG's letter to UK banks?

AThe APPG is concerned that a lack of banking access is a major obstacle for UK crypto and digital asset businesses, which could undermine the success of the country's forthcoming crypto regulatory framework. They cite numerous reports from licensed companies facing account closures, payment limits, and broad restrictions.

QWhat principle do the legislators argue banks should use when assessing crypto companies?

AThe legislators argue that a bank's decisions should reflect a company's individual risk profile, not simply the sector it operates in. They believe licensed firms should not face blanket restrictions from banks solely because they are in the crypto sector.

QWhat broader investigation is this letter a part of, and what is its goal?

AThe letter is part of the APPG's broader investigation into crypto companies' access to banking services, launched on July 21. The investigation aims to understand the scale of the problem, its impact on investment and growth, and whether further government or regulatory action is needed. The goal is to develop policy recommendations.

QWhy is the timing of this legislative pressure significant?

AThe timing is significant because the UK is preparing to implement formal regulations for the digital asset industry while also trying to attract such businesses. Legislators fear that if licensed companies continue to be denied basic banking services, the new regulatory regime could fail in its broader goal of enhancing the UK's competitiveness in this sector.

Leituras Relacionadas

Left Hand PYUSD, Right Hand Open USD: PayPal's Stablecoin Risk "Hedging"

PayPal recently released its Q2 2024 earnings, reporting revenue of $8.68 billion and a Total Payment Volume of $486.4 billion, both exceeding market expectations. However, GAAP profit margins declined year-over-year, with the company attributing an $81 million net loss partly to strategic investments and crypto assets. The report highlighted the strategic role of its PYUSD stablecoin, now positioned as a "major enabler" for the PayPal World platform and integrated into a newly formed "Payment Services & Crypto" business unit. PayPal aims to launch more merchant products powered by PYUSD and AI-driven "agentic payments," focusing on mainstream consumer and business use cases. Despite this strategic push and expansion to over 70 markets and nine blockchains, PYUSD's circulating supply has contracted significantly. After peaking around $4.2 billion in March 2024, its supply fell approximately 31% to roughly $2.7 billion by the end of Q2, indicating a gap between its broad integration narrative and actual sustained user demand post-incentives. The competitive landscape is evolving with the announcement of Open USD, a consortium-backed stablecoin project with over 140 partners including Visa, Mastercard, and Stripe. Unlike PYUSD's single-issuer model, Open USD proposes a shared revenue and governance model among its participants. Notably, PayPal itself is a signatory to the Open USD initiative, suggesting a hedging strategy where it continues developing PYUSD while securing a potential stake in an alternative industry-standard model. PayPal's challenge is to convert PYUSD's established distribution network into organic, subsidy-independent usage. If unsuccessful, its current supply level may represent a peak, especially as competition intensifies from established giants like USDC and new structural paradigms like Open USD.

Odaily星球日报Há 33m

Left Hand PYUSD, Right Hand Open USD: PayPal's Stablecoin Risk "Hedging"

Odaily星球日报Há 33m

Trading

Spot
活动图片