$635M in, $405M out – How the Fed quietly shook the crypto market

ambcryptoPublicado em 2026-03-25Última atualização em 2026-03-25

Resumo

The crypto market slowed last week, with many attributing the decline to Middle East tensions. However, the primary driver was the U.S. Federal Reserve's cautious policy signals. According to CoinShares, digital asset investments saw $230 million in inflows—significantly lower than previous weeks. Notably, $635 million entered just before the Fed meeting, but $405 million exited shortly after, indicating investors are highly sensitive to interest rate expectations. Bitcoin led with $219 million in weekly inflows, though short-Bitcoin products also gained $6 million, reflecting mixed sentiment. Solana remained strong with $17 million inflows over seven weeks, while Ethereum saw $27.5 million in outflows. Chainlink and Hyperliquid attracted $9.1 million combined. Despite price declines—ETH and HYPE fell ~6.7%, BTC dropped ~4%, and SOL dipped only 2%—capital continued flowing in. User activity was highest for Chainlink, while Solana maintained steady social volume. The Altcoin Season Index read 47, below the 75 threshold for a confirmed altcoin season, but sustained inflows suggest a potential buildup toward a broader rally. Institutional behavior showed a "buy the dip" mindset rather than panic selling.

The crypto market slowed down last week. And, while many blamed global tensions in the Middle East, the real reason behind the same might have been the U.S. Federal Reserve.

According to a report from CoinShares, digital asset investment products saw $230 million in inflows. However, this figure was much lower than the ones seen in previous weeks.

Looking closer, most of the money came in before the Fed’s meeting, with $635 million added in just two days. After the Fed signaled a more cautious approach, about $405 million quickly left the market.

This suggested that investors may be reacting more to interest rate expectations than global conflicts, adjusting their positions based on future monetary policy.

While total inflows of $230 million hinted at a recovering market, the data showed that investor sentiment is still mixed.

Analysis of different coins and their performance over the past week

Bitcoin [BTC] is still leading the market, bringing in about $219 million in weekly inflows. However, the overall picture revealed that investors are unsure about what comes next.

Interestingly, short-Bitcoin products also saw $6 million in inflows, which means some investors are betting on a price drop while others are buying the dip.

At the same time, Chainlink [LINK] and Hyperliquid [HYPE] have been gaining attention, bringing in a combined $9.1 million.

Notably, Solana [SOL] has been strong, bringing in $17 million and extending its inflow streak to seven weeks. Ethereum [ETH], however, saw $27.5 million in outflows.

Overall, this suggsted that the investors are being cautious after the recent signals from the FOMC.

Price action and more

These figures come on the back of most cryptocurrencies falling on the charts over the past week. ETH and HYPE were hit the hardest, both falling by around 6.69%.

LINK also dropped by about 5.21% over the past week. BTC performed a bit better, with a smaller decline of 3.97%. Meanwhile, SOL exhibited the most strength, slipping only 2.03% over the same period.

However, even though prices were falling, money was still flowing into the market.

In fact, Santiment’s 7-day active addresses suggested that Chainlink was leading in terms of user activity. All while Ethereum and Bitcoin showed more moderate and stable usage patterns.

Additionally, the social volume data suggested that Solana has maintained a steady and strong presence in discussions over time.

On the contrary, while Hyperliquid has seen short bursts of attention, it has struggled to sustain any consistent momentum.

Is altcoin season around the corner?

All this has also pushed analysts to think that the altcoin season is imminent.

For its part though, the Altcoin Season Index, with a press time reading of 47, needs to reach 75 to confirm a full altcoin season.

Hence, if inflows from regions like the U.S and Europe continue, this phase could be the final buildup before a broader altcoin rally begins.

Final Summary

Institutional behavior hinted at a “buy the dip” mindset, rather than panic selling.
Gap between price action and capital inflows alluded to hidden strength beneath short-term market weakness.

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat was the main reason behind the crypto market slowdown last week, according to the article?

AThe main reason was the U.S. Federal Reserve's cautious approach, as investors reacted more to interest rate expectations than global conflicts.

QHow much money flowed into digital asset investment products before the Fed's meeting, and how much left after?

A$635 million flowed in before the Fed's meeting, and about $405 million left after the Fed signaled a more cautious approach.

QWhich cryptocurrency saw the largest weekly inflows, and how much was it?

ABitcoin [BTC) saw the largest weekly inflows, bringing in about $219 million.

QWhat does the Altcoin Season Index need to reach to confirm a full altcoin season?

AThe Altcoin Season Index needs to reach 75 to confirm a full altcoin season.

QWhat was the overall net inflow for digital asset investment products last week?

AThe overall net inflow for digital asset investment products last week was $230 million.

Leituras Relacionadas

How Likely is it for TradeXYZ to Go Solo from Hyperliquid?

The article analyzes the possibility of TradeXYZ, a dominant project on Hyperliquid's HIP-3 real-world asset (RWA) perpetual contracts market, splitting off to build its own independent trading platform. With TradeXYZ commanding over 90% of HIP-3 volume and over 35% of Hyperliquid's total open interest, its leverage and influence are significant. The primary motive for a split is seen as capturing the underlying protocol fees, of which TradeXYZ currently receives only half. However, several factors strongly discourage such a move. First, replicating Hyperliquid's high-performance infrastructure would be challenging and could degrade TradeXYZ's product quality. Second, Hyperliquid serves as a crucial distribution channel, with most users accessing TradeXYZ's liquidity through its frontend. Third, the close, trusting relationship between the founders of both projects makes a hostile "betrayal" unlikely. The conclusion is that a split would likely result in a lose-lose scenario. Hyperliquid would lose its main growth narrative and see its valuation impacted, while TradeXYZ would face immense technical hurdles, lose its primary user channel, and damage its reputation. Instead of a full separation, the more probable path is for TradeXYZ to negotiate better terms while deepening integration, focusing on enhancing its own brand and user ownership.

marsbitHá 13m

How Likely is it for TradeXYZ to Go Solo from Hyperliquid?

marsbitHá 13m

"Teletubbies" Robot Cleaning Service, $30/Hour, Pure·Manual·Intelligence

Anthropomorphic "Teletubby" robot offers cleaning services in San Francisco at $30/hour, but it's entirely remote-controlled. The robot, created by startup Tau Robotics, can perform household tasks like washing hands, mopping floors, and taking out trash. While the initial demo videos appear impressive and are notably shown at normal speed (unlike many sped-up robot demos), the company reveals the actions are performed via human teleoperation, not autonomous AI. Tau Robotics, founded in 2024, argues this "cheat" is a strategic way to bridge the current capability gap, ensure task completion, and collect real-world home data to eventually train autonomous systems. Their service features three robot models: Chelsea for kitchens/bathrooms, Elon for regular tidying with memory, and Tony for deep cleaning. Priced at $30 per hour, it's cheaper than average human cleaners in the US. The article discusses the broader challenge of deploying humanoid robots in homes, comparing Tau's approach to others like China's Ziliang and the US's 1X Neo, which also use teleoperation. A key reason for choosing a humanoid form is to make remote control more intuitive for human operators. The piece also notes the potential "emotional value" of having a humanoid servant. The service is currently invite-only in San Francisco.

marsbitHá 28m

"Teletubbies" Robot Cleaning Service, $30/Hour, Pure·Manual·Intelligence

marsbitHá 28m

From South Korea to the United States: Blue-Collar Jobs Are Becoming Increasingly Popular, Thanks to AI

AI is reshaping the labor market's value proposition. The traditional four-year college degree is losing its appeal as a guaranteed career path, while skilled blue-collar trades like electricians, welders, and plumbers are experiencing historic demand and wage premiums. This shift is driven by dual pressures: AI's displacement of certain white-collar roles and a booming need for physical infrastructure and data center construction. Data confirms the trend. In the U.S., vocational school revenue surged, and a significant portion of recent layoffs are AI-related. Surveys show a majority of Gen Z adults plan to pursue blue-collar work, citing better job security against AI automation. Vocational education interest has exploded recently. Experts cite a psychological shift as younger generations seek tangible, AI-resistant careers and avoid high student debt. In many cases, salaries for skilled trades now match or exceed those requiring a bachelor's degree. In South Korea, semiconductor vocational high schools boast near-total employment, with graduates securing high-paying roles at companies like Samsung. The shortage is structural, exacerbated by a retiring baby boomer workforce and massive infrastructure projects. Companies like JPMorgan Chase, Meta, and Lowe's are investing heavily in training programs. However, overcoming historical stigma and a "perception gap" around trade careers remains a key challenge to closing the talent gap.

marsbitHá 1h

From South Korea to the United States: Blue-Collar Jobs Are Becoming Increasingly Popular, Thanks to AI

marsbitHá 1h

Qualcomm: AI Hype Subsides, When Will Smartphones Emerge from the Gloom?

Qualcomm reported its Q3 FY2026 results (ending June 2026), with revenue of $9.95B, down 4% YoY but above expectations. Gross margin declined to 53.1%, pressured by rising costs across manufacturing and memory. Key business segments showed mixed performance: Handset revenue fell 19.6% YoY to $5.09B, dragged by an 11% decline in non-Apple Android shipments and weaker high-end mix. Conversely, Automotive revenue surged 61% to $1.59B, and IoT grew 9% to $1.83B. Core operating profit dropped 41% YoY due to margin compression and higher expenses. Management's Q4 FY2026 guidance projects revenue of $9.7B-$10.5B, in line with consensus, but Non-GAAP EPS guidance of $2.05-$2.25 fell short of expectations. Amidst persistent weakness in its core handset market, Qualcomm is pursuing growth in AI, focusing on Edge AI (smartphones, PCs, automotive) and Data Center AI. Its data center strategy includes four pillars: AI accelerators (e.g., AI200), commercial CPUs (Dragonfly C1000), custom silicon, and connectivity solutions. While these initiatives initially boosted its stock, concerns over AI capital expenditure sustainability have since erased those gains. The company targets $5B in data center revenue for FY2027 and $15B for FY2029. The report concludes that with the traditional handset business still under pressure, the data center opportunity is currently viewed as a longer-term option, and a more conservative valuation based on core operations may be warranted until AI contributions materialize.

marsbitHá 1h

Qualcomm: AI Hype Subsides, When Will Smartphones Emerge from the Gloom?

marsbitHá 1h

From TPU to Self-Evolving Agents: How Jeff Dean Predicts the Next Step in AI

At the 2026 YC Startup School, Jeff Dean outlined his vision for AI's next phase, shifting focus from simply scaling models to building intelligent, autonomous systems. He believes AI's progress is no longer just about creating smarter models, but about integrating them into systems capable of long-term, iterative work, automated experimentation, and continuous learning. This evolution moves the competition from "who has the bigger model" to "who can best organize intelligence." Dean suggests AI capabilities are now comparable to a junior engineer, enabling the automation of complex workflows. However, the true challenge and opportunity lie in managing these AI "workers" at scale. He emphasizes the importance of **context engineering**—structuring tools, memory, and feedback loops—over raw model power. For startups, this means building deep expertise in niche domains where general models currently fail (near 0-1% success rates), leveraging proprietary data, specialized tools, and domain-specific evaluators. A recurring theme is re-examining fundamental constraints. Dean's past work, like moving Google's search index to memory or creating the TPU, stemmed from questioning outdated assumptions about hardware and cost. He sees similar inflection points today, particularly in **specialized inference hardware** to drastically reduce latency and energy consumption for real-time Agent operation. Notably, he points out that in modern AI systems, the dominant cost is often not computation but **data movement**. Reliable, long-running Agents require robust system design, borrowing concepts from distributed computing like checkpointing, state management, and parallel exploration to handle failures and maintain progress over days or weeks. As AI automates execution, the scarcest human skills will shift to **defining clear specifications**, **judging what problems are worth solving** (taste), and designing effective feedback loops. Ultimately, Dean's framework prioritizes understanding the problem deeply, identifying the true bottlenecks, and systematically building closed-loop systems where AI can not only perform tasks but also improve AI itself.

marsbitHá 1h