Allbridge Suspends Core Protocol After $1.65M Solana Flash Loan Exploit

TheNewsCryptoPublicado em 2026-07-20Última atualização em 2026-07-20

Resumo

Cross-chain protocol AllBridge Core suspended operations after suffering a $1.65 million flash loan exploit on its Solana deployment. The attacker manipulated a stablecoin pool's exchange rate using a $1.12 million USDC loan from Kamino, creating a price imbalance to perform a profitable arbitrage. Stolen funds were moved to Ethereum via privacy pools. This is the protocol's second such attack, following a $573,000 exploit in April 2023. The suspension causes operational delays, reduces cross-chain liquidity, and highlights persistent security vulnerabilities in bridge protocols and automated market maker systems.

Cross-chain platform AllBridge Core shut down its operations following a security issue that resulted in the loss of $1.65 million on Sunday. The hack specifically occurred within the AllBridge Core deployment on the Solana blockchain. The attacker transferred the funds stolen via the bridge from Solana to the Ethereum blockchain. The hacker swiftly transferred the stolen funds through privacy pools to cover his tracks.

The perpetrator executed a well-thought-out flash-loan strategy to influence the exchange rate in the pool for stablecoins. As per on-chain data, the hacker took out a loan of $1.12 million in USDC from the lending platform Kamino. Quick switching between USDC and USDT led to a price imbalance within the pool balance. This price imbalance created a favorable arbitrage opportunity for the perpetrator.

The exploiter then took the liquidity from the pool at exaggerated prices to gain huge profits. The profit earned after repayment of the Kamino loan was retained by the perpetrator as loot. The entire trade reveals major flaws in the mathematical equation of the automated market maker pricing system.

Recurrent Cross-Chain Bridge Attacks

This particular event marks the second instance of an attack on Allbridge Core via a flash loan hack, after a previous $573,000 heist targeting its BNB Chain pools in April 2023. In addition, pausing the bridge would mean that there are operational delays, with the process of sending funds across chains coming to a temporary halt. This would have implications not only for trading operations but would reduce the possibility of the liquidity needed by traders and institutions being moved across.

At the same time, there is a threat that long-term protocol outages will mean the loss of revenue streams due to reduced transactions, thus making users and liquidity providers consider alternative means of bridging. Finally, security pauses in cross-chain protocols act as a reminder about the security challenges associated with liquidity pools, thus requiring investors to change their risk management strategy for bridges.

Highlighted Crypto News:
FTX Bankruptcy Estate Plans $900 Million Distribution, Total Payouts Hit $10 Billion

TagsBlockchainCORECore chainCryptocurrencyETHEREUMEthereum (ETH)SolanaSolana (SOL)

Criptomoedas em alta

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat was the main action taken by Allbridge Core after the security incident?

AAllbridge Core shut down its operations, suspending its core protocol following the exploit.

QWhat type of attack strategy did the hacker use in the Allbridge exploit?

AThe hacker executed a flash loan strategy, specifically taking out a large USDC loan from the Kamino lending platform on Solana.

QHow did the attacker's actions create an opportunity for profit?

ABy quickly swapping between USDC and USDT, the attacker created a price imbalance in the liquidity pool, which allowed them to withdraw liquidity at exaggerated prices for a large profit after repaying the flash loan.

QWhat does the article mention about previous similar incidents involving Allbridge?

AThe article states this is the second flash loan attack on Allbridge Core, with a previous heist of $573,000 targeting its BNB Chain pools in April 2023.

QWhat are some potential consequences of a core protocol being paused, as mentioned in the article?

AConsequences include operational delays for cross-chain transfers, reduced liquidity movement for traders and institutions, potential loss of revenue from reduced transactions, and users possibly seeking alternative bridging solutions.

Leituras Relacionadas

The Encryption Bill Clarity's Challenge: A Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

U.S. lawmakers are attempting to advance the Clarity Act, a significant crypto market structure bill, but its path is fraught with partisan hurdles. The process has been rocky since January, when a prior bipartisan deal in the Senate Banking Committee was upended. A key compromise in May on "yield" issues allowed the bill to move forward in committee, but only with the conditional support of two Democratic senators, Angela Alsobrooks and Ruben Gallego. They emphasized that their final vote depends on reaching an agreement on ethics provisions for elected officials. Ultimately, the Senate Agriculture Committee passed its version along party lines without Democratic support. As Republicans push for a full Senate vote in July, the demand for strong ethics language has expanded beyond Democrats. Additional controversies surround provisions related to yields (aligning some Republicans with large banks) and developer protections (opposed by enforcement agencies). Core concerns about illicit finance and consumer protection remain central to the debate. Despite consensus on the need for legislation, achieving the necessary bipartisan compromise is proving difficult. While momentum exists—including recent meetings between senators and White House officials—a reconciled bill text faces skepticism. Senator Gallego has stated that without ethics terms acceptable to Democrats, they will not provide the needed votes. The immediate goals for the crypto community in Congress are unclear: a symbolic Senate vote before the August recess, eventual passage into law by 2026, or forging a final compromise framework. The arduous, vote-by-vote effort to build bipartisan support continues, mirroring the traditional legislative grind the industry must now navigate.

Foresight NewsHá 43m

The Encryption Bill Clarity's Challenge: A Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

Foresight NewsHá 43m

Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business War Is Far More Brutal Than You Imagine

The New York Times details the fierce, personal rivalry between Kalshi CEO Tarek Mansour and Polymarket founder Shayne Coplan, which has escalated beyond typical business competition into a conflict marked by legal complaints, regulatory battles, and public hostilities. The feud intensified in late 2024 when FBI agents raided Coplan's New York apartment. While Coplan publicly blamed political motives, sources indicate his team privately suspected Mansour, noting that Kalshi's lawyers had previously reported Polymarket's operational model to federal prosecutors, highlighting that U.S. users could still access its offshore platform despite a ban. The animosity extends through their companies' operations. Kalshi positions itself as a compliance-focused, fully licensed U.S. operator, while Polymarket has historically operated its core platform offshore without a U.S. license, offering more anonymity and controversial betting markets. Mansour has publicly called Polymarket's model "illegal and immoral," while Coplan privately dismisses Kalshi as a copycat. Their competition has played out in Washington lobbying, attempts to sabotage each other's major deals (such as Kalshi's efforts to dissuade Intercontinental Exchange from investing in Polymarket), competing sponsorships, and poaching staff. The rivalry continues as both platforms experience massive growth, with Kalshi currently holding a valuation and trading volume edge, but facing ongoing regulatory scrutiny alongside Polymarket.

Foresight NewsHá 1h

Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business War Is Far More Brutal Than You Imagine

Foresight NewsHá 1h

Trading

Spot

Artigos em Destaque

Como comprar CORE

Bem-vindo à HTX.com!Tornámos a compra de CORE (CORE) simples e conveniente.Segue o nosso guia passo a passo para iniciar a tua jornada no mundo das criptos.Passo 1: cria a tua conta HTXUtiliza o teu e-mail ou número de telefone para te inscreveres numa conta gratuita na HTX.Desfruta de um processo de inscrição sem complicações e desbloqueia todas as funcionalidades.Obter a minha contaPasso 2: vai para Comprar Cripto e escolhe o teu método de pagamentoCartão de crédito/débito: usa o teu visa ou mastercard para comprar CORE (CORE) instantaneamente.Saldo: usa os fundos da tua conta HTX para transacionar sem problemas.Terceiros: adicionamos métodos de pagamento populares, como Google Pay e Apple Pay, para aumentar a conveniência.P2P: transaciona diretamente com outros utilizadores na HTX.Mercado de balcão (OTC): oferecemos serviços personalizados e taxas de câmbio competitivas para os traders.Passo 3: armazena teu CORE (CORE)Depois de comprar o teu CORE (CORE), armazena-o na tua conta HTX.Alternativamente, podes enviá-lo para outro lugar através de transferência blockchain ou usá-lo para transacionar outras criptomoedas.Passo 4: transaciona CORE (CORE)Transaciona facilmente CORE (CORE) no mercado à vista da HTX.Acede simplesmente à tua conta, seleciona o teu par de trading, executa as tuas transações e monitoriza em tempo real.Oferecemos uma experiência de fácil utilização tanto para principiantes como para traders experientes.

332 Visualizações TotaisPublicado em {updateTime}Atualizado em 2026.06.02

Como comprar CORE

Discussões

Bem-vindo à Comunidade HTX. Aqui, pode manter-se informado sobre os mais recentes desenvolvimentos da plataforma e obter acesso a análises profissionais de mercado. As opiniões dos utilizadores sobre o preço de CORE (CORE) são apresentadas abaixo.

活动图片