Vitalik Buterin – “Merge Isn’t Priced In Yet”, What It Means For Ethereum (ETH) Price

CoingapePublicado em 2022-07-28Última atualização em 2022-07-30

Resumo

Vitalik Buterin Says the Merge Isn’t Priced In Until It Happens

Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin in an interview said “the merge is not priced in” until it happens, not just for market terms but also for psychological and narrative terms. The highly-awaited Merge is most likely to occur on September 19 and will not immediately be a complete PoS transition with the merge of Ethereum Mainnet and Beacon Chain.

In market terms, the prices are not likely to be rising soon before or after the Merge. Expect a 6-8 months waiting period before the actual price action “under the right set of conditions.” The Ethereum will be deflationary after the Merge.

Vitalik Buterin Says the Merge Isn’t Priced In Until It Happens

Vitalik Buterin, Ethereum co-founder and developer, doesn’t believe the Merge is priced in until it happens, reported Bankless on July 28.

“I basically expect that the merge is going to be kind of not priced in, by which I mean like not even just like market terms but even just kind of like psychological and narrative terms.”

He means the transition to Proof of Stake (PoS) will not be complete by just the Merge of Ethereum Mainnet and the Beacon Chain. Ideally, the Surge, Verge, Purge, and Splurge phrases are crucial for the Merge.

In market terms, people anticipating a price rally as a result of the upcoming Merge in mid-September will have to wait 6-8 months for the price rally to actually kicks in.

A post-merge cleanup fork usually runs for about 6 to 8 months. Ethereum developers will most likely open withdrawals after a post-cleanup update. New Ether issue will continue only after the cleanup phase.

The Ethereum (ETH) will become deflationary crypto after the Merge, with the supply reducing as a result of the EIP-1559 proposing to burn ETH instead of giving it to miners.

The Ethereum (ETH) prices could rise before the Merge, dump on Merge, and again as Vitalik Buterin said at the Ethereum Community Conference, the value of Ethereum will rise under the right market conditions.

Staked Ethereum and Ethereum Classic after the Merge

Lido Staked ETH (stETH) and Ethereum Classic (ETC) prices are also rising higher with Ethereum (ETH) prices in the last 24 hours. ETH, stETH, and ETC prices jumped 12%, 11%, and 22%, respectively.

Staked ETH will most likely also be locked until Ethereum developers complete the post-cleanup update. However, some exchanges such as Coinbase and Kraken claim to allow for trading of staked ETH before the 6-month period.

Meanwhile, Ethereum Classic (ETH) price is rising as miners can switch to it post-Merge. The PoS transition will make ETH miners obsolete. Also, AntPool promises support for the Classic blockchain.

Leituras Relacionadas

Understanding Bound in One Article: The "Multi-signature + Timelock" Escape Mechanism and the Off-Chain Matching Black Box

**Title**: Understanding Bound: The Escape Mechanism of "Multi-Sig + Time Lock" and the Off-Chain Matching Black Box **Summary**: Bound Exchange, evolved from the earlier radFi platform, introduces a novel approach to Bitcoin trading by combining self-custody security with exchange-like speed. Its core mechanism relies on a 2-of-2 multi-signature (multi-sig) address for user deposits. One private key is held by the user via a passkey, and the other is held by Bound. This setup requires both keys to sign any transaction, preventing Bound from unilaterally accessing user funds (non-custodial). To address the risk of Bound becoming unavailable, a 3-month timelock is integrated into the Bitcoin script. After this period, users can withdraw their assets with just their single signature, ensuring an escape hatch. For trading, Bound operates a concentrated liquidity AMM. However, as Bitcoin L1 lacks smart contracts, the AMM curve, liquidity management, and trade price calculations occur off-chain in Bound's backend database. On-chain Bitcoin transactions serve only as final settlement receipts for pre-determined amounts. This creates a centralization point: the critical sequence of trade execution—which determines the exact price along the curve for each order—is managed off-chain by Bound in a non-transparent "black box." While the 2-of-2 setup protects user本金 (principal), the pricing and ordering of trades introduce potential operational MEV risks, as the order processing is invisible and unverifiable on-chain. In practice, users can also connect external wallets (like Unisat) for fully self-custodied trading, but this requires manually signing every transaction. The platform currently supports deposits of BTC and Runes only.

marsbitMesmo agora

Understanding Bound in One Article: The "Multi-signature + Timelock" Escape Mechanism and the Off-Chain Matching Black Box

marsbitMesmo agora

Amid Internal and External Challenges, Is Ethereum's Neutral Route Still Viable?

"Ethereum is facing a dual crisis of market pressure and internal challenges. Its native token ETH is in a mid-term downtrend, with negative sentiment prevailing, weak price action, and significant outflows from ETFs. The ETH/BTC ratio has hit a ten-month low, and institutional holdings have shrunk. Concurrently, the Ethereum Foundation has seen a major exodus of core personnel following its commitment to a neutral, non-commercial development roadmap focused on censorship resistance, openness, privacy, and security (CROPS). This stance has sparked debate. Critics, including former members, argue that the ecosystem lacks a dedicated, well-funded entity to promote ETH's commercial value and compete with rival chains. Proposals suggest creating a new, independent body to drive adoption and token value, forming a dual-model with the Foundation. While some investors view the personnel changes as normal turnover and remain bullish on Ethereum's long-term fundamentals, the immediate path forward is unclear. Analysts believe Ethereum must execute its technical roadmap (like upcoming upgrades), clarify governance, and focus on high-value sectors like DeFi and tokenization to convert its technological edge into a compelling investment thesis. The current downturn tests whether its decentralized model can adapt to balance core principles with commercial competitiveness."

marsbitHá 6m

Amid Internal and External Challenges, Is Ethereum's Neutral Route Still Viable?

marsbitHá 6m

Technology Has No Barriers, 24/7 Trading is the Key to Hyperliquid's Success

The article argues that Hyperliquid's competitive edge lies not in technological superiority but in its 24/7 trading model, which fundamentally challenges traditional finance's fixed market hours. Based in Singapore with an 11-person team, Hyperliquid has generated significant revenue and trading volume. Its core advantage is the ability to facilitate trading continuously, including during weekends when major exchanges like the CME are closed. This was demonstrated when Hyperliquid listed a SpaceX pre-IPO perpetual contract on a Sunday, allowing the market to price the company hours before traditional institutions opened. This disruption has drawn regulatory scrutiny from traditional giants like CME and ICE, who cite risks like lack of KYC and market manipulation. However, the article suggests their concern stems from Hyperliquid eroding the "time monopoly" of established markets. The piece contrasts Hyperliquid's synthetic derivatives—pure price-betting contracts with no underlying asset or centralized issuer—with other models like PreStocks (dependent on real股权) and Ondo (licensed but targetable). Hyperliquid's code-based, decentralized structure makes it resilient to takedowns, even if founders face legal action. Ultimately, the author concludes that while it raises legitimate regulatory questions, Hyperliquid's "unforgeable" competitive barrier is the time advantage of non-stop trading, a feature legacy systems cannot replicate.

marsbitHá 6m

Technology Has No Barriers, 24/7 Trading is the Key to Hyperliquid's Success

marsbitHá 6m

New Information Laundering in Prediction Markets: How Secrets Blend into Investment Signals

"The New Information Laundering in Prediction Markets: How Secrets Infiltrate Investment Signals In late February 2026, nine linked anonymous wallets on Polymarket placed over 80 bets on specific details of a US-Iran war, winning over $2.4 million with a 98% win rate. This exemplifies 'information laundering'—a destructive flaw inherent to prediction markets. These markets function by aggregating trader supply and demand on an order book to set prices, which represent collective probability estimates. This makes them valuable real-time sentiment indicators for institutions. However, the system cannot distinguish between public information and stolen secrets. Confidential information enters one end, and 'clean' market prices—bearing no trace of their illicit origin—emerge from the other. For example, an insider knowing of an imminent strike can buy contracts at low odds, pushing the price up and disguising the secret as a savvy market signal, then profit massively when the event occurs. Analysts can sometimes uncover these schemes due to the blockchain's transparency, as seen with Bubblemaps. Paradoxically, this same transparency can inadvertently broadcast secrets to adversarial observers, providing them with low-cost intelligence. Current laws, like insider trading regulations focused on corporate information, fail to address this issue, especially concerning events like military actions with no 'issuer.' Jurisdictional challenges are amplified as platforms operate offshore, easily bypassing national bans with VPNs. Recent US congressional investigations and proposed bills aim to ban war betting and trading on non-public information by officials. The core issue is that information laundering is not a bug but a feature: a market that perfectly converts knowledge into price will inherently reward those with the best information, including those who obtained it illicitly. As prediction markets grow, potentially reaching hundreds of billions in volume, society must confront whether it can tolerate a machine that profitably transforms its most guarded secrets into public, tradable numbers."

链捕手Há 15m

New Information Laundering in Prediction Markets: How Secrets Blend into Investment Signals

链捕手Há 15m

Trump’s Dual Pressure: When the Iran Deal Meets the Midterm Elections

U.S. President Donald Trump’s efforts to negotiate a deal with Iran are triggering a political backlash within his own Republican Party, as the approach of midterm elections intensifies internal divisions. Reports of a potential agreement—involving a temporary ceasefire, phased sanctions relief, and the unfreezing of Iranian assets in exchange for discussions on Tehran diluting or transferring its stockpile of highly enriched uranium—have drawn sharp criticism from GOP hawks. Key allies like Senators Lindsey Graham and Ted Cruz warned that such concessions could allow Iran to recuperate, undermine recent U.S. military gains, and ultimately strengthen a hostile regime. The dispute highlights a broader political struggle for Trump, who must reconcile his "America First" posture with diplomatic compromise while facing a tough electoral landscape. With Republicans fighting to maintain control of Congress and Trump’s approval ratings declining, the Iran deal has quickly become a test of party loyalty and perceived toughness. Public sparring between Trump aides and critics—including former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo—underscores the internal pressure. While Secretary of State Marco Rubio defended Trump’s historically hardline stance, skeptics like Senator Thom Tillis questioned the logic of any deal that leaves nuclear materials in Iran. The outcome now hinges on whether Trump can persuade his party’s hardliners to accept a negotiated exit.

marsbitHá 18m

Trump’s Dual Pressure: When the Iran Deal Meets the Midterm Elections

marsbitHá 18m

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片

Categorias popularesright-arrow

Etiquetas Popularesright-arrow