NFT winter deepens: Monthly sales hit lowest point of the year

cointelegraphPublicado em 2025-12-09Última atualização em 2025-12-09

Resumo

NFT monthly sales hit a yearly low in November, dropping to $320 million—nearly half of October’s total. The market cap fell 66% from its peak of $9.2 billion in January to $3.1 billion. Most major collections declined, with CryptoPunks down 12% and Hypurr plunging 48%. Exceptions include Infinex Patrons, up 14.9%, and Autoglyphs, surging 20.9%. Despite a brief rebound in mid-November, the market remains weak, with December weekly sales at just $62 million—the lowest of the year—indicating the downturn is likely to continue.

Non-fungible tokens (NFTs) have fallen to their lowest monthly sales volume this year, with digital collectibles declining by over 66% in market capitalization from their January highs.

CryptoSlam data shows that NFT sales declined to $320 million in November, roughly half of the $629 million recorded in October. The drop pulled the monthly volumes back to levels not seen since September 2024, when digital collectible sales hit $312 million.

The data also shows that between Dec. 1 and 7, NFTs generated $62 million in sales, marking the weakest weekly total of 2025. The slow start to December suggests that the downturn may persist through the month as NFT momentum slows.

The downward trend comes amid a broader decline in NFT valuations. According to CoinGecko, the sector’s overall market cap is at $3.1 billion, down 66% from its high of $9.2 billion in January.

NFT market cap in 2025. Source: CoinGecko

Blue chips slide, but Infinex Patrons and Autoglyphs buck trend

CoinGecko data showed that most of the top NFT collections mirrored the broader market decline, with CryptoPunks, the largest by market cap, falling 12% in the last 30 days.

Bored Ape Yacht Club slipped 8.5%, while Pudgy Penguins dropped 10.6% in the same time frame, continuing a pullback across the most dominant NFT assets.

The downturn did not spare art-driven blue-chip collections. Chromie Squiggle slid 5.6%, Fidenza fell 14.6%, Moonbirds dropped 17.9% and the Mutant Ape Yacht Club was down 13.4% in the last month.

The biggest decline came from Hypurr, which shed 48%, making it the largest decline among the top 10 NFT collections.

Meanwhile, two major collections posted gains in the last 30 days, bucking the downward trend. Infinex Patrons, currently the second-largest NFT collection by market cap, posted gains of 14.9%, while Autoglyphs outperformed the entire top 10 leaderboard with a 20.9% surge in the last 30 days.

NFT collections 30-day heat map. Source: CoinGecko

Related: Meta shares climb on report of possible 30% metaverse budget cut

NFT winter deepens as 2025 concludes

The latest decline comes amid a turbulent quarter for the NFTs market. As Cointelegraph previously reported, NFTs recorded a sharp drop in valuation from October to November.

Digital collections dropped from $6.6 billion to $3.5 billion even as sales slightly climbed. This represented a 46% drop in just 30 days.

The weakness was followed by a rebound. On Nov. 11, NFT market cap briefly recovered from $3.5 billion to $3.9 billion, reflecting renewed appetite alongside a memecoin rally.

However, the recovery was short-lived. CoinGecko data showed that the NFT market cap is at $3.1 billion, down 53% from October.

Magazine: Digital art will ‘age like fine wine’: Inside Flamingo DAO’s 9-figure NFT collection

Leituras Relacionadas

Public Chain Moat Only 3/10? Alliance DAO Founder's Remarks Ignite Crypto Community Debate

Alliance DAO founder qw (@QwQiao) sparked intense debate in the crypto community by claiming that Layer 1 blockchains have "limited moats," rating them only 3/10 in terms of sustainable competitive advantage. This triggered strong reactions from key industry figures. Dragonfly Capital partner Haseeb strongly disagreed, arguing that Ethereum’s decade-long dominance despite well-funded challengers proves its strong moat. Others, like Multicoin’s Kyle Samani and researchers from Ethereum and Circle, questioned whether liquidity alone constitutes a real moat, with some calling it fleeting and unreliable. In response, qw elaborated on his moat rating framework, giving traditional giants like Microsoft, Apple, and Visa perfect scores (10/10) based on revenue models and infrastructure, while rating top crypto projects around 5/10. He notably rated Bitcoin at 9/10, citing its unique founding story and Lindy effect, but deducted a point due to uncertainties around security and quantum threats. The debate expanded into what truly constitutes a moat in crypto. Critics argued qw’s framework overemphasizes current revenue and undervalues network effects, trust, and technological ethos. Defenders of blockchain moats pointed to elements like developer ecosystems, brand strength, switching costs, and application diversity as core defensive attributes. The article concludes that the crypto industry is still young and small compared to traditional finance and tech giants. Rather than fixating on abstract moat concepts, the priority should be solving real user needs at scale, driving adoption, and expanding overall market reach.

marsbitHá 49m

Public Chain Moat Only 3/10? Alliance DAO Founder's Remarks Ignite Crypto Community Debate

marsbitHá 49m

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片