Uniswap menembus dukungan multi-tahun: Akankah UNI mengalami penurunan lebih besar?

ambcryptoPublicado em 2026-02-02Última atualização em 2026-02-02

Resumo

Uniswap (UNI) telah kehilangan level dukungan kunci di $4,10 yang dipertahankan sejak Maret 2022, membuka peluang penurunan lebih lanjut. Harga UNI turun 5,10% menjadi sekitar $3,85 dengan volume perdagangan yang juga menurun. Analisis teknis menunjukkan potensi penurunan hingga 45% ke level $2,30 jika harga gagal kembali di atas $4,10. Meskipun indikator ADX dan MFI menunjukkan momentum yang lemah dan kondisi pasar netral, data derivatif mengungkapkan sentimen bearish dengan posisi short-leveraged yang lebih dominan. Di sisi lain, arus keluar aset dari bursa mengindikasikan akumulasi oleh investor jangka panjang. Risiko penurunan signifikan tetap ada jika level $4,10 tidak berhasil ditembus kembali.

Di tengah kondisi pasar yang bearish, Uniswap [UNI] telah membuka pintu untuk pergerakan turun lebih lanjut setelah kehilangan level kunci yang dipertahankannya sejak Juni 2022.

Prospek ini semakin diperkuat oleh trader intraday, karena taruhan pada posisi leverage short terus meningkat, menunjukkan bahwa penurunan lebih lanjut mungkin akan terjadi.

Hingga berita ini ditulis, harga UNI kehilangan 5,10% nilainya dan diperdagangkan di sekitar $3,85. Volume perdagangan aset juga menurun signifikan, turun 9% menjadi $395 juta, mengindikasikan ketakutan yang tumbuh di kalangan trader dan investor.

Uniswap – Aksi harga dan level kunci

Melihat grafik mingguan, UNI tampaknya telah kehilangan kendali atas support kunci di $4,10 dan juga menutup lilin mingguan di bawah level ini.

Grafik lebih lanjut menunjukkan bahwa aset tersebut telah mempertahankan support ini sejak Maret 2022. Setelah breakdown ini, aksi harga berubah menjadi bearish, menunjukkan bahwa pergerakan turun yang signifikan mungkin akan segera terjadi.

Berdasarkan kinerja masa lalu dan aksi harga saat ini, jika UNI gagal merebut kembali level $4,10, ada kemungkinan kuat bahwa harga bisa turun lagi sebesar 45% dan mencapai support berikutnya di $2,30.

Namun, Average Directional Index (ADX)—indikator yang mengukur kekuatan tren—berada di 20,32, di bawah ambang batas kunci 25, menunjukkan bahwa aset tersebut kurang memiliki momentum arah yang kuat.

Sementara itu, Money Flow Index (MFI), yang melacak tekanan jual dan beli berdasarkan harga dan volume, berada di 44,32, menunjukkan kondisi pasar netral tanpa dominasi yang jelas dari pembeli maupun penjual.

Data derivatif menunjukkan sentimen campuran

Dari perspektif derivatif, trader intraday UNI tampaknya sangat mengikuti tren yang berlaku.

Menurut data dari platform analitik derivatif CoinGlass, trader menunjukkan minat tertinggi di $3,69 pada sisi downside dan $3,99 pada sisi upside.

Trader di level-level ini telah membangun posisi leverage long senilai sekitar $1,63 juta dan posisi leverage short senilai $2,10 juta, menunjukkan bahwa sentimen pasar saat ini condong ke sisi bearish.

Namun, investor jangka panjang tampaknya memanfaatkan penurunan harga baru-baru ini, karena mereka sepertinya sedang mengakumulasi token UNI.

Menurut CoinGlass, data Arus Masuk/Keluar Spot UNI mencatat outflow moderat senilai $1,26 juta UNI dari bursa dalam 24 jam terakhir, mengindikasikan akumulasi potensial.

Dalam lanskap kripto, arus keluar aset dari bursa ke dompet umumnya dipandang sebagai tanda akumulasi.


Pemikiran Akhir

  • UNI telah kehilangan support kuncinya di $4,10, meningkatkan risiko penurunan lebih lanjut karena trader menunjukkan minat kuat pada posisi leverage short.
  • Jika UNI gagal merebut kembali level $4,10, aset tersebut dapat menghadapi penurunan tambahan sekitar 45% dalam beberapa hari mendatang, karena tidak ada support terdekat.

Perguntas relacionadas

QApa yang terjadi dengan harga Uniswap (UNI) berdasarkan artikel tersebut?

AHarga Uniswap (UNI) telah turun 5,10% dan diperdagangkan di sekitar $3,85, setelah kehilangan level support kunci di $4,10 yang dipertahankan sejak Maret 2022.

QApa indikasi dari penurunan volume perdagangan UNI sebesar 9%?

APenurunan volume perdagangan sebesar 9% menjadi $395 juta mengindikasikan meningkatnya ketakutan di kalangan trader dan investor.

QBerapa potensi penurunan harga lebih lanjut yang disebutkan jika UNI gagal kembali ke level $4,10?

AJika UNI gagal merebut kembali level $4,10, ada kemungkinan kuat harga bisa turun 45% lagi untuk mencapai support berikutnya di $2,30.

QApa yang ditunjukkan oleh data derivatif tentang posisi leveraged trader intraday?

AData derivatif menunjukkan minat tertinggi trader pada $3,69 (downside) dan $3,99 (upside), dengan posisi short-leveraged senilai $2,10 juta yang lebih tinggi daripada posisi long senilai $1,63 juta, mengindikasikan sentimen pasar yang bearish.

QApa arti dari arus keluar aset UNI senilai $1,26 juta dari exchange?

AArus keluar aset UNI senilai $1,26 juta dari exchange dalam 24 jam terakhir mengindikasikan akumulasi potensial, di mana investor jangka panjang mungkin membeli token pada harga yang lebih rendah.

Leituras Relacionadas

Has the 'Digital Gold' Narrative for BTC Failed?

**Title: Has the "Digital Gold" Narrative for Bitcoin Failed?** The article argues that Bitcoin's "digital gold" narrative remains valid despite a recent sharp price decline (from a peak near $126k in Oct 2025 to briefly under $61k in Feb 2026). It presents a long-term investment framework based on three core points: **1. Viewing Bitcoin as an Asset:** Bitcoin is presented as a superior potential store of value compared to gold. Key arguments are its absolute scarcity (21 million cap), superior portability, and transparent auditability via its public ledger. While acknowledging its current use in early, volatile stages (~3-4% global adoption), the author draws parallels to the early, disruptive phases of the internet and e-commerce. **2. Understanding the Recent Downturn:** The current ~50% correction is framed as a predictable, consensus-driven cycle following its post-halving peak (the 2024 halving preceded the Oct 2025 high). A crucial factor is a historic "changing of hands": the influx of new institutional buyers via ETFs allowed early, low-cost holders (miners, OG believers) to take profits. The author notes that while severe, Bitcoin's historical drawdowns (e.g., 93% in 2011, 77% in 2021-22) have been progressively smaller, suggesting maturing holder structure and decreasing volatility over time. **3. The Long-Term Perspective:** The long-term thesis hinges on Bitcoin capturing a portion of gold's market value. With Bitcoin's market cap at ~$1.4 trillion (at $70k) versus gold's ~$20 trillion, significant upside potential exists if the "digital gold" narrative is partially realized. However, the author strongly cautions that short-term risks remain, the bottom is unpredictable, and high volatility is inherent. The real risk is not Bitcoin failing but poor personal position management (over-leverage, wrong capital) and a lack of deep understanding, which can force investors out during severe downturns. The conclusion uses Amazon's 95% crash post-2000 dot-com bubble and subsequent 42x recovery as an analogy. The ultimate question is not if Bitcoin's price will rise, but if an investor's strategy and conviction can withstand the volatility to see the long-term play out. The recent divergence (gold up, Bitcoin down) is posed not as a narrative failure, but as potential evidence of this ongoing, painful transition from a speculative asset to a mainstream allocation.

marsbitHá 5h

Has the 'Digital Gold' Narrative for BTC Failed?

marsbitHá 5h

Has BTC's 'Digital Gold' Narrative Failed?

The article discusses Bitcoin's "digital gold" narrative, its recent price drop, and long-term outlook through the perspective of "Jason". It argues the narrative is not a failure but that Bitcoin represents a superior, new asset class due to its fixed supply (21 million), portability, and auditability. The piece compares its current ~3-4% global adoption rate to early internet/e-commerce, suggesting significant growth potential. Regarding the 2025-2026 price decline (from ~$126k to briefly under $61k), the author views it as a predictable, consensus-driven sell-off within Bitcoin's ~4-year cycle post-halving, exacerbated by a major "handover" from early, low-cost holders to new institutional buyers via ETFs. A key observation is that historical peak-to-trough drawdowns have lessened over time (e.g., 93% in 2011 to ~50% in 2026), indicating maturing volatility as holder structure changes. For the long term, the author uses a simple framework: Bitcoin's total market cap (~$1.4T at $70k) is only about 7% of gold's (~$20T). Even capturing 30-50% of gold's value would imply substantial upside. However, the article strongly cautions against viewing this as investment advice, emphasizing extreme volatility and the critical importance of risk management, position sizing, and deep fundamental understanding to survive severe drawdowns. It concludes by drawing a parallel to Amazon's 95% crash in 2000 and subsequent 42x recovery, stressing that the key is surviving market cycles to realize long-term potential.

链捕手Há 5h

Has BTC's 'Digital Gold' Narrative Failed?

链捕手Há 5h

From Code to Cognition: A Ten-Thousand-Word Guide to the Evolution of the Robot Brain

"From Code to Cognition: The Evolution of Robot Brains" The journey of robotic intelligence has shifted dramatically from manually coded systems to AI-driven brains. For decades, robots relied on layered software stacks—perception, state estimation, planning, control—each handcrafted. While predictable, they lacked adaptability. The 2010s saw deep learning revolutionize perception (e.g., object detection) and control (via reinforcement learning), but learned skills remained narrow. The arrival of Large Language Models (LLMs) marked a turning point. LLMs acted as high-level planners, interpreting natural language instructions and generating sequences of actions for traditional robotic systems to execute. However, true integration came with Visual-Language-Action (VLA) models, which fused vision, language, and motion prediction into a single network. Pioneered by models like RT-2 and open-source projects like OpenVLA, VLAs enable robots to reason and act directly from visual input and commands. The most advanced humanoid robots now employ a "dual-brain" architecture: a slow-thinking, large VLA (System 2) for reasoning and planning, and a fast-reacting, small network (System 1) for high-frequency motion control, sometimes with an even lower-level System 0 for balance. This split balances cognition with the physics of real-time movement. Computation is split between onboard hardware (e.g., NVIDIA Jetson) for safety-critical control loops and cloud/edge servers for non-critical tasks like learning and interfaces. A crucial driver is the open-source ecosystem—models like GR00T and OpenVLA allow startups to build upon pre-trained brains and fine-tune them with their own data, accelerating development. Despite progress, current systems struggle with recovery from errors, sample inefficiency, and long-horizon tasks. This has spurred the rise of **World Models**—neural networks that predict the consequences of actions. By simulating possible futures before acting (like NVIDIA Cosmos or Meta V-JEPA), robots can plan, recover, and generalize better. This represents the next frontier: shifting intelligence from learned reactions to an internal model of physics and cause-and-effect. The field is rapidly evolving. While not yet at its "ChatGPT moment," the convergence of cheaper hardware, scalable simulation, and world models points toward robots that are increasingly capable, adaptive, and useful. The question is shifting from "what can robots do?" to "what *should* they do?"

marsbitHá 6h

From Code to Cognition: A Ten-Thousand-Word Guide to the Evolution of the Robot Brain

marsbitHá 6h

Trading

Spot
Futuros

Artigos em Destaque

Como comprar UNI

Bem-vindo à HTX.com!Tornámos a compra de Uniswap (UNI) simples e conveniente.Segue o nosso guia passo a passo para iniciar a tua jornada no mundo das criptos.Passo 1: cria a tua conta HTXUtiliza o teu e-mail ou número de telefone para te inscreveres numa conta gratuita na HTX.Desfruta de um processo de inscrição sem complicações e desbloqueia todas as funcionalidades.Obter a minha contaPasso 2: vai para Comprar Cripto e escolhe o teu método de pagamentoCartão de crédito/débito: usa o teu visa ou mastercard para comprar Uniswap (UNI) instantaneamente.Saldo: usa os fundos da tua conta HTX para transacionar sem problemas.Terceiros: adicionamos métodos de pagamento populares, como Google Pay e Apple Pay, para aumentar a conveniência.P2P: transaciona diretamente com outros utilizadores na HTX.Mercado de balcão (OTC): oferecemos serviços personalizados e taxas de câmbio competitivas para os traders.Passo 3: armazena teu Uniswap (UNI)Depois de comprar o teu Uniswap (UNI), armazena-o na tua conta HTX.Alternativamente, podes enviá-lo para outro lugar através de transferência blockchain ou usá-lo para transacionar outras criptomoedas.Passo 4: transaciona Uniswap (UNI)Transaciona facilmente Uniswap (UNI) no mercado à vista da HTX.Acede simplesmente à tua conta, seleciona o teu par de trading, executa as tuas transações e monitoriza em tempo real.Oferecemos uma experiência de fácil utilização tanto para principiantes como para traders experientes.

462 Visualizações TotaisPublicado em {updateTime}Atualizado em 2026.06.02

Como comprar UNI

Discussões

Bem-vindo à Comunidade HTX. Aqui, pode manter-se informado sobre os mais recentes desenvolvimentos da plataforma e obter acesso a análises profissionais de mercado. As opiniões dos utilizadores sobre o preço de UNI (UNI) são apresentadas abaixo.

活动图片