Liquidity Improvement Upgraded Again: Bonds, Gold, and Bitcoin Rise Simultaneously. Why Do Tech Stocks Continue to Fall?

marsbitPublicado em 2026-08-25Última atualização em 2026-08-25

Resumo

On August 25th, US financial markets exhibited an unusual pattern: US Treasury bonds, gold, and Bitcoin rose simultaneously, the dollar remained strong, crude oil prices declined, and tech stocks continued to fall. The core drivers were two policy signals from US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent. First, reports suggested the Treasury might use cash from its General Account (TGA) at the Fed to fund an expansion of long-term bond buybacks. Second, the US policy focus on Iran appeared to shift toward economic sanctions rather than further military escalation. These developments collectively lowered long-term Treasury yields and oil prices, while supporting gold and crypto assets. However, US equities did not broadly rally, with AI and semiconductor stocks continuing to weigh on the Nasdaq. The potential use of TGA cash, estimated at $80-$200 billion, was seen as a stronger tool to stabilize the long-end of the bond market by improving liquidity and altering the supply structure of tradable bonds. This led to a flatter yield curve. However, analysts from Goldman Sachs and others argue such buybacks may not address the fundamental pressures on long-term yields stemming from fiscal deficits, debt supply, sticky inflation, and term premiums. Regarding Iran, the US emphasis on "economic D-Day" sanctions against entities facilitating Iranian oil trade was interpreted as a de-escalation of immediate military risks, leading to a pullback in oil's geopolitical risk premium. However, r...

On August 25th, the U.S. stock market exhibited an uncommon combination: U.S. Treasuries, gold, and Bitcoin all rose simultaneously, the U.S. dollar remained strong, crude oil prices retreated, and technology stocks continued to face pressure.

The core variables driving the market came from two policy signals released by U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent. On one hand, market reports suggested the Treasury Department might utilize cash from the Treasury General Account (TGA) to fund expanded long-term Treasury bond repurchases; on the other hand, the U.S. policy focus on Iran temporarily shifted toward economic sanctions rather than further escalating military action.

Both pieces of news jointly pressured long-end U.S. Treasury yields and oil prices, while also providing support for gold and crypto assets. However, U.S. stocks did not strengthen across the board, with adjustments in the AI and semiconductor sectors continuing to weigh on the Nasdaq index.

TGA Becomes a New Variable in the Treasury Market

Previously, the U.S. Treasury Department had announced an expansion of repurchases for 10- to 30-year Treasury bonds. The market initially interpreted this as a "Operation Twist"-like maturity adjustment: the Treasury would increase the issuance of short-term Treasury bills while repurchasing long-term bonds to alter the debt maturity structure.

The latest development is that the Treasury may not need to rely on new short-term debt financing but could directly use cash held in the TGA at the Federal Reserve.

Morgan Stanley interest rate strategist Martin Tobias estimated that the Treasury might withdraw $80 billion to $200 billion from the TGA to fund expanded bond repurchases. Compared to the currently announced repurchase scale, this potential funding source is significantly larger, leading some traders to view it as a "stronger tool" for the Treasury to stabilize the long-bond market.

As a result, long-end Treasuries outperformed, and the yield curve flattened. Meanwhile, market pricing for 2026 rate hikes actually edged up slightly to about 27.4 basis points, indicating that the day's long-bond rally stemmed primarily from supply-demand and policy expectation changes, not a sudden shift toward broad-based easing trades.

It's important to note that using TGA funds for repurchases remains within the realm of media reports and market speculation at this stage and cannot be considered a confirmed Treasury arrangement. Even if implemented, such operations would primarily serve to improve liquidity and adjust the structure of market-tradable bonds, not equate to Federal Reserve quantitative easing.

Repurchases Can Stabilize Liquidity, But Struggle to Alleviate Long-End Rate Pressure

Wall Street remains clearly divided on whether repurchases can truly lower long-term interest rates.

Institutions like Goldman Sachs and Wells Fargo believe that expanding repurchases does not address the main drivers behind the recent rise in long-end yields. Goldman Sachs strategists George Cole and William Marshall pointed out that even a further expansion of repurchase scale may not be sufficient to significantly reset interest rate levels.

The recent pressure on long-end U.S. Treasuries is still driven by a combination of fiscal deficits, Treasury supply, sticky inflation, and term premium. While the Treasury can improve liquidity for some older bonds through repurchases and marginally optimize supply-demand dynamics, it cannot directly reduce government financing needs.

Strategists from Societe Generale, Deutsche Bank, and Scotiabank anticipate that as long-term yields continue to rise relative to short-term yields, the yield curve may steepen again. This also explains why Goldman Sachs's "stagflation stock basket" has continued to perform strongly recently: the market is simultaneously trading near-term policy support while still pricing in longer-term fiscal and inflation risks.

Therefore, TGA repurchase expectations act more like an added layer of liquidity protection for the long-bond market, rather than a complete reversal of the interest rate trend.

Iran Risk Temporarily Shifts to Economic War, Oil Prices Retreat on Risk Premium

The drop in oil prices stems from another policy clue.

Multiple reports indicate that oil tanker traffic is recovering in the Strait of Hormuz under U.S. protection. Axios, citing U.S. officials, reported that approximately 40 tankers, carrying about 16 million barrels of crude oil, navigated the southern channel and exited the Strait of Hormuz on Friday night. Kpler data showed that an additional 30 vessels passed through the strait over the weekend, with 83 vessels passing through the Bab al-Mandab Strait.

While Iran questioned the reported scale of this traffic, the crude oil market temporarily chose to believe the signals of resumed shipping.

The UK Maritime Trade Operations office subsequently reported an attack on a Saudi tanker in the Red Sea, causing a brief oil price rebound. However, oil prices retreated again after Bessent announced the U.S. would launch an "economic D-Day" against Iran, focusing on targeting third-party institutions purchasing and transporting Iranian oil.

The market interpreted this statement as indicating the U.S. currently prefers using secondary sanctions to squeeze Iran's oil revenue rather than directly expanding military action. Compared to further damaging energy infrastructure or blockading shipping lanes, economic sanctions pose a relatively limited immediate impact on global physical crude supply.

Nonetheless, this optimistic pricing remains fragile. Iran has historically evaded sanctions through shadow fleets and intermediary trading and has threatened retaliation against countries supporting the U.S. plan. If shipping lanes face renewed disruption, crude oil risk premiums could quickly rebound.

Crude Retreats, But Refined Product Inflation Pressure Not Yet Resolved

A drop in crude oil prices does not mean energy inflation risks have disappeared.

Shipping risks in the Strait of Hormuz and the Red Sea continue to affect refined product transport, while Ukrainian drone attacks limit Russian fuel supplies. Simultaneously, global refining capacity has become a new supply bottleneck, keeping prices for refined products like diesel relatively high compared to crude.

TotalEnergies management believes the outlook for crude oil prices is skewed bearish as crude cargoes gradually pass through the Strait of Hormuz; however, due to ongoing tight refined product supply, prices for products like diesel and gasoline may remain strong.

This suggests the transmission channel of energy inflation is changing: market concerns about crude shortages have eased somewhat, but refining and transportation bottlenecks may still affect corporate costs and consumer inflation through refined product prices.

Falling Rates Fail to Rescue Tech Stocks

Compared to the rise in bonds, gold, and Bitcoin, U.S. stock performance showed clear divergence.

Korean tech stocks weakened first, with Samsung's announced shareholder return plan—the largest in its history—still falling short of market expectations, subsequently transmitting pressure to U.S. semiconductor and AI sectors. Most major U.S. stock indices declined, with only the Dow Jones Industrial Average recording gains led by financial stocks; the Nasdaq index led the losses.

On a sector level, consumer staples and financials showed relative resilience, while technology and energy sectors both fell over 1%. Key AI trading sectors like optical communications and semiconductors generally weakened.

Nvidia has fallen for seven consecutive trading days, marking its longest losing streak since September 2022, with its credit default swap spread also rising to a record high. As Nvidia's earnings, the Jackson Hole central bank symposium, and U.S. policy news converge, funds are actively reducing risk exposure.

Notably, while index volatility rose alongside the broader market decline, individual stock volatility somewhat retreated. This divergence indicates investors are more concerned about systemic risks at the macro policy and sector levels rather than company-specific突发事件.

Overall, the market's main narrative for the day was not a simple risk-off or easing trade. Treasury repurchase expectations improved long-bond supply-demand dynamics, the de-escalation of Iran risk lowered oil prices, and gold and Bitcoin benefited from falling real interest rates and policy uncertainty. However, the failure of tech stocks to follow the rebound indicates that the AI trade is transitioning from a liquidity-driven phase into a concentrated verification period for earnings, valuations, and capital expenditure returns.

Perguntas relacionadas

QAccording to the article, what were the two key policy signals released by U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Besant that influenced the markets?

AFirst, the market indicated that the Treasury might use cash from the Treasury General Account (TGA) to fund an expansion of long-term Treasury buybacks. Second, the U.S. policy focus on Iran temporarily shifted towards economic sanctions rather than escalating military action.

QWhy did the prices of U.S. long-term bonds, gold, and Bitcoin rise simultaneously on August 25th, as described in the article?

AThe rise was driven by the combined effect of the two policy signals. The potential use of TGA cash for Treasury buybacks lowered long-term bond yields, providing support. The de-escalation of military risks with Iran, shifting focus to economic sanctions, lowered oil prices and provided a supportive environment for gold and crypto assets like Bitcoin, partly due to lower real interest rates and policy uncertainty.

QWhat is the market's view on the potential impact of expanding Treasury buybacks using TGA funds on long-term interest rates?

AThere is significant divergence on Wall Street. While the move is seen as improving liquidity and adjusting the structure of marketable bonds, many analysts (e.g., from Goldman Sachs, Wells Fargo) believe it does not address the root causes of rising long-term yields, such as fiscal deficits, Treasury supply, sticky inflation, and term premiums. It is viewed more as a liquidity safeguard rather than a trend reversal for rates.

QDespite the fall in crude oil prices, why does the article suggest that energy inflation pressure is not yet resolved?

AThe article points out that while crude oil supply concerns have eased, bottlenecks remain in refining capacity and the transportation of refined products. Risks to shipping routes (like the Red Sea) and attacks on refineries (e.g., in Russia) are keeping prices for refined products like diesel and gasoline high. Therefore, energy inflation may still be transmitted through higher costs for finished products.

QHow did the U.S. stock market, particularly tech stocks, perform on the day described, and what is the suggested reason for this performance divergence?

AThe U.S. stock market was mixed, with the Nasdaq Index falling notably while the Dow Jones Industrial Average rose slightly. Tech and energy sectors fell over 1%, with AI and semiconductor stocks leading the decline. The article suggests that tech stocks did not follow the bond/gold rally because the AI trade is moving from a liquidity-driven phase into a period of intense scrutiny of corporate earnings, valuations, and returns on capital expenditure.

Leituras Relacionadas

The End of Old Cryptography: How Ethereum is Preparing for the Era of Quantum Computing

Ethereum developers have proposed a new system for handling staking deposits, aiming to future-proof the network against the potential threat of quantum computers. Currently, Ethereum's security relies on elliptic curve cryptography, which could be broken by sufficiently powerful quantum machines capable of deriving private keys from public ones. While estimates of the timeline for this threat vary, with Google research in March 2026 suggesting it could be closer than previously thought, major blockchains are proactively preparing. The new proposal introduces a more flexible deposit contract capable of accepting keys of various types and lengths, identified by a scheme label. It also changes how deposit data is communicated within the network's layers. Crucially, the transition plan involves a three-phase process to ensure a controlled and predictable shift, initially disabling new deposits, then re-enabling the current format, and finally permanently switching to new post-quantum cryptography in a future update. The proposal is currently a draft with no set implementation date. It represents a strategic move to build infrastructure in advance, rather than a direct solution for existing accounts. Analysis notes that Ethereum is structurally vulnerable to a "store now, decrypt later" attack, as public keys revealed in past transactions remain permanently on-chain. This proposal prepares for a signature algorithm change but does not address the risk to keys already exposed.

cryptonews.ruHá 3m

The End of Old Cryptography: How Ethereum is Preparing for the Era of Quantum Computing

cryptonews.ruHá 3m

Meta Faces a $1.4 Trillion Penalty: Algorithmic Recommendation in the Dock. Will the Rules Change in the Second Half of the Internet Era?

A landmark federal trial in Oakland, California, has begun against Meta, with 29 states accusing the company of harming children and teens through its social media platform designs. The states seek a potential maximum penalty of $1.4 trillion, calculated from alleged repeated violations of consumer protection laws and the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) involving millions of underage users. The core legal strategy bypasses the traditional shield of Section 230 by targeting Meta's own platform features—like its recommendation algorithms, infinite scroll, and "like" buttons—rather than user-generated content. The plaintiffs argue these designs are addictive and deceptive. Meta denies the claims, calling the penalty "unprecedented" and disputing the methodology. While the astronomical $1.4 trillion figure is seen as a starting point for negotiations, even a significantly reduced penalty in the hundreds of billions could establish a critical precedent. The case focuses on holding platforms legally responsible for their algorithmic designs. A ruling against Meta could force product changes, such as removing "likes" or imposing usage limits, and provide a legal template for similar suits against other tech giants like TikTok and YouTube. The trial's outcome may redefine accountability for algorithm-driven business models across the internet.

marsbitHá 13m

Meta Faces a $1.4 Trillion Penalty: Algorithmic Recommendation in the Dock. Will the Rules Change in the Second Half of the Internet Era?

marsbitHá 13m

A Precedent for the Prediction Markets: CFTC Aims to Prove Authority Over Polymarket via Criminal Case

A U.S. Army soldier, Gannon Ken Van Dyke, who earned $400,000 using non-public information on the crypto event-prediction platform Polymarket, is contesting the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission's (CFTC) attempt to intervene in his criminal case. The CFTC, which initiated a separate civil suit against Van Dyke but has not pursued it to trial, seeks to submit arguments in the ongoing criminal proceeding. Van Dyke's lawyers filed a motion opposing this, arguing the CFTC is improperly trying to influence the criminal case as an outside expert rather than through its own lawsuit. They contend that event contracts traded on platforms like Polymarket are not swaps and thus fall outside the CFTC's jurisdiction, calling the regulator's tactics a procedural maneuver. Van Dyke faces criminal fraud charges for allegedly trading based on confidential information about potential regime change in Venezuela. His civil case with the CFTC is stayed pending the criminal trial, expected in late 2026 or early 2027. The court's decision on whether to allow the CFTC's intervention could set a precedent for how such event contracts are regulated. An AI analysis notes inconsistency in the CFTC's approach compared to a similar case involving a Google employee, raising questions about the legal strategy for the prediction market industry, which includes platforms like Kalshi. The outcome may define future regulatory standards for the entire market.

cryptonews.ruHá 17m

A Precedent for the Prediction Markets: CFTC Aims to Prove Authority Over Polymarket via Criminal Case

cryptonews.ruHá 17m

Trading

Spot
活动图片