Trend in US Stocks: A Post Triggers a 930-Point Rebound, Tonight Belongs to SpaceX

marsbitPublicado em 2026-06-12Última atualização em 2026-06-12

Resumo

On Thursday (June 11, U.S. Eastern Time), Wall Street staged a textbook V-shaped reversal. The Dow Jones surged 929.97 points (+1.86%) to close above 50,000, while the Nasdaq and S&P 500 rose 2.54% and 1.75%, respectively. The rally occurred despite the hottest PPI report in years, with May data showing a 6.5% year-on-year surge, the highest since 2022. The market ignored the inflation data, focusing instead on reports that former President Trump called off a planned strike on Iran, hinting at a potential multi-party peace agreement draft. This sparked a sharp drop in oil prices, fueling hopes that inflation may have peaked. Sector rotations were stark: previously battered AI hardware and cyclical stocks led the gains, while defensive sectors that hit record highs the prior day were sold off. Chip stocks like Micron and Intel saw sharp rebounds. In contrast, software giant Oracle plunged nearly 10% despite beating earnings, with concerns over cloud revenue and cash flow. Adobe also fell after hours despite raising guidance, as its CFO announced departure. The rally's sustainability is questioned, driven largely by social media posts about unconfirmed geopolitical developments. Inflation risks remain, with pipeline pressures still high. Meanwhile, the market's risk appetite faces a major test with SpaceX's historic IPO. Priced at $135 per share, it aims to raise ~$75 billion with a $1.75 trillion valuation, becoming the largest U.S. IPO ever. It will join the Nasdaq 100 in 1...

Author: Trend Research

Thursday (US Eastern Time, June 11) witnessed a textbook V-shaped reversal on Wall Street. Funds that were fleeing headlong from inflation and war the day before collectively reversed course within 24 hours.

The Dow Jones surged 929.97 points (+1.86%) to close at 50,848.75, recapturing the 50,000 mark; the Nasdaq rose 2.54% to 25,809.66; the S&P 500 gained 1.75% to 7,394.30. The Russell 2000 index led all major indices with a 3.02% gain. The VIX fear index fell nearly 12%, dropping back below 20.

The interesting part is that this big green candle emerged despite the hottest inflation data of the year.

Hottest PPI, Coldest Reaction

The May PPI released in the morning soared 6.5% year-over-year, the highest since November 2022; it rose 1.1% month-over-month, far exceeding the expected 0.7%. Breaking it down is even more startling: goods prices rose 2.8% month-over-month, the largest single-month increase since records for this data series began in 2009, with about 80% coming from energy—wholesale gasoline prices surged a staggering 23.4% in a single month. The first-stage intermediate demand prices, closer to the upstream pipeline, rose 3.2% month-over-month, also setting a historical record.

On any ordinary trading day, this data would be enough to knock the Nasdaq down 2%. But the market cared about only one thing: whether the war is about to end.

In the afternoon, Trump announced the cancellation of a scheduled strike against Iran that night, stating that Iran's top leadership had approved a draft multilateral consensus agreement, and allies including Israel had "agreed in principle." Upon the news, WTI crude oil plummeted over 4% intraday to around $86, and Brent fell below $89. Oil is the engine of this round of inflation; an oil price plunge directly dismantles the ammunition for PPI. Trump's own response to inflation was even more blunt: "I like, I like this inflation," and stated that once the war ends, oil prices will "fall like a rock."

The logical chain for funds was thus closed: draft agreement, oil price plunge, peak inflation expectations, buy everything. Sectors that fell the hardest the previous day—tech, industrials, materials—led the gains, while defensive sectors (consumer staples, real estate, energy), which hit record highs on Wednesday, were conversely sold off. In two trading sessions, the same batch of funds completed a full rotation from short to long.

Chip Stocks' Vengeful Rebound, Software Stocks' No Man's Land

The rebound firepower concentrated on AI hardware. Micron surged nearly 12%, erasing all of this week's losses in a single day; Sandisk rose 14%; Intel, upgraded by Bank of America, gained about 10% on the rationale of a surge in CPU orders; AMD rose 8%. The Philadelphia Semiconductor Index, counting from the crash on June 5th, completed its sentiment repair in just four trading sessions.

Software is a different world. Oracle plunged 9.56%, closing around $184. Beating earnings expectations was meaningless; the market focused on cloud revenue missing expectations, negative free cash flow of $23.7 billion, and a new $40 billion financing plan. After hours, Adobe delivered a standard "beat and raise" combo: Q2 revenue of $6.62 billion up 13%, full-year EPS guidance raised to $24.35 to $24.45, AI-related recurring revenue tripling year-over-year. The stock's response was a further drop of over 5% after hours. The trigger was CFO Dan Durn announcing his departure next Monday to join Marvell, following CEO Narayen's announcement of succession in March, making him the second core executive to leave Adobe in three months. The stock is down 38% year-to-date. At current prices, a company whose AI revenue has tripled is being priced as a victim of AI.

The same AI narrative: hardware is being scooped up, software is being abandoned. The market's subtext is brutal: the money in computing power is visible; software moats are not. The direction executives are voting with their feet coincides precisely with the stock price—the CFO is going to Marvell, a chip company.

Tonight, The Largest IPO in History Opens

Another motive for the late Thursday buying spree lies in Friday: SpaceX priced at $135 per share and officially debuts on Nasdaq tonight, ticker SPCX.

The scale of this deal is unprecedented: the base offering raises approximately $75 billion, nearly triple the previous record holder Saudi Aramco ($25.6 billion); the offering valuation is about $1.75 trillion, making it the seventh-largest US company by market cap upon listing, ahead of its sibling Tesla (approx. $1.6 trillion). Reports indicate subscription demand exceeded $250 billion, roughly 3.5 to 4 times the fundraising target. About 30% of the shares were allocated to retail investors, three times the industry norm. Musk retains over 82% of the voting power post-offering.

More noteworthy for traders is the follow-up: by rule, SpaceX will be added to the Nasdaq-100 Index 15 days after listing, at which point global index funds tracking QQQ will be forced to buy mechanically, estimated at $22 to $27 billion.

Risks are also clear. Senator Warren wrote to the SEC requesting a delay in the offering, questioning the valuation's detachment from financial fundamentals (annual revenue approx. $20 billion, implying a P/S ratio of about 88x) and the dual-class share structure; Morningstar directly gave it a "significantly overvalued" rating. There's a more practical issue: the $75 billion fundraising will drain liquidity from the secondary market within a week; part of the violent volatility in the storage and CPU sectors this week was the result of funds repositioning for the IPO.

Trend Observation

The quality of this rebound warrants a question mark.

Wednesday's 953-point plunge and Thursday's 930-point surge were driven by the same person's social media account. The draft agreement is not yet signed, confirmation from Iran still comes from unofficial channels, and historically this conflict has seen multiple reversals after being "close to a deal." If an index is pulled back from the cliff edge by a post, it can be pushed back over by another.

The inflation line also remains un-de-risked. The record surge in intermediate PPI demand is water already in the pipeline; even if oil prices peak immediately, it will still feed into CPI over the next two to three months. Pricing for a 25-basis-point rate hike in December remained unmoved after the data release; the ECB already hiked to 2.25% on Thursday, with the Fed, Bank of Japan, and Bank of England taking the stage next week. The market is betting on the perfect script: "war ends, oil prices plummet, rate hikes canceled"—all three links are indispensable.

Counterarguments are also on the table: core PPI month-over-month at 0.4% was below expectations, indicating that inflation momentum excluding energy is indeed slowing; Intel's CPU orders and Micron's demand are real orders, not sentiment; if a peace deal materializes, the inflation path corresponding to $86 oil will look completely different from this week's panic pricing. Bulls don't need a perfect script; they just need oil prices to stop making new highs.

Tonight's SPCX opening price will be the most honest gauge of this market's risk appetite. $75 billion in new shares, an 88x P/S ratio, 4x oversubscription—greed and skepticism will meet in the same candlestick.

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat was the primary reason for the sharp market rebound on Thursday, June 11th, despite hot inflation data?

AThe primary reason for the sharp market rebound was news from former President Donald Trump, who announced the cancellation of a planned strike on Iran and indicated that a multilateral consensus agreement draft had been approved, raising hopes for an end to conflict. This led to a sharp drop in oil prices, fueling expectations that inflation may have peaked and prompting a broad market rally.

QHow did the performance of hardware (chip) stocks differ from software stocks during the market rally described in the article?

AHardware (chip) stocks, particularly in the AI sector, led the rally with strong gains, such as Micron (up nearly 12%), Intel (up about 10%), and AMD (up 8%). In contrast, software stocks like Oracle (down 9.56%) and Adobe (down over 5% after-hours) were sold off despite positive earnings, reflecting market skepticism about software's competitive moats compared to the more tangible demand for computing hardware.

QWhat are the key details and potential market impacts of SpaceX's (ticker SPCX) upcoming IPO as mentioned in the article?

ASpaceX's IPO is priced at $135 per share, aiming to raise approximately $75 billion, making it the largest IPO on record. It will have a valuation of around $1.75 trillion, ranking it as the seventh-largest U.S. company. Key market impacts include: significant liquidity being drawn from the market for subscriptions, its expected inclusion in the Nasdaq 100 index 15 days post-listing (triggering estimated $22-$27 billion in forced buying by index funds), and concerns over its high valuation (around 88x price-to-sales) and dual-class share structure.

QWhat concerns does the article raise about the sustainability and quality of the market rebound?

AThe article questions the rebound's sustainability, noting it was largely driven by social media posts regarding unconfirmed peace prospects, which could easily reverse. Inflation risks remain, as record-high intermediate demand PPI will likely feed into CPI in coming months. The market is betting on a 'perfect script' of war ending, oil prices crashing, and rate hikes being canceled, but any failure in this chain could undermine the rally. The high valuation and massive capital absorption of the SpaceX IPO also pose near-term risks to market liquidity and sentiment.

QAccording to the article, what is the market's implicit view on AI-related companies, as illustrated by the contrasting performance of hardware and software stocks?

AThe market's implicit view, as illustrated by the divergent performance, is a preference for AI hardware companies over software companies. The perception is that the demand and profits for computing power (chips, semiconductors) are more visible and secure, while the competitive advantages and monetization paths for AI software are less clear and more vulnerable, as evidenced by software companies' weak stock performance even with strong AI revenue growth and executive departures to hardware firms.

Leituras Relacionadas

Sequoia Dialogue with Jensen Huang: Computing Model Undergoes a 60-Year Transformation; You Won't Be Replaced by AI, But You Will Be Dimensionality-Reduced by 'Those Who Master AI'

NVIDIA founder and CEO Jensen Huang, in a conversation with Sequoia Capital's Konstantine Buhler, argues that we are witnessing the most significant computing shift in 60 years—from retrieval-based to generative computing. Instead of just storing and retrieving data, future systems will generate highly personalized content (text, images, video) on demand, powered by massive "AI factories." Huang envisions a global "intelligence network" that will envelop the planet, following the historical patterns of energy and communication grids. He outlines a five-layer investment framework: 1) Energy, 2) Chips/Computers, 3) Infrastructure (data centers), 4) AI Models, and 5) Applications. He predicts this ecosystem will reach a scale of $20 trillion annually. Crucially, Huang pushes back against fears of AI-driven job loss. He distinguishes between specific "tasks" (e.g., typing, analyzing images) and overall "jobs" (e.g., CEO, radiologist). While AI automates tasks, it increases efficiency and demand for the higher-value problem-solving aspects of professions, thus creating more jobs and "up-leveling" careers. The real risk, he asserts, is not being replaced by AI, but being outperformed by someone who effectively leverages it. He urges everyone to embrace AI as a tool for augmented capability and innovation.

marsbitHá 42m

Sequoia Dialogue with Jensen Huang: Computing Model Undergoes a 60-Year Transformation; You Won't Be Replaced by AI, But You Will Be Dimensionality-Reduced by 'Those Who Master AI'

marsbitHá 42m

"I Don't Need a Better Model Anymore": A Panorama of AI Users Under a Reddit Hot Post

Titled "I Don't Need a Better Model Anymore": AI User Reactions on Reddit Anthropic recently released Claude Fable 5, its first publicly available 'Mythos'-tier model, achieving 80.3% on the SWE-Bench Pro benchmark and significantly outperforming its predecessor and competitors. However, a viral Reddit post titled "Claude Fable made me realize I don't need better models anymore" highlighted a growing user sentiment of "good enough." Top comments expressed "model fatigue," with users stating that earlier models like Opus 4.5/4.8 already sufficed for their workflows. High cost was a key concern, as Fable 5's API is nearly twice the price of Opus 4.8, with users questioning the return on investment and suggesting the field has hit a plateau. The most frequent complaint targeted Fable 5's stringent safety filters. Designed to intercept high-risk requests (e.g., cybersecurity), the system was perceived as overly conservative. Users reported frequent rejections for routine security-related tasks, leading to automatic fallbacks to the older Opus model. Paying users were particularly frustrated, feeling they paid a premium for a less usable product. Dissenting voices came from users with heavy, complex tasks. For workloads like high-energy physics simulations with thousands of code lines, Fable 5's improved long-context understanding and error detection represented a significant, worthwhile leap—described as moving from a "college player to an NBA starter." The debate underscores a divergence between benchmark performance and practical utility. For most users, current models meet their needs, making further advances relevant only for extreme use-cases. The discussion also raised concerns about a potential "Public AI Freeze," where the most powerful models (like the restricted Mythos 5) remain exclusive to enterprises and governments, while public offerings stagnate. The launch presents two report cards: one of technical excellence and another of user skepticism. Fable 5's ultimate reception may depend on Anthropic's ability to refine its safety filters and justify its cost for specialized, high-demand users.

marsbitHá 49m

"I Don't Need a Better Model Anymore": A Panorama of AI Users Under a Reddit Hot Post

marsbitHá 49m

When AI Traffic Surpasses Humans, How Do You Prove You're Human?

With AI-generated web traffic surpassing human activity, websites face a crisis as AI agents bypass ads, avoid clicks, and scrape data without generating revenue. This disrupts the ad-based internet economy, diverting traffic and reducing site visits. In response, sites are blocking AI crawlers and deploying traps like Cloudflare's "honeypot" pages. Traditional CAPTCHAs are now ineffective against advanced AI. The focus has shifted to behavioral biometrics—analyzing unique human patterns such as cursor movement, typing rhythm, and keystroke dynamics. Companies like IBM and BioCatch use this data to distinguish humans from bots, even detecting fraud through behavioral inconsistencies. Two competing approaches aim to verify human identity centrally. Sam Altman’s World (formerly Worldcoin) uses iris scanning to create unique credentials, though it faces privacy concerns and regulatory bans. Alternatively, cryptographic zero-knowledge proofs offer anonymous verification without revealing personal data, championed by Vitalik Buterin to avoid centralized surveillance. However, both systems have flaws. Centralized solutions risk biometric data misuse, while decentralized models may be exploited through identity rental markets in economically unequal regions. Despite challenges, the author favors cryptographic methods for preserving privacy over pervasive behavioral monitoring that permanently captures and controls personal biometric data.

marsbitHá 58m

When AI Traffic Surpasses Humans, How Do You Prove You're Human?

marsbitHá 58m

2026 Landscape of Decentralized AI: Why is Blockchain the Inevitable "Antidote" for AI?

**The 2026 Landscape of Decentralized AI: Why Blockchain is the "Cure" AI Cannot Ignore** Decentralized AI addresses fundamental bottlenecks of centralized AI: scarce and expensive computational resources, excessive control concentration, unverifiable model outputs, and increasing difficulty in acquiring training data due to privacy and regulation. Blockchain offers a path to make intelligence open, verifiable, and economically accessible. The technical stack comprises three layers: 1. **Applications & Services**: The main crypto use cases are "Agentic Finance" (converting natural language into on-chain actions) and "Agentic Payments" for machine-to-machine commerce. Projects like Giza, Infinity Labs, Coinvest AI, and x402 (handling 173M+ transactions) are key players. 2. **Middleware**: This coordination layer enables agents to discover, identify, and transact. Notable projects include Gokite AI (specialized L1), Virtuals (an OS for the agent economy), and especially Bittensor—a network of specialized subnets forming competitive AI micro-economies. 3. **Infrastructure**: The capital-intensive layer providing raw resources. It includes decentralized compute (Akash, Render, Aethir), verifiable inference (Venice AI, OpenGradient), distributed training (Prime Intellect, Templar AI), decentralized storage (Filecoin, Walrus), and privacy/verification layers (Nillion, Arcium, Phala Network) using technologies like ZKPs, MPC, and TEEs. The outlook for 2026-2027 indicates AI demand outpacing infrastructure, with AI agents as a primary growth engine. Computation is becoming an asset class, with on-chain markets as its financial layer. Tokenomics is emerging as a structural advantage for coordinating capital, compute, and data in decentralized AI networks. While still early—with adoption uneven and revenue often trailing token incentives—projects like Bittensor, NEAR, and Virtuals demonstrate a shift from speculative narrative to a new model for coordinating intelligence.

marsbitHá 1h

2026 Landscape of Decentralized AI: Why is Blockchain the Inevitable "Antidote" for AI?

marsbitHá 1h

a16z Crypto Partner: Cash Flow is the Moat

Cash Flow as the Moat: A Playbook for Crypto Founders Historically, the most enduring businesses have been built by positioning themselves within the "flow of funds"—facilitating the creation and transfer of value in a network and extracting a portion of it. Cryptocurrency is the first modern technology natively built for this purpose. For startups, failing to architect products and businesses to leverage these principles means missing a major opportunity. Blockchains are inherently network businesses. Each transaction settles on a shared ledger, and every new participant strengthens the underlying network for all. Well-designed network tokens amplify this by aligning users, developers, and validators around growing the network, with value flowing back to contributors in a transparent feedback loop. This model is not new; companies from railroads and Standard Oil to Google, Meta, and AWS have thrived by inserting themselves into critical flows of value (goods, attention, compute). Financial markets make it even clearer: firms like Visa and major market makers generate immense revenue not by predicting markets but by being in the path of transactions. The combination of fund flow and network effects creates one of the most durable business structures. The high margins in traditional finance (payments, custody, lending, FX) represent prime targets. Crypto founders have the opportunity to build the next version—programmable, instant, global, and natively in the flow of funds. The frontier extends beyond finance to areas like computing/GPUs, AI training data, energy, robotics, and space—markets without entrenched intermediaries, ripe for building new, efficient value rails on programmable infrastructure. Founders should ask: Are you in the flow of funds today? Does your revenue scale 10x with the value of activity on your platform? Where in your target market are profit margins highest relative to value created? The opportunity is clear: embed your startup into the new flows of value and let the network effects accumulate.

marsbitHá 1h

a16z Crypto Partner: Cash Flow is the Moat

marsbitHá 1h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片