Vitalik: Metaverse ‘Is Going to Happen’ but Meta’s ‘Will Misfire’

DecryptPublicado em 2022-08-01Última atualização em 2022-08-01

Resumo

The Ethereum creator said corporate attempts at the metaverse will fail because “it’s far too early to know what people actually want.”

Meta’s attempt at cornering the metaverse will “misfire” largely because nobody can come up with what the term actually means, according to Ethereum creator Vitalik Buterin.

In a Twitter thread discussing how the metaverse might look, he said corporate projects currently underway don’t look promising, and he specifically criticized Meta, the tech giant founded and run by Mark Zuckerberg, using the company’s former name.

“We don’t really know the definition of ‘the metaverse’ yet, it’s far too early to know what people actually want,” Buterin said in a tweet. “So anything Facebook creates now will misfire.”

My critique is deeper than "Metaverse Wikipedia will beat Metaverse Encyclopedia Britannica". It's that we don't really know the definition of "the metaverse" yet, it's far too early to know what people actually want. So anything Facebook creates now will misfire.

— vitalik.eth (@VitalikButerin) July 31, 2022

The metaverse is often described as an evolution of today’s internet, centered around immersive 3D worlds and online communities where people interact by using virtual reality headsets and augmented forms of reality.

While Buterin isn’t sold on how corporations envision the metaverse, he did describe its establishment as a somewhat inevitable step in the progression of today’s technology.

“The ‘metaverse’ is going to happen,” Buterin continued. “But I don’t think any of the existing corporate attempts to intentionally create the metaverse are going anywhere.”

The "metaverse" is going to happen but I don't think any of the existing corporate attempts to intentionally create the metaverse are going anywhere. https://t.co/tVUfq4CWmP

— vitalik.eth (@VitalikButerin) July 30, 2022

Over how the metaverse will be shaped, there is tension between the centralized authority of corporations and the decentralized forms of ownership that blockchain technology affords. Recently, a group of Web3 companies came together with the goal of establishing standards for the metaverse as companies including Microsoft, Meta, and Sony announced a separate alliance.

The Sandbox is currently one of the most popular Web3 metaverse projects, with virtual plots of land tied to the ownership of NFTs. And Yuga Labs, which created the Bored Ape Yacht Club, is in the early stages of its own metaverse gaming project, the Otherside, recently hosting a first-look tech demo of that virtual world.

The term metaverse first appeared in “Snow Crash,” a science fiction novel written by Neal Stephenson in 1992. The term applied to a “computer-generated universe,” conveyed to a character through a set of goggles and earphones.

Meta’s official bid for the metaverse began when the company changed its name from Facebook to Meta in October. The rebranding followed the company’s 2014 acquisition of Oculus, a company that produces VR headsets with an emphasis on gaming, for $2 billion.

“I believe the metaverse is the next chapter for the internet,” Zuckerberg said last year. “Today, we’re seen as a social media company, but in our DNA, we are a company that builds technology to connect people, and the metaverse is the next frontier.”

Meta divulged in the company’s latest earnings report that its metaverse-specific division, Facebook Reality Labs (FRL), lost $2.81 billion in the second quarter. And last year, the company lost $10.2 billion developing software, technology, and content for the metaverse.

“This is obviously a very expensive undertaking over the next several years,” Zuckerberg said. “But as the metaverse becomes more important in every part of how we live ... I’m confident that we’re going to be glad we played an important role in building this.”

Leituras Relacionadas

My Coding Betting Dashboard is Profiting, but Polymarket is Truly Not a Good Place for 'Arbitrage'

The author built a custom monitoring dashboard for Polymarket, a prediction market platform, and tested it with $1,600, achieving over 30% returns. However, the core argument is that Polymarket is not a good venue for traditional arbitrage. The dashboard has two main sections: a "Portfolio Dashboard" for tracking active positions with key metrics like total capital, P&L, and a risk-control module using a tier system (T1, T2, T3), and an "Opportunity Watchlist" for monitoring markets. The article details a critical structural trap in binary markets: a bet with a high perceived probability of success still carries a 100% loss risk if wrong. The author's T1/T2/T3 system is designed to manage this by limiting position sizes based on conviction and time horizon, emphasizing that high confidence should not equal high concentration. A key insight is the danger of "pseudo-diversification"—betting on different markets driven by the same underlying variable. The author concludes that Polymarket offers few true low-risk, arbitrage opportunities. It is instead a high-risk environment where wins can create a false sense of mastery, leading to large losses. The platform is better viewed as a training ground for honing judgment through disciplined, framework-driven betting rather than a reliable income source. The tools help transform intuition into structured, rule-based decisions to mitigate the risk of catastrophic errors.

marsbitHá 1h

My Coding Betting Dashboard is Profiting, but Polymarket is Truly Not a Good Place for 'Arbitrage'

marsbitHá 1h

WeChat AI Card Hands-On Guide: Has the AI Shopping Era Arrived?

**"WeChat AI Card" Practical Test Guide: Has the Era of AI Shopping Arrived?** WeChat has officially launched the "AI Exclusive Card," a feature integrated into its Workbuddy AI assistant. This card is designed to handle payments for AI-initiated purchases. Our hands-on test reveals it's not yet a tool for fully autonomous AI shopping, but rather a controlled payment layer for AI agents. The AI Card functions as an isolated sub-wallet within WeChat Pay. Users must bind the card and transfer funds into it from their main wallet. Crucially, every transaction requires explicit user confirmation via smartphone scan; AI cannot spend autonomously. Currently accessible through the Workbuddy agent, the card targets specific digital consumption scenarios: purchasing paid content (reports, data), calling paid APIs/tools, and subscribing to services. Its design prioritizes security and control by separating funds and mandating approval for each payment. We tested a real-world scenario: ordering bubble tea via Workbuddy using a "Meituan Life Assistant" skill. The process encountered multiple hurdles: high "skill" usage costs (exceeding daily free credits), and most importantly, while a payment was successfully initiated, the AI purchased an incorrect product (a mismatched group-buy coupon instead of the desired drink). This highlights the current limitation: the **AI Card only solves the payment step**. The broader challenge lies in the **AI agent's execution chain**—accurately understanding intent, navigating third-party platforms, selecting the right product, and ensuring proper fulfillment. The payment succeeded, but the purchase failed to meet the user's need. In conclusion, the WeChat AI Exclusive Card is a cautious, early-step experiment in AI commerce. It provides a secure, user-controlled payment method for agent interactions but is not yet capable of reliable, end-to-end complex purchases. For now, it's best used for low-value, low-risk digital services with careful user verification at each step. The vision of AI handling complete shopping tasks remains a work in progress.

marsbitHá 4h

WeChat AI Card Hands-On Guide: Has the AI Shopping Era Arrived?

marsbitHá 4h

Deconstructing Notion's Growth: From a Note-taking Tool to 100 Million Users—How Notion Built a Triple Growth Flywheel Through Product, Templates, and Community

Notion's growth from a niche note-taking tool to a platform with 100 million users is powered by three interconnected flywheels: Product-Led Growth (PLG), a Template Economy, and Community-Driven Growth. First, Notion's PLG strategy relies on a highly flexible, "plastic" product that users can adapt to countless personal and team workflows. Its freemium model lowers the barrier to entry, while features like page sharing and collaboration drive organic, usage-based viral growth as users naturally invite others. Second, the Template Economy solves the "blank page" problem. Templates, created by both Notion and its community, transform abstract product capabilities into concrete, copyable solutions for specific scenarios (e.g., project management, content calendars). This dramatically lowers activation costs for new users and fuels SEO-driven discovery. Third, a vibrant Community acts as a distributed growth engine. Users and official Ambassadors create tutorials, share use cases, and host local events. This community not only educates users but also fosters a sense of identity around pursuing "better ways of working," strengthening loyalty and enabling global, low-cost expansion. Together, these flywheels create a self-reinforcing ecosystem: a great product attracts users who create templates and community content, which in turn attracts more users and deepens engagement. This system allowed Notion to scale from individuals to teams and enterprises through a bottom-up adoption path. Looking ahead, AI integration promises to accelerate these flywheels further by making templates smarter and the platform a potential AI-native work operating system. Ultimately, Notion's defensible advantage is not just its features, but this deeply entrenched network of user assets, creators, and community trust.

marsbitHá 4h

Deconstructing Notion's Growth: From a Note-taking Tool to 100 Million Users—How Notion Built a Triple Growth Flywheel Through Product, Templates, and Community

marsbitHá 4h

$10 Billion, Qualcomm to Acquire Chip Legend Jim Keller's Company

Global mobile chip giant Qualcomm is in advanced talks to acquire AI chip startup Tenstorrent in a deal valued between $8-10 billion, according to media reports. This potential acquisition would be one of the largest in the AI chip sector in recent years. Tenstorrent, led by legendary chip architect Jim Keller, has gained prominence for its RISC-V architecture and AI accelerator designs. The move highlights Qualcomm's strategic push to diversify beyond its core smartphone chip business. As the smartphone market matures, Qualcomm is aggressively targeting growth in automotive, data center, and cloud AI. Acquiring Tenstorrent would allow Qualcomm to rapidly enter the high-end AI computing market, bypassing lengthy in-house development cycles. Tenstorrent's cost-effective system architecture, which avoids expensive HBM memory and relies on standard Ethernet for clustering, offers a potential alternative to Nvidia's costly solutions. Furthermore, Tenstorrent's high-performance RISC-V CPU technology and its focus on the automotive and edge computing segments align with Qualcomm's strategic goals, including its "Snapdragon Digital Chassis" platform. Despite the strategic rationale, the high valuation has sparked some investor caution. The successful integration of Tenstorrent's open-source culture and independent team into Qualcomm's organization, along with the commercialization of its technology, remains a key challenge.

marsbitHá 5h

$10 Billion, Qualcomm to Acquire Chip Legend Jim Keller's Company

marsbitHá 5h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片