What Wall Street Really Wants After the Crypto Story Recedes

marsbitPublicado em 2026-06-17Última atualização em 2026-06-17

Resumo

The tide of speculative crypto narratives has receded, revealing Wall Street's true objective: building a controlled, yield-generating, and compliant financial pipeline on distributed ledgers. They are migrating core functions onto blockchains, not for decentralization, but for efficiency and new revenue streams. Key developments include BlackRock's BUIDL fund, a tokenized treasury fund acting as a foundational reserve asset, and the rise of Securitize, which is going public and partnering with the NYSE to build a 24/7 digital securities trading and settlement system. This signals a major shift of securities clearing to blockchain technology. To make volatile assets like Bitcoin palatable for institutional investors, firms like BlackRock and Goldman Sachs are creating "covered call" ETFs (e.g., BITA). These products systematically sell options on Bitcoin holdings, transforming price volatility into stable monthly income, effectively repackaging crypto as a yield-bearing asset. Stablecoins are being positioned not as speculative tools but as efficient payment rails. Companies like Stripe and Mastercard are integrating them for instant, low-cost merchant settlements and cross-border card payments, respectively. Critically, new legislation like the GENIUS Act shapes them as non-interest-bearing, heavily regulated extensions of the US dollar system. In summary, Wall Street is quietly constructing a parallel, blockchain-based financial infrastructure featuring tokenized tradit...

Author: Vernacular Blockchain

In the fall of 2008, on the weekend when Lehman Brothers collapsed, Wall Street traders were packing boxes in their offices. Months later, a person using the pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto inscribed the genesis block into the Bitcoin network, attaching a taunt: "The Chancellor is on the brink of a second bailout for banks."

That was a declaration of war on Wall Street. Seventeen years later, the tide has turned.

Most of those who declared war have dispersed, while Wall Street has instead walked the path they paved into the on-chain world. However, this time, they bring not speculative narratives, but treasury bonds, option contracts, and banking settlement systems.

Between 2025 and 2026, the global scale of tokenized assets surged over 220%. The BUIDL fund managed by BlackRock has stabilized its assets under management between $25 billion and $28 billion, becoming the anchor of the on-chain short-term U.S. Treasury market. Securitize is about to list on the NYSE with a valuation of $1.25 billion, while the NYSE itself has signed a memorandum of understanding to build a 24/7 stock clearing system on-chain.

Wall Street no longer wants the "decentralization" story. What they want is a set of compliant financial pipelines they can control, that generate yield, but this time, these pipelines are built on distributed ledgers.

01 Moving Treasury Bonds On-Chain: BlackRock and Securitize's Tokenization Empire

The design of the BUIDL fund is purely in the taste of traditional buy-side institutions.

Minimum investment of $5 million, open only to "Accredited Investors" as defined by U.S. law. Underlying assets are 100% allocated to cash, short-term U.S. Treasuries, and overnight reverse repurchase agreements, with Bank of New York Mellon as the custodian. No exposure to crypto assets whatsoever, as clean as a money market fund.

But it runs on-chain. Through Securitize's transfer agent infrastructure, BUIDL achieves daily dividend auto-reinvestment and 24/7 instant transfers. This has quickly made it the safest underlying reserve asset in the eyes of large on-chain protocols, derivatives clearinghouses, and synthetic dollar issuers.

More noteworthy is Securitize's own path to capitalization. In June 2026, the SEC announced that its merger registration statement with a SPAC affiliated with Cantor Fitzgerald had become effective. The pre-merger valuation was $1.25 billion, accompanied by $225 million in PIPE financing. The new company will list on the NYSE under the name "Securitize Corp." with the ticker symbol SECZ.

Simultaneously, the NYSE signed an MOU with Securitize in March, designating the latter as the first official transfer agent for its planned digital trading platform. This platform has grand ambitions: using the NYSE's existing matching engine plus a private blockchain to enable 24/7 trading, on-chain instant settlement, and stablecoin funding channels for U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs.

Nasdaq, across the street, has taken another path, choosing to overlay a tokenized trading layer on top of the traditional clearing system. The NYSE is building a brand-new on-chain trading and transfer system from scratch.

The technical routes of the two exchanges are diverging. This in itself speaks to one thing: Wall Street's core securities clearing function is migrating towards distributed ledger technology.

Meanwhile, the synthetic dollar protocol Ethena invested $250 million in the STAC fund issued by Securitize. This fund invests in AAA-rated collateralized loan obligations, deployed on the Solana chain.

Ethena's reason for doing this is straightforward: Its synthetic dollar USDe previously heavily relied on crypto derivatives arbitrage to maintain its peg. Once the market cooled and funding rates turned negative, yields would dry up. Now, floating rates from the traditional credit market provide its safety net.

The global CLO market exceeds $1.3 trillion. This capital is flowing into the reservoir of on-chain finance through the programmability of public chains.

02 Making Money Even if Bitcoin Doesn't Rise: BITA's Covered Call Magic

Bitcoin pays no interest and is highly volatile, which has kept pension funds and sovereign wealth funds away. Wall Street's solution: turn volatility itself into yield.

BlackRock's iShares Bitcoin Premium Income ETF (ticker BITA) is expected to list around June 19, 2026. Its mechanism is not complex but quite ingenious.

The fund holds physical Bitcoin and BlackRock's own IBIT spot ETF as its underlying positions. IBIT has over $50 billion in assets under management, with excellent secondary market liquidity. On this foundation, the fund manager systematically sells short-term call options on IBIT, collects premiums, and after deducting the 0.65% management fee, distributes the proceeds to investors monthly in the form of cash dividends.

In essence, it trades the potential for Bitcoin's explosive growth for stable monthly income.

If Bitcoin trades sideways or dips slightly, BITA's performance will far exceed simply holding the spot asset, as the option premiums provide downside cushion and stable income. However, if Bitcoin surges sharply in the short term, exceeding the option strike price, the excess gains go entirely to the option buyer, and BITA holders only receive the capped return.

This resembles the fixed annuity products traditional financial advisors sell to retirees. Wall Street has stripped away Bitcoin's chaotic volatility and repackaged it into a standardized, income-generating asset that pays interest monthly.

Existing similar products like BTCI and YBTC offer coupon dividend rates as high as 27% to 41%, but suffer from shallow liquidity and significant basis risk, with their principal severely eroded during the past year's bull market. BlackRock's advantage lies in the $50 billion liquidity pool of its IBIT underlying asset, something other issuers simply cannot match.

Goldman Sachs isn't sitting idle either, planning to launch its own Premium Income product in early July. The fact that established investment banks are now in direct competition on the same track indicates this is no longer a pilot but a consensus direction.

03 Stablecoins Aren't Trading Tools, They're Cash Registers

Credit card payment experiences are smooth, but for a cross-border transaction from swipe to the merchant actually receiving funds, it often takes several days. The process passes through correspondent banks, clearing agents, and settlement cycles layer by layer, with fees being siphoned off at each step.

Stablecoins are changing this.

Stripe now accepts merchants in over 70 countries globally to receive payments directly via stablecoins. Consumers pay by scanning a wallet QR code, Stripe confirms instantly on Solana, Ethereum, or Polygon, and the backend handles forex and compliance checks through Bridge.xyz, which it acquired for $1.1 billion. Merchants can choose to receive USD or keep USDC. The entire process requires almost zero development cost for the merchant.

Mastercard has gone even further. The upgraded settlement architecture launched in June 2026 supports financial institutions using compliant stablecoins like USDC, PYUSD, RLUSD, etc., to execute card clearing intraday, on weekends, and on holidays across multiple mainstream public chains. Banks no longer have to wait for weekdays to settle.

Even SWIFT can't sit still anymore. The giant controlling global cross-border payment messaging released a roadmap for its Minimum Viable Product of a distributed "Shared Ledger" in March 2026, aiming to allow global commercial banks to directly manage tokenized deposits via a consortium blockchain, enabling 24/7 cross-border clearing.

This isn't about eliminating correspondent banks, but about solving a real pain point: To prevent settlement failures due to time zones and holidays, small and medium-sized banks globally have long frozen over $10 trillion in reserves at large correspondent banks.

The key enabler for all this happening is legislation. The GENIUS Act, signed into law in 2025, excludes compliant stablecoins from the definitions of securities and commodities, while making two key designs.

First, it prohibits stablecoins from distributing dividends to holders, firmly restricting them to the category of "pure payment instruments" to prevent the siphoning of bank deposits. Second, it mandates stablecoin issuers be brought under anti-money laundering regulatory systems, making dollar stablecoins an extension tool for the U.S. to expand the effectiveness of global financial sanctions.

No dividends, strong regulation, programmable. This is the stablecoin Wall Street wants.

04 Summary

Wall Street hasn't slowed down. They've just changed their path.

No more coin speculation, no more grand narratives of decentralization. On-chain, they are replicating an entire set of things they are familiar with: treasury bond funds, covered call options, card clearing networks, compliant transfer systems. Each product comes with hard yield, each pipeline is embedded with U.S. sovereign credit.

Blockchain fundamentalists once dreamed of replacing Wall Street with code. In the end, Wall Street learned to write code.

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the core shift in Wall Street's approach to blockchain technology, as described in the article?

AThe core shift is that Wall Street is no longer pursuing speculative 'decentralization' narratives or crypto trading. Instead, they are focusing on building a compliant, yield-generating financial infrastructure on distributed ledgers that they can control, such as tokenized treasury funds, covered call strategies, and new payment/clearing systems.

QExplain the purpose and significance of BlackRock's BUIDL fund in the context of tokenized assets.

ABlackRock's BUIDL fund is a tokenized short-term U.S. Treasury fund that serves as a foundational reserve asset in the on-chain world. Its significance lies in bringing traditional, highly secure financial assets (cash, treasuries, repos) onto the blockchain with features like daily dividend reinvestment and 24/7 instant transfers, attracting large protocols and institutions seeking safe, regulated on-chain yield.

QHow does the iShares Bitcoin Premium Income ETF (BITA) transform Bitcoin into a product appealing to traditional investors?

AThe BITA ETF transforms Bitcoin by systematically selling covered call options against its Bitcoin holdings. This strategy converts Bitcoin's price volatility into stable monthly cash income for investors, effectively repackaging it as a standardized, income-generating asset. It appeals to traditional investors by offering downside buffering and predictable yields, similar to fixed-income products, while capping exposure to extreme upside price movements.

QAccording to the article, what key regulatory design under the GENIUS Act shapes the role of stablecoins in finance?

AThe GENIUS Act shapes the role of stablecoins by: 1) Prohibiting them from distributing dividends to holders, firmly defining them as 'pure payment tools' to prevent bank deposit drainage. 2) Mandating that issuers comply with anti-money laundering regulations, making USD stablecoins an extension tool for U.S. global financial sanctions. This creates a framework for stablecoins that are non-interest-bearing, heavily regulated, and programmable.

QWhat fundamental challenge in the traditional financial system are institutions like SWIFT and Mastercard aiming to address with their new blockchain initiatives?

AThey aim to address the inefficiency and cost of cross-border and interbank settlement. A key pain point is the trillions of dollars in reserves that smaller banks are forced to park at larger correspondent banks to guard against settlement failures due to time zones and holidays. Their blockchain initiatives (like SWIFT's shared ledger and Mastercard's upgraded settlement) seek to enable 24/7, near-instant, and direct settlement, thereby freeing up this trapped capital and reducing intermediary fees.

Leituras Relacionadas

Has the Crypto Market Bottomed? Here's What Institutions Think

The crypto market is in a period of significant debate, with leading institutions offering differing views on whether a bottom has been reached. Three prominent firms have published detailed analyses: * **Galaxy Digital** argues Bitcoin has **not yet bottomed**. Their analysis of 13 historical indicators across six dimensions (valuation, profit-taking, miner pressure, etc.) shows only four are fully met. They project a potential bottom range between $30k and $54k. * **NYDIG** states a bottom is **possible but not likely**. While metrics are close to historic bear market extremes, they note the absence of a classic panic-selling event. They also suggest increased institutional adoption may have structurally altered the market cycle, potentially leading to a shallower downturn. * **Standard Chartered Bank** asserts the **bottom has already occurred** at around $59k. They cite two key factors: potential US-Iran diplomatic progress and the anticipated SpaceX IPO, which they believe absorbed capital and caused ETF selling pressure that is now subsiding. They forecast a year-end price target of $100k. Despite the surface-level disagreement, the reports share critical common ground more valuable for long-term investors: 1. All three believe the market bottom will form **within this year**. 2. All agree the current price is **closer to the bottom than to previous highs**. 3. All maintain a **bullish long-term outlook** for Bitcoin and a new cycle. The core takeaway is that while the exact bottom price ($40k, $50k, or $60k) is debated, the consensus is that a bottom is imminent. For long-term holders, the primary focus should not be pinpointing the absolute low, but on the future potential for prices to reach $100k, $200k, or higher. The fundamental thesis for Bitcoin—sovereign debt accumulation, inflation, declining trust in centralized institutions, global digitization, and improved accessibility—remains intact and is arguably strengthening. The overall landscape is viewed as more favorable than in previous crypto winters.

marsbitHá 7m

Has the Crypto Market Bottomed? Here's What Institutions Think

marsbitHá 7m

The 'Chip' Challenge and Breakthroughs in China's Optical Industry Chain

China's Photonics Industry: Bottlenecks and Breakthroughs In the global AI race, computing chips dominate the narrative, but the underlying bottleneck increasingly defining the scale of AI clusters is light—or more specifically, optical connectivity. Optical modules, which translate electrical signals to light and vice versa, are crucial for connecting thousands of GPUs in AI data centers, preventing data congestion and ensuring efficient model training. High-speed modules (800G, 1.6T) are now standard, with performance hinging on advanced DSP (Digital Signal Processor) chips. This is where a critical dependency lies. Two US giants—Marvell and Broadcom—collectively dominate over 90% of the high-end DSP chip market. Chinese optical module leaders like Zhongji Innolight and Eoptolink rely on these chips to manufacture modules for overseas AI customers, primarily in North America. While this creates a supply chain vulnerability, complete decoupling is difficult. Marvell derives over half its revenue from Greater China, and the US firms depend on Chinese partners for chip packaging and optical components. The risk from laser chips (e.g., from Lumentum), another key component, is considered more manageable due to multiple global suppliers and faster progress in domestic alternatives from companies like YOFC and Accelink. To mitigate risks, China's industry is pursuing a multi-pronged strategy: diversifying supply chains and locking in long-term orders; fostering a domestic market ecosystem to adopt homegrown DSPs from firms like Huawei HiSilicon and CETC; accelerating R&D in high-speed DSPs and advanced packaging; and investing in next-gen technologies like silicon photonics and Co-Packaged Optics (CPO) to reduce reliance on discrete DSPs. The ultimate solution lies not in short-term博弈 but in persistent advancement of domestic high-end chip R&D and manufacturing. While challenges remain in performance, certification, and ecosystem building, China's vast domestic market and manufacturing base provide a crucial buffer, buying time for the industry to achieve greater technological independence.

marsbitHá 21m

The 'Chip' Challenge and Breakthroughs in China's Optical Industry Chain

marsbitHá 21m

Behind SpaceX's $2 Trillion Market Cap: Why Does Musk Always Have the Next Move Planned?

On June 12th, SpaceX debuted on the Nasdaq, reaching a valuation that briefly touched $2 trillion. This marked the culmination of a 24-year journey from its founding in 2002, driven by Elon Musk's frustration at the high cost of buying rockets. The company's path was defined by early failures, with its first three Falcon 1 launches ending in explosions before a successful 2008 flight opened the era of commercial spaceflight. Key to its model was a fixed-price NASA contract, incentivizing cost reduction. SpaceX mastered rocket reusability, first achieving a Falcon 9 landing in 2015, which drastically cut launch costs. This enabled its profitable Starlink satellite internet constellation, envisioned years before reusability was proven, to create an internal market for frequent launches. Similarly, the next-generation Starship rocket was in development long before its first flight, with its business case evolving from Mars colonization to supporting the emerging concept of in-orbit data centers for AI—a story now central to its valuation. The company's recent IPO, a reversal of its long-standing "no IPO" stance, is funding this ambitious "space-based compute" vision. While major tech players like Google, Blue Origin, and others are investing heavily, significant technical and cost hurdles remain. Ultimately, SpaceX's history is one of creating its own demand: first with Starlink and now with space-based AI compute, betting that its next rocket will enable its next giant market.

marsbitHá 23m

Behind SpaceX's $2 Trillion Market Cap: Why Does Musk Always Have the Next Move Planned?

marsbitHá 23m

When Crypto Meets the World Cup: CoinW and Modrić's Art of "Navigating Cycles"

When Encryption Meets the World Cup: CoinW and Modrić's "Transcending Cycles" Philosophy In the context of the 2026 FIFA World Cup and its massive global audience, the crypto exchange CoinW announced football legend Luka Modrić as its global brand ambassador. This move is framed not merely as a marketing tactic, but as a strategic experiment in user profile migration. It targets mature, financially stable football fans—particularly in Europe, Southeast Asia, and Latin America—who traditionally have low crypto awareness but value trusted, time-tested authority figures like Modrić. The article draws parallels between Modrić's enduring, disciplined career—marked by consistency and success at the highest level over two decades—and CoinW's own development path. Founded in 2017 during a volatile industry period, CoinW focused on building robust infrastructure and risk management. It weathered the 2022 industry crisis without major security incidents, subsequently earning recognition like "Europe's Most Trusted Exchange" and growing to over 20 million registered users. This "long-termism" is translated into user-centric products. CoinW Academy lowers the initial knowledge barrier. Its integrated ecosystem (CoinW, GemW, DeriW, PropW) and the recent launch of a TradFi section—offering perpetual contracts on traditional assets like stocks, gold, and oil—aim to create a unified platform for diverse assets. For the World Cup, CoinW launched the "We Are The Game" campaign, collaborating with Alchemy Pay to offer zero-fee deposits and local payment options, aiming to transform spectators into participants and lower entry barriers. Ultimately, CoinW's sports partnerships and product strategy are presented as a concerted effort to build trust and accessibility for the "silent majority" still outside crypto—shifting the industry narrative toward inclusivity and long-term value.

Foresight NewsHá 29m

When Crypto Meets the World Cup: CoinW and Modrić's Art of "Navigating Cycles"

Foresight NewsHá 29m

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片