Founder of Baixing.com: My Fourteen Experience Points in Using Claude Code

marsbitPublicado em 2026-06-08Última atualização em 2026-06-08

Resumo

Founder of Baixing.com: My Fourteen Claude Code Usage Experiences The author shares personal insights from using Claude Code. Key recommendations include: focusing deeply on one primary tool; mastering essential shortcuts like Control+G for the editor; utilizing voice input; starting projects with a structured PROJECT.md; defaulting to Claude agents; integrating with GitHub and Cloudflare for infrastructure; clearly separating human-written core files (like CLAUDE.md) from AI-generated content, and interacting with AI output only through queries; dragging various files (audio, video, screenshots) into the interface for clarification. He advises centralizing and version-controlling memory and skill files in git (e.g., ~/.claude/CLAUDE.md) to build a permanent, cumulative knowledge base across projects. Skills should be continuously refined and used to capture learnings. For complex tasks, using ultracode for dynamic workflows is recommended despite cost. Using git documentation as handoff between agents ensures task continuity without relying solely on context. Finally, he suggests treating Claude Code like a horse with its own path-finding abilities—setting goals and boundaries rather than micromanaging—viewing its autonomy as a feature, not a bug.

Author: Wang Jianshuo

Simply record my experience with Claude Code up to this point. This is purely personal exploration and may not be suitable for everyone.

1. Focus on mastering one tool intensely. I use Claude Code. I don't necessarily think it's better than Codex, but the ROI of comparing tools may not be high, even though being able to articulate the differences eloquently gives a false sense of accomplishment.

2. Remember the most important shortcuts. Control+G to open the editor, helpful for writing longer content; shortcuts like Control+A, Control+E, Control+U which are very practical for quickly moving the cursor in the command line. Although not new to the AI era, they are as important as Control+C and Control+V when in use.

3. Use voice input. HoldSpeak is very helpful.

4. For a project, start by writing PROJECT.md, using a structured method to jot down all thoughts at once.

5. Claude agents are the default way to start.

6. Claude Code, github.com, and cloudflare.com are a perfect match. Hand over the build process, release process, and all domain-related operations to the infrastructure.

7. Separate what is written by humans and by machines. Manually maintain the core CLAUDE.md; don't read the .md files or code written by Claude Code. Let machines handle machine things, humans handle human things. Understand AI-written content by asking the AI, don't look at the source code.

8. Drag and drop files into the Claude Code window—audio, video, documents, screenshots—if you can't explain it clearly, use Command+Shift+5 to take a screenshot and drag it over, it's the fastest.

9. Reconstruct the memory system. Center it around ~/.claude/CLAUDE.md, categorically referencing multiple memory files. Require not using the project's memory, and keep all memory files in git, synchronized to github (private). This way, your memory becomes permanent and cumulative, not scattered across each project.

10. Write Skills, and at the end of each work session, ask Claude to "precipitate what was learned into Skills"—it can do this automatically.

11. Whenever possible, use ultracode to trigger dynamic workflows for complex tasks. Although expensive and slow, the results are still guaranteed.

12. Accumulate skills and refactor skills along the way. Skills need to be kept in git.

13. Use git documents as the output of the previous task and the input for the next task. Let agents have clear handover documents, not relying on context for transitions.

14. Treat Claude Code as a horse (or a person), not as a car. A car turns under your command; a horse has its own ideas, we just need to set goals and boundaries. Its autonomous pathfinding feature is a characteristic, not a bug.

Does anyone have anything to add?

Perguntas relacionadas

QAccording to the author, what is the most critical shortcut to remember when using Claude Code?

AThe author considers the Control+G shortcut (to open the editor for writing longer content) and the Control+A, Control+E, Control+U shortcuts (for quickly moving the cursor in the command line) to be the most important, comparable to Control+C and Control+V.

QWhat does the author suggest is the best practice for handling content written by AI versus content written by humans?

AThe author advises to clearly separate human-written and machine-written content. Manually maintain the core CLAUDE.md file and do not read the .md files or code written by Claude Code. To understand AI-generated content, ask the AI directly instead of reading its source code.

QHow does the author recommend managing one's permanent and accumulative memory system with Claude Code?

AThe author recommends refactoring the memory system by centering it around ~/.claude/CLAUDE.md, which categorically references multiple memory files. One should disable project-specific memory, store all memory files in a git repository, and sync them to a private GitHub repository to ensure memory is permanent, accumulative, and not scattered across projects.

QWhat is the author's analogy for how to treat Claude Code, and what characteristic does this highlight?

AThe author suggests treating Claude Code like a horse (or a person) rather than a car. A car turns under direct command, but a horse has its own ideas; you only need to set the goal and boundaries. This highlights its autonomous pathfinding feature as a characteristic, not a bug.

QWhat infrastructure services does the author mention as a perfect match for use with Claude Code?

AThe author states that Claude Code, github.com, and cloudflare.com are a perfect combination. They recommend handing over the build process, release process, and all domain-related operations to this infrastructure.

Leituras Relacionadas

When AI Begins to Audit the World: From Claude Discovering the ZEC Vulnerability, Watching the Encryption Industry Enter the 'Recursive Security Era'

**When AI Audits the World: From Claude's Discovery of a ZEC Vulnerability, Viewing the Crypto Industry Entering a "Recursive Security Era"** This article examines a pivotal shift in the blockchain security landscape, triggered by the convergence of two events: Anthropic's research on AI's "Recursive Self-Improvement" and Claude Opus 4.8's discovery of a critical vulnerability in Zcash's code. Traditionally, crypto security has relied on human experts and automated tools for periodic audits. However, the article argues AI is transitioning from a mere tool to an active participant in understanding and analyzing complex systems. Claude's ability to identify a subtle flaw in Zcash's zero-knowledge proof system demonstrates AI's potential to dramatically lower the cost and time required for risk discovery. This goes beyond finding a single bug; it signals a change in the very mechanism of how vulnerabilities are found. The core thesis introduces the concept of "Recursive Security," drawing a parallel to Anthropic's "Recursive Self-Improvement." Just as AI can accelerate its own development through feedback loops, security systems are evolving towards a continuous cycle of analysis, risk identification, remediation, and re-analysis. Security is becoming a persistent, evolving capability integrated into a system's lifecycle, rather than a one-time pre-launch audit. This shift is particularly urgent for the crypto industry, where system complexity from Layer-2 networks, modular architectures, and ZK-proofs is growing faster than human analysis capacity. AI excels at the pattern recognition and contextual understanding needed to navigate this complexity. Importantly, the article cautions that AI augments both defenders and potential attackers, accelerating the entire threat landscape. The future competitive advantage may not lie in having zero vulnerabilities, but in having the fastest risk discovery, validation, and response capabilities. The Claude-Zcash incident is thus an early signal of an era where AI-driven, recursive security systems become essential for managing risk in an increasingly complex digital world.

marsbitHá 1h

When AI Begins to Audit the World: From Claude Discovering the ZEC Vulnerability, Watching the Encryption Industry Enter the 'Recursive Security Era'

marsbitHá 1h

From MSTR to STRC+: Where Is the Limit of the Strategy Universe?

From MSTR to STRC+: The Evolution and Limits of the Strategy Universe This article examines the transformation of Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy) from a simple "Bitcoin treasury" company into a complex financial engineering firm building a BTC-backed credit system. **Core Thesis:** Strategy's true significance lies not just in its massive BTC holdings (~844k BTC), but in its attempt to transform this static reserve into a multi-layered credit curve within traditional capital markets and, subsequently, into on-chain yield infrastructure. **The MSTR Flywheel:** The initial model was a reflexive loop: BTC price rises → MSTR stock rises → company raises capital (debt/equity) at a premium → buys more BTC → increases per-share BTC exposure → MSTR premium grows. This "amplified Bitcoin" equity (MSTR) thrives on bullish momentum but is vulnerable to tightening premiums and rising funding costs. **Building the Credit Curve:** Strategy's innovation is slicing its single BTC balance sheet into different risk/return profiles via specialized securities: * **MSTR:** High-volatility equity layer absorbing full BTC upside/downside. * **STRC:** Key product. A perpetual preferred stock designed as "short duration high yield credit," offering ~11.5% floating monthly dividends. It attracts fixed-income investors seeking yield without direct BTC exposure, funding Strategy's operations. * **STRD/STRK/STRF:** Other preferred/share classes with varying durations, conversion rights, and fixed dividends. **Risks of the STRC Model:** STRC's high yield is not risk-free. Its stability depends on: 1) Sufficient BTC asset coverage, 2) Strategy's continued ability to pay dividends, and 3) Market faith in the MSTR/STRC funding flywheel. Stress points include deep BTC price declines eroding the asset buffer, rising dividend costs if STRC trades below par, and a broken flywheel if MSTR's premium (mNAV) falls persistently. **On-Chain Expansion: STRC+:** Projects like **Saturn** and **Apyx** aim to package STRC's (and other DAT preferred stock) cash flows into on-chain stablecoin yield (e.g., sUSDat, apyUSD). They offer DeFi a new yield source distinct from trading fees or incentives—cash dividends from traditional securities. However, this introduces compounded risks: off-chain custody, issuer credit risk, BTC volatility, and protocol execution risk. **Conclusion: The Ultimate Boundary** Strategy's endgame is not infinite BTC accumulation. It is the market's long-term acceptance of a new credit system where BTC serves as collateral for tradable securities whose cash flows can power on-chain financial applications. Its "universe" expands if this BTC-native credit curve gains legitimacy, but contracts if these instruments are repriced purely as high-risk, yield-bearing credit assets without stablecoin mythology.

marsbitHá 2h

From MSTR to STRC+: Where Is the Limit of the Strategy Universe?

marsbitHá 2h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片