Krisis Kapasitas Komputasi: Google Diam-diam Menerapkan Batas Penggunaan Gemini untuk Meta

marsbitPublicado em 2026-06-29Última atualização em 2026-06-29

Resumo

Ketegangan antara pasokan dan permintaan infrastruktur kecerdasan buatan semakin memanas di antara perusahaan teknologi terkemuka. Google dilaporkan telah memberlakukan batas penggunaan pada Meta untuk model AI Gemini-nya sekitar bulan Maret, karena ketidakmampuan memenuhi seluruh permintaan daya komputasi dari raksasa media sosial tersebut. Pembatasan ini dilaporkan oleh Financial Times telah mengganggu dan menunda sejumlah proyek AI internal Meta, mendorong perusahaan untuk lebih efisien dalam penggunaan sumber daya AI dan mempromosikan penggunaan model buatan sendiri seperti Muse Spark. Daya komputasi untuk inferensi AI — yang digunakan setelah pelatihan model — menjadi hambatan utama industri seiring meluasnya penerapan asisten AI. Meski telah berinvestasi besar, pasokan Google tetap tertinggal dari permintaan, membatasi pertumbuhan bisnis cloud-nya. Meta, sebagai salah satu pelanggan terbesar, terkena dampak signifikan. Untuk mengatasi kekurangan ini, Google mempercepat ekspansi dengan menandatangani perjanjian sewa daya komputasi senilai $920 juta per bulan dengan SpaceX milik Elon Musk. Situasi ini mengungkap tekanan nyata pada penyedia layanan AI global dalam mengalokasikan sumber daya komputasi yang terbatas, sekaligus mendorong perusahaan seperti Meta untuk mempercepat pengembangan infrastruktur dan model AI mandiri.

Penulis: Xu Chao

Ketegangan antara pasokan dan permintaan infrastruktur kecerdasan buatan semakin memanas di antara perusahaan teknologi terkemuka dunia. Menurut sumber yang mengetahui masalah ini, sekitar Maret tahun ini, Google memberi tahu Meta bahwa mereka tidak dapat memenuhi seluruh kebutuhan kapasitas komputasi Gemini dan menerapkan batas penggunaan untuk raksasa media sosial ini—bahkan penyedia layanan AI terbesar di dunia pun sulit mengatasi gelombang kebutuhan komputasi yang meluap-luap.

Dilaporkan oleh Financial Times Inggris, pembatasan ini hingga kini belum dicabut dan telah menyebabkan beberapa proyek AI internal Meta terganggu dan tertunda. Dampaknya, Meta telah meminta karyawan untuk meningkatkan efisiensi penggunaan kapasitas komputasi AI, menerapkan penghematan yang ketat terhadap penggunaan token AI di internal. Baik Google maupun Meta menolak berkomentar mengenai hal ini.

Situasi ini memaksa Google mempercepat langkah ekspansi kapasitasnya. Awal bulan ini, Google menandatangani perjanjian sewa kapasitas komputasi senilai 920 juta dolar AS per bulan dengan SpaceX milik Elon Musk. CEO Google Sundar Pichai mengakui dalam konferensi laporan keuangan kuartal pertama tahun ini: "Kami memang menghadapi kendala dalam hal kapasitas komputasi belakangan ini, pendapatan bisnis cloud akan lebih tinggi jika kami dapat memenuhi permintaan."

Meta bukan satu-satunya kasus. Beberapa sumber mengetahui menunjukkan bahwa klien perusahaan Google lainnya juga mengalami pembatasan dengan tingkat yang berbeda-beda, dan Meta terkena dampak paling dalam karena skala kebutuhannya yang luar biasa besar. Gelombang masalah ini mencerminkan ledakan beban kerja inferensi AI, yang telah menjadi salah satu tantangan terbesar yang dihadapi seluruh industri.

Kendala Kapasitas Komputasi Terus Berlanjut, Klien Besar Paling Terdampak

Meskipun berbagai perusahaan teknologi telah menggelontorkan ratusan miliar dolar untuk chip, pusat data, dan pasokan listrik, pasokan kapasitas komputasi AI masih sulit mengejar laju pertumbuhan permintaan.

Pendapatan bisnis cloud Google pada kuartal pertama kali ini menembus 20 miliar dolar AS, kontrak cloud yang telah ditandatangani tetapi belum dikirimkan menumpuk hampir dua kali lipat secara kuartalan, melebihi 460 miliar dolar AS. Pichai dengan jelas menyatakan bahwa kendala kapasitas komputasi akan terus berlanjut dalam waktu dekat.

Dalam konteks ini, dampak yang dialami Meta sangat mencolok. Sumber mengetahui menyatakan bahwa permintaan intensif dari klien perusahaan besar seperti Meta lah yang secara langsung mendorong Google mempercepat pencarian sumber kapasitas komputasi eksternal. Seiring perusahaan-perusahaan melakukan penyebaran skala besar untuk chatbot, asisten pemrograman, dan agen cerdas AI, beban kerja inferensi—yaitu konsumsi kapasitas komputasi saat model yang telah dilatih menjalankan tugas dalam aplikasi praktis—sedang menjadi hambatan inti industri.

Proyek Internal Meta Terganggu, Berakselerasi Beralih ke Model In-House

Meta secara luas menggunakan Gemini di internal, mencakup moderasi keamanan platform (termasuk mengidentifikasi konten penipuan, membersihkan informasi berbahaya), chatbot bantuan layanan pelanggan dan iklan, serta sebagian alur kerja internal dan pengembangan kode, sambil juga menggunakan model lain seperti Claude dari Anthropic.

Menurut sumber mengetahui, Meta awalnya memilih Gemini karena kinerjanya lebih unggul daripada model open-source Llama yang dikembangkan sendiri perusahaan. Namun seiring dengan pengencangan pembatasan kapasitas komputasi, Meta semakin mempercepat migrasi ke model in-house. Beberapa sumber mengetahui menyatakan bahwa Meta baru-baru ini telah mulai memprioritaskan promosi model Muse Spark yang baru diluncurkan, yang dianggap telah mampu menyaingi Gemini dalam hal kinerja, membantu mengurangi ketergantungan pada model eksternal.

CEO Meta Mark Zuckerberg sebelumnya terus meningkatkan investasi dalam talenta dan infrastruktur AI, berkomitmen untuk membangun apa yang disebutnya sebagai "kecerdasan super pribadi". Berbeda dengan Google, Meta tidak memiliki bisnis cloud, sedang mempercepat pembangunan sistem pusat data sendiri, dan berkomitmen untuk menginvestasikan total 6000 miliar dolar AS di Amerika Serikat pada tahun 2028.

Google Manfaatkan SpaceX untuk Ekspansi, Industri Mencari Jalan Keluar

Menghadapi tekanan kapasitas komputasi, Google bulan ini menandatangani perjanjian sewa kapasitas komputasi dengan SpaceX senilai 920 juta dolar AS per bulan untuk menutup kekurangan infrastruktur. Laboratorium AI Anthropic juga mencapai perjanjian serupa dengan SpaceX bulan lalu.

Tindakan Google membatasi Meta memberikan jendela langka bagi dunia luar untuk mengintip tekanan nyata yang dihadapi penyedia layanan AI kelas dunia dalam alokasi kapasitas komputasi. Saat ini, hambatan infrastruktur di seluruh industri AI sedang merambat dari sisi pelatihan ke sisi inferensi, penyelesaian ketegangan antara pasokan dan permintaan masih bergantung pada realisasi investasi modal skala besar baru yang diimplementasikan.

Perguntas relacionadas

QApa yang menyebabkan Google membatasi penggunaan Gemini oleh Meta?

AGoogle membatasi penggunaan Gemini oleh Meta karena ketidakmampuan memenuhi seluruh permintaan daya komputasi AI yang meningkat pesat, terkait dengan keterbatasan kapasitas infrastruktur mereka.

QDampak apa yang dialami Meta akibat pembatasan ini?

APembatasan ini mengakibatkan gangguan dan penundaan pada beberapa proyek AI internal Meta, memaksa mereka untuk meningkatkan efisiensi penggunaan daya komputasi AI dan mengalokasikan token AI dengan lebih ketat.

QLangkah apa yang diambil Google untuk mengatasi keterbatasan daya komputasi?

AGoogle mempercepat ekspansi kapasitas dengan menandatangani perjanjian sewa daya komputasi senilai $920 juta per bulan dengan SpaceX milik Elon Musk.

QBagaimana respons Meta terhadap pembatasan dari Google?

AMeta mulai mempercepat migrasi ke model buatan sendiri, seperti Muse Spark yang dianggap setara dengan Gemini, untuk mengurangi ketergantungan pada model eksternal.

QMenurut artikel, apa tantangan utama yang dihadapi industri AI saat ini?

ATantangan utamanya adalah pertumbuhan eksplosif beban kerja inferensi AI, di mana pasokan daya komputasi tidak dapat mengimbangi permintaan, menyebabkan kemacetan di seluruh industri.

Leituras Relacionadas

After Three Consecutive Quarters of Decline, Can the Crypto Market Find a Window for Stabilization in Q3?

The cryptocurrency market has just concluded its worst-performing quarter since 2022, with total capitalization dropping 12.6% to $2.1 trillion. All core metrics indicate capital is leaving the sector, not just rotating within it. Bitcoin fell 14.2% and Ethereum dropped 25.4% in Q2, breaking their previous correlation with US tech stocks. A key driver is the reversal in US spot Bitcoin ETF flows, which saw a net outflow of approximately $4.67 billion in Q2, including a record monthly outflow near $4.5 billion in June. While recent data suggests long-term holders are accumulating again, sustained ETF outflows mean continued selling pressure. Market focus is now singularly on the Federal Reserve. The upcoming July FOMC meeting is seen as the most critical event for Q3. A dovish signal could support Bitcoin reclaiming a $68,000-$84,000 range, while a hawkish stance might establish a new trading band around $50,000-$56,000. Additionally, regulatory uncertainty persists, with the progress of the crucial *CLARITY Act* stalling in the Senate, reducing its perceived 2026 passage probability to 40-45%. Despite the broad downturn, a few sectors showed growth. Prediction markets saw nominal volume surge 48.7% year-over-year to $113.8 billion, and tokenized collectibles transaction volume rose 143% quarterly to $1.4 billion. The Real-World Asset (RWA) tokenization sector also continued steady growth, now representing ~$28.1 billion in on-chain value. The market's foundation for an extreme crash appears limited, with Bitcoin price hovering near its 200-week moving average. However, the trading paradigm has shifted from narrative-driven speculation to decisions based on price action, policy developments, and interest rate expectations, making a broad sentiment-driven rally unlikely in the near term.

marsbitOntem 08:36

After Three Consecutive Quarters of Decline, Can the Crypto Market Find a Window for Stabilization in Q3?

marsbitOntem 08:36

BIT Trading Moment: BTC Still Suppressed by Weekly 200 EMA, Rejection May Restart Decline; Storage and Semiconductors that Surged Last Night Begin Falling in Evening Trading

**Crypto & Stock Market Wrap: Bitcoin Tests Resistance, Stocks Retreat After AI Surge** Bitcoin consolidates around $66,000, facing key resistance near $68,000—an area seen as a major psychological and technical hurdle where previous rallies have failed. Analysts note the cryptocurrency is caught between its 200-week moving average (~$63,333) and 200-week EMA (~$68,328). A clear break above $68k is needed to signal a stronger bullish trend, while a rejection could lead to a retest of $63k support. Market sentiment remains cautious, with low futures open interest pointing to a low-liquidity rebound rather than a full bull market. Bitcoin spot ETFs saw another $203 million inflow. US stock futures pointed lower after a strong Tuesday session led by a massive rebound in semiconductors and memory stocks. The rally was fueled by renewed optimism about AI-driven hardware demand, with Micron, SanDisk, and SK Hynix surging. However, those gains reversed in pre-market trading. Super Micro Computer (SMCI) soared over 20% after hours on strong guidance and a record backlog. Other standouts included Rocket Lab and nuclear energy plays Oklo and X-Energy. Rising oil prices (Brent above $91) and climbing Treasury yields (10-year near 4.64%), however, are reigniting inflation concerns and acting as a headwind for equities. In Asia, markets were mixed. South Korea's KOSPI pared early gains to close slightly higher as semiconductor stocks like SK Hynix gave back initial surges. Japan's Nikkei edged lower as the yen hit a fresh 38-year low against the dollar, raising fears of potential market intervention. Key events to watch include the Samsung Galaxy launch, AMD's AI event, and a slew of major tech earnings from Alphabet, Tesla, and IBM after the close on Wednesday, followed by the ECB meeting and Intel's earnings on Thursday.

marsbitOntem 08:28

BIT Trading Moment: BTC Still Suppressed by Weekly 200 EMA, Rejection May Restart Decline; Storage and Semiconductors that Surged Last Night Begin Falling in Evening Trading

marsbitOntem 08:28

Former CFTC Chairman, Circle President Tarbert: Preaching Long-Termism While Cashing Out $30 Million Himself

Former CFTC Chairman and Circle President Heath Tarbert has consistently advocated for a long-term vision in public, urging patience from investors as Circle’s stock price has fallen significantly from its peak. However, it has been revealed that since Circle’s IPO, Tarbert has continuously sold his CRCL shares through pre-arranged trading plans, cashing out approximately $30 million, without making any public market purchases. This contrast between his public messaging and personal actions has drawn criticism. Tarbert joined Circle in July 2023 as Chief Legal Officer, leveraging his regulatory experience to help guide the company through its IPO and expansion. Despite promoting stablecoins as long-term infrastructure, he established a 10b5-1 trading plan just before Circle went public, leading to substantial stock sales over the following year. In March 2026, he initiated another plan to sell more shares. His career trajectory highlights a pattern of moving between high-level regulatory roles and influential positions in the financial sector. After resigning as CFTC Chairman in early 2021, he joined Citadel Securities as Chief Legal Officer just 27 days later, during a period of intense regulatory scrutiny for the firm. He later joined Circle, aiding its efforts to navigate regulatory challenges for its public listing. While Tarbert's expertise in policy and compliance is valuable to companies like Circle, his actions—advocating long-term confidence while personally divesting—raise questions about the alignment between his public statements and his private financial decisions, leaving investors who followed his advice to bear the market risks.

marsbitOntem 08:06

Former CFTC Chairman, Circle President Tarbert: Preaching Long-Termism While Cashing Out $30 Million Himself

marsbitOntem 08:06

Gate Research Institute: The 'Wall Street-ization' Wave of Crypto Financial Products – Competition or Integration?

The article titled "Gate Research Institute: Are Crypto Financial Products Sparking a 'Wall Street' Wave—Competition or Convergence?" explores the evolving relationship between the crypto ecosystem and traditional finance (TradFi). The piece begins by reflecting on Bitcoin's original 2009 vision of decentralization, disintermediation, and moving away from banks. It then contrasts this with the 2024 landscape, where key crypto assets like Bitcoin are increasingly held through Wall Street products like ETFs issued by giants like BlackRock. The article questions whether this signifies that TradFi is systematically taking over the rights to issue, price, custody, and distribute crypto financial assets. The core argument is that this is not a zero-sum takeover but rather a bidirectional convergence where each side addresses the other's weaknesses. Crypto offers 24/7 global markets, programmable settlement, and open access but lacks compliant channels, institutional-grade custody, deep fiat liquidity, and mainstream distribution. TradFi possesses these but is constrained by legacy systems, limited operating hours, and slow settlement. Two primary convergence paths are highlighted: * **Path A (CEX to TradFi):** Exemplified by Gate, which has progressed from offering tokenized stocks and CFDs to providing direct, real stock trading (US, Hong Kong, South Korea) within its platform, using USDT. * **Path B (TradFi to Crypto):** Exemplified by Robinhood, which has integrated crypto trading, acquired exchanges like Bitstamp, and is moving traditional assets like stocks onto the blockchain via tokenization and its own Layer 2. Both paths are ultimately competing to become the next-generation, unified financial account—a "super account" where users can seamlessly trade cryptocurrencies, stocks, ETFs, RWA (Real World Assets), and tokenized treasury products in one interface. The growth of RWA and tokenized treasuries (e.g., BlackRock's BUIDL) is presented as the asset-layer fusion, providing stable, yield-bearing assets on-chain and acting as a bridge between the two worlds. In conclusion, the "Wall Street-ization" of crypto is framed as a mutual transformation. Decentralized ideals persist in the protocol layer, while at the application layer, a more efficient, global, and accessible unified capital market is emerging from this convergence. The future competition lies not between crypto exchanges and stockbrokers, but between platforms vying to offer the most comprehensive asset coverage, liquidity, and user experience within a single account.

marsbitOntem 08:01

Gate Research Institute: The 'Wall Street-ization' Wave of Crypto Financial Products – Competition or Integration?

marsbitOntem 08:01

Trading

Spot
活动图片