高盛警告:霍尔木兹航道受阻,全球石油供应复苏面临变数!

金十数据Publicado em 2026-07-09Última atualização em 2026-07-09

Resumo

高盛在最新发布的研究报告中发出预警:由于美伊紧张局势导致霍尔木兹海峡航运受阻,全球石油供应的复苏进程正面临严峻挑战。

高盛在最新发布的研究报告中发出预警:由于美伊紧张局势导致霍尔木兹海峡航运受阻,全球石油供应的复苏进程正面临严峻挑战。

分析师Yulia Zhetkova Grigsby指出,当前波斯湾的原油产量仍比战前水平低约1050万桶/日。尽管过去一个月中东产油国已开始尝试重启闲置油井,但这一势头正被不断升级的航道冲突所阻断。高盛估测,目前通过该海峡的石油流量已从此前恢复到的80%水平,再度萎缩至正常水平的70%左右。分析师直言,在航运风险居高不下、停火状态不明的背景下,托运商的犹豫情绪将直接拖累近期的供应回升。

高盛的担忧在实地监测数据中得到了印证。周四,全球最关键的能源通道——霍尔木兹海峡的航运几近停摆。在华盛顿与德黑兰连续两天发生武装交火后,这条黄金水道的船舶通行量呈现断崖式下跌。

根据Kpler的船舶追踪数据,周三仅有14艘大宗商品货船通过海峡,创下自6月中旬临时和平协议达成以来的最低纪录。相比之下,在协议生效的最初三周内,日均通行量高达34艘,峰值曾触及59艘。

目前,海峡内的航行秩序显得极度混乱且脆弱。多数船舶为避险选择紧贴伊朗控制的北部航道,而由美国支持的阿曼一侧航道则几乎无人问津。与此同时,海峡周边出现了疑似电子干扰现象,部分船只信号显示其航速异常超过30节,反映出该地区可能已激活无人机防御系统,进一步加剧了航行风险。

本轮危机的直接导火索是美伊关系的彻底破裂。美国总统特朗普明确宣布,此前达成的临时和平协议已经作废,并撤销了允许伊朗出售石油的豁免权。尽管他表示谈判的大门并未完全关闭,但市场信心已备受打击。

受此地缘冲突刺激,布伦特原油期货本周一度冲破80美元/桶。高盛指出,目前全球石油流向与价格正处于“双向波动”的十字路口。若未来60天的谈判能继续进行,并伴随安全保障和新的制裁豁免,石油供应有望在7月底迎来修复;若谈判无果且针对油轮的袭击持续升级,石油流量将进一步枯竭,推升全球能源成本。

值得注意的是,就在上个月,高盛还曾因航道恢复预期而下调过油价预测。然而,随着霍尔木兹海峡再度陷入电子干扰与导弹交火的阴云,这家华尔街巨头不得不重新审视“原油过剩”的可能性,转而警惕供应断裂带来的剧烈冲击。

Leituras Relacionadas

Paradigm's New Playbook: Crypto in One Hand, AI and Robotics in the Other

Title: Paradigm's New Strategy: Crypto in One Hand, AI and Robotics in the Other On July 8, 2026, top-tier venture capital firm Paradigm announced the successful $12 billion close of its fourth fund, marking a strategic evolution beyond its pure-play crypto roots. While remaining committed to cryptocurrency, the firm is now formally extending its investment focus to include artificial intelligence, robotics, and other frontier technologies. This shift was foreshadowed by a subtle but significant change to its official social media description earlier in March, from "A research-driven crypto investment firm" to a broader "We build and invest in the companies and ideas shaping the frontier." The move is driven by the firm's recognition of transformative technological waves beyond crypto, particularly in AI and robotics, and a response to the shifting capital allocation landscape. Despite significant AI sector fundraising, Paradigm emphasizes its commitment remains grounded in deep technical rigor. A key intersection for Paradigm lies in AI Agents, where decentralized blockchain networks and stablecoins are seen as a natural financial infrastructure for autonomous digital operations. The firm is active in promoting open-source, decentralized AI (e.g., investing in Nous Research) and building agent-friendly blockchains (e.g., incubating Tempo). It is also developing tools like EVMbench (with OpenAI) and the Centaur AI Agent platform. Within its crypto stronghold, Paradigm will continue focusing on core infrastructure areas. These include derivatives and new liquidity layers (e.g., Hyperliquid), prediction markets (with plans for a proprietary trading terminal), and developer tools (continuing development of Reth and Foundry). In summary, Paradigm's expansion reflects a broader realignment in venture capital, where the intense capital concentration in AI and the search for exponential growth compel even crypto-native funds to broaden their narratives. However, this does not signify an abandonment of crypto; instead, the focus is sharpening on real-world financial applications like stablecoins, RWA, on-chain derivatives, prediction markets, and the convergence of Crypto and AI Agents.

Foresight NewsHá 22m

Paradigm's New Playbook: Crypto in One Hand, AI and Robotics in the Other

Foresight NewsHá 22m

The Preferred Stock Domino Effect: Strive Incurs a 7.08 Million Dollar Loss, Strategic Risk Spreading in a Chain Reaction

"Priority Stock Domino Effect": Strive's $7.08 Million Loss Reveals Chain-Reaction Risk in Bitcoin Reserve Sector Bitcoin reserve company-issued preferred shares are no longer just yield assets but a credit test for balance sheet health. While focus remains on Strategy, Strive, the 7th largest public Bitcoin holder, disclosed a tangible spillover effect: its holding of Strategy's (STRC) preferred shares lost $7.08 million in fair value over eight days, despite no change in share count. This exposes a clear cross-company risk transmission channel within the sector. Strive's filing shows its 505,000 STRC shares fell from ~$88.59 to ~$74.57 per share. While Strive remains solvent with 19,864 BTC and $141.7M cash, the loss signals that preferred stock risks can spread via inter-company holdings, shifting their perception from stable income to credit-like, high-risk assets dependent on issuer liquidity and dividend sustainability. In response, Strategy unveiled a "Digital Credit Capital Framework," raising STRC's annual dividend to 12%, mandating a 12-month cash reserve for dividends, and authorizing up to $1B each for STRC/common stock buybacks and a $1.25B Bitcoin sale plan to bolster reserves. This marks a shift to active credit risk management, formally incorporating potential Bitcoin sales to stabilize its capital structure. Third-party valuation tools, like Farside's calculator estimating STRC's net present value at ~$49.89, highlight that pricing now hinges critically on perpetual dividend sustainability and the issuer's ability to pay amid market volatility. Bitcoin's price (~$62k) remains below Strategy's average cost basis ($75,651), intensifying focus on reserve policies. The market faces two scenarios: 1) Contained risk, where STRC's discount narrows and stress is limited to Strategy; or 2) Systemic risk, where deep STRC discounts persist, dividend hikes fail, Bitcoin sales commence, and pressure spreads to other issuers like Strive's SATA shares. Key indicators to watch are STRC/SATA discount levels, dividend coverage credibility, equity issuance rates, and any actual Bitcoin divestment. Strive's future reports will be crucial in determining if its loss is an isolated event or the first sign of sector-wide credit risk contagion via preferred shares.

marsbitHá 26m

The Preferred Stock Domino Effect: Strive Incurs a 7.08 Million Dollar Loss, Strategic Risk Spreading in a Chain Reaction

marsbitHá 26m

Are the Frantic Acquisitions of Crypto Companies by Giants Good or Bad?

In a bear market, giants are actively acquiring crypto companies. Recent months have seen at least five major deals: Samsung Securities bought a 2% stake in Upbit operator Dunamu; Robinhood acquired WonderFi for $180 million to enter the Canadian market; Figure purchased Kiavi for $717 million to expand into on-chain real estate credit; Franklin Templeton bought 250Digital to launch Franklin Crypto; and Blockworks acquired data platform Messari at a steep discount—over 90% less than its 2022 $300 million valuation. These moves highlight a strategic shift. Cash-rich giants are consolidating resources at low cost, targeting companies with established compliance frameworks to navigate tightening global regulations. Acquisitions like WonderFi and the Upbit stake provide immediate market access and licensed user bases. Figure's deal signals real-world asset (RWA) tokenization moving from concept to large-scale implementation, with Kiavi's $7+ billion annual transaction volume being integrated into on-chain capital markets. Franklin Crypto's launch targets institutional investors like pension funds, offering them tailored, compliant crypto strategies. For these strategic players, bear markets present an ideal entry point: valuations are depressed, speculative noise is minimized, and they can acquire robust technology and compliance infrastructure at a fraction of the cost. This acquisition wave marks a transitional phase for crypto—from a wild frontier toward an institutional, regulated financial system. Giants are positioning themselves to capture future growth when macroeconomic conditions and liquidity improve, leaving latecomers behind.

marsbitHá 1h

Are the Frantic Acquisitions of Crypto Companies by Giants Good or Bad?

marsbitHá 1h

Trading

Spot
活动图片