Amidst Ongoing Crisis, Ukraine Launches NFT Museum War

CoingapePublicado em 2022-03-27Última atualização em 2022-03-27

Resumo

Ukraine’s NFT collection is to go on sale in about 3 days.

Ukraine continues to leverage blockchain technology to support its course in the conflict with Russia. Today, the Ukrainian government has launched an NFT War Museum to raise more funds for its war efforts.

Ukraine’s NFT collection is to go on sale in about 3 days

Mykhailo Fedorov, Ukraine’s minister for digital transformation, asserted that the initiative is intended to keep the memory of the war and celebrate Ukrainian identity.

While Russia uses tanks to destroy Ukraine, we rely on revolutionary blockchain tech. Meta History UA NFT-Museum is launched. The place to keep the memory of war. And the place to celebrate the Ukrainian identity and freedom, Federov said via a tweet.

The project, named Meta History, is essentially a blockchain-based chronicle of the Russian invasion of Ukraine. The collection will feature digital art pieces created by Ukrainian artists since the war began. Each art piece will also carry stories from trusted news sources.

The first drop from the project could come as soon as Tuesday according to a countdown on the web interface of the project. Reports also indicate that each NFT piece would have a price tag of 0.15 ETH (about $466 by the current market price of ETH). Proceeds from the sale will go directly to the ministry of digital transformation.

Crypto has been playing a beneficial role for the war-torn country. Since the Russian invasion began in February, donations in crypto have been pouring in to support the country’s military and citizens. Per data from SlowMist’s dashboard, the total donations to Ukraine stand at $96,523,983.3. Around $63 million of this amount was sent directly to the Ukrainian government’s official wallet.

Deputy minister of digital transformation, Alex Bornyakov, revealed that the donations have been extremely helpful in funding the military.

Crypto assets proved extremely helpful in facilitation of funding flows to the Amed Forces of Ukraine. Huge thanks to everyone who donated to the Crypto Fund of Ukraine.

Each and every helmet and vest bought via crypto donations is currently saving Ukrainian soilders' lives. pic.twitter.com/CghDmXEcJG

— Alex Bornyakov (@abornyakov) March 11, 2022

Ukraine’s president, Volodymyr Zelensky, has also signed a bill to give cryptocurrencies legal status recently.

Is the war accelerating crypto adoption?

Many market commentators have opined that the Russia Ukraine crisis will have the effect of fast-tracking the adoption of cryptocurrencies. The latest to comment was Larry Fink, the CEO of BlackRock, who said that the war was going to make countries re-examine their dependence on traditional payments infrastructure.

Meanwhile, the crypto market has seemingly shrugged off concerns over the war and has been surging. The crypto market capitalization has again crossed $2 trillion. Bitcoin, the market-leading cryptocurrency, is up 25% in the last month and is currently trading at around $44,300.

Leituras Relacionadas

Who Funds the Agents?

**Summary: Who Funds AI Agents?** OpenAI recently shut down a feature allowing AI agents to shop for users, highlighting the challenge of creating a secure and regulated environment for agent-driven transactions. While payment infrastructure exists, a crucial governance layer—defining spending limits, fraud detection, tax handling, and return policies—is largely missing. The potential is enormous: AI agents already processed $73M across 176M transactions last year, with McKinsey forecasting this could grow to $3-5T in global consumer commerce by 2030. The core competition isn't just about processing payments, which can be very cheap (especially with crypto-based settlement), but about controlling the rules that govern agent spending. Key players like Stripe and Coinbase are racing to dominate this governance layer. Stripe's acquisition of wallet provider Privy allows it to set spending policies, identity checks, and human-in-the-loop approvals directly at the wallet level. Similarly, Coinbase's stack, including its x402 protocol and AgentKit, embeds governance rules. This vertical integration across settlement, wallet, and governance layers is becoming the dominant strategy. Control over the governance layer is where significant future value lies. If agents handle trillions in transactions, even a small fee for managing compliance, fraud prevention, and policy enforcement could generate billions in annual revenue. The companies that successfully integrate across the payment stack will capture value from idle agent balances, transaction fees, and governance services, positioning themselves as the foundational banks of the AI agent economy.

marsbitHá 25m

Who Funds the Agents?

marsbitHá 25m

A Nation Blocks Chips, a Giant Buys a Nuclear Power Plant: Why It's Time to Seriously Consider DeAI

**Title: Great Powers Blockade Chips, Giants Buy Nuclear Plants: Why It's Time to Seriously Consider DeAI** In May 2026, the US closed loopholes for Chinese firms to acquire advanced NVIDIA chips via overseas subsidiaries. That same month, Kenya halted a $1B geothermal data center project involving Microsoft, fearing its immense energy consumption. Meanwhile, Huawei announced mass production of its Ascend AI chip. These disparate events underscore a new reality: the competition for computing power ("compute") has escalated beyond the tech industry, becoming a geopolitical and infrastructural battleground. A new era of oligopoly is forming, with control over the AI stack—from GPU chips (NVIDIA) and cloud platforms (AWS, Azure, Google Cloud) to foundational models (OpenAI, Anthropic)—concentrating in a few Western "AI Octopus" corporations. This centralization creates systemic risks: pricing power and platform lock-in for users, infrastructure fragility, and a widening "compute divide" that threatens to marginalize nations without independent AI capacity. An "AI Iron Curtain" is deepening through export controls. In response, some nations like Saudi Arabia and the UAE are investing heavily to buy compute power, aiming to transition from oil to AI economies. The EU seeks to triple its compute capacity by 2030 to reduce dependency. However, the spending gap is vast, with four US tech giants alone planning ~$750B in AI capex for 2026. The race is increasingly constrained by energy, with AI tasks consuming up to 1000x more power than web searches, pushing firms to even acquire nuclear plants. This landscape is fueling interest in Decentralized AI (DeAI). It proposes a third way: using open protocols to coordinate a global network of idle GPUs, independent developers, and data centers, creating an AI infrastructure without a single controlling entity. Leveraging blockchain and cryptographic verification, DeAI aims to break market concentration, disperse energy demands, reduce geopolitical dependencies, and enhance transparency. While still nascent in performance and stability, DeAI's core promise is not immediate superiority but providing a crucial alternative architecture to resist monopoly, censorship, and centralized power. As specialized AI hardware costs fall and open-source models flourish, the window to build this foundation is open. The very existence of such competition serves as a vital check against the inevitable abuse of concentrated power.

marsbitHá 1h

A Nation Blocks Chips, a Giant Buys a Nuclear Power Plant: Why It's Time to Seriously Consider DeAI

marsbitHá 1h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片