Reviewing the Epstein Files, Discovering He Met Satoshi Nakamoto

marsbitPublicado em 2026-02-03Última atualização em 2026-02-03

Resumo

U.S. Department of Justice recently released a batch of Epstein files, revealing his significant early involvement in the cryptocurrency space. As early as 2011, Epstein was discussing Bitcoin, calling it a "brilliant idea" with "serious flaws." The documents show his communications with tech elites, including former Microsoft executives and PayPal co-founder Peter Thiel, about cryptocurrency investments and ideology. Epstein invested in Blockstream's seed round, and emails suggest he may have also funded Ripple/Stellar, leading to internal conflicts. He was also connected to MIT's Digital Currency Initiative, which paid Bitcoin Core developers using his anonymous donations. Most notably, in a 2016 email, Epstein claimed to have "spoken with some of the Bitcoin creators," raising questions about Satoshi Nakamoto's identity and potential U.S. government awareness. However, he later advised against buying Bitcoin in 2017 when it was under $5,000. The files also note his brief encounter with MicroStrategy CEO Michael Saylor. With half the documents still unreleased, the full extent of Epstein's crypto connections remains unknown.

On January 30th, the U.S. Department of Justice disclosed a large number of "Epstein Files" for the first time, immediately attracting widespread attention and discussion globally. While we were seeing whether Musk "went to the island," Bill Gates' extramarital affair, or the next Federal Reserve Chair nominee Kevin Warsh also appeared on Epstein's party invitation list, these newly disclosed files also dropped a bombshell regarding the cryptocurrency industry.

The history of the cryptocurrency industry may have finally revealed the tip of the iceberg and could be rewritten from now on.

Was Epstein a "Crypto OG"?

As early as 2011, Epstein had already taken notice of Bitcoin. That year, the total annual trading volume of Bitcoin had not yet exceeded $100 million, and its price once broke $30 before plummeting by 90%.

The following email is dated June 12, 2011, right around the peak of Bitcoin's price that year. Epstein stated in the email, "Bitcoin is a brilliant idea, but it also has some serious shortcomings."

In 2013, the frequency of cryptocurrency mentions in Epstein's correspondence increased.

First, there was an email exchange with Boris Nikolic (who once served as Bill Gates' chief technology advisor and was named in Epstein's will), titled "Who Uses Bitcoin Now?". They jokingly and mockingly discussed Ross Ulbricht, the founder of Silk Road who was arrested that year, saying that Ross using a Gmail account with his real name was a stupid mistake.

a16z board partner, former president of Microsoft's Windows division, Steven Sinofsky, emailed Epstein saying his Bitcoin investment had already increased by 50%, and shared Timothy B. Lee's article "How Bitcoin Captivated Washington".

He also received news that the once-famous Bitcoin website Satoshi Dice was sold for $11.4 million.

In 2014, Epstein engaged in an in-depth discussion with PayPal co-founder Peter Thiel about the nature of Bitcoin.

This conversation indicates that Epstein was already very familiar with the ideological debates surrounding Bitcoin's nature in the early stages of the cryptocurrency market. He even compared it to gender identity.

Another email shows that Epstein participated in the seed round financing of Bitcoin infrastructure company Blockstream. The total amount of this round was $18 million, and Epstein's investment increased from $50,000 to eventually $500,000.

Blockstream CEO Adam Back recently issued a statement denying any direct or indirect financial connection between the company and Epstein or his estate. He explained that Epstein was once a limited partner in a fund that held a minority stake in Blockstream, but the fund has since completely divested.

However, the names of Adam Back and Austin Hill (Blockstream co-founder) appeared in travel arrangement emails for St. Thomas Island (about 2 miles from "Epstein Island"):

Furthermore, in 2014, Austin Hill emailed Epstein and Joi Ito (former director of the MIT Media Lab; Epstein invested in Blockstream through his fund). He stated that Ripple ($XRP) and Stellar (a new project by Ripple founder Jed McCaleb after leaving Ripple) had a negative impact on the ecosystem Blockstream was building and harmed Blockstream because their investors were "backing two horses in the same race."

The interpretation of this in English-speaking circles has some divergence. Considering the context, my personal interpretation tends to be that Epstein might have also invested in Ripple/Stellar at the time, which caused Blockstream's dissatisfaction, leading Austin Hill to say in the email, "I was asked by other co-founders to reduce or even cancel your allocation."

Although the growth of Ripple and Stellar was not affected, we don't know if more, unknown, excellent cryptocurrency projects have been stifled in their infancy through such behind-the-scenes pressure, from then until now.

In response, former Ripple CTO David Schwartz tweeted, "I don't want to be a conspiracy theorist, but if this is just the tip of the iceberg, I wouldn't be surprised at all."

So does this mean Epstein's evil also existed in the cryptocurrency field? David Schwartz also said that for most ultra-wealthy individuals, having some connection to Bitcoin is probably very common.

Even more, in 2014-2015, the collapse of the Bitcoin Foundation left Bitcoin Core developers without stable salaries. The MIT Media Lab's Digital Currency Initiative (DCI) began paying salaries to several Bitcoin Core developers. Gavin Andresen, Wladimir van der Laan, and Cory Fields, three Bitcoin Core developers, therefore decided to join the MIT Media Lab.

At that time, the scandal had not yet broken, and the public was unaware of Epstein's anonymous donations to the MIT Media Lab. Joi Ito thanked Epstein via email, not only explaining Bitcoin's development operations to Epstein but also stating that thanks to this money, the lab was "able to move quickly and score a huge victory" because "many organizations wanted to take advantage of the situation to control Bitcoin's developers."

Epstein's reply was a simple compliment about Gavin Andresen: "Gavin is very smart."

Did Epstein Meet Satoshi Nakamoto?

In 2016, Epstein emailed Saudi Royal Court advisor Raafat AlSabbagh and current Abu Dhabi Department of Culture and Tourism advisor Aziza Al Ahmadi, proposing two "radical ideas for creating two new currencies." One was a "Sharia" dollar; just like all U.S. dollar bills have "In God We Trust," the Middle East could have its own "Sharia" dollar for internal use.

The other idea was to create a digital currency like Bitcoin to make money compliant with Sharia law. Then, after this idea, he casually and lightly dropped this message as if in small talk:

"I have spoken with some of the Bitcoin creators, and they are very excited."

Epstein's purpose at the time might have been more about炫耀 his connections to enhance his reliable image, so he just mentioned it offhand. But this could completely rewrite the entire history of Bitcoin and even the cryptocurrency industry. "Some Bitcoin creators"—does this mean Satoshi Nakamoto was not an individual but a team? If so, many mysteries surrounding Satoshi Nakamoto would have a reasonable explanation.

There are even more thought-provoking questions. Who was this team? What was the motivation for creating Bitcoin? If Epstein really met them, how did he initially find out who they were, and how did he establish a relationship with them? If even Epstein knew who created Bitcoin, wouldn't the U.S. government know? What motive has the U.S. government had for remaining silent on this issue all along?

After this latest batch of Epstein files was disclosed, the probability on the prediction market Polymarket of "Satoshi Nakamoto's Bitcoin address taking action in 2026" rose from about 6% to about 9.3% at one point and is currently holding at 8%.

If Epstein did meet Satoshi Nakamoto, it seems Satoshi did not successfully evangelize Bitcoin to him during their contact. In an email exchange on August 31, 2017, when asked "Is it worth buying one Bitcoin?", Epstein simply replied "No." At that time, one Bitcoin was less than $5,000.

Whether Epstein actually met Satoshi Nakamoto, we currently have no way of knowing. However, we can know that he met the now most famous Bitcoin bull—MicroStrategy CEO Michael Saylor.

For years, Saylor's determination to only buy and never sell Bitcoin has been堪称变态 (abnormal/extraordinary). But in 2010, he was not yet famous for this identity.

That year, Comrade Saylor spent $25,000 to get into a party set up by Epstein's publicist Peggy Siegal and initially displayed his "autistic" traits at the party. This is how Peggy Siegal described Saylor:

Being called变态 (abnormal/weird) by a变态 (abnormal/weird) subordinate shows just how变态 Saylor really is. Perhaps only a creation as great as Bitcoin could accommodate a变态 like Saylor and allow him to build a great enterprise.

Conclusion

About half of the Epstein files have not yet been disclosed. How many more bombshells related to the cryptocurrency industry are hidden in these remaining files?

Will time clear the fog?

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat evidence from the article suggests that Jeffrey Epstein may have met Satoshi Nakamoto?

AThe article cites a 2016 email where Epstein stated, 'I have spoken with some of the creators of Bitcoin, and they are very excited,' while proposing a Sharia-compliant digital currency to Saudi and Abu Dhabi advisors.

QWhich Bitcoin infrastructure company did Epstein invest in, and what was the controversy surrounding it?

AEpstein invested in Blockstream's seed round, initially putting in $50,000 which grew to $500,000. The controversy involves emails showing Blockstream's co-founder, Austin Hill, traveling to an island near Epstein's and later expressing that Epstein's potential investment in rival projects Ripple/Stellar was harmful, suggesting pressure to reduce his stake.

QHow did Epstein's association with MIT's Media Lab connect to Bitcoin Core developers?

AEpstein made anonymous donations to the MIT Media Lab, which its director, Joi Ito, used to fund the salaries of Bitcoin Core developers like Gavin Andresen, Wladimir van der Laan, and Cory Fields after the Bitcoin Foundation collapsed, preventing other organizations from controlling them.

QWhat was Epstein's view on investing in Bitcoin in 2017, and how did it contrast with his earlier interest?

ADespite his early interest and discussions about Bitcoin since 2011, Epstein replied 'No' to an email in August 2017 when asked if it was worth buying a Bitcoin, which was then priced under $5,000.

QWhich prominent crypto figure was mentioned as having attended a party organized by Epstein's associate, and how was he described?

AMicroStrategy CEO Michael Saylor was mentioned as attending a party organized by Epstein's PR associate, Peggy Siegal, in 2010. Siegal described Saylor as exhibiting 'autistic' traits during the event.

Leituras Relacionadas

The $290 Million Deficit: A Three-Way Game Between Aave, L0, and Kelp—Who Should Foot the Bill?

An incident involving the theft of 116,500 rsETH (worth approximately $290 million) from Kelp DAO’s cross-chain bridge contract has triggered a complex dispute over responsibility and compensation among Kelp DAO, LayerZero, and Aave. The attack occurred due to a compromised RPC provider used by LayerZero’s Decentralized Verifier Network (DVN). Since Kelp DAO’s bridge used a 1/1 DVN configuration—a single point of failure—the attacker successfully forged a cross-chain message, leading to the unauthorized release of rsETH tokens from the mainnet. These genuine tokens were then deposited into Aave and other lending platforms to borrow WETH, enabling the attacker to exit with the funds. Responsibility is attributed primarily to Kelp DAO for its risky 1/1 DVN setup. LayerZero bears secondary responsibility for permitting such a vulnerable configuration in its protocol layer. Aave also shares indirect blame for over-collateralizing rsETH and other Liquid Restaking Token (LRT) assets without adequate ongoing risk oversight. Kelp DAO lacks sufficient funds to cover the loss, shifting focus to the deeper-pocketed players: LayerZero, whose cross-chain ecosystem and reputation are at risk, and Aave, which faces massive bad loans and declining Total Value Locked (TVL). Aave has asserted that mainnet rsETH remains fully backed, implying it expects Kelp DAO to allow redemption of underlying ETH. This approach would preserve Aave’s mainnet positions but invalidate Layer2 rsETH, damaging LayerZero’s cross-chain credibility. Potential solutions include: - A universal 18.5% haircut on all rsETH holders, causing significant Aave bad debt. - Writing off Layer2 rsETH entirely, protecting Aave mainnet but harming LayerZero and Kelp DAO. - Negotiating a bounty with the hacker for partial fund return. - A joint bailout, possibly led by LayerZero’s ecosystem fund, given its long-term stake in the cross-chain ecosystem. The situation remains unresolved as the parties negotiate, but prolonged delay risks broader DeFi instability, including potential liquidity crises and loss of confidence in LRT and cross-chain infrastructures.

Odaily星球日报Há 12m

The $290 Million Deficit: A Three-Way Game Between Aave, L0, and Kelp—Who Should Foot the Bill?

Odaily星球日报Há 12m

Bitcoin's Bull-Bear Range Battle Continues, HYPE Faces Critical Test of Wave V Support | Exclusive Analysis

This market analysis covers Bitcoin (BTC) and HYPE, highlighting key levels and trading strategies for the week. HYPE is currently testing a critical support level at $40.17. A hold above this level could lead to consolidation between $40.17–$45.76, while a break below it may signal the end of its current V-wave uptrend from the April 2 low. The short-term strategy is to look for long entries near $40.17 if support holds, using 30% leverage and strict stop-loss discipline. Bitcoin is interpreted to be in a larger D-wave rebound from the February 6 low of $60,000, currently trading within a $73,500–$79,000 range. Key resistance lies at $79,000–$80,600 and $83,500–$84,500, with supports at $73,500, $69,500, and $65,000–$66,000. The medium-term strategy maintains a 60% short position from $89,000. Short-term tactics include selling into rallies near $76,500–$79,000 (Scenario A) or breaking below $73,500 (Scenario B), using 30% leverage. Last week, a 1x leveraged long trade in HYPE yielded a 6.80% gain, and the BTC short from $89,000 is currently up approximately 17.08%. Risk management is emphasized: set stop-losses at entry, move to breakeven at +1% profit, and trail stops to lock in gains thereafter. All views are based on technical analysis and are not investment advice. Traders are urged to exercise caution and adapt to market changes.

marsbitHá 43m

Bitcoin's Bull-Bear Range Battle Continues, HYPE Faces Critical Test of Wave V Support | Exclusive Analysis

marsbitHá 43m

Bitcoin's Bull-Bear Range Battle Continues, HYPE Faces Critical Test of Wave V Support | Invited Analysis

The market is experiencing directional uncertainty with both opportunities and risks. HYPE's daily V-wave structure is at a critical juncture, with the $40.17 support level being pivotal for its future trajectory. A break below this level, followed by an inability to surpass the recent high of $45.76, could signal the end of the current upward structure. The short-term strategy for HYPE is to "follow the trend and buy on dips," using a 30% position size and a 30/60-minute trading cycle, entering long upon confirmed support holds with model signals. Bitcoin's market structure is reinterpreted, with the rally from the $60,000 low now considered a larger D-wave rebound within a medium-term correction, facing a key test between $73,500 and $79,000. A break above the upper bound may lead to limited upside, while a drop below could see a decline toward $69,500. Core resistance lies at $79,000–$80,600 and $83,500–$84,500, with support at $73,500, $69,500, and $65,000–$66,000. The medium-term strategy maintains a 60% short position from $89,000, to be exited if price stabilizes above the multi-empty band. Short-term tactics involve 30% positions for "spread" opportunities, with two scenarios: selling on rallies near $76,500–$79,000 (Scheme A) or shorting on a breakdown below $73,500 (Scheme B), both with strict stop-losses. A复盘 of HYPE's recent short trade showed a 6.80% gain from a long entry at $41.59 (based on model buy signals) and exit at $44.42 (triggered by top signals). Key reminders include setting initial stops at entry, moving to breakeven at +1% profit, and trailing stops thereafter. All views are for reference only; market conditions change rapidly, and caution is advised.

Odaily星球日报Há 50m

Bitcoin's Bull-Bear Range Battle Continues, HYPE Faces Critical Test of Wave V Support | Invited Analysis

Odaily星球日报Há 50m

On the Same Day Aave Introduced rsETH, Why Did Spark Choose to Exit?

On April 18, Kelp DAO's cross-chain bridge was exploited, resulting in the malicious minting of 116,500 unbacked rsETH. The attacker deposited these into Aave and borrowed WETH, creating a potential bad debt of approximately $195 million. Aave’s Guardian quickly froze the market, but the protocol’s insurance could only cover about 25% of the loss. In contrast, SparkLend, a lending protocol in the MakerDAO ecosystem, suffered no direct losses. This was not due to superior foresight but rather a preemptive governance decision. On January 29, Spark executed a governance action to discontinue new rsETH supply, citing low usage and high concentration from a single wallet. The same day, Aave expanded its rsETH market by enabling E-Mode with a 93% LTV to attract more deposits. Spark’s risk management framework is designed to remove assets with low usage or poor risk-adjusted returns, regardless of external security concerns. Aave’s decision was growth-oriented, aiming to boost WETH utilization and attract capital. Spark also employs additional safeguards: rate-limited supply and borrow caps that would have limited the scale of such an attack, and a robust oracle system using the median of three price feeds. These mechanisms systemically contain the maximum exposure to any single risk event, demonstrating a fundamentally different approach to risk than Aave’s growth-first model.

marsbitHá 50m

On the Same Day Aave Introduced rsETH, Why Did Spark Choose to Exit?

marsbitHá 50m

Strategy's 'Money Printer': Is STRC Bitcoin's Savior or Destroyer?

Bitcoin's recent price movement is being heavily influenced by Michael Saylor and his company, MicroStrategy, through a new financial instrument: STRC (Variable Rate Series A Perpetual Stretch Preferred Stock). This Nasdaq-listed perpetual preferred stock offers an 11.5% annual dividend, attracting significant capital. Crucially, funds raised from STRC are used to purchase Bitcoin, with a 3x leverage effect—for every $1 from STRC, MicroStrategy adds $2 from MSTR equity to buy $3 worth of BTC. This creates a powerful "flywheel": more STRC sales fuel massive BTC buying, supporting its price and improving MicroStrategy's credit, which in turn makes STRC more attractive to investors. However, this mechanism introduces risks. A significant "ex-dividend arbitrage" pattern has emerged, where traders buy STRC before its monthly dividend, collect the payout, and quickly sell, causing price volatility and potentially driving up Bitcoin's cost basis for MicroStrategy. In response, Saylor has proposed shifting STRC to a semi-monthly dividend to smooth out these effects. Furthermore, STRC's high yield is being integrated into DeFi protocols like Apyx Protocol and Saturn Credit, offering new on-chain yield opportunities. The central concern remains: as MicroStrategy aggressively accumulates over 3.5% of all BTC, it challenges Bitcoin's foundational principle of decentralization, creating a system where a single public company significantly influences the market.

marsbitHá 58m

Strategy's 'Money Printer': Is STRC Bitcoin's Savior or Destroyer?