"Kalshi" Removes All Sports Event Options Amidst CFTC Investigation

cryptonews.ruPublicado em 2026-08-15Última atualização em 2026-08-15

Resumo

"Kalshi" has removed all of its sports-related event options amid an investigation launched by the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), according to an NPR report citing anonymous sources. Federal regulators are scrutinizing "mention markets," with sources indicating these markets are potentially highly susceptible to manipulation. A court order from Washington State's King County also compels Kalshi to cease marketing or offering contracts related to sports, elections, politics, entertainment, and mentions, citing violations of gambling laws and high fraud risks. The order prohibits Kalshi from advertising such bets to Washington consumers. This follows a high-profile incident where a former Trump teleprompter operator allegedly used advance access to speeches for mention market trades. Kalshi froze approximately $90,000 of his profits and reported the activity to the CFTC. The company, which has positioned itself as a "prediction market," is facing a complex and rapidly evolving legal landscape with differing state-level rulings on its contracts.

Federal regulators have launched an investigation into prediction markets, and Kalshi removed all its sports-related offerings in the course of the probe, NPR reports, citing two informed sources who spoke anonymously as they were not authorized to speak publicly. Kalshi and the CFTC declined to comment, and the commission has not published any materials describing the review. Sports bets account for the lion's share of the billions that flow through the Kalshi platform weekly.

Under the Commodity Exchange Act, only contracts that are not susceptible to manipulation can be listed on designated contract markets, and one of NPR's sources said that prediction markets are "potentially very susceptible to manipulation, so the CFTC is carefully studying whether some of them make sense." A second source, a former Kalshi employee, told the outlet that the exchange's own lawyers share this concern, as the nature of some markets attracts people capable of influencing the outcome. According to the former employee, inside Kalshi, employees discussed the usefulness of this category, with co-founder Luana Lopes Lara defending it.

As of Friday, our analysis shows that the "Predictions" section of Kalshi lacks a sports filter altogether: the only subcategories are earnings reports, politicians, Trump, and a section dedicated to public companies. At least 216 individual contracts remain across 12 market groups: prediction markets on earnings reports for Klarna, Walmart, Target, Home Depot, John Deere, Toll Brothers, Futu, and Amer Sports are scheduled to open next week, along with a NASA press conference and a Massachusetts state Senate debate. Polymarket also offers prediction markets, but only on its overseas platform, which is not regulated by the CFTC. They are not currently available on its smaller US-based exchange.

In a Washington state court, King County Superior Court Judge John McHale in his revised injunction orders Kalshi to cease marketing, offering, or accepting contracts related to sports, elections, politics, entertainment, culture, technology and science, as well as predictions. Commodity, climate, economy, and financial markets may continue operating. The state Attorney General's office announced this ruling on Thursday, simultaneously imposing a series of restrictions based on a geographical limitation. Besides violating gambling laws, the Attorney General stated that "this type of betting carries a high risk of fraud by persons close to the source of information. Such bets are particularly unfair to consumers."

The ruling also prohibits Kalshi from advertising the specified bets to consumers in Washington state, as it was found that "Kalshi's provision, promotion, and advertising of illegal gambling activity constitutes unfair and/or deceptive acts or practices." The Attorney General's office cited a Kalshi advertisement in which one person writes to another that they "found a way to bet on the NFL, even though we live in Washington state." Furthermore, the ruling notes that Kalshi had previously positioned itself as a service allowing consumers to "bet on anything," calling its activities a "prediction market," not gambling.

This decision is based on a preliminary injunction issued by McHale in July, which found that Washington state would likely be able to prove its case, and that without intervention, "significant harm to Washington state consumers" was likely. Kalshi appealed to the Court of Appeals to stay this injunction, but the court denied the request.

A recent high-profile scandal involving prediction markets reached the White House. Gabriel Perez, a teleprompter operator for Trump, allegedly used advance access to prepared speeches to trade on prediction markets. Kalshi froze approximately $90,000 of his profits and passed information about these trades to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) after its oversight team identified them. NPR reported that traders who view prediction markets as a full-time job set up television antennas to gain fractions of a second when watching live broadcasts, and that Trump's rambling speech style causes sharp price swings as traders try to guess which topic he will turn to next.

Events in the legal arena are developing rapidly. The CFTC is attempting to defend Kalshi based on an emergency ruling in New York, and a judge in Connecticut ruled that its sports contracts were never swaps—just a few of many recent examples of diverging actions by different states.

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhy did Kalshi remove all its sports-related prediction markets?

AKalshi removed all its sports-related prediction markets in response to an investigation launched by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) into 'mentions' markets, amid concerns that such markets are potentially very easy to manipulate.

QWhat legal action did a Washington state court take against Kalshi?

AA Washington state court issued a revised preliminary injunction ordering Kalshi to stop marketing, offering, or accepting contracts related to sports, elections, politics, entertainment, culture, technology, science, and mentions markets. Only commodities, climate, economic, and financial markets are allowed to continue.

QWhat specific concern did the Washington Attorney General cite regarding Kalshi's markets?

AThe Washington Attorney General stated that this type of betting carries a high risk of fraud from individuals close to the information source and is particularly unfair to consumers. They also found Kalshi's provision, promotion, and advertising of illegal gambling activity to be unfair and/or deceptive acts or practices.

QHow did a recent scandal involving 'mentions' markets implicate the White House?

AGabriel Perez, an operator of former President Trump's teleprompter, allegedly used advance access to prepared speeches to trade on mentions markets. Kalshi froze approximately $90,000 of his profits and reported the trades to the CFTC after its surveillance team identified them.

QHow do traders reportedly attempt to gain an advantage on 'mentions' markets during live events?

AAccording to the article, traders who treat mentions markets as a full-time job set up TV antennas to gain fractions of a second advantage when watching live broadcasts. Former President Trump's discursive speaking style also causes sharp price fluctuations as traders try to guess which topic he will mention next.

Leituras Relacionadas

Bitcoin Volatility Halved Yet Extreme Days Exceed 2018: VaR Models May Underestimate Tail Risk

Bitcoin's volatility has significantly decreased in 2026, with annualized volatility dropping to approximately 46% from around 84% in 2018. However, it has already recorded 10 "3-sigma" trading days this year—days where price moves deviate by at least three standard deviations from recent norms—surpassing the 8 such days observed in the entirety of 2018. This indicates that while average daily price swings are calmer, extreme outlier movements remain frequent, even surpassing the frequency seen in a previous bear market. This paradox presents a challenge for standard risk models like Value-at-Risk (VaR), which often rely on recent volatility to gauge risk. Lower volatility can misleadingly signal reduced risk, potentially encouraging larger positions while failing to adequately capture persistent "tail risk"—the potential for rare but severe losses. Experts note the industry is shifting towards metrics like Expected Shortfall to better account for these extreme outcomes. Market participants attribute the continued occurrence of these sharp swings to unpredictable macroeconomic shocks and highly leveraged options positions, particularly strategies like shorting volatility or call overwriting. These strategies can amplify price moves when unexpected news triggers a market shift. Despite the persistent volatility spikes, the market demonstrates greater resilience in absorbing them, attributed to increased institutional participation, deeper liquidity from ETFs, and improved overall risk management. However, experts conclude that these extreme price movements are likely to remain a feature of the Bitcoin market due to enduring macro uncertainties and complex derivatives activity.

marsbitHá 59m

Bitcoin Volatility Halved Yet Extreme Days Exceed 2018: VaR Models May Underestimate Tail Risk

marsbitHá 59m

Pearl: The 'AI Version of Bitcoin' Most Mentioned at Token2049

The article discusses Pearl, a cryptocurrency generating significant buzz at Token2049, often described as the "AI version of Bitcoin." At its core, Pearl employs a Proof-of-Useful-Work consensus mechanism where miners perform matrix multiplication, the foundational computation for AI model inference, rather than traditional hash calculations. This aims to make mining productive for AI while generating the PRL token. Proponents are excited by a three-layer narrative: 1) Pearl as a decentralized, AI-native store of value and potential payment rail, 2) its alignment with the energy migration from Bitcoin mining to AI compute, and 3) "2-for-1" unit economics where a single GPU computation earns both AI inference fees and mining rewards. However, a fundamental technical challenge is highlighted: the protocol cannot verify if miners are computing real AI tasks or simply cheap, random matrices—a known "job-binding failure." Academic analysis suggests current mining software lacks actual inference code, allowing "garbage mining." The team acknowledges this but argues future protocol upgrades and economic incentives will discourage it. A partnership with Together AI offers lower-cost inference, though skeptics question if it’s genuine compute usage or just token-subsidized marketing. With a fair launch, no VC backing, and a $2.8B FDV, Pearl capitalizes on powerful narratives of AI and decentralization. Ultimately, the article frames it as an option on a future where GPU mining and AI inference seamlessly merge, contingent on the protocol solving its core utility-verification problem.

marsbitHá 2h

Pearl: The 'AI Version of Bitcoin' Most Mentioned at Token2049

marsbitHá 2h

Trading

Spot
活动图片