Calm Before the Surge? Experts Declare Market Caution Amidst Active Whale Accumulation

cryptonews.ruPublicado em 2026-07-28Última atualização em 2026-07-28

Resumo

Analytical platforms Glassnode and Santiment have published reviews on the current state of the cryptocurrency market. Experts note cautious consolidation amidst positive on-chain signals, while institutional and derivatives market activity remains restrained. According to Glassnode, despite a pullback from near $66,700 to $64,000, Bitcoin continues to trade within an established range. The derivatives market shows a more cautious approach, with funding rates for long positions declining significantly, indicating reduced leverage usage. Regulated investment products have seen net outflows, and weekly trading volumes have decreased. Overall, the market is described as being in a calm transitional phase, supported by stable coin holding but constrained by cautious spot and derivatives activity. Meanwhile, Santiment data reveals that large market participants, or "whales," are actively accumulating Bitcoin, adding 19,696 BTC over eight days. In contrast, activity from the smallest retail wallets is decreasing. This shift of coins to stronger hands is viewed as a positive signal. Additional analysis from CryptoQuant's Maartunn indicates that 374,000 BTC have moved from short-term to long-term holders, statistically reducing the likelihood of near-term sales and decreasing Bitcoin's liquid supply on the market.

Analytical platforms Glassnode and Santiment have published reviews of the current state of the cryptocurrency market. Experts point to cautious consolidation with positive on-chain signals against a backdrop of restrained institutional and derivatives market activity.

Derivatives and ETFs Signal Caution

Glassnode noted that after a local high near $66,700, Bitcoin pulled back to $64,000 and then partially recovered. Despite this, the market structure remains unchanged — the price continues to move within the established range.

Analysts also drew attention to the derivatives market. Although open interest has increased somewhat, funding rates for long positions have decreased significantly, indicating traders' more cautious use of leverage.

Furthermore, regulated investment products have switched to net outflows, and weekly trading volumes have decreased. At the same time, according to Glassnode's estimates, aggregate institutional positions remain moderately profitable.

Glassnode pointed out that profitability indicators suggest sentiment stabilization. They stated that aggregate unrealized losses have decreased somewhat, and realized losses have also diminished, indicating a gradual easing of corrective selling pressure.

"Overall, the market remains in a calm transitional phase, supported by stable coin holding from investors, but restrained by cautious activity in the spot market, derivatives market, and among institutional participants," the experts summarized.

Whales Accumulate While Supply Shrinks

Meanwhile, Santiment data indicates that large market participants continue to accumulate Bitcoin. Over the past eight days, wallets holding from 10 $BTC to 10,000 $BTC have increased their reserves by 19,696 $BTC.

At the same time, the activity of the smallest retail investors is declining. Wallets with less than 0.01 $BTC are increasingly less likely to buy the price dip. Santiment believes this combination is a positive signal for the market, as coins are gradually transferring to stronger holders.

Additionally, CryptoQuant analyst Maartunn reported that 374,000 $BTC have transitioned from short-term holders to long-term holders. This means these coins are statistically less likely to be sold in the near future, which reduces Bitcoin's liquid supply on the market, he added.

Recall that earlier, Grayscale assessed the chances of Bitcoin's bear market ending.

end-content

Perguntas relacionadas

QAccording to Glassnode, what are the key characteristics of the current cryptocurrency market structure?

AAccording to Glassnode, the current market structure remains unchanged, with the price moving within a formed trading range. They also note cautious consolidation with positive on-chain signals, coupled with restrained activity from institutional and derivatives markets.

QWhat do recent data from derivatives and ETF markets indicate about trader sentiment?

ARecent data indicates a more cautious sentiment. Funding rates for long positions have dropped significantly, suggesting traders are using less leverage. Furthermore, regulated investment products have seen a net outflow of funds, and weekly trading volumes have declined.

QWhat do the Santiment data reveal about the behavior of Bitcoin 'whales' compared to small retail investors?

ASantiment data shows that Bitcoin 'whales' (wallets holding 10 to 10,000 BTC) have been accumulating, increasing their reserves by 19,696 BTC in eight days. In contrast, the smallest retail investors (wallets with

QWhy does the transfer of 374,000 BTC from short-term to long-term holders have a positive implication for the market, according to CryptoQuant's Maartunn?

AThe transfer of 374,000 BTC from short-term to long-term holders is positive because these coins are statistically less likely to be sold soon. This reduces the liquid supply of Bitcoin on the market, easing selling pressure.

QHow do the reports from Glassnode and Santiment characterize the overall market phase?

AThe reports characterize the overall market as a calm or quiet transitional phase. This phase is supported by stable coin holding from investors but is restrained by cautious activity across spot, derivatives, and institutional markets.

Leituras Relacionadas

Has the Crypto Utopia Collapsed? The Industry Reaches an Inflection Point After the Frenzy Subsides

Has the crypto utopia collapsed? The industry is at an inflection point as the hype fades. The prevailing view is that crypto has become an outlet for excess liquidity, with many participants leaving as financial returns have fallen short of past-decade expectations. The 2021 boom has been revealed as an illusion, placing the industry in the "trough of disillusionment" on Gartner's Hype Cycle. This forces a return to first principles: re-evaluating token value, securing DeFi protocols, and finding real-world applications. The core failure is a repetitive cycle of reflexive speculation, driven by the premature liquidity of tokens. The industry's incentives prioritized short-term gains over genuine innovation. While curiosity drives invention, recent DeFi hacks signal a need for engineering and iteration, including token models. The culture is shifting; the industry is no longer in its early stages. Positioned at a turning point on the technology adoption curve, crypto faces the immense challenge of rebuilding finance from scratch, a process of inevitable iteration and failure. Regarding crypto VC, claims of its death are overstated. The exceptional returns of 2016-2021 were an anomaly. The initial crypto-anarchist ethos has largely been co-opted by Wall Street and regulators. The utopian vision is over; the industry is being assimilated into the existing system, becoming a business. Current viable project categories include stablecoins, prediction markets, tokenized assets/RWA, perpetual contracts, and AI/agent integration. Crypto is converging with fintech, far from the envisioned DeFi revolution, and must find killer apps within regulatory boundaries. A reconciliation is possible: cryptocurrency may change value storage and transfer in subtle, imperceptible ways that integrate into existing systems, rather than through revolutionary fanfare. True creativity often emerges from adversity. There remains much to build for those driven by genuine curiosity.

marsbitHá 15m

Has the Crypto Utopia Collapsed? The Industry Reaches an Inflection Point After the Frenzy Subsides

marsbitHá 15m

Lei Jun Earns 7 Billion in One Day from CXMT's IPO? Xiaomi Executive Responds

On July 28th, Changxin Technology's stock price on the Sci-Tech Innovation Board experienced minor fluctuations. The company had made a historic market debut the previous day, becoming the first A-share stock to record a single-day trading volume exceeding 1 trillion yuan. This led to significant paper gains for its strategic investors. Among them, Xiaomi's wholly-owned subsidiary was allocated 18.24 million shares with an initial investment of approximately 158 million yuan. Reports estimated a paper profit of 717 million yuan for Xiaomi founder Lei Jun based on his shareholding structure. However, a Xiaomi executive clarified that this was a corporate investment and should not be conflated with personal wealth. Other major beneficiaries included Alibaba and Nio. Alibaba, an early investor, held nearly a 5% stake through two entities, with an estimated paper gain exceeding 160 billion yuan. Nio, participating in the strategic placement, also saw substantial paper returns. Additionally, state-owned banks and insurance institutions that invested in Changxin recorded potential gains in the hundreds of billions. Conversely, companies like Country Garden reportedly missed out on nearly 50 billion yuan in potential gains after divesting their stakes before the IPO due to liquidity pressures. The article notes that these are paper profits based on the listing price, as the allocated shares are subject to lock-up periods, and final realized gains will depend on future stock performance. An employee from Changxin Technology commented that ordinary staff remain focused on their salaries and benefits rather than the market hype.

marsbitHá 24m

Lei Jun Earns 7 Billion in One Day from CXMT's IPO? Xiaomi Executive Responds

marsbitHá 24m

Selling Tokens or Selling Outcomes: Several Paradoxes of the AI Business Model

"The Token vs. Outcome Sale: Key Paradoxes in the AI Business Model By mid-2026, the AI industry shows rapid growth in revenue and token usage, yet the underlying business models differ significantly. This article analyzes four structural paradoxes defining the current landscape, all pointing to the commoditization of intelligence and the concentration of profits in few segments. **The Cost Paradox: Cheaper Tokens, Heavier Bills** Despite a >95% price drop for equivalent AI capability since 2023, total spending has skyrocketed due to the Jevons Paradox: lower prices expand usage into previously uneconomical tasks. Furthermore, the shift to autonomous agents operating 24/7 multiplies consumption. However, efficiency gains often remain unrealized due to unchanged organizational workflows (the Solow Paradox). The focus is shifting from optimizing token price to optimizing the task itself. **The Hierarchy Paradox: The App is King vs. The App is Dead** While conventional wisdom holds that value accrues at the application layer, the AI stack is inverted. Infrastructure (chips) captures ~70% of industry revenue and ~80% of gross profit, while application-layer margins are thin (0-30%). Fast-evolving base models threaten "thin" apps. Sustainable applications are those that embed intelligence into specific contexts, possessing private data, workflows, or delivery capabilities that become more valuable as the base model improves. **The Responsibility Paradox: Profit Follows Accountability** Growth rates alone don't guarantee profit. A key differentiator is a company's willingness and ability to take responsibility for specific outcomes. Selling by the token competes for IT budgets; selling by the outcome (e.g., a resolved support ticket) taps into larger human labor budgets. Low-responsibility, high-volume tasks (e.g., generic客服) face commoditization. High-stakes, regulated domains (e.g., law, healthcare) where vendors assume heavier liability for results command higher margins, as seen with companies like Harvey in legal tech. **The Open-Source Paradox: Open Wins Traffic, Closed Wins Revenue** Open-source models dominate in usage share and developer adoption, often being 5-20x cheaper. However, closed-source models still capture the majority of enterprise spending (~89%). Enterprises pay a premium for closed-source reliability, support, compliance, and accountability. The total cost of ownership (TCO) is converging as closed-source prices fall faster than open-source builds trust, leading to hybrid deployments. Profit is migrating from the model layer itself to upstream (compute) and downstream (orchestration, data, services)."

marsbitHá 25m

Selling Tokens or Selling Outcomes: Several Paradoxes of the AI Business Model

marsbitHá 25m

Trading

Spot
活动图片