Altcoin volume dominance at highest since Jan 2021, trouble for Bitcoin?

newsbtcPublicado em 2023-01-12Última atualização em 2023-01-12

Resumo

On-chain data shows that altcoin volume dominance is now at the highest level since January 2021, while Bitcoin's is at its lowest. Altcoin Dominance By Volume Recently Touched A High...

On-chain data shows that altcoin volume dominance is now at the highest level since January 2021, while Bitcoin’s is at its lowest.
""

Altcoin Dominance By Volume Recently Touched A High Of 64%
""

As pointed out by an analyst in a CryptoQuant post, Bitcoin’s dominance is just at 16% now. The “dominance by volume” is an indicator that measures the percentage of the total crypto market trading volume that’s being contributed by a specific coin.

When the value of this metric goes up for any crypto, it means that particular crypto is observing a higher amount of activity relative to the rest of the market currently. This suggests that the coin is garnering more interest from investors right now. On the other hand, low values can imply that the crypto is losing mindshare at the moment as its volume percentage is going down.
""

Now, here is a chart that shows the trend in the dominance by volume for the entire altcoin sector combined (minus Ethereum), as well as for Bitcoin, over the past couple of years:

The two metrics seem to have gone opposite ways in recent days | Source: CryptoQuant

As shown in the above graph, Bitcoin’s dominance by volume has sharply decreased recently and has touched a value of just 16%. This is the lowest value BTC has observed during the last couple of years.
""

The altcoins (other than Ethereum), on the contrary, have observed their dominance shoot up in the last week or so, as the metric now has a value of 64%. This suggests that BTC has lost its market share to these alts recently.

The quant finds this trend “very concerning,” however. The reason behind that is the fact that whenever rallies have kicked off with altcoins being on top, they haven’t usually lasted for too long, and the prices have quickly come back down.

This can be very clearly seen in the chart. For example, the tops of both the bull rallies of 2021 (the ones in the first and second half of the year) took formation while the altcoins had a higher trading volume dominance than Bitcoin. The latest FTX crash also took place while alts were dominating the market.
""

It would appear that generally any sustainable and healthy price rallies have only started with the dominance of BTC being higher than these alts. One prominent example is that the July 2021 bottom, which kicked off the second-half bull run of 2021, took place with the Bitcoin volume percentage being higher than altcoins.
""

The entire market has been rallying in the last week, but if the historical pattern is anything to go by, this uplift may not last too long as the dominance of altcoins is at very high levels right now. This would spell trouble not only for Bitcoin but also for these alts themselves.
""

BTC Price
""

At the time of writing, Bitcoin is trading around $17,400, up 3% in the last week.

Looks like the value of the crypto has gone up over the last few days | Source: BTCUSD on TradingVIew

Leituras Relacionadas

a16z: In the AI Era, Company Competition for Talent Starts with Job Title Naming

The article discusses how companies in the AI era are competing for talent through strategic "title arbitrage," or the renaming of key roles to reflect and attract new, high-value capabilities. It uses Palantir's creation of the "Forward-Deployed Engineer" (FDE) as a prime example. This title reframed client-facing technical work from a peripheral "implementation" role into a core, high-status engineering function. The move was strategic, allowing Palantir to attract talent that blended technical skill with business acumen and to dominate the market's perception of this capability. The piece argues that job titles are an organizational language that signals the value and authority of certain work. Effective new titles, like "Data Scientist" or "Site Reliability Engineer," emerge when a role's strategic importance genuinely outgrows its old name. Conversely, mere title inflation without substantive change is ineffective. For AI companies, particularly in B2B, this is a crucial strategy. AI transformation creates new high-leverage roles (e.g., "Legal Engineer," "GTM Engineer") that combine domain expertise with technical automation. By naming these roles, a company can help clients internally legitimize these change-makers. This, in turn, builds market mindshare, associating the company with the new capability. In conclusion, as AI blurs the lines between product and service, the ability to accurately name and organize the critical, client-adjacent work that defines product learning will be a key competitive advantage. The first to define this new organizational language plants a flag in the market's mind.

marsbitHá 38m

a16z: In the AI Era, Company Competition for Talent Starts with Job Title Naming

marsbitHá 38m

CBRS First Post-IPO Earnings Report: Revenue Doubles but Gross Margin Guidance Plummets, OpenAI's Massive Order Faces a Long Road to Realization

Cerebras Systems (CBRS) released its first quarterly report since going public. Q1 core revenue of $191.3M beat expectations, surging 92% YoY, with full-year revenue guidance raised to $855-$865M. However, the company's Q2 gross margin guidance of 36%-38% represents a sharp drop from Q1's 47%, sending shares down over 10% after-hours. Management attributed the margin pressure to temporary costs from leasing back hardware to deploy capacity for OpenAI, highlighting a business model shift from selling chips to selling compute power. While growth is strong, key investor debates center on valuation, customer concentration, and long-term contracts. Revenue remains heavily concentrated (86% from two UAE-linked entities in FY25), though major deals with OpenAI (a $20B+ contract) and AWS provide a long-term growth narrative. Analysts are broadly bullish, citing Cerebras's unique wafer-scale chip architecture as a potential advantage in the AI inference market. However, skeptics point to the narrow moat of its speed advantage, uncertainties around margin recovery amid its business transition, and a high valuation (~50x forward sales) that prices in the flawless execution of its large, long-dated contracts.

marsbitHá 39m

CBRS First Post-IPO Earnings Report: Revenue Doubles but Gross Margin Guidance Plummets, OpenAI's Massive Order Faces a Long Road to Realization

marsbitHá 39m

Interview with Strategy CEO: Can STRC Recover After Selling Bitcoin?

Interview with Strategy CEO Phong Le on the recent sale of 32 Bitcoin and its impact. He clarifies the move was a small, strategic action to demonstrate liquidity to debt holders, test internal processes, and prove operational discipline—not a response to fears of a "death spiral" from DeFi protocols leveraging STRC (Strategy's preferred stock product), which he notes holds less than 10% of STRC. Le emphasizes Strategy’s long-term focus as the largest corporate Bitcoin holder, using the adage that markets are a "voting machine" short-term but a "weighing machine" long-term. Decision-making is data-driven, involving the board, complex modeling, and multiple stakeholder considerations, moving beyond a founder-centric model. He outlines various capital options but stresses the strategic importance of "doing nothing" as a valid choice, citing resilience built during the 2022 bear market. Le expresses unwavering belief in Bitcoin's foundational value for global sovereignty and its future role in an AI-driven economy with trillions of autonomous agents. Addressing STRC's current price below its $100 face value, Le explains recent pressure was due to using dollar reserves for bond buybacks. He expects STRC to return to par as reserves are replenished and its semi-monthly dividend payments begin, noting the product is heavily over-collateralized. Finally, Le confirms the company sold Bitcoin the week prior to May 31st, as disclosed in an 8-K filing, leaving prediction market interpretations to others. The overarching philosophy remains "Spread Bitcoin with love," embracing all methods of gaining Bitcoin exposure.

marsbitHá 1h

Interview with Strategy CEO: Can STRC Recover After Selling Bitcoin?

marsbitHá 1h

Ethereum Staking Tax Debate Erupts Over Validator Redirected Revenue Proposal

A new Ethereum Research proposal titled "Validator Redirected Revenue" has sparked debate over staking economics. It outlines a mechanism allowing validators to redirect part of their staking rewards toward funding ecosystem public goods, such as research and infrastructure, aiming to create a more sustainable funding model beyond donations and grants. Critics have labeled the concept a "staking tax," arguing it could politicize validation and potentially become mandatory, undermining validator incentives and network neutrality. Supporters contend it addresses Ethereum's long-term funding needs and allows validators to coordinate on ecosystem priorities. Importantly, the proposal is in an early research and discussion stage on the Ethereum Research forum. It is not an approved or imminent protocol change. The path to implementation is long and uncertain. However, it signals a significant governance debate that market participants and ETH holders are watching closely due to its potential impact on staking rewards and Ethereum's investment case.

bitcoinistHá 1h

Ethereum Staking Tax Debate Erupts Over Validator Redirected Revenue Proposal

bitcoinistHá 1h

IOSG Founder: Ethereum Doesn't Need Another Leap of Technical Faith, It Needs a Musk-style Compromise

Jocy, founder of IOSG Ventures, argues that Ethereum does not need renewed technological faith but a "Musk-like compromise." The recent formation of ETHLabs—funded by major ETH holders like BitMine and Lubin—highlights a market-driven move to fill a gap left by the Ethereum Foundation (EF), signaling a loss of confidence in its decentralized, hands-off approach. The core critique contrasts Vitalik Buterin's (V) idealistic, technology-first vision with Elon Musk's pragmatic, business-driven execution. The author asserts Ethereum's current shortage is not another technical roadmap but a clear, real-world application narrative and a leader willing to engage directly with commercial realities—like Musk. Internal issues are emphasized, citing EF's management problems and talent drain. While the new decentralized model with independent nodes like ETHLabs addresses the single foundation's limitations, it risks fragmentation without cohesive direction. True cohesion, the author suggests, must come from a shared, compelling narrative around ETH's value, not just from aligned financial interests. Independence claims for new entities are seen as aspirational, needing years of transparency to build trust. The ultimate threat is not competitors like Solana, but the broader shift of attention and talent toward AI. Ethereum has a limited window—12 to 18 months—to recapture focus by delivering tangible, real-world applications. The conclusion urges V to shift from abstract ideals to grounded, pragmatic leadership. The time for this crucial pivot is running out.

marsbitHá 2h

IOSG Founder: Ethereum Doesn't Need Another Leap of Technical Faith, It Needs a Musk-style Compromise

marsbitHá 2h

Trading

Spot

Futuros