最终修复方案出炉，Aave坏账风波终于要结局了

Odaily星球日报Publicado em 2026-04-28Última atualização em 2026-04-28

原创 | Odaily 星球日报(@OdailyChina)

作者|Azuma(@azuma_eth)

折腾了一个多星期的 Aave 坏账风波已基本迎来尾声。

随着 DeFi United 已募集到了足够解决问题的资金(截至发文已募集 132704 ETH,价值约 3.02 亿美元),Aave 官方也在 4 月 28 日中午发布了关于修复 rsETH 抵押状况并恢复市场正常运行的技术实施方案。

Odaily注:前情提要可参阅《DeFi再次被盗2.92亿美元,这下连Aave都不安全了?》;《2.9亿窟窿下的三方博弈:Aave、L0、Kelp谁能买单?》;《Aave正因自己的愚蠢,拱手让出DeFi借贷的王座》。

背景回溯

关于 Kelp DAO 如何失窃 116500 rsETH 的细节已不用多提,重点在于被盗之后的赃款流向。

黑客得手之后,先是将这 116500 枚 rsETH 分散至多个地址。其中一部分被作为抵押存入以太坊主网上的 Aave V3 并借出 WETH,另一部分被桥接至 Arbitrum 并在该网络上的 Aave 抵押借出 WETH,其余少部分赃款则通过不同渠道转移。

目前,与黑客相关的 7 个地址在 Aave 和 Compound 上仍持有活跃的 rsETH 抵押头寸,约占最初被盗 116500 枚中的 107000 枚。

解决方案

为了实现修复目标,Aave 在拟设的实施方案中设置了两个目标。其一为恢复 rsETH 的抵押支撑;其二为清理 Aave、Compound 等借贷市场中的受影响头寸,以回收约 107000 枚 rsETH 的超额抵押资产,进而修复市场受损情况。

先来说说第一个目标 —— 恢复 rsETH 的抵押支撑。

目前的 rsETH 实质上是属于“资不抵债”状态,虽然底层质押中 ETH 仍然完好,但黑客已通过抵押借贷完成出逃,这部分缺口的存在就导致 rsETH 与 ETH 的兑换报价出现了“脱锚”。

因此 Aave 提到,为了恢复 rsETH 的抵押支撑,就需要将 rsETH 和 ETH 之间的兑换比例拉回到 1 :1.07。这将通过 DeFi United 推动实现,该组织现已获得足够的 ETH 承诺出资,以恢复系统的完整运作,但最终执行仍取决于治理批准、执行时间安排以及相关协议的签署。

若方案能够顺利推进,DeFi United 将通过向 rsETH 的桥接锁仓合约(RSETH_OFTAdapter 0x85d456b2...98ef3)存入 ETH 来完全恢复 rsETH 的抵押支持。具体流程如下:

分批将 DeFi United 的 ETH 转换为 rsETH;
将这些 rsETH 转入相关锁仓合约;
使桥接系统能够安全恢复并全面运行。
LayerZero 和 Kelp DAO 方面会实施额外安全措施,以确保桥恢复后的安全性。

再来看第二个目标 —— 清理借贷市场中的受影响头寸。

rsETH 的抵押支撑恢复之后,理论上 Aave 的借贷市场便已不存在坏账(此时抵押价值已大于借出价值),但仍需将与黑客相关的几个异常抵押头寸清理(预计可回收 13000 ETH),以恢复市场的正常运行。

对此,Aave 表示将在以太坊与 Arbitrum 依次上发起治理提案,通过“受控的清算流程”来清理异常头寸。具体的解决流程为:

暂时调整 rsETH 预言机价格,以触发高效清算;
清算过程中会产生暂时性亏空(后续步骤将弥补该亏空);
回收的 rsETH 抵押品将转移至 DeFi United 管理的多签地址。

Aave 强调,上述参数调整仅为临时措施,仅用于恢复执行,所有调整将在完成后恢复,不会对 Aave 协议造成长期影响。在解决问题期间,以太坊主网、Arbitrum、Base、Mantle 和 Linea 上的 WETH 与 rsETH 存款均将保持冻结状态。

完成清算后的理想状况为:rsETH 价格预言机将恢复; 回收的 rsETH 将通过 Kelp DAO 标准赎回流程兑换为 ETH;这些 ETH 将用于填补 Aave 在以太坊和 Arbitrum 市场中的亏空。

至于 Compound,也将采取类似的清理方式,在 DeFi United 提供流动性支持的情况下,预计可额外回收约 16776 ETH。

待两大目标都有效完成后,Aave 解除所有相关市场中的 rsETH 与 ETH 暂停和冻结状态,随后会恢复 ETH 及其他资产的贷款价值比(LTV)等参数配置。

待解问题

Aave 补充提到,尽管上述方案有望在不出现社会化损失的情况下实现修复目标,但仍存在以下几点不确定性。

一是尽管已获得足够 ETH 承诺,但资金部署仍依赖最终协议与治理批准; 二是受影响头寸的清理依赖治理提案顺利通过与执行; 三是攻击者若刻意干扰,可能导致亏空未完全形成,需要额外清算步骤; 四是LayerZero 与 Kelp 已部署额外安全措施,但在生产环境验证前仍存在残余风险;

但无论如何,已搅扰 DeFi 市场许久的“Kelp DAO 被盗,Aave 坏账”事件看起来终于是要有个尾声了,后续需要看的就是方案能否在实际环境下如预期般推进。

正如 The Rollup 创始人 Andy 的评论:“接下来几天对 DeFi 来说至关重要,任务艰巨,且必须既快速又稳妥地完成。这既是一次技术挑战,更是一场社会协同的考验。能实时见证这一切的发展,确实有种不真实的感觉。”

希望好运站在 DeFi 这一侧。

Leituras Relacionadas

The Trillion-Yuan Market Cap 'Yi Zhong Tian': Who is the True Value King?

The article analyzes the three leading Chinese optical module companies, collectively nicknamed "Yi Zhong Tian": Xinyisheng, Zhongji Innolight, and TFC Optical Communication. It evaluates their "cost-performance" not by current stock price, but through three lenses: PEG ratio (growth vs. valuation), earnings quality, and premium/discount for certainty. Xinyisheng shows the most attractive PEG ratio and high profitability, but its valuation reflects discounts for risks like high customer concentration and reliance on overseas markets. Zhongji Innolight, the most expensive, commands a premium for its market leadership, dominant share in key products like 800G/1.6T modules, and higher earnings certainty, though it faces geopolitical risks. TFC Optical, as an upstream component supplier ("water seller"), has the highest gross margin and bets on the long-term CPO/NPO architecture trend, but trades at a high valuation with more stable, less explosive growth. The core argument is that while these companies dominate module assembly, the true profit pool and technological moat lie upstream in laser and switch chips, currently controlled by U.S. firms like Lumentum and Coherent. The long-term "cost-performance" for these Chinese leaders hinges on whether the domestic industry, exemplified by companies like Yuanjie Technology, can successfully move up the value chain into high-power laser chips. Otherwise, their high growth may remain confined to the lower-margin assembly segment.

marsbitHá 5m

The Trillion-Yuan Market Cap 'Yi Zhong Tian': Who is the True Value King?

marsbitHá 5m

Has the Crypto Market Bottomed? Here's What Institutions Think

The crypto market is in a period of significant debate, with leading institutions offering differing views on whether a bottom has been reached. Three prominent firms have published detailed analyses: * **Galaxy Digital** argues Bitcoin has **not yet bottomed**. Their analysis of 13 historical indicators across six dimensions (valuation, profit-taking, miner pressure, etc.) shows only four are fully met. They project a potential bottom range between $30k and $54k. * **NYDIG** states a bottom is **possible but not likely**. While metrics are close to historic bear market extremes, they note the absence of a classic panic-selling event. They also suggest increased institutional adoption may have structurally altered the market cycle, potentially leading to a shallower downturn. * **Standard Chartered Bank** asserts the **bottom has already occurred** at around $59k. They cite two key factors: potential US-Iran diplomatic progress and the anticipated SpaceX IPO, which they believe absorbed capital and caused ETF selling pressure that is now subsiding. They forecast a year-end price target of $100k. Despite the surface-level disagreement, the reports share critical common ground more valuable for long-term investors: 1. All three believe the market bottom will form **within this year**. 2. All agree the current price is **closer to the bottom than to previous highs**. 3. All maintain a **bullish long-term outlook** for Bitcoin and a new cycle. The core takeaway is that while the exact bottom price ($40k, $50k, or $60k) is debated, the consensus is that a bottom is imminent. For long-term holders, the primary focus should not be pinpointing the absolute low, but on the future potential for prices to reach $100k, $200k, or higher. The fundamental thesis for Bitcoin—sovereign debt accumulation, inflation, declining trust in centralized institutions, global digitization, and improved accessibility—remains intact and is arguably strengthening. The overall landscape is viewed as more favorable than in previous crypto winters.

marsbitHá 15m

Has the Crypto Market Bottomed? Here's What Institutions Think

marsbitHá 15m

The 'Chip' Challenge and Breakthroughs in China's Optical Industry Chain

China's Photonics Industry: Bottlenecks and Breakthroughs In the global AI race, computing chips dominate the narrative, but the underlying bottleneck increasingly defining the scale of AI clusters is light—or more specifically, optical connectivity. Optical modules, which translate electrical signals to light and vice versa, are crucial for connecting thousands of GPUs in AI data centers, preventing data congestion and ensuring efficient model training. High-speed modules (800G, 1.6T) are now standard, with performance hinging on advanced DSP (Digital Signal Processor) chips. This is where a critical dependency lies. Two US giants—Marvell and Broadcom—collectively dominate over 90% of the high-end DSP chip market. Chinese optical module leaders like Zhongji Innolight and Eoptolink rely on these chips to manufacture modules for overseas AI customers, primarily in North America. While this creates a supply chain vulnerability, complete decoupling is difficult. Marvell derives over half its revenue from Greater China, and the US firms depend on Chinese partners for chip packaging and optical components. The risk from laser chips (e.g., from Lumentum), another key component, is considered more manageable due to multiple global suppliers and faster progress in domestic alternatives from companies like YOFC and Accelink. To mitigate risks, China's industry is pursuing a multi-pronged strategy: diversifying supply chains and locking in long-term orders; fostering a domestic market ecosystem to adopt homegrown DSPs from firms like Huawei HiSilicon and CETC; accelerating R&D in high-speed DSPs and advanced packaging; and investing in next-gen technologies like silicon photonics and Co-Packaged Optics (CPO) to reduce reliance on discrete DSPs. The ultimate solution lies not in short-term博弈 but in persistent advancement of domestic high-end chip R&D and manufacturing. While challenges remain in performance, certification, and ecosystem building, China's vast domestic market and manufacturing base provide a crucial buffer, buying time for the industry to achieve greater technological independence.

marsbitHá 29m

The 'Chip' Challenge and Breakthroughs in China's Optical Industry Chain

marsbitHá 29m

Behind SpaceX's $2 Trillion Market Cap: Why Does Musk Always Have the Next Move Planned?

On June 12th, SpaceX debuted on the Nasdaq, reaching a valuation that briefly touched $2 trillion. This marked the culmination of a 24-year journey from its founding in 2002, driven by Elon Musk's frustration at the high cost of buying rockets. The company's path was defined by early failures, with its first three Falcon 1 launches ending in explosions before a successful 2008 flight opened the era of commercial spaceflight. Key to its model was a fixed-price NASA contract, incentivizing cost reduction. SpaceX mastered rocket reusability, first achieving a Falcon 9 landing in 2015, which drastically cut launch costs. This enabled its profitable Starlink satellite internet constellation, envisioned years before reusability was proven, to create an internal market for frequent launches. Similarly, the next-generation Starship rocket was in development long before its first flight, with its business case evolving from Mars colonization to supporting the emerging concept of in-orbit data centers for AI—a story now central to its valuation. The company's recent IPO, a reversal of its long-standing "no IPO" stance, is funding this ambitious "space-based compute" vision. While major tech players like Google, Blue Origin, and others are investing heavily, significant technical and cost hurdles remain. Ultimately, SpaceX's history is one of creating its own demand: first with Starlink and now with space-based AI compute, betting that its next rocket will enable its next giant market.

marsbitHá 32m

Behind SpaceX's $2 Trillion Market Cap: Why Does Musk Always Have the Next Move Planned?

marsbitHá 32m

USDe Circumvents GENIUS Act Yield Ban: How Synthetic Dollars Became Crypto's Most Successful Gray Area?

In drafting the GENIUS Act, Congress prohibited licensed payment stablecoin issuers from paying interest or yield to holders—a rule that forced changes for USDC. However, Ethena's USDe, a rapidly growing "yield dollar," operates outside this regulation. USDe is a delta-neutral synthetic dollar backed by crypto collateral and hedged perpetual futures positions, generating yield from funding rates rather than traditional reserves. Because it doesn't fit the legal definition of a payment stablecoin, the GENIUS Act's restrictions do not apply. USDe's supply peaked above $14 billion in 2025, making it a top-three dollar-denominated crypto asset. Its model carries distinct risks, notably dependence on sustained positive funding rates and vulnerability during market deleveraging events, as seen in a brief depeg in October 2025. Regulatory approaches differ: Germany's BaFin banned USDe sales, viewing it as an unregistered security, while U.S. institutional capital, like Janus Henderson, has embraced it for treasury management. The GENIUS Act defined and regulated payment stablecoins but left synthetic dollars like USDe in a gray area. The unresolved question is whether future regulations will address this category or if yield will continue migrating to undefined spaces.

marsbitHá 34m

USDe Circumvents GENIUS Act Yield Ban: How Synthetic Dollars Became Crypto's Most Successful Gray Area?

marsbitHá 34m

Trading

Spot

Futuros

Artigos em Destaque

Como comprar AAVE

Bem-vindo à HTX.com!Tornámos a compra de Aave Protocol (AAVE) simples e conveniente.Segue o nosso guia passo a passo para iniciar a tua jornada no mundo das criptos.Passo 1: cria a tua conta HTXUtiliza o teu e-mail ou número de telefone para te inscreveres numa conta gratuita na HTX.Desfruta de um processo de inscrição sem complicações e desbloqueia todas as funcionalidades.Obter a minha contaPasso 2: vai para Comprar Cripto e escolhe o teu método de pagamentoCartão de crédito/débito: usa o teu visa ou mastercard para comprar Aave Protocol (AAVE) instantaneamente.Saldo: usa os fundos da tua conta HTX para transacionar sem problemas.Terceiros: adicionamos métodos de pagamento populares, como Google Pay e Apple Pay, para aumentar a conveniência.P2P: transaciona diretamente com outros utilizadores na HTX.Mercado de balcão (OTC): oferecemos serviços personalizados e taxas de câmbio competitivas para os traders.Passo 3: armazena teu Aave Protocol (AAVE)Depois de comprar o teu Aave Protocol (AAVE), armazena-o na tua conta HTX.Alternativamente, podes enviá-lo para outro lugar através de transferência blockchain ou usá-lo para transacionar outras criptomoedas.Passo 4: transaciona Aave Protocol (AAVE)Transaciona facilmente Aave Protocol (AAVE) no mercado à vista da HTX.Acede simplesmente à tua conta, seleciona o teu par de trading, executa as tuas transações e monitoriza em tempo real.Oferecemos uma experiência de fácil utilização tanto para principiantes como para traders experientes.

418 Visualizações TotaisPublicado em {updateTime}Atualizado em 2026.06.02

Discussões

Bem-vindo à Comunidade HTX. Aqui, pode manter-se informado sobre os mais recentes desenvolvimentos da plataforma e obter acesso a análises profissionais de mercado. As opiniões dos utilizadores sobre o preço de AAVE (AAVE) são apresentadas abaixo.