US Banking Lobby Considers Lawsuit Over OCC Crypto Charters

TheNewsCryptoPublicado em 2026-03-10Última atualização em 2026-03-10

Resumo

A US banking lobby group, the Bank Policy Institute (BPI), is considering legal action against the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) for granting national trust bank charters to cryptocurrency companies like Ripple, BitGo, and Paxos. The BPI argues that these charters, which allow crypto firms to operate as trust banks and provide custody services, could pose risks to Americans and the financial system. They claim this move blurs the definition of a "bank," increases systemic risk, and undermines the credibility of national banking charters. The BPI had previously urged the OCC to reject such applications, and while no final decision on a lawsuit has been made, the group has a history of taking legal action against the agency. Similar concerns were echoed by the Independent Community Bankers of America.

A banking lobby group hailing from the US is looking to take legal action against the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency over the agency permitting national trust bank charters to crypto companies.

An unknown source close to the lobby’s thinking has informed The Guardian that the Bank Policy Institute has plans to sue the OCC for avoiding previous warnings from banking groups and state regulators and proceeding with its revisionism of federal licensing rules to permit national trust bank charters to crypto companies.

As per the group, this could probably put Americans and the financial system at stake. Under Jonathan Gould’s leadership, the OCC permitted the first batch of conditional national trust bank charter approvals to crypto companies comprising Ripple, BitGo and Paxos, among others. Since that time, various companies have demanded similar approvals.

Hanging Sword on OCC

Once permitted, the National Trust Bank charter will grant these firms the ability to function as trust banks and provide custody and asset safekeeping services. In October, the BPI stated it was requesting the OCC to decline applications from crypto companies, comprising Ripple and Circle, as it claimed that permitting such charters could lead to risk to the financial system.

It also mentions that BPI alerts that approving this route and permitting companies to pick a lighter regulatory touch while providing bank-like products could blur the statutory boundary of what it means to be a “bank”, heighten systemic risk and highlight the credibility of the national banking charter itself.

As per The Guardian, the BPI hasn’t decided yet if it plans to pursue legal action against the OCC. Although the report mentioned that the BPI was among a group of banks that had so far taken legal action against the OCC.

The Independent Community Bankers of America issued similar warnings over the OCC’s crypto charter approvals. Lately, the ICBA requested the OCC to pull or change its proposal for issuing licences to crypto companies. ‘

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Hyperliquid (HYPE) Jumps 9%: Can the $40 Zone Be Reached and Anchor the Bull Run?

TagsLawsuitoccUSA

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the main reason the US banking lobby group is considering legal action against the OCC?

AThe banking lobby group, the Bank Policy Institute (BPI), is considering legal action because the OCC is granting national trust bank charters to crypto companies, which they believe avoids previous warnings and could put Americans and the financial system at risk.

QWhich companies were among the first to receive conditional national trust bank charter approvals from the OCC?

ARipple, BitGo, and Paxos were among the first crypto companies to receive conditional national trust bank charter approvals from the OCC under Jonathan Gould's leadership.

QWhat specific concerns does the Bank Policy Institute (BPI) have about granting these charters to crypto firms?

AThe BPI is concerned that granting these charters could blur the statutory boundary of what it means to be a 'bank', heighten systemic risk, and undermine the credibility of the national banking charter itself by allowing companies to operate with a lighter regulatory touch while providing bank-like services.

QHas the Bank Policy Institute (BPI) definitively decided to sue the OCC at this time?

ANo, as per the article, the BPI hasn't yet decided if it will pursue legal action against the OCC, though it has taken such action against the agency in the past.

QWhich other banking group has issued similar warnings to the OCC regarding crypto charters?

AThe Independent Community Bankers of America (ICBA) has also issued similar warnings and recently requested the OCC to withdraw or change its proposal for issuing licenses to crypto companies.

Leituras Relacionadas

Understanding x402 and MPP: Two Approaches to Agent Payments

Stripe's MPP and x402 represent two competing approaches to enabling machine-to-machine payments, both leveraging the long-dormant HTTP 402 status code ("Payment Required"). x402, led by Coinbase, is a minimalist protocol that embeds payment directly into HTTP requests. It requires no accounts, API keys, or intermediaries. A server returns a 402 response with payment details; the client pays on-chain and resubmits the request with a proof. It's open-source, chain-agnostic (currently supporting Base, Polygon, Solana), and designed for open, permissionless systems. However, current usage is low, with small microtransactions. MPP, developed by Stripe and Tempo, is a full-stack solution built for high-frequency agent transactions. Its core innovation is sessions, allowing an agent to pre-authorize a spending limit and make numerous micro-payments within it without repeated on-chain transactions. It runs on the Tempo blockchain, optimized for high throughput and sub-second confirmations. Crucially, it integrates with Stripe's existing compliance, risk, and fiat infrastructure, including support for credit cards via Shared Payment Tokens (SPTs). While x402 offers simplicity and decentralization, MPP provides scalability and enterprise-grade features. Stripe supports both, aiming to capture agent payment flows regardless of the underlying protocol. The ecosystem is still experimental, but major players like Google, Visa, and Anthropic are involved. The choice depends on the use case: x402 for open, long-tail applications, and MPP for commercial, high-volume scenarios.

marsbitHá 31m

Understanding x402 and MPP: Two Approaches to Agent Payments

marsbitHá 31m

The Use of Humans: Agentic Wallet and the Next Decade of Wallets

The article "The Use of Humans: Agentic Wallet and the Next Decade of Wallets" discusses the evolution of digital wallets in the age of AI agents. It argues that as software users shift from humans to autonomous agents, traditional wallet security models—relying on human confirmation, signatures, and private key management—become inadequate. The core proposition is that Agentic Wallets must serve two masters: humans, who set rules and retain ultimate control, and agents, which require constrained autonomy to execute transactions efficiently. The wallet thus evolves from a simple asset container into a permission and execution system that allows agents to operate within predefined boundaries (e.g., budget limits, approved assets, whitelisted addresses). The article identifies key challenges: current wallets are designed for human interaction, not agentic speed and scale. It outlines four tiers of agent autonomy—from human-controlled to fully autonomous—and emphasizes "bounded autonomy" as the pragmatic near-term solution. A four-layer architecture is proposed: account isolation, permission rules, execution primitives for agents, and governance tools (logging, alerts, veto mechanisms). Critical enabling technologies include standardized Skills (for链上 operations), policy engines, session keys for limited delegation, and audit trails. Current solutions from players like Coinbase, Safe, Privy, and Polygon are noted, but face gaps in portable identity/reputation, unified policy standards, adversarial security (e.g., prompt injection), and cross-chain functionality. The future direction involves a "Wallet Policy Plane" that sits between agent intent and on-chain execution, performing real-time policy checks, risk scoring, and identity verification—akin to Stripe's payment infrastructure. Ultimately, the wallet's role shifts from a front-end gatekeeper to an embedded control layer enabling secure, scalable agentic economies.

marsbitHá 54m

The Use of Humans: Agentic Wallet and the Next Decade of Wallets

marsbitHá 54m

ZANO targets $17 after 73% surge – Should traders wait for a dip?

ZANO experienced a significant 73% price surge in a week after testing its long-term demand zone at $5.5-$6.0. While the weekly chart suggests a potential rally toward the range highs at $17.2 over the next few months, short-term indicators show signs of overextension. The 4-hour chart reveals a divergence in OBV and an overbought MFI, indicating a possible retracement. Traders may find a buying opportunity if the price dips to the $8.1-$9.2 support region, a high-volume node that could serve as a consolidation area. A drop below $8.1 wouldn't invalidate the bullish weekly structure but could offer a better entry point for long positions.

ambcryptoHá 1h

ZANO targets $17 after 73% surge – Should traders wait for a dip?

ambcryptoHá 1h

Must-Follow Next Week｜Polymarket to Announce Major News Next Monday; Backpack TGE on March 23 (3.23-3.29)

The following is a summary of key events scheduled for the week of March 23-29, 2026. **March 23:** * **Polymarket** is set to announce major news, speculated to be related to a token launch or funding round. * **Backpack** will conduct its Token Generation Event (TGE). * The U.S. SEC may begin processing **Morgan Stanley's Bitcoin ETF** application. * Cboe plans to launch the **BITVX** volatility index, based on iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) options. * **NilChain** will cease operations; NIL token holders must migrate to Ethereum. * **Binance** will list the PAYPUSDT stock perpetual contract. **March 25:** * The U.S. House Financial Services Committee will hold a hearing on **tokenization**. * **Metaplanet** will hold its annual shareholders meeting. **March 26:** * A proposal to distribute ~70 million **USDS** to Sky Agents may be executed. * U.S. weekly initial jobless claims data will be released. **March 27:** * Federal Reserve Vice Chair **Jefferson** is scheduled to speak. * **Bithumb** will delist Neiro (NEIRO). **March 28:** * **Linea** will update its Terms of Service to prepare for the launch of its Yield Boost feature. **Other Events (Date TBD):** * Elon Musk announced that **X Platform** will release a major open-source update to its AI algorithm next week. * **Starknet** will launch the **STRK20** testnet next week, with a mainnet release planned for late April. STRK20 aims to provide token-level privacy for assets on the network.

marsbitHá 1h

Must-Follow Next Week｜Polymarket to Announce Major News Next Monday; Backpack TGE on March 23 (3.23-3.29)

marsbitHá 1h

CertiK Test: How the Vulnerable OpenClaw Skill Bypassed Review and Took Over Computers Without Authorization

CertiK's latest research reveals critical security vulnerabilities in OpenClaw's third-party Skill ecosystem. Despite OpenClaw's three-layer review system—including VirusTotal scanning, static code analysis, and AI logic checks—malicious Skills can easily bypass these safeguards. CertiK demonstrated this by developing a seemingly benign "test-web-searcher" Skill that contained a hidden remote code execution vulnerability. It was approved without warnings, allowing unauthorized command execution on the host machine (e.g., launching system calculators via Telegram commands). The core issue is the industry’s overreliance on pre-release scans rather than runtime isolation and strict permission controls. Unlike iOS’s mandatory sandboxing, OpenClaw’s sandbox is optional and often disabled by users for functionality, leaving systems exposed. CertiK urges developers to enforce mandatory sandboxing and granular permissions for Skills, and advises users to deploy OpenClaw on isolated devices away from sensitive data or assets. The study underscores that scanning alone cannot secure high-permission AI agents; runtime isolation and damage containment are essential for safety.

marsbitHá 1h

CertiK Test: How the Vulnerable OpenClaw Skill Bypassed Review and Took Over Computers Without Authorization

marsbitHá 1h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片

Categorias popularesright-arrow

Etiquetas Popularesright-arrow