SSV Network DAO Meluncurkan SSV Staking: Mengubah SSV Menjadi Token Akrual ETH

TheNewsCryptoPublicado em 2026-01-28Última atualização em 2026-01-28

Resumo

SSV Network, penyedia teknologi validator terdistribusi (DVT) terkemuka di Ethereum, mengumumkan proposal besar bernama "SSV Staking". Proposal ini akan mengubah token SSV dari sekadar aset governance menjadi token yang menghasilkan ETH, dengan memungkinkan pemegang SSV melakukan staking dan menerima imbalan dalam ETH dari biaya jaringan. Perubahan ini didukung oleh pengenalan "Effective Balance Oracles" untuk menyesuaikan dengan model validator pasca-Pectra Ethereum, di mana satu validator dapat menampung hingga 2.048 ETH. Pemegang token dapat melakukan staking SSV untuk menerima cSSV, token likuid ERC-20 yang tetap mempertahankan hak governance sekaligus memberikan bagian proporsional dari fee jaringan yang dibayarkan dalam ETH. Jika disetujui oleh DAO, upgrade ini akan menyelaraskan ekonomi protokol SSV dengan realitas ekonomi validator Ethereum dan memperkuat hubungan antara infrastruktur Ethereum dan pemegang token SSV.

SSV Network, penyedia teknologi validator terdistribusi (DVT) terkemuka di Ethereum, yang mengamankan lebih dari 5,5 juta ETH, akan mengalami peningkatan komprehensif terbesar dalam sejarahnya. SSV DAO telah mengungkapkan jalur potensial untuk SSV Staking, peningkatan besar yang akan mendesain ulang secara fundamental bagaimana jaringan memperhitungkan saldo validator dan mengumpulkan biaya. Jika disetujui, proposal ini akan memperkenalkan delegasi SSV Staking dan Effective Balance Oracles, yang integral bagi jaringan, serta mengubah token SSV menjadi token akrual ETH, memungkinkan staker SSV menerima imbalan ETH yang diperoleh dari biaya jaringan.

Inti dari proposal ini adalah peralihan dari biaya protokol yang didominasi SSV menuju model akuntansi dan imbalan yang sepenuhnya asli ETH yang mencerminkan realitas ekonomi validator Ethereum. Imbalan validator diperoleh dalam ETH, biaya operator ditetapkan dalam ETH, dan saldo validator pasca-Pectra kini dapat meningkat hingga 2.048 ETH per validator. SSV Staking dirancang untuk menyelaraskan protokol — dan tokennya — dengan realitas tersebut.

Memperkenalkan Effective Balance Oracles untuk akuntansi pasca-Pectra

Secara paralel, mendukung staking SSV dan model validator pasca-Pectra Ethereum memerlukan akuntansi yang sadar saldo efektif. Effective Balance Accounting memastikan bahwa biaya, perhitungan runway, dan logika likuidasi skala sesuai dengan stake aktual yang diamankan oleh validator, alih-alih mengandalkan akuntansi "per-validator" yang telah berubah dengan konsolidasi validator – memungkinkan satu validator memiliki saldo 2048 ETH.

Mengimplementasikan model ini secara native mengharuskan protokol untuk mencerminkan saldo efektif validator di on-chain sepanjang siklus hidupnya. Untuk menjembatani kesenjangan antara lapisan konsensus Ethereum dan akuntansi on-chain, protokol memperkenalkan Effective Balance Oracles yang melacak saldo validator dan memperbarui status protokol.

Mengoperasikan lapisan oracle ini dengan aman dan tangguh adalah fungsi inti protokol. Di bawah SSV Staking, pemegang SSV akan melakukan staking dan mendelegasikan token mereka untuk mendukung seleksi dan operasi peserta oracle, menyelaraskan insentif ekonomi dengan keamanan protokol.

Dari token tata kelola menjadi aset akrual ETH

Berdasarkan proposal, pemegang SSV akan dapat melakukan staking token mereka dalam kontrak staking baru dan menerima cSSV, token ERC-20 likuid yang dicetak 1:1 untuk mewakili posisi staking. Selama memegang cSSV, peserta akan mengakumulasi bagian proporsional dari biaya jaringan yang didominasi ETH, didistribusikan melalui protokol sesuai dengan proporsi partisipasi staking.

Elad Gafni, SSV Foundation, mengatakan:

“cSSV dirancang untuk mewakili lebih dari sekadar posisi staking; ini mewakili partisipasi.” Tambahnya: “SSV Staking adalah mekanisme bagi pemegang SSV untuk membantu mengoperasikan dan mengamankan fungsi inti protokol melalui delegasi. Ini adalah perubahan fundamental dalam bagaimana nilai mengalir melalui jaringan.”

Yang terpenting, memegang cSSV mempertahankan hak tata kelola dan suara penuh, sekaligus memungkinkan komposabilitas di seluruh DeFi sebagai representasi likuid dari SSV yang di-staking.

Hubungan baru antara infrastruktur Ethereum dan pemegang token SSV

SSV Staking melampaui sekadar memperkenalkan hasil. Ini adalah desain ulang penuh dari mesin ekonomi jaringan, yang menghubungkan saldo validator, biaya yang didominasi ETH, akuntansi berbasis oracle, dan insentif token menjadi satu sistem tunggal.

Jika disetujui oleh DAO, SSV Staking akan menandai peralihan dari SSV sebagai token pembayaran untuk tata kelola dan operator menuju token akrual ETH, yang terhubung erat dengan penggunaan salah satu penyedia infrastruktur staking terbesar Ethereum.

Tentang SSV Network

SSV Network menyediakan infrastruktur terdistribusi yang dirancang untuk meningkatkan toleransi kesalahan, desentralisasi, dan keamanan validator Ethereum melalui Distributed Validator Technology (DVT). SSV Network adalah penyedia terkemuka di Ethereum, mengamankan lebih dari 5,5 juta ETH, senilai sekitar ~$16 miliar, di hampir 2.000 operator node yang terdistribusi secara global.

Kontak pers:

  • Robert Drage
  • robert@ssvlabs.io

Penafian: TheNewsCrypto tidak mendukung konten apa pun di halaman ini. Konten yang digambarkan dalam Siaran Pers ini tidak mewakili saran investasi apa pun. TheNewsCrypto merekomendasikan pembaca kami untuk membuat keputusan berdasarkan penelitian mereka sendiri. TheNewsCrypto tidak bertanggung jawab atas segala kerusakan atau kerugian yang terkait dengan konten, produk, atau layanan yang dinyatakan dalam Siaran Pers ini.

TagsSiaran PersSSV Network

Leituras Relacionadas

Behind Musk and Huang Jen-hsun's 'AI Factories', an Unseen Battle for Freshwater Has Begun

Behind the "AI factories" of Elon Musk and Jensen Huang lies a hidden battle for a critical resource: fresh water. As AI models like ChatGPT and Claude process billions of prompts daily, they consume vast amounts of water for cooling. By 2030, global AI infrastructure is projected to use 9.3 trillion liters annually—enough to meet the basic needs of 1.3 billion people. This "water grab" stems from the massive heat generated by high-powered GPUs. Over 70% of data centers use evaporative cooling systems, where water absorbs heat and evaporates into the atmosphere, depleting local groundwater. Training models like GPT-4 can consume over 600 million liters of water. Tech giants like Google and Microsoft report skyrocketing water usage, sparking conflicts with local communities over resources. A flashpoint occurred in Memphis, Tennessee, where Musk's xAI built the Colossus supercomputer. It draws nearly 3.8 million liters of drinking water daily from local aquifers, leading to public outrage and legal action. In response, xAI is building an $80 million water recycling plant to use treated wastewater instead. Facing pressure, companies like Microsoft promote "waterless" closed-loop cooling systems. However, these systems increase electricity consumption by 20-30%, shifting the water burden to power plants, which require immense cooling water themselves—a case of indirect water footprint transfer. For China's AI industry, this crisis offers a strategic warning and opportunity. Instead of replicating the West's resource-intensive model, China can leverage its "East Data, West Computing" policy to locate data centers in cooler, water-rich regions like Guizhou. Furthermore, developing lightweight edge computing for smart homes and embodied AI robots can drastically reduce the need for constant cloud queries, cutting both water and energy consumption at the source. The freshwater war underscores a fundamental question: Will AI be a tool for human advancement or a silicon-based monster competing for our planet's last drops of clean water? The answer is becoming clearer as the water vapor rises.

marsbitHá 4m

Behind Musk and Huang Jen-hsun's 'AI Factories', an Unseen Battle for Freshwater Has Begun

marsbitHá 4m

AGI is Just One Step Away

The article discusses Anthropic's release of the Fable 5 model, a heavily restricted version of its powerful Mythos model. Initially unveiled in April, Mythos reportedly identified over 10,000 high-risk vulnerabilities for 50 enterprise clients, causing significant concern. Due to its dangerous capabilities in areas like autonomous cyber-attacks and biochemical weapons design guidance (classified as CB-1 level), the unaltered Mythos 5 remains limited to about 200 vetted entities like government agencies. Fable 5, released with a safety classifier, demonstrates extraordinary performance, leading benchmarks in coding (SWE-Bench Pro), software engineering, and research. It exhibits true "long-horizon agency," autonomously planning and executing complex, multi-step tasks like migrating 50 million lines of code in a day, moving beyond simple question-answering. The article positions Fable 5 at OpenAI's Level 3 ("Agent") and progressing toward Level 4 ("Innovator"), suggesting AGI (Artificial General Intelligence) is within reach, potentially 18-24 months away. To mitigate risks, Anthropic implemented a two-layer safety "cage": a silent routing system that redirects dangerous queries to a weaker model, and a mandatory 30-day data retention policy for all Mythos traffic to detect patterns of malicious use. Despite its high cost ($10/$50 per million input/output tokens), the model targets the enterprise market, where its unparalleled productivity and defensive capabilities against AI-powered cyber threats justify the premium. This signals a market maturation where top-tier AI becomes a strategic, high-value tool for businesses, potentially widening the gap with consumer-focused models and accelerating the rise of "one-person companies" while disrupting labor markets.

marsbitHá 16m

AGI is Just One Step Away

marsbitHá 16m

AI Investors' 2026 Anxiety: When Models Devour Everything, What Moat Is Left for Startups?

In 2026, a wave of investor anxiety questions the defensibility of AI startups as models improve, fearing that most companies are just "thin wrappers" destined to be absorbed by foundation models or chipmakers. The author argues against this despair, positing that true moats lie not in benchmark performance but in areas models cannot easily reach. The logic of despair is that if models excel at all measurable tasks, only compute and cutting-edge model weights hold lasting value. However, the essay contends that the most valuable work is inherently "untrainable." Benchmarks measure what can be measured and thus optimized for, but real-world correctness often resides in private, complex systems. Examples include legacy codebases, intricate legal transactions, or hospital workflows. This kind of correctness is proprietary, costly to establish, and cannot be validated quickly—it requires time and trust within an organization. As models commodify visible, measurable tasks from both above (labs absorbing scaffolding) and below (saturation by cheaper models), value shifts to "untrainable ground." This encompasses work where correctness is a private truth, locked behind integration barriers, licenses, liability frameworks, and entrenched user habits. Trust and adoption are slow, human-centric processes that smarter models cannot accelerate. Successful companies defend their position by embedding deeply into client operations, owning the definition of "good" within a specific domain (e.g., Harvey in law, OpenEvidence in medicine), and pricing on outcomes rather than tokens. While labs compete fiercely, they are incentivized to keep the application layer vibrant. The future belongs not to those competing on generic benchmarks but to those navigating unscoreable terrain, doing the "unsexy work" of translation between models and messy human realities. The most cited benchmark scores are thus maps of territory about to become worthless, signaling who will lose the right to define what counts as good.

marsbitHá 1h

AI Investors' 2026 Anxiety: When Models Devour Everything, What Moat Is Left for Startups?

marsbitHá 1h

Trading

Spot
Futuros

Artigos em Destaque

Como comprar DAO

Bem-vindo à HTX.com!Tornámos a compra de DAO Maker (DAO) simples e conveniente.Segue o nosso guia passo a passo para iniciar a tua jornada no mundo das criptos.Passo 1: cria a tua conta HTXUtiliza o teu e-mail ou número de telefone para te inscreveres numa conta gratuita na HTX.Desfruta de um processo de inscrição sem complicações e desbloqueia todas as funcionalidades.Obter a minha contaPasso 2: vai para Comprar Cripto e escolhe o teu método de pagamentoCartão de crédito/débito: usa o teu visa ou mastercard para comprar DAO Maker (DAO) instantaneamente.Saldo: usa os fundos da tua conta HTX para transacionar sem problemas.Terceiros: adicionamos métodos de pagamento populares, como Google Pay e Apple Pay, para aumentar a conveniência.P2P: transaciona diretamente com outros utilizadores na HTX.Mercado de balcão (OTC): oferecemos serviços personalizados e taxas de câmbio competitivas para os traders.Passo 3: armazena teu DAO Maker (DAO)Depois de comprar o teu DAO Maker (DAO), armazena-o na tua conta HTX.Alternativamente, podes enviá-lo para outro lugar através de transferência blockchain ou usá-lo para transacionar outras criptomoedas.Passo 4: transaciona DAO Maker (DAO)Transaciona facilmente DAO Maker (DAO) no mercado à vista da HTX.Acede simplesmente à tua conta, seleciona o teu par de trading, executa as tuas transações e monitoriza em tempo real.Oferecemos uma experiência de fácil utilização tanto para principiantes como para traders experientes.

190 Visualizações TotaisPublicado em {updateTime}Atualizado em 2026.06.02

Como comprar DAO

Discussões

Bem-vindo à Comunidade HTX. Aqui, pode manter-se informado sobre os mais recentes desenvolvimentos da plataforma e obter acesso a análises profissionais de mercado. As opiniões dos utilizadores sobre o preço de DAO (DAO) são apresentadas abaixo.

活动图片