Bitwise CIO: STRC Plunge is a Bottom Signal, Bull Market to Begin in Autumn

Foresight NewsPublicado em 2026-07-02Última atualização em 2026-07-02

Resumo

Matt Hougan, Chief Investment Officer at Bitwise, explains the recent Bitcoin price drop below $60,000 and its connection to the steep decline in MicroStrategy's STRC (Strategy's Perpetual Preferred Stock). STRC, designed as a high-yield, stable-price instrument, fell from its $100 target to $75 due to market fears over MicroStrategy's ability to sustain its dividend amid Bitcoin's price weakness. Hougan clarifies that while MicroStrategy's overall financial position remains strong, with significant Bitcoin holdings and cash, the core market anxiety centered on the optional nature of the dividend payments. In response, MicroStrategy announced a new operational framework: it will sell some Bitcoin as needed to fund dividends, will no longer actively defend the $100 share price through dividend hikes, and may repurchase STRC on the open market. This shift marks a change in MicroStrategy's role from a consistent, one-way buyer of Bitcoin to a more dynamic participant that may both buy and sell. According to Hougan, the STRC volatility is a classic late-cycle event, signaling the painful but necessary process of flushing out excessive leverage from the market. He draws parallels to the unwinding of the GBTC premium in the previous cycle. He identifies key potential bottoming signals: MSTR trading at a discount to its net asset value (NAV), extreme readings on the Crypto Fear & Greed Index, and persistently negative Bitcoin funding rates. Hougan concludes that while the exact t...


Author: Matt Hougan, Chief Investment Officer, Bitwise

Compiled by: Chopper, Foresight News


Last week, the price of Bitcoin fell below $60,000, hitting a new low for 2024. While there are multiple reasons for this decline, the core trigger was the perpetual preferred stock STRC issued by MicroStrategy.


I have received many questions from clients regarding STRC and MSTR. Given that they reflect the phase of the cycle we are currently in, I would like to address them here.


What is STRC?


STRC is a preferred stock product launched by MicroStrategy last year, designed to provide investors with high yield while maintaining a stable price at or near its $100 par value.


At issuance, STRC offered an annualized dividend yield of 9%. To maintain the $100 target price, the company stated that if the market price fell below $100, it would increase the dividend by 0.25%–0.5%. The higher yield would attract buyers, pushing the price back to the $100 par value.


This mechanism initially worked. MicroStrategy gradually raised the dividend to 11.5%, and STRC's price hovered around $100 for a long time. This high-yield, seemingly zero-risk product was widely sought after, with investors pouring a total of $10.5 billion into STRC. The company used all the raised funds to accumulate Bitcoin.


Over the past few weeks, as Bitcoin and MSTR's stock price weakened simultaneously, the market began to worry about MicroStrategy's ability and willingness to pay STRC dividends. Consequently, STRC's price plummeted, hitting a low of $75.


Is Investor Panic Justified?


Yes, and no.


Looking at the overall balance sheet, the company's fundamentals are very solid: it holds $49.6 billion worth of Bitcoin, $2.6 billion in cash, with total liabilities of $6.8 billion and preferred stock totaling $15.5 billion. If all Bitcoin were sold now, the proceeds would be enough to cover all dividend payments for the next 28 years.


However, the core disagreement lies in whether the company would choose to suspend dividends. MicroStrategy has the right to autonomously suspend STRC dividend payments; dividends are only accrued and there is no mandatory obligation to pay them immediately. With Bitcoin's continuous decline, the market fears that the company's cash flow is under pressure and it might halt dividends at any time, fueling this panic.


Did the Company Ultimately Suspend Dividends?


It did not.


This Monday, MicroStrategy announced a new operational framework: the company will opportunistically sell some Bitcoin specifically to fund dividend payments. Simultaneously, the company will no longer maintain the $100 par value by raising dividends, allowing STRC to float freely; furthermore, the company may repurchase STRC in the secondary market.


Following this announcement, both MSTR and STRC stock prices rebounded sharply.


Why Didn't MicroStrategy Simply Raise Dividends to Support the Price?


The required dividend increase to pull the price back to the $100 par value would have been unaffordably high.


The company's initial plan was to make small interest rate adjustments to stabilize the stock price. However, when STRC fell to $75, the market's effective yield had already reached 15.4%. To restore it to par value through interest rate hikes, the nominal dividend rate would need to increase by nearly 4 percentage points from 11.5% to 15.4%.


Even with a rate hike, the effect might not be ideal. A substantial increase in dividends could exacerbate market doubts: how can the company sustainably pay such high dividends? This could potentially trigger a new round of selling.


The gap between $75 and the $100 par value is too large to be bridged in the short term by raising dividends.


Under the New Framework, Can STRC Return to $100?


Not necessarily. The company is no longer relying on mechanized means to anchor the stock price at $100; although the official dividend has been raised to 12%, STRC is likely to return to $100 only if Bitcoin's price sees a significant increase.


What Do These Changes Signify?


Market opinions are highly divided, but in my view, MicroStrategy's role in the Bitcoin market has fundamentally changed.


For many years, it was the world's largest buyer of Bitcoin, consistently providing one-way buying pressure to the market. This phase is likely over. Going forward, the company will dynamically buy and sell Bitcoin based on market conditions, no longer being a net buyer only.


It's important to note: I do not believe MicroStrategy will engage in large-scale selling. There is no mandatory clause forcing the company to liquidate tens of billions of dollars in Bitcoin annually; once Bitcoin enters a bull market, MicroStrategy will likely become a net buyer again.


However, in the next cycle, MicroStrategy's influence on Bitcoin's price action will be far less than in the previous one.


Who Will Replace MicroStrategy as the Largest Incremental Buyer of Bitcoin?


Institutional capital.


Throughout Bitcoin's development, the dominant buyer demographic has continuously evolved: cypherpunks, Asian retail investors, US retail investors, the GBTC Grayscale Trust, and MSTR have successively taken the lead. I judge that the core incremental force for the next market upswing will be various institutional funds — global banks, asset managers, pension funds, endowment funds, sovereign wealth funds, and independent financial advisors — which control the world's largest pools of capital.


Several signals already confirm this trend. Morgan Stanley recently launched its own Bitcoin ETF; Wells Fargo has included Bitcoin in its standard asset allocation model; last year, Texas became the first U.S. state to establish a strategic Bitcoin reserve; several sovereign funds and national-level banks have already allocated to Bitcoin or initiated related research projects. Although Bitcoin ETFs experienced outflows in 2026, they have seen cumulative net inflows exceeding $50 billion since their launch in 2024, and mainstream wealth management platforms have already listed related products.


Is There a Liquidation Risk for MicroStrategy?


Based on available data, it's completely non-existent. All talk of liquidation and collapse does not align with financial logic. As mentioned earlier, the company's total liquid assets amount to $52 billion, with total debt being only $7 billion. Bitcoin would need to crash by over 70% and stay low for an extended period to push the company into a survival crisis.


Skeptics argue that the long-term pressure from the $15+ billion in preferred stock dividends is a downside risk, but in extreme situations, the company could choose to suspend preferred stock dividends, making the risk manageable.


What Stage of the Market Cycle Does This Reflect?


The severe volatility in STRC coupled with the correction in MSTR's stock price is a classic feature of the late cycle. All financial markets, including crypto, follow a highly unified bull-bear cycle logic: a bull market emerges first; subsequently, investor greed leads to increased leverage, giving rise to numerous financial derivative instruments; a risk event triggers a market reversal; the market clears, squeezing out all excess leverage before a true bottom is found.


STRC is a typical product of financial leverage in this cycle: funds seeking stable, high returns poured into STRC, and the company then used that money to buy Bitcoin. Simply put, a batch of capital seeking low-volatility, stable returns ultimately flowed into the highly volatile Bitcoin asset.


This type of capital is inherently mismatched with Bitcoin's asset characteristics and must exit and clear the market for a bottom to be established. We are currently experiencing this process.


History has repeated this exact playbook in the crypto market. During the 2019–2021 bull market, the GBTC Trust traded at a significant premium to its underlying Bitcoin Net Asset Value (NAV) for an extended period. Institutions could subscribe to GBTC at NAV, lock it up for six months, and then sell it on the secondary market at a 20%–50% premium, flooding massive capital into Bitcoin and spawning various complex financial instruments. Starting in 2021, the GBTC premium rapidly disappeared, leverage tools exited en masse, and the market subsequently bottomed.


This cycle is highly likely to follow a similar path.


When Will the Market Bottom Arrive?


I cannot give an exact timing; no one can accurately predict the bottom. Only in hindsight can it be clearly identified.


However, several precursor signals for a bottom can be closely monitored: First, when MSTR's stock price falls below its Net Asset Value (NAV) and trades at a discount, it signals that market sentiment has completely shifted from greed to extreme panic, a clear sign of nearing a bottom. Second, when the Crypto Fear & Greed Index drops to historical extremes, entering the extreme fear zone, it presents value for positioning. Third, when Bitcoin futures funding rates remain persistently negative, indicating retail shorting sentiment far exceeding longing sentiment, reflecting complete market pessimism.


Simply put: the reversal opportunity emerges only when the market falls to a point of extreme pessimism.


The market is currently in the process of clearing, and the chain reaction triggered by STRC is a necessary stage of the cycle. Every crypto cycle goes through this painful but essential deleveraging phase.


As the market continues to adjust and clear, I firmly believe the bottom is near, and a new bull market will begin this autumn.

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is STRC and why was it significant in the recent Bitcoin market downturn according to Bitwise CIO Matt Hougan?

ASTRC is a perpetual preferred stock issued by MicroStrategy, designed to provide investors with high yield while aiming to maintain a stable price around its $100 par value. According to Matt Hougan, its recent sharp decline to as low as $75 was the core catalyst that triggered Bitcoin's fall below $60,000 last week, as it raised concerns about MicroStrategy's ability and willingness to pay dividends on STRC.

QWhat new operational framework did MicroStrategy announce regarding STRC, and what was its impact?

AMicroStrategy announced a new framework where it may opportunistically sell some Bitcoin specifically to fund dividend payments for STRC. It also abandoned the mechanism of raising dividends to maintain the $100 par value, allowing STRC to float freely, and indicated potential buybacks of STRC on the secondary market. This announcement led to a significant rebound in the prices of both MSTR and STRC.

QWhy does Matt Hougan believe MicroStrategy's role in the Bitcoin market has fundamentally changed?

AHougan believes MicroStrategy's role has shifted from being the world's largest unilateral buyer of Bitcoin to a more dynamic participant that will buy and sell Bitcoin based on market conditions. He states that while it will likely not engage in massive selling, its influence on Bitcoin's price in the next cycle will be far less dominant than in the previous bull run.

QAccording to the article, who does Matt Hougan identify as the next major incremental buyer of Bitcoin?

AMatt Hougan identifies institutional capital as the next core source of incremental demand for Bitcoin. This includes global banks, asset managers, pension funds, endowments, sovereign wealth funds, and independent financial advisors, who collectively manage the world's largest pools of capital.

QWhat signals does Matt Hougan suggest investors monitor to identify a potential market bottom?

AHougan suggests monitoring three key signals: 1) MSTR's stock price trading at a discount to its Net Asset Value (NAV), indicating extreme panic. 2) The Crypto Fear & Greed Index reaching historical extreme lows. 3) Persistent negative funding rates in Bitcoin futures markets, showing excessive bearish sentiment among retail traders. He concludes that a true reversal opportunity appears only when market sentiment becomes extremely pessimistic.

Leituras Relacionadas

Robinhood Chain Mainnet Goes Live: Can Stocks Finally Be Moved Into Wallets?

Robinhood has officially launched its public mainnet, Robinhood Chain, along with stock-like tokens, the USDG yield product, and a DeFi lending portal. This marks a significant shift where a major online broker is integrating its user interface, regulatory compliance, self-custody wallet, and on-chain protocols into a single, streamlined experience. The goal is to simplify access to stock exposure, stablecoin yields, collateralized lending, and AMM trading for mainstream users. Eligible non-U.S. users can hold these "Stock Tokens"—structured as tokenized debt securities—in the Robinhood Wallet for 24/7 exposure to assets like U.S. stocks or ETFs. U.S. users can access an estimated ~7% APY on dollar-backed USDG through the Robinhood Earn program via self-custody wallets, with lending infrastructure powered by Morpho protocol. Built as a Layer 2 on Arbitrum, Robinhood Chain leverages existing DeFi protocols like Uniswap. The core strategy is not to reinvent DeFi but to channel Robinhood's large traditional finance user base (27.4 million funded customers as of Q1 2026) into on-chain finance, lowering the technical barriers. However, key limitations exist. The stock tokens are not direct equity ownership and are unavailable in the U.S. and some jurisdictions due to regulatory constraints. The ~7% yield is variable and carries inherent DeFi risks, not guaranteed principal protection. Furthermore, while AMMs enable trading, price discovery for major stocks will likely remain anchored in traditional markets like NASDAQ for the foreseeable future. Ultimately, Robinhood Chain is an early experiment in "on-chain brokerage." Its success will depend on real-world metrics like trading volume, sustained user migration to self-custody, stable yield performance, and regulatory feedback, rather than its launch narrative.

marsbitHá 1h

Robinhood Chain Mainnet Goes Live: Can Stocks Finally Be Moved Into Wallets?

marsbitHá 1h

Circle CEO Responds to OUSD Challenge: Stablecoin Market Is 'Winner-Takes-All', Consortium Model Doomed to Fail

Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire addresses market concerns following the announcement of the Open USD (OUSD) stablecoin project backed by 140 global companies. Allaire argues the stablecoin market exhibits "winner-takes-all" dynamics due to powerful network effects. He cites USDC's near-decade lead in three key areas: 1) **Application Integration & Protocol Development**: Thousands of integrated services and protocols (like CCTP) create utility and lock-in for developers and users. 2) **Liquidity Network Effects**: A deeply embedded, globally distributed liquidity infrastructure across primary and secondary markets, built over years. 3) **Regulatory Integration**: Extensive licensing and compliance groundwork ensuring USDC's acceptance in major markets like Europe and Japan. Allaire challenges OUSD's proposed advantages. He contends that promises of free redemption, while appealing, face market realities where such models can become exit routes for other stablecoins. He also questions the feasibility of fully distributing all revenue to an alliance, stating it would "starve" the critical infrastructure investments needed for scale and utility. Furthermore, he expresses skepticism about large alliance governance models, noting they often lead to slow decision-making and misaligned incentives. While welcoming OUSD to the ecosystem, Allaire reaffirms confidence in USDC's dominant position, backed by its long-term infrastructure investments and strong partnerships, including its ongoing collaboration with Coinbase.

marsbitHá 1h

Circle CEO Responds to OUSD Challenge: Stablecoin Market Is 'Winner-Takes-All', Consortium Model Doomed to Fail

marsbitHá 1h

Circle CEO Responds to OUSD Challenge: Alliance Model Doomed to Fail, It's a 'Winner-Takes-All' Game

Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire addresses the challenge posed by the new Open USD (OUSD) stablecoin project, backed by 140 global companies. He argues that the stablecoin market exhibits "winner-take-all" characteristics, where USDC's near-decade-long lead in application integrations, global liquidity, and regulatory compliance secures its dominant position. Allaire outlines three key network effects underpinning USDC's strength: 1) Extensive integration as an internet protocol layer, 2) Deep, globally distributed liquidity networks, and 3) Deep integration with global policy and regulatory frameworks. He cites data showing USDC facilitated 80% of on-chain USD stablecoin transaction volume in Q1 2026. He directly counters OUSD's proposed advantages: 1) "Free minting and redemption" may not be sustainable against market realities, which USDC addresses via contractual mechanisms. 2) "Sharing all revenue" risks starving the infrastructure of necessary investment for growth and reliability. 3) A "consortium model" often leads to slow innovation and poor coordination compared to focused, independent operators like Circle. Allaire reaffirms Circle's strong partnership with Coinbase and notes that Circle continues to collaborate with many OUSD founding members. He concludes by welcoming OUSD to the ecosystem while expressing confidence in USDC's entrenched network advantages and continued expansion.

Odaily星球日报Há 1h

Circle CEO Responds to OUSD Challenge: Alliance Model Doomed to Fail, It's a 'Winner-Takes-All' Game

Odaily星球日报Há 1h

Trading

Spot
活动图片