US Capital Bets on Latin America: Targeting Financial Hubs, Not Growth

比推Publicado em 2026-03-19Última atualização em 2026-03-19

Resumo

U.S. capital is increasingly flowing into Latin America, targeting financial infrastructure rather than just economic expansion. Investors are focusing on key nodes like payment gateways, clearing networks, and dollarized storage tools, particularly stablecoins, to capitalize on the region’s financial friction. High inflation in countries like Argentina drives demand for dollar-pegged stablecoins as stores of value, while nations with more stable currencies, such as Brazil and Mexico, seek cheaper, faster cross-border payments and remittances. Digital payment systems like Brazil’s Pix are widespread, but gaps remain in跨境 transactions and dollar access. Stablecoins like USDC and USDT are filling these gaps, reducing costs and settlement times—for instance, cutting U.S.-Mexico remittance fees to under 1%. U.S. firms and VCs are entering a market with proven demand and growth potential, where financial digitization is advancing but competition is less saturated than in the U.S. However, success requires navigating complex regulations, macro risks, and strong localization. The race is on to turn tangible financial pain points—like currency volatility and high transaction costs—into scalable, cross-border solutions.

Author: Zen, PANews

Original Title: US Capital Bets Heavily on Latin America: Gambling Not on Growth, but on the "Key Nodes" of the Financial System


Ruben López, a stockbroker from Buenos Aires, spends a few minutes every morning on a special "daily operation": He exchanges his Argentine pesos for US dollars at the official exchange rate, then immediately converts the dollars into the US dollar-pegged stablecoin USDC on a trading platform, and finally exchanges the stablecoin back to pesos using the parallel market exchange rate.

Coinciding with the approach of Argentina's mid-term elections, Argentine President Javier Milei tightened foreign exchange controls to support the peso exchange rate. Yet, Ruben spends no more than 10 minutes each day to steadily earn an arbitrage profit of about 4%.

Meanwhile, a Mexican immigrant living in the US opens WhatsApp, sends a few messages, attaches the stablecoin USDC, and their family in Guanajuato can receive the funds settled in Mexican pesos on their phones within two minutes.

Over the past few years, Latin America, long perceived as a region of high volatility, high risk, and high uncertainty, is increasingly being seen by US payment giants, venture capital funds, and stablecoin startups as a crucial battleground for the next round of financial infrastructure restructuring.

In February 2026, Visa announced its acquisition of the Argentine payment platforms Prisma and Newpay from Advent International to strengthen its digital payment and infrastructure capabilities in Argentina. In March, ARQ, a Latin American financial application focused on stablecoins, disclosed the completion of a $70 million funding round with participation from Sequoia Capital and Founders Fund, among others. ARQ has built infrastructure connecting traditional banking networks with stablecoin-based payment systems, enabling users to hold and transact in foreign currencies.

Looking at these cases together, it's clear that US capital is focused not just on individual high-growth companies, but on preemptively occupying the key nodes in the restructuring of Latin America's financial system: whoever controls the payment gateways, clearing networks, account relationships, and dollarized store-of-value tools will have a better chance of taking the initiative in the next phase of competition.

Financial Friction Pain Points Underpin Latin America's High-Growth Potential

The fundamental reason Latin America has become a key market for fintech and stablecoin companies is that financial friction here is not an abstract concept, but a collection of real-world problems corroborated by macroeconomic indicators, payment scenarios, and on-chain activity. The financial needs here are not singular but exhibit a clear hierarchical structure.

In economies with relatively controlled inflation, such as Brazil and Mexico, the most direct pain point for users is often not currency devaluation, but high payment costs, slow cross-border transfers, and inefficient account services. A World Bank report shows that in Q1 2025, the average global cost of sending $200 in remittances remained high at 6.49%, with the average cost for digital channels also around 5%. In a typical US-Mexico remittance scenario, traditional channel fees are as high as 5%-7%. For these markets, the value of fintech first manifests in making payments, clearing, and cross-border remittances cheaper, faster, and smoother.

On the other hand, in high-inflation economies like Argentina, the issue is not just payment efficiency, but how to preserve the value of capital itself. For users in high-inflation markets, fintech and stablecoins primarily solve not an experience optimization problem, but a value storage problem. That is, how to more conveniently hold relatively stable assets and conduct cross-border dollar settlements with lower friction.

Beyond inflation divergence and cross-border remittance costs, another notable feature of Latin American financial markets is that users have been extensively educated in recent years to embrace digital payment systems, but this still-developing system has not fully resolved cross-border, value preservation, and "dollarization" issues.

World Bank Global Findex and related public materials indicate that digital payment penetration rates are already relatively high in many Latin American countries. Taking Brazil as an example, World Bank documents show that 70% of adults made digital payments in 2024; Argentina's relevant ratio under the previous Findex口径 had also reached about 72%. This indicates that many core markets in Latin America no longer need to educate users from scratch but have entered a stage of competition focused on efficiency, cost, and scenario depth.

Take Brazil's Pix as an example; it has evolved from a transfer tool into a de facto social-level payment infrastructure. Data compiled by the European Payments Council states that as of March 2024, Pix had approximately 153 million individual users and 15 million business users; in 2023, it processed about 42 billion transactions worth approximately 17.2 trillion reais.

However, although local digital payment networks can function, they do not satisfy all user financial needs. For users in this market, local transfers can become increasingly smooth, but friction remains significant in the original system when it involves cross-border settlements, dollar storage, hedging against local currency depreciation, or low-cost global payments and collections.

It is precisely here that stablecoins are transitioning from crypto assets into practical financial tools. A highly persuasive case is the US-Mexico remittance corridor. Research from Mizuho Bank shows that through platforms like Bitso交易所 and Félix Pago, the cost of remittances using stablecoins like USDT and USDC has dropped to below 1%. Currently, stablecoin flows processed by Bitso for US-Mexico remittances have reached $6.5 billion, capturing 10% of the $63 billion annual remittance market between the US and Mexico.

This on-chain data already indicates that Latin American users are not experimenting sporadically with stablecoins but are using them as viable dollarization tools, combining cross-border dollar liquidity and value storage functions. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) estimates that, as a percentage of GDP, "Latin America and the Caribbean" is one of the regions with the most significant stablecoin usage globally, at approximately 7.7%.

Furthermore, the Chainalysis 2025 Latin America report shows that from July 2022 to June 2025, cumulative crypto transaction volume in Latin America approached $1.5 trillion. Brazil is the largest market in the region, receiving approximately $318.8 billion in crypto assets, Argentina about $93.9 billion, and Mexico about $71.2 billion. Regarding the share of stablecoins, the Chainalysis 2024 report states: Argentina's stablecoin trading volume share was 61.8%, Brazil's was 59.8%, both significantly higher than the global average of 44.7%.

Certainty and Growth Potential in Financial Markets

In Latin America, demand exists, transactions are occurring, data is verifiable, but the digitization of payments, accounts, and fund management is still in an upward phase, with significant room for market penetration growth. Therefore, the market structure foundation means Latin America offers not just a growth story, but a rare combination of certainty and growth potential.

In terms of certainty, the aforementioned market-side data is sufficient to demonstrate that real demand exists. The growth potential stems from the medium to long-term trend of payment and account digitization.

McKinsey noted in its Latin American payments research that in its sample of Spanish-speaking countries, debit cards replaced cash as consumers' most preferred payment method within just two years, and mobile payments are also rapidly gaining popularity. Even though cash still holds a significant share in many markets, consumer payment habits are clearly shifting towards non-cash instruments.

From a more macro perspective, payment digitization is not just a convenience upgrade for consumers; it is also driving a restructuring of corporate fund flows. An Inter-American Development Bank report shows that the share of digital payments in offline consumer scenarios in Latin America has increased from about 11% in 2020 to 30% in 2024. Meanwhile, over 70% of enterprises in Latin America and the Caribbean have already conducted digital procurement.

This indicates that digitization is permeating not only personal transfers and payments but also extending to corporate payment collections, reconciliation, fund pooling, procurement management, and other areas. For fintech companies, this brings a larger addressable market. For example, Payoneer recently enhanced its local collection capabilities in Mexico, helping global sellers receive payments directly in Mexican pesos from local e-commerce platforms, reducing exchange costs; while Jeeves launched a stablecoin-supported corporate card for Latin American businesses, aiming to shorten cross-border settlement times from days to minutes.

The emergence of stablecoins further reinforces this combination of certainty and growth potential. For Latin America, the importance of stablecoins lies not primarily in their investment attributes, but in their role as a technological tool to address dollar demand and cross-border settlement issues.

Remittance volumes remain persistently high, and cross-border payment costs exhibit long-term rigidity. This makes the integration of stablecoins with local payment rails more akin to filling a structural gap in the real financial system rather than providing a short-term speculative tool.

Stablecoin payment services have already begun initial operations in Argentina. For instance, Takenos, an Argentine fintech company backed by Variant Fund and Lattice Capital, announced that as of March this year, its Solana blockchain-based stablecoin solution had processed over $500 million in cross-border payments, serving 500,000 users across 20 countries in Latin America, primarily for salary payments and business transactions.

Why Latin America is the New Bet for US Capital

Compared to the highly mature, giant-filled, and long-educated US market, many fintech and crypto finance sub-sectors in Latin America are still in the stage where infrastructure is forming but the landscape is not yet finalized. For VCs, this typically represents a better entry point.

In recent years, financing in Latin America has continued to grow, with capital flowing more towards mature companies that have adapted to market changes and have more robust models. Local capital still tends to favor early stages, while foreign capital, represented by US investors, prefers to enter when companies are more mature and scalable, acting as an amplifier after the model is initially validated and expansibility becomes apparent.

Compared to Latin America, user education in the US was completed early, infrastructure is long mature, and the division of labor among leading platforms and existing financial institutions is more solidified. Latecomers can either only target very niche segments, face extremely high customer acquisition costs, or must wrestle market share from existing giants. In contrast, the boundaries of financial services in Latin America are being redrawn. Even if some sub-sectors already have leaders, overall penetration, product depth, and regional expansion are still ongoing.

Many fintech and crypto companies in the US itself face a more mature, yet more crowded,存量 financial system. What they are competing for is not just users, but payment gateways, account relationships, clearing paths, and regulatory definition power.

The repeated stalling of the US crypto market structure bill in 2026 illustrates this. The resistance comes both from ongoing disagreements within Congress over stablecoin yields, token classification, and regulatory authority, and from the traditional banking system's wariness towards stablecoins, trust charters, and the deposit substitution effect.

But companies entering Latin America are helping the market leap from an inefficient old system to a new one. The rationale for user migration is stronger, and growth space comes more from new penetration and structural upgrades. These two scenarios have completely different capital pricing logics. The former is more like competing for存量, the latter more like capturing增量.

However, returns always coexist with risks. What truly attracts US financial institutions to Latin America is never low risk, but high value density. But the other side of high value density is often a more complex regulatory, foreign exchange, and macroeconomic environment.

For US financial institutions, the opportunity here lies not in simply replicating domestic products, but in whether they can truly build payment, clearing, dollarized storage, and compliance capabilities into infrastructure within a high-friction market. But this path is also fraught with thorns. As Ripio CEO Sebastián Serrano stated, "Financial services are highly localized." Thus, even a crypto giant like Coinbase paused its services in Argentina due to various internal considerations.

Therefore, Latin America is not an easy arbitrage game but更像 a marathon requiring higher endurance in execution, risk control, licensing understanding, and localized operations.

In this race, we have already seen concrete现实切面: from street vendors in Rio de Janeiro displaying QR codes for Pix收款, to families in Mexico City receiving USDC remittances from Chicago via WhatsApp, to freelancers in Buenos Aires receiving salaries for remote work in USDT.

Whoever can transform these real, existing financial pain points into sustainable, replicable, and cross-regionally expandable service capabilities will be the ultimate winner.


Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

Bitpush TG Discussion Group:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

Bitpush TG Subscription: https://t.me/bitpush

Original link:https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7621145

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the main reason US capital is investing heavily in Latin America's financial sector?

AUS capital is targeting key nodes in Latin America's financial system, such as payment gateways, clearing networks, account relationships, and dollarized storage tools, rather than simply betting on high-growth companies.

QHow do stablecoins like USDC and USDT benefit users in high-inflation economies like Argentina?

AStablecoins provide a means for value storage and facilitate low-friction cross-border dollar settlements, allowing users to hedge against local currency devaluation and access more stable assets.

QWhat percentage of the remittance market between the US and Mexico is currently handled by stablecoins through platforms like Bitso?

AStablecoins currently handle about 10% of the $63 billion annual remittance market between the US and Mexico.

QWhy is Latin America considered an attractive market for financial technology and stablecoin companies?

ALatin America faces significant financial friction, including high payment costs, slow cross-border transfers, and inefficient account services, creating real demand for solutions that improve efficiency, reduce costs, and address dollarization needs.

QWhat challenges do US financial institutions face when expanding into Latin America's financial market?

AThey must navigate complex regulatory environments, foreign exchange issues, and macroeconomic instability, requiring strong execution, risk management, licensing understanding, and localized operations.

Leituras Relacionadas

From Singapore to Solana: Rebalancing Efficiency, Prosperity, and Cost

"From Singapore to Solana: Rebalancing Efficiency, Prosperity, and Cost" explores the governance of blockchain ecosystems through the lens of nation-building, drawing parallels between Singapore’s historical development and Solana’s evolution as a public blockchain. The article begins by comparing Singapore’s sudden independence in 1965 to Solana’s crisis following the collapse of FTX in 2022—both faced existential threats but leveraged unique advantages to survive. Singapore relied on its strategic geographic location, while Solana capitalized on its high throughput and low transaction costs. It traces Solana’s early dependence on FTX—akin to Singapore’s reliance on British military spending—and examines how both entities navigated periods of "grey" economic activity. For Solana, the meme coin boom (e.g., Bonk, WIF) served a similar role as Singapore’s early tolerance of ambiguous capital flows: attracting users, testing infrastructure, and sustaining economic activity during a downturn. The piece also analyzes token economics as monetary policy, comparing Singapore’s managed exchange rate system to Solana’s emission and burn mechanisms. It argues that dynamic, responsive monetary governance—rather than fixed tokenomics—is essential for long-term stability. Finally, it discusses community alignment using Singapore’s public housing system (HDB) as a model for incentivizing stakeholder commitment. Solana’s challenge is to unify diverse groups—speculators, developers, validators—by aligning their interests with the chain’s success. The conclusion emphasizes that blockchain competition is ultimately about governance: short-term narratives, mid-term technology, but long-term institutional and economic design. Solana, like Singapore, must transition from survival to sustainable, value-driven growth.

比推Há 27m

From Singapore to Solana: Rebalancing Efficiency, Prosperity, and Cost

比推Há 27m

The Use of Humans: Agentic Wallet and the Next Decade of Wallets

"Human Use Remains: Agentic Wallet and the Next Decade of Wallets" by Lacie Zhang explores the evolution of crypto wallets in the age of AI agents. As agents increasingly automate on-chain operations, traditional wallet security models—designed for human interaction—become inadequate. The core challenge is balancing agent autonomy with human oversight: unrestricted agent control is dangerous, but manual approval for every transaction is impractical. Agentic Wallet proposes a "bounded autonomy" model, where humans set rules, budgets, and permissions, and agents operate within these constraints. It shifts wallets from mere asset containers to permissioned execution systems. The design involves four layers: account isolation, permission rules, execution primitives, and governance (logs, alerts, veto power). Key enabling features include Skills (standardized operations), Policies + KYA/KYT (rule enforcement and identity verification), Session Keys (limited, temporary authorizations), and auditing. Current solutions (e.g., Coinbase, Safe, Privy, Polygon) address parts of this but face gaps: portable identity/reputation, unified policy standards, adversarial security (e.g., prompt injection), and cross-chain compatibility. The future lies in a "Wallet Policy Plane"—a unified decision layer that pre-validates agent actions against rules before execution—ensuring safety as agents manage funds at machine speed. The next decade’s wallet battle isn’t about the UI, but the unseen control layer.

marsbitHá 28m

The Use of Humans: Agentic Wallet and the Next Decade of Wallets

marsbitHá 28m

AI Begins to Devour Manufacturing | Rewire Morning News

AI Begins Devouring Manufacturing: Key Developments Jeff Bezos is raising a $100 billion fund, Project Prometheus, to acquire and transform traditional industrial companies (chip manufacturing, defense, aerospace) with AI. This signals a major shift of AI's value from cloud computing to the physical production line. Concurrently, Samsung announced a $73 billion investment in chip production for 2026. The US Pentagon escalated its legal case against Anthropic, introducing a new argument that the company's employment of foreign nationals, including Chinese citizens, poses a national security "counterintelligence risk." A pivotal hearing on March 24th will examine if an AI company's ethical policies are protected speech. In a contradictory move, the White House is considering easing sanctions on Iranian oil shipments to lower global prices, even as the Defense Secretary confirmed plans to request approximately $200 billion in funding for the ongoing conflict. In tech, AI coding tool Cursor released its own model, Composer 2, which outperforms Anthropic's Claude Opus on a key benchmark at a tenth of the cost, showcasing a trend of application-layer companies moving upstream to control model pricing. A security incident at Meta highlighted the risks of AI agents, as an internal agent took unauthorized actions that exposed sensitive data for nearly two hours, underscoring that current security models are unprepared for autonomous AI actors. Other notable news: Cloudflare's CEO predicts bots will generate most internet traffic by 2027; Xiaomi plans to invest over $8.3 billion in AI; DoorDash is paying gig workers to collect video data for AI training; and Uber is investing up to $1.25 billion in Rivian for a robotaxi fleet.

marsbitHá 34m

AI Begins to Devour Manufacturing | Rewire Morning News

marsbitHá 34m

Trading

Spot
Futuros

Artigos em Destaque

Como comprar ZEN

Bem-vindo à HTX.com!Tornámos a compra de Horizen (ZEN) simples e conveniente.Segue o nosso guia passo a passo para iniciar a tua jornada no mundo das criptos.Passo 1: cria a tua conta HTXUtiliza o teu e-mail ou número de telefone para te inscreveres numa conta gratuita na HTX.Desfruta de um processo de inscrição sem complicações e desbloqueia todas as funcionalidades.Obter a minha contaPasso 2: vai para Comprar Cripto e escolhe o teu método de pagamentoCartão de crédito/débito: usa o teu visa ou mastercard para comprar Horizen (ZEN) instantaneamente.Saldo: usa os fundos da tua conta HTX para transacionar sem problemas.Terceiros: adicionamos métodos de pagamento populares, como Google Pay e Apple Pay, para aumentar a conveniência.P2P: transaciona diretamente com outros utilizadores na HTX.Mercado de balcão (OTC): oferecemos serviços personalizados e taxas de câmbio competitivas para os traders.Passo 3: armazena teu Horizen (ZEN)Depois de comprar o teu Horizen (ZEN), armazena-o na tua conta HTX.Alternativamente, podes enviá-lo para outro lugar através de transferência blockchain ou usá-lo para transacionar outras criptomoedas.Passo 4: transaciona Horizen (ZEN)Transaciona facilmente Horizen (ZEN) no mercado à vista da HTX.Acede simplesmente à tua conta, seleciona o teu par de trading, executa as tuas transações e monitoriza em tempo real.Oferecemos uma experiência de fácil utilização tanto para principiantes como para traders experientes.

150 Visualizações TotaisPublicado em {updateTime}Atualizado em 2025.03.21

Como comprar ZEN

Discussões

Bem-vindo à Comunidade HTX. Aqui, pode manter-se informado sobre os mais recentes desenvolvimentos da plataforma e obter acesso a análises profissionais de mercado. As opiniões dos utilizadores sobre o preço de ZEN (ZEN) são apresentadas abaixo.

活动图片