OpenSea Enables NFT Purchases Using Power Protocol’s $POWER Token

TheNewsCryptoPublicado em 2025-12-16Última atualização em 2025-12-16

Resumo

OpenSea now supports the use of Power Protocol’s $POWER token as a payment method for NFT purchases on its marketplace. The $POWER token, which is earned through gameplay in titles like Fableborne, can now be used directly without conversion to other assets. This integration connects in-game rewards with one of the world’s largest NFT marketplaces, expanding the token’s utility beyond gaming into broader digital commerce. According to Kam Punia, CEO of Pixion Games, the move enables game-earned value to participate in the wider digital economy. Oliver Maroney of OpenSea highlighted that the integration aligns with their vision of flexible, onchain transactions and supports the growing demand for portable in-game assets. The Power Protocol serves as a shared infrastructure designed to connect multiple games and applications through a common token economy.

Gameplay-earned tokens from Fableborne can now be used directly across OpenSea’s marketplace.

Power Protocol announced that its $POWER token, a gameplay-earned reward, is now supported as a payment option for NFT purchases on OpenSea.

The integration lets players use $POWER without first converting into another asset, connecting in-game activity with one of the largest NFT marketplaces in the world. The update expands the utility of $POWER beyond gaming and into broader NFT commerce.

$POWER is earned through participation in the Power ecosystem, with Fableborne serving as its flagship title. Until now, OpenSea payments have primarily relied on assets such as ETH, WETH, and USDC. Adding $POWER introduces a gameplay-earned token as a marketplace-wide payment method, enabling value generated in games to flow directly into NFT transactions.

Kam Punia, Founder and CEO of Pixion Games, said:

“Our objective with Power Protocol has been to create a framework in which game-earned value can participate in the wider digital economy. OpenSea’s integration of POWER allows a token earned through gameplay to be used natively across one of the world’s largest NFT and token marketplaces.”

Power Protocol is designed as a shared infrastructure layer connecting games, applications, and digital products through common token mechanics. While Fableborne is the first major driver of activity, the protocol is built to support additional integrations over time.

Oliver Maroney, Head of Business Development and Partnerships at OpenSea, said:

“This integration reflects growing demand for more flexible payment options and our vision of everything onchain, all in one place. POWER represents a great use case for our space, originating from a game ecosystem yet designed to participate in wider digital markets. Enabling POWER as a platform-wide payment method gives creators and collectors on OpenSea a new way to transact, and we’re pleased to support this integration.”

The move positions $POWER as a token with utility beyond a single game, reflecting a broader shift toward making in-game rewards portable across open marketplaces.

Leituras Relacionadas

Bitcoin perpetual open interest rises as traders bet on year-end rally

Bitcoin perpetual open interest has risen from 304,000 to 310,000 BTC as its price briefly reached $90,000, signaling increased trader anticipation of a year-end rally. The funding rate also climbed from 0.04% to 0.09%, indicating growing bullish sentiment and leveraged long positioning. However, high funding rates may also suggest market overheating and potential correction risks. Bitcoin retreated to $88,200 after failing to hold above $90,000. A major year-end options expiry event on Dec. 26, with over $23 billion in contracts, could amplify volatility. Calls are concentrated at $100,000 and $120,000 strikes, while puts cluster around $85,000, with a put/call ratio of 0.37 reflecting dominant bullish bets. The max pain price is $96,000, suggesting many optimistic calls may expire worthless if prices don't rise.

cointelegraphHá 3m

Bitcoin perpetual open interest rises as traders bet on year-end rally

cointelegraphHá 3m

2025 Asset Review: Why Did Bitcoin Significantly Underperform Gold and U.S. Stocks?

In 2025, Bitcoin underperformed compared to gold and U.S. equities, particularly AI-driven tech stocks like NVIDIA, due to several fundamental factors. First, the rise of generative AI created a more efficient energy-to-value conversion, diverting capital and electricity from Bitcoin mining to high-margin AI data centers. This shift prioritized productivity gains over digital scarcity. Second, gold’s atomic-level physical certainty made it a superior hedge against geopolitical instability and systemic risks, whereas Bitcoin remains reliant on digital infrastructure and liquidity channels. Third, Bitcoin ETFs institutionalized the asset, reducing its volatility and aligning it more with traditional risk models, dampening its speculative appeal amid prolonged high-interest rates. Finally, the opportunity cost of holding non-cash-flow-generating Bitcoin increased as investors chased exponential growth in AI. Bitcoin’s current phase represents a recalibration within a complex system—yielding temporarily to AI-driven productivity and defensive asset demand—rather than a long-term failure. It remains a potential long-term store of value awaiting future liquidity cycles.

比推Há 7m

2025 Asset Review: Why Did Bitcoin Significantly Underperform Gold and U.S. Stocks?

比推Há 7m

The AI Era: When the 'Human-Dog Gap' Shrinks to the 'Human-Human Gap'

In the AI era, the gap between humans is narrowing from what was once likened to the difference between "humans and dogs" to a more comparable "human-to-human" difference. The author uses a hypothetical scoring system: a child scores 10 points, a PhD 60, a professor 75, and Einstein 100. With AI estimated at 40 points in cognitive value (effectively 80 when considering its generalist nature), a child with AI reaches 90 points, while Einstein with AI reaches 180—reducing their relative gap from 10x to 2x. Some argue that AI proficiency varies—novices may only leverage 20% of AI’s potential, while experts extract 100%, widening absolute gaps (e.g., child+AI novice=30 vs. Einstein+AI expert=200). However, the author contends this is temporary. As AI evolves, it will become smarter and easier to use, reducing the skill threshold. Future AI might score 240+ points, with humans consistently utilizing 80-120% of its potential. Eventually, a child with advanced AI could reach 1010 points, and Einstein 1100—a negligible 1.1x difference. The core idea: while current AI proficiency disparities may temporarily widen gaps, AI’s inevitable progress in intelligence and usability will democratize access, diminish human cognitive inequalities, and make individual expertise less impactful—like everyone having access to the same powerful tool.

marsbitHá 8m

The AI Era: When the 'Human-Dog Gap' Shrinks to the 'Human-Human Gap'

marsbitHá 8m

Ripple Chiseled a Crack in the Wall, but Swift Tore Down the Entire Wall

At the Sibos 2025 conference, Swift announced the integration of a blockchain-based shared ledger into its infrastructure, built on Consensys' Ethereum Layer-2 network Linea, to enable secure, real-time, and interoperable digital finance. This move, supported by major banks like JPMorgan and Citibank, aims to bridge traditional finance with tokenized assets using zk-EVM technology for faster, cheaper, and more transparent settlements. While Ripple pioneered blockchain-based cross-border payments with XRP Ledger and achieved significant legal and operational milestones—including court victories against the SEC and expansion into 40+ markets—its reach remains limited compared to Swift’s global network of over 11,000 institutions. Ripple’s model relies heavily on XRP as a bridge currency, whereas Swift’s asset-agnostic approach supports multiple currencies, stablecoins, and CBDCs, reducing dependency on any single asset. Swift’s adoption of blockchain signals a major shift in global finance, potentially freeing trillions in trapped capital and enabling 24/7 real-time settlement. This transition from legacy systems to mathematically verified transactions represents a convergence of TradFi and DeFi, positioning Swift to dominate the next era of value transfer.

marsbitHá 13m

Ripple Chiseled a Crack in the Wall, but Swift Tore Down the Entire Wall

marsbitHá 13m

Publicly Pumping Ethereum, Internally Bearish in Reports: Is Tom Lee's Team Still Trustworthy?

Tom Lee, co-founder of Fundstrat and a prominent public Ethereum bull, faces credibility questions after an internal Fundstrat report presented a bearish short-term outlook, contrasting his highly optimistic public statements. Publicly, Lee repeatedly called Ethereum to reach $12,000-$15,000 by end-2025 and declared it "severely undervalued" at $3,000. He has been a vocal "perma-bull" in media appearances. However, Fundstrat's internal 2026 Crypto Outlook report, led by Digital Asset Strategist Sean Farrell, advised paying subscribers to expect a significant market correction in early 2026. Its base case predicted ETH could fall to $1,800-$2,000 and BTC to $60,000-$65,000, citing macroeconomic risks like a potential U.S. government shutdown and Federal Reserve leadership change. The report recommended clients increase cash/stablecoin holdings and wait for better entry points, while maintaining a long-term bullish year-end 2026 target of $4,500 for ETH. Fundstrat responded that the discrepancy stems from different analysts serving different client types: Lee's long-term, structural views are for traditional investors with low (1%-5%) crypto allocations, while Farrell's tactical, short-term risk management is for crypto-heavy portfolios. Critics argue this distinction was never clearly disclosed in Lee's public media appearances, which serve as marketing for Fundstrat's subscription service. Further complicating matters, Lee is also Chairman of BitMine, a company adopting an Ethereum treasury strategy, raising potential conflict of interest concerns about his public endorsements. The incident highlights the blurred lines between personal commentary, institutional research, and marketing in the crypto research space.

marsbitHá 32m

Publicly Pumping Ethereum, Internally Bearish in Reports: Is Tom Lee's Team Still Trustworthy?

marsbitHá 32m

Trading

Spot

Futuros

Discussões

Bem-vindo à Comunidade HTX. Aqui, pode manter-se informado sobre os mais recentes desenvolvimentos da plataforma e obter acesso a análises profissionais de mercado. As opiniões dos utilizadores sobre o preço de S (S) são apresentadas abaixo.